Satisfaction with testicular prosthesis: a Portuguese questionnaire-based study in testicular cancer survivors.

Radical orchiectomy in testicular cancer patients can have a negative impact on body image and self-esteem. Reconstructive surgery with testicular prosthesis might mitigate this burden. We conducted a questionnaire-based study aiming to evaluate our patients' satisfaction with testicular prosthesis. Overall satisfaction was rated as excellent or good in 97.7%. The main complaints were related to the prosthesis' inappropriate texture (45.5%), size (18.1%) or position (15.9%). Among men interviewed, 59% considered that having a normal looking scrotum was either extremely important or important for their self-esteem. The majority (88.2%) stated they would make the same decision again, and nearly all patients would recommend it to other men with testicular cancer. We believe testicular implants should always be offered, leaving the final decision to the patient.

Satisfaction with testicular prosthesis: a Portuguese questionnaire-based study in testicular cancer survivors / Satisfacción con las prótesis testiculares: estudio portugués basado en cuestionario de los supervivientes de cáncer de testículo

Radical orchiectomy in testicular cancer patients can have a negative impact on body image and self-esteem. Reconstructive surgery with testicular prosthesis might mitigate this burden. We conducted a questionnaire-based study aiming to evaluate our patients’ satisfaction with testicular prosthesis. Overall satisfaction was rated as excellent or good in 97.7%. The main complaints were related to the prosthesis’ inappropriate texture (45.5%), size (18.1%) or position (15.9%). Among men interviewed, 59% considered that having a normal looking scrotum was either extremely important or important for their self-esteem. The majority (88.2%) stated they would make the same decision again, and nearly all patients would recommend it to other men with testicular cancer. We believe testicular implants should always be offered, leaving the final decision to the patient (AU)

La orquiectomía radical en los pacientes de cáncer de testículo puede tener un impacto negativo en su imagen corporal y autoestima. La cirugía reconstructora con prótesis testiculares podría mitigar esta carga. Realizamos un estudio basado en el uso de un cuestionario con el objetivo de evaluar la satisfacción de nuestros pacientes con las prótesis testiculares. La satisfacción general fue calificada como excelente o buena en el 97,7% de los casos. Las principales quejas guardaron relación con la textura inadecuada de las prótesis (45,5%), el tamaño (18,1%) o su posición (15,9%). Entre los varones entrevistados, el 59% consideró que tener un escroto con aspecto normal era extremadamente importante, o importante para su autoestima. La mayoría (88,2%) afirmó que volverían a tomar la misma decisión de nuevo, y casi todos los pacientes lo recomendarían a otros varones con cáncer de testículo. Consideramos que siempre deberían ofrecerse los implantes testiculares, dejando que el paciente tome siempre la decisión final. (AU)

Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).

INTRODUCTION: RP (radical prostatectomy) technique continues the major treatment option for men with potential cure and life expectancy exceeding 10 years. The aim of the study is to assess the impact of PSM on BR (biochemical relapse), to identify PSM risk factors, to clarify the factors involved in BR in the absence of PSM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consultation of 171 medical-records from patients submitted to RRP (radical retropubic prostatectomy) between January/2000-December/2005. Mean-age: 64 yr. Mean - PSA (positive surgical margin): 11.88 ng/ml. Clinical staging: 67.8% cT1, 32.2% cT2. GS: ≤6 (66.1%), =7 (21.1%), 8-10 (12.3%). PS: pT0 1.2%, pT2 50.3%, pT3a 36.3%, pT3b 12.9%, pT4 0.6%. pathological Gleason score: ≤6 39.2%, =7 40.9%, 8-10 19.3%. RB definition was PSA ≥0.2 ng/ml. Adjusted Odds-Ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated through univariate logistic regression. RESULTS: There were PSM in 46 specimens, 28 had single PSM and 18 multiple PSM (≥2). BR occurred in 57 patients (33.3%), with an average time after surgery of 23.5 months - 26 patients had PSM and 31 had not. Statistical significant results for BR in variables PSA, PS and PSM. Quadruples if PSM (p <0.0001), triples in single PSM (p = 0.01) and is 6x higher in multiple PSM (p = 0.001). Regarding factors that influence the presence of PSM, only PS ≥pT3a reach statistical significance (p <0.0001). Patients with BR but without PSM (54.38%), variables statistically significant were: initial PSA >10, (p = 0.029) and pathological Gleason score ≥8 with a risk nearly 4x higher than pathological Gleason score ≤6 (p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Statistical risk analysis concluded that the presence of PSM in RRP is strongly influenced by PS ≥pT3a. The presence of PSM and their number increase significantly the risk of BR compared to other factors. In the absence of PSM, the factors that seem to be crucial and with greater impact on BR are initial PSA>10 and pathological Gleason score ≥8.