Outcomes and reoperation rates after tibial tubercle transfer and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: higher revision stabilization in patients with trochlear dysplasia and patella alta.

PURPOSE: To determine the reoperation rate, risk factors for reoperation, and patient-reported outcomes after isolated or combined tibial tubercle transfer and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, for patellofemoral instability surgery. METHODS: Patient's records who underwent medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and/or tibial tubercle transfer for patellar instability by 35 surgeons from 2002 to 2018 at a single academic institution were retrospectively reviewed using CPT codes. Four-hundred-and-eighty-six patients were identified. Radiographic measurements, demographic parameters, and subsequent revision procedures and their indications were identified. A modified anterior knee pain survey was conducted by mail and with follow-up phone survey. RESULTS: The overall rate of reoperation was 120/486 (24.7%). The most common cause for reoperation was removal of hardware 42/486 (8.6%). The rate of reoperation for isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction 43/226 (19%) was lower than that of isolated tibial tubercle transfer 45/133 (33.8%) or a combined procedure 32/127 (25.2%) (P = 0.007). Woman had a higher rate of reoperation (29.4%) compared to men (15.9%) (P = 0.002). Patients at risk for a revision stabilization procedure included those with severe trochlear morphology (C or D) (6.1%) and those with Caton-Deschamps index > 1.3 (7.3%). Patients who underwent reoperation of any kind had poorer patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: The overall reoperation rate after patellofemoral instability surgery remains high, and any reoperation portends worse patient-reported outcomes. Re-operations for instability are more likely in patients with trochlear dysplasia and patella alta and may benefit from more aggressive initial treatment, such as medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and tibial tubercle transfer in combination. Using the results of this study, surgeons will be able to engage in meaningful discussion with patients to counsel patients on expectations postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Total Joint Arthroplasty and Golf Play: Analysis of Regional Golf Handicap Database.

BACKGROUND: As the numbers of senior golfers increase, many will consider a hip or knee joint replacement (JR) over their lifetime. The relationship of JR to the rate of return and validated level of play has not been well defined. METHODS: A regional golf association's membership was mailed a questionnaire regarding their JR. Members with valid Golf Handicap Information Network numbers and with at least five pre- and post-JR scores were included. Prospectively collected rounds of play and handicap differentials were used for the analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-one members reported having a JR, with 120 qualifying for the analysis. The sites of JR include 50 hips (41.7%) and 70 kness (58.3%). Plays per month after the first JR increased from 5.2 to 5.6 (P = 0.017). Handicap differentials increased from an average of 15.8 to 17.3 (P < 0.0001). Average return to play was 62 days. Twenty-eight players who had a second JR saw an increase in plays per month from 4.2 to 6.3 (P = 0.0074) and an increase in handicap differentials from 19.3 to 20.2 (P = 0.0036). CONCLUSIONS: After the initial JR, amateur golfers will likely play more frequently; however, the level of play will typically decrease slightly. The same effects are seen after a subsequent JR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: retrospective, cross-sectional review.

An update on graft-tunnel mismatch in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A survey of the experts in the field of orthopedic sports medicine demonstrates no clear consensus in management.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify and report on the rate at which leaders in orthopaedic surgery are encountering GTM, their treatment methods and to identify whether these clinicians' demographics or techniques correlate with their GTM incidence and/or treatment algorithms. METHODS: A survey was sent to identify the rate at which member orthopaedic surgeons of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the National Football League Physicians Society (NFLPS), and the Herodicus Society are encountering GTM in ACL reconstruction with BTB graft and to establish what methods are most commonly utilized. RESULTS: In total, 260 orthopaedic surgeons completed the survey. Respondents most frequently reported GTM in 1-5% of cases, with GTM most often between 5 and 10 mm. For lower levels of GTM, surgeons are most frequently recessing the femoral bone plug and adding a cortical suspensory device or outside-in fixation. Higher degrees of GTM are most commonly supplemented with a screw/post on the tibia. Those with >15 years of experience were more commonly using a transtibial femoral drilling with lower tibial tunnel angulation, and lower incidences of GTM than their less experienced counterparts. CONCLUSION: There is tremendous variability in the incidence and management of GTM in ACL reconstruction with BTB graft with no clear consensus among experts. Differences are seen in ACL reconstruction techniques and means of correcting GTM when evaluating based on years of surgical experience and Sports Medicine Fellowship completion.

Biomechanical Evaluation of an All-Inside Posterior Medial Meniscal Root Repair Technique Via Suture Fixation to the Posterior Cruciate Ligament.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the tibiofemoral contact mechanics of an all-inside posterior medial meniscal root repair technique via suture fixation to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and to compare with that of the intact knee and the knee with a root tear. METHODS: Tibiofemoral contact mechanics were recorded in 8 human cadaveric knee specimens using pressure sensors. Each knee underwent 3 testing conditions related to the posterior medial meniscal root: (1) intact knee; (2) root tear; and (3) all-inside repair via suture fixation to the PCL. Knees were loaded with a 1000-N axial compressive force at 4 knee flexion angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°). Calculations were performed for contact area, mean contact pressure, and peak contact pressure. A generalized linear model with a Tukey adjusted least square means test was used to determine differences between testing conditions. RESULTS: Across all knee flexion angles, there was an overall mean 26.3% reduction in contact area with root tear (211.34 mm2 vs intact 286.64 mm2, P = .0002), and a 31.6% increase from root tear to repair (277.61 mm2, P = .0297). Across all knee flexion angles, there was an overall mean 24.3% increase in contact pressure with root tear (1849.12 N/mm2 vs. intact 1487.52 N/mm2, P < .0001), and a 31.1% decrease from root tear to repair (1410.7 N/mm2, P = .0037). Across all knee flexion angles, there was an overall mean 10.6% increase in peak contact pressure with root tear (4083.55 N/mm2 vs. intact 3693.68 N/mm2, P < .0001), and a 12.4% decrease from root tear to repair (3632.13 N/mm2, P = .531). CONCLUSIONS: In most testing conditions and with overall averaging across knee flexion angles, the all-inside posterior medial meniscal root repair with suture fixation to the adjacent PCL fibers restored contact area (from 26.3% reduction with root tear to 31.6% increase with repair), contact pressures (from 24.3% increase with root tear to 31.1% decrease with repair), and peak contact pressures (from 10.6% increase with root tear to 12.4% decrease with repair) to that of the intact knee This may be a future potential technique to limit complications associated with the traditional transtibial pull-out method of repair. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This technique may provide a posterior medial meniscal root repair construct that restores most tibiofemoral contact mechanics and offers theoretical benefits of technical ease and potential for an acceptable, less "anatomic" repair location.

Trends in Surgical Management and Costs for Operative Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly.

Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are increasing in frequency as the population ages. The purpose of this study was to investigate surgical and cost trends in the Medicare population. The PearlDiver database was queried using diagnosis codes to identify Medicare recipients with proximal humerus fractures from 2005 to 2012. Surgical trends, demographics, and charge/reimbursement data were analyzed. There were 750,426 proximal humerus fractures in Medicare recipients during the 8-year period. Eighty-five percent of the fractures were treated nonoperatively; however, the percentage of operative vs nonoperative management increased significantly over time for all fractures, isolated fractures, and fracture dislocations. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was the most common surgical treatment and remained constant. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) increased by 406% and hemiarthroplasty (HEMI) decreased by 47%. Compared with younger patients, older patients were more likely to undergo HEMI or RTSA than to undergo ORIF for isolated fractures and fracture dislocations. Charges and reimbursements from Medicare increased over time. The charge to reimbursement gap increased from 87% in 2005 to 104% in 2012. Charges were higher for RTSA than for ORIF or HEMI. Nonoperative management was the treatment of choice for 85% of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly; however, there was a trend toward higher rates of surgery. The RTSA rate increased and the HEMI rate decreased, while ORIF remained constant. There was an increasing charge to reimbursement ratio for all procedure types. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(4):e641-e647.].

Initial medical management of rotator cuff tears: a demographic analysis of surgical and nonsurgical treatment in the United States Medicare population.

BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tears have a lifetime incidence between 25% and 40% in the United States, but optimum treatment strategies and protocol have not yet been widely accepted. This study evaluated the proportions of patients treated with nonoperative and operative modalities and how this proportion has changed during an 8-year period (2005-2012) among patients with Medicare. METHODS: Using the PearlDiver patient record database, we identified Medicare patients having been diagnosed with a rotator cuff tear. These patients were then stratified on the basis of treatment with physical therapy, subacromial/glenohumeral injection, or rotator cuff repair. We analyzed the data in regard to standard demographic information, comorbidities, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: During the study period, 878,049 patients were identified and 397,116 patients had rotator cuff repair. The proportion of patients treated initially with physical therapy dropped from 30.0% in 2005 to 13.2% in 2012, and the subacromial/glenohumeral injection proportion decreased from 6.00% to 4.19% (P < .001). The proportion of patients who had rotator cuff repair increased from 33.8% to 40.4% from 2005 to 2012 (P < .001). Charlson Comorbidity Indexes were significantly lower in operative patients compared with each nonoperative treatment examined. DISCUSSION: This analysis demonstrates a significant decrease in the initial trial of nonoperative treatment and an increase in the rate of surgery. Patients undergoing rotator cuff repair had fewer comorbidities than those undergoing nonoperative treatments. It also demonstrates that patients who had a trial of injection had a higher incidence of eventual rotator cuff repair compared with the patients with an initial trial of physical therapy.