Effects of phentermine / topiramate extended-release, phentermine, and placebo on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in adults with overweight or obesity: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind study.

Background: A fixed-dose combination of phentermine and extended-release topiramate (PHEN/TPM - approved for weight management) has demonstrated in-clinic reduction of blood pressure (BP). Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) may be a better predictor of cardiovascular disease risk than in-clinic BP. Methods: This randomized, multicenter, double-blind study enrolled 565 adults with overweight/obesity. Inclusion criteria included participants willing to wear ABPM device for 24 h. Exclusion criteria included screening blood pressure >140/90 mmHg and antihypertensive medications not stable for 3 months prior to randomization. Participants received placebo (n = 184), phentermine 30 mg; (n = 191), or PHEN 15 mg/TPM 92 mg; (n = 190). 24-hour ABPM was performed at baseline and at week 8. The primary endpoint was mean 24-h systolic BP (SBP) as measured by ABPM, in the per protocol population. Results: Participants were mostly female (73.5 â€‹%) and White (81.6 â€‹%), with a mean age of 53.4 years; 32.4 â€‹% had no hypertension diagnosis or treatment, 62.5 â€‹% had hypertension using 0 to 2 antihypertensive medications, and 5.1 â€‹% had hypertension using ≥ 3 antihypertensive medications. Baseline mean SBP/diastolic BP (DBP) was 123.9/77.6 â€‹mmHg. At week 8, mean SBP change was -0.1 â€‹mmHg (placebo), +1.4 â€‹mmHg (phentermine 30 â€‹mg), and -3.3 â€‹mmHg (PHEN/TPM). Between-group difference for PHEN/TPM versus placebo was -3.2 â€‹mmHg (95 â€‹% CI: -5.48, -0.93 â€‹mmHg; p â€‹= â€‹0.0059). The between-group difference for PHEN/TPM versus phentermine 30 â€‹mg was -4.7 â€‹mmHg (95 â€‹% CI: -6.96, -2.45 â€‹mmHg; p â€‹< â€‹0.0001). Common (>2 â€‹% in any treatment group) adverse events (i.e., dry mouth, constipation, nausea, dizziness, paresthesia, dysgeusia, headache, COVID-19, urinary tract infection, insomnia, and anxiety) were mostly mild or moderate. Conclusions: In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind ABPM study, PHEN/ TPM reduced SBP compared to either placebo or phentermine 30 mg (Funding: Vivus LLC; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05215418).

Phentermine/Topiramate for the Treatment of Adolescent Obesity.

BACKGROUND: Antiobesity medication may be useful for the treatment of pediatric obesity, yet few safe and effective options exist. We evaluated phentermine/topiramate (PHEN/TPM) for weight management in adolescents with obesity. METHODS: This 56-week, randomized, double-blind trial enrolled adolescents 12 to less than 17 years of age with obesity. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:2 to receive either placebo (n=56), mid-dose PHEN/TPM (7.5 mg/46 mg; n=54), or top-dose PHEN/TPM (15 mg/92 mg; n=113), respectively. All participants received lifestyle therapy. The primary end point was mean percent change in body-mass index (BMI) from randomization to week 56. RESULTS: Participants had a mean (±SD) age of 14.0±1.4 years and a mean (±SD) BMI of 37.8±7.1 kg/m2; 54.3% were female. The primary end point of percent change in BMI at week 56 showed differences from placebo of -10.44 percentage points (95% CI, -13.89 to -6.99; P<0.001) and -8.11 percentage points (95% CI, -11.92 to -4.31; P<0.001) for the top and mid doses of PHEN/TPM, respectively. Differences from placebo in percent change in triglycerides nominally favored PHEN/TPM (mid dose, -21%; 95% CI, -40 to -2; and top dose, -21%; 95% CI, -38 to -4), as did differences in percent change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (mid dose, 10%; 95% CI, 3 to 18; and top dose, 9%; 95% CI, 2 to 15). The incidence of participants reporting at least one adverse event was 51.8%, 37.0%, and 52.2% in the placebo, mid-dose, and top-dose groups, respectively. Serious adverse events were reported for two participants in the top-dose group. CONCLUSIONS: PHEN/TPM at both the mid and top doses offered a statistically significant reduction in BMI and favorably impacted triglyceride and HDL-C levels in adolescents with obesity. (Funded by VIVUS LLC, with project support provided by Covance LLC; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03922945.).

Combined treatment with formoterol and tiotropium is more efficacious than treatment with tiotropium alone in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, regardless of smoking status, inhaled corticosteroid use, baseline severity, or gender.

A recent randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled, multicenter study of 255 patients ≥ 40 years of age with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) showed that combined formoterol (FOR) and tiotropium (TIO) treatment in patients with COPD significantly improved lung function as well as symptoms and other patient-reported outcomes compared with TIO alone. FOR and TIO are long-acting bronchodilators that represent the ß2-adrenergic agonist and anticholinergic classes, respectively. However, the possible influence of smoking status, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use, baseline disease severity, and gender differences on bronchodilator efficacy requires further investigation. Using data from the previously published study mentioned above, a post hoc analysis was performed to examine the efficacy of combined FOR + TIO treatment compared with TIO monotherapy in subgroup analyses of men and women, current and ex-smokers, ICS users and non-ICS users, and patients with moderate and severe/very severe COPD. Efficacy comparisons were based on the changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s measured 0-4 h after the morning dose (FEV1 AUC0₋4h). After a run-in period, patients were treated for 12 weeks with either FOR 12 µg twice daily (BID) plus TIO 18 µg once daily (QD) in the morning (AM, n = 124) or with FOR placebo BID plus TIO 18 µg QD AM (n = 131). The least squares mean change from baseline in the normalized FEV1 AUC0₋4h was assessed using analysis of covariance. With the exception of treatment differences at week 4 in smokers and subjects with "very severe" COPD, and at weeks 4, 8, and 12 for ICS users and non-ICS users (p values not determined), FOR + TIO was significantly superior (P < 0.05) to TIO alone at all time points (weeks 4, 8, 12, and endpoint), regardless of gender, smoking status, ICS use, or COPD severity. We conclude that coadministered FOR + TIO significantly improves lung function compared with TIO treatment alone in COPD patients regardless of differences in patient subgroups.

Mometasone furoate nasal spray provides early, continuing relief of nasal congestion and improves nasal patency in allergic patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients report nasal congestion as the most bothersome seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) symptom. Measurement of this symptom in previous research has largely been based on subjective patient ratings. This study was designed to measure efficacy, onset, and duration of action of the corticosteroid mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) on nasal congestion using an environmental exposure chamber (EEC) and the objective assessment acoustic rhinometry (AcR). METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, ragweed-sensitive subjects were exposed to ragweed pollen (3500 ± 500 pollen grains/m(3)) in an EEC (day 1). Subjects rated instantaneous total nasal symptom score (TNSS), including NSS for congestion (NSS-C). Qualifying subjects received MFNS, 200 micrograms, or placebo and rated postdosing symptoms; a subset received MFNS, 200 micrograms, or placebo q.d. for 6 subsequent days, returning to EEC on day 8. Days 1 and 8 assessments included AcR, TNSS, and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire developed for use in the EEC (RQOLQ-EEC). RESULTS: At day 1, hour 6, patients receiving MFNS (n = 155) reported significantly reduced congestion versus placebo (n = 155) per AcR and NSS-C after one dose, showing numerically superior TNSS change from baseline (p = NS). Among the subset who received 6 additional days of treatment, MFNS (n = 78) yielded significantly lower TNSS versus placebo (n = 77) before day 8 EEC entry and throughout 4-hour exposure (p < 0.05), except at 3.5 hours. AcR showed lower congestion with MFNS versus placebo before day 8 EEC exposure and at 24 and 26 hours after final dose (p < 0.05 for all). AcR and NSS-C correlated at multiple time points. Day 8 RQOLQ-EEC between-group scores were significantly different (p = 0.02) for practical problems. CONCLUSION: MFNS, 200 micrograms, showed onset of nasal congestion relief at 6 hours and duration of action beyond 24 hours postdosing. Objective and subjective assessments were correlated in subjects with maximal (placebo) or minimal (MFNS treatment) congestion symptoms; both assessments were correlated with improved QOL.

Intranasal mometasone furoate therapy for allergic rhinitis symptoms and rhinitis-disturbed sleep.

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) and related nasal congestion cause rhinitis-disturbed sleep (RDS). Intranasal corticosteroids reduce nasal congestion and improve sleep quality in AR but have not been extensively studied in RDS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of mometasone furoate nasal spray (NS) on nasal symptoms, nasal patency, sleep variables, quality of life, and daytime functioning in perennial AR (PAR) and concomitant RDS. METHODS: In this double-blind 4-week study, 30 adults with PAR and moderate RDS were randomized 2:1 to receive mometasone furoate NS, 200 microg, or placebo each morning. The primary end point was the apnea-hypopnea index. Secondary outcome measures included changes in total nasal symptom score (TNSS), nighttime symptom score, daytime peak nasal inspiratory flow, nighttime flow limitation index, Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire-Standardized (RQLQ-S) score, Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, and Work Productivity and Activities Impairment-Allergy Specific (WPAI-AS) questionnaire score. Analysis of covariance was used for all efficacy end points. RESULTS: The apnea-hypopnea index at study end was not statistically significantly different between groups. However, mometasone furoate NS therapy significantly improved morning (P = .04) and evening (P = .01) TNSSs, morning (P = .049) and evening (P = .03) nasal obstruction/blockage/congestion, daily peak nasal inspiratory flow (P = .03), flow limitation index (P = .02), Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (P = .048), RQLQ-S score (P = .03), and 2 of 5 WPAI-AS domains. Among patients receiving mometasone furoate NS, TNSS improvements were significantly correlated with improved work- and non-work-related productivity. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PAR and RDS, mometasone furoate NS use improved nasal symptoms, sleepiness, and impairment in daily activities. Correlated reduced nasal symptoms and improved performance suggest that improving AR symptoms with mometasone furoate NS administration can benefit sleep and daytime functioning.

Formoterol and tiotropium compared with tiotropium alone for treatment of COPD.

Combined use of beta(2)-agonists and anticholinergic bronchodilators may have complementary benefits in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The objective of this study was to compare combination treatment with formoterol (FORM) plus tiotropium (TIO) versus treatment with TIO alone in patients with COPD. In this active-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial, a total of 255 subjects with diagnosed COPD were randomized to 12 weeks of either a combination of FORM 12 microg twice-daily plus TIO 18 microg once-daily in the morning (QD AM) or monotherapy with TIO 18 microg QD AM. The primary efficacy variable was the area under the curve for forced expiratory volume in 1 second measured 0 to 4 hours after AM dosing (FEV(1) AUC(0-4h)). Significantly greater improvements in the FEV(1) AUC(0-4h) were seen with FORM + TIO (n = 116) versus TIO (n = 124) at all time points. The increase in FEV(1) 5 minutes after the first dose was 180 mL with FORM + TIO versus 40 mL with TIO (p < 0.001). At endpoint, FEV(1) AUC(0-4h) increased 340 mL with FORM + TIO versus 170 mL with TIO (p < 0.001). Improvements in trough FEV(1) with FORM + TIO versus TIO were 180 mL and 100 mL, respectively (p < 0.01). Significantly greater reductions from baseline in symptom scores (p < 0.05) and daytime albuterol use (p < 0.04) were seen at endpoint with combination FORM + TIO versus TIO monotherapy. Both treatments were well tolerated. This study demonstrated that concurrent treatment with FORM + TIO results in greater therapeutic benefits than TIO alone.

Efficacy of fexofenadine in the prophylactic control of cat allergen-induced allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: To date, it is unknown whether fexofenadine mitigates the worsening of symptoms induced by the cat allergen Felis domesticus allergen 1. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of a single dose of fexofenadine hydrochloride, 180 mg, in preventing and controlling cat allergen-induced allergic rhinitis symptoms using the cat room challenge model. METHODS: This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-way crossover study consisted of a screening visit, 1 or 2 qualifying visits, and 2 treatment periods separated by a mean +/- SD washout period of 14 +/- 3 days. Patients were randomized to treatment sequence 1 (placebo followed by fexofenadine) or sequence 2 (fexofenadine followed by placebo). Baseline end points were obtained before study drug administration, and allergen challenges were initiated 1 1/2 hours after dosing. The primary end point was the change from predose baseline in the total symptom score (sum of rhinorrhea, itchy nose/palate/ throat, sneezing, and itchy/watery/red eyes) after 30 minutes of allergen exposure compared with placebo. RESULTS: Of 211 patients screened, 66 were randomized and 63 completed the study. Mean change in the total symptom score from predose baseline was significantly less with fexofenadine compared with placebo 30 minutes after initiation of the cat allergen challenge (2 hours after dosing) (P = .03). The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was low and comparable for both groups. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic treatment with a single dose of fexofenadine hydrochloride, 180 mg, significantly mitigated the worsening of allergic rhinitis symptoms induced by exposure to cat allergen compared with placebo use.

Once-daily fexofenadine treatment for chronic idiopathic urticaria: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) can have a profound effect on patients' health and quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily dosing of fexofenadine hydrochloride, 180 mg, on CIU. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study consisted of a placebo run-in period followed by a 4-week treatment period. Patients 12 years and older with active CIU were randomized 2:1 to receive once-daily fexofenadine, 180 mg, or placebo. The primary end points were change from baseline in mean daily number of wheals (MNW score) and mean daily severity of pruritus during treatment. Secondary efficacy measures included modified total symptom scores and MNW and pruritus severity scores evaluated weekly and instantaneously at trough drug levels. RESULTS: Patients administered fexofenadine (n = 163) experienced significantly greater improvements in MNW and pruritus severity scores compared with the placebo group (n = 92) (P < .001 for both). Similarly, throughout treatment and at each individual week, the mean reductions in modified total symptom scores were significantly greater in the fexofenadine group (P < or = .005 for all comparisons vs placebo). The mean reductions in instantaneous MNW and pruritus severity scores were greater in patients in the fexofenadine group than in those who received placebo (MNW score: P = .015; pruritus severity score: P < .001). There were no significant differences in the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events between the 2 treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: A once-daily dose of fexofenadine hydrochloride, 180 mg, offered effective, well-tolerated relief for the management of CIU.