Speed and Nighttime Usage Restrictions and the Incidence of Shared Electric Scooter Injuries.

Importance: Electric scooter (e-scooter) crashes have become a serious health issue worldwide. The need for effective e-scooter regulations has been established in numerous instances. Objective: To investigate the association of restrictions on top speed and nighttime usage on the incidence of e-scooter-related injuries. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective comparative cohort study of all patients with an injury related to shared e-scooter riding sustained in Helsinki, Finland. Data were collected from the electric patient database from 3 trauma hospitals representing all public hospitals treating patients with acute trauma in Helsinki. Shared e-scooter injuries from 2 periods were compared: an unrestricted period (January 1 to August 31, 2021) and a restricted period (January 1 to August 31, 2022). Data were analyzed from September 2022 to September 2023. Exposures: The restrictions established for shared e-scooters during the restricted period were: (1) the daytime top speed of 20 km/h, as opposed to the previous top speed of 25 km/h, (2) the use of shared e-scooters was prohibited on Friday and Saturday nights between 12 am and 5 am, and (3) the nighttime top speed was decreased to 15 km/h from Sunday to Thursday between 12 am and 5 am, as opposed to 25 km/h. Main outcome: The incidence of e-scooter injuries compared with the total trips made by e-scooters. Results: There were 528 e-scooter injuries requiring hospital care during the unrestricted period and 318 injuries during the restricted period of similar length. The median (IQR) age of the patients in the study periods was 25 (21-32) and 28 (22-37), respectively; 308 (58%) and 191 (60%) were male, respectively. The incidence of e-scooter injuries was 19 (95% CI, 17-20) for every 100 000 rides during the unrestricted period and 9 (95% CI, 8-10) per 100 000 rides during the restricted period. In the risk analysis, the odds ratio for shared e-scooter injuries was 0.5 (95% CI, 0.4-0.6) for the restricted period when adjusted for hourly temperature, rain amount, wind speed, and visibility. After introducing the restrictions, the number of e-scooter injuries decreased significantly between 11 pm and 5 am. Conclusion and Relevance: The number of injuries decreased after implementing restrictions on the top speed and nighttime usage of e-scooters. Similar restrictions in cities with shared e-scooter services should be explored.

Adverse Events After Surgical Treatment of Adult Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures: a Retrospective Analysis of 470 Patients.

Background: The incidence of and risk factors for adverse events after internal fixation of diaphyseal forearm fractures have not been well defined in the current literature. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of adverse events after diaphyseal forearm fracture surgery in adults and explore potential risk factors for adverse events. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study in which we evaluated all diaphyseal forearm fractures between 2009 and 2019 in patients presenting to 4 trauma hospitals in southern Finland. Patients <16 years of age and fracture-dislocations were excluded. There were 470 patients included in this study. Patient records were evaluated to identify and analyze adverse events. Results: There were 202 patients with both-bone fractures, 164 patients with isolated ulnar fractures, and 104 patients with isolated radial fractures. In total, 146 patients (31%) experienced an adverse event; 83 (18%) had major adverse events (persistent or requiring surgical intervention). The patients underwent procedures performed by 185 different surgeons. The median number of operations for a single surgeon was 2 (range, 1 to 12). The most common major adverse events were plate and screw-related issues (6%), nonunion (5%), persistent nerve injuries (4%), and refractures (4%). Higher body mass index, Gustilo-Anderson type-II open fractures, both-bone fractures, isolated radial fractures, and operations performed by junior residents were found to be risk factors for adverse events in the multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Adverse events after diaphyseal forearm fracture surgery are common. We recommend concentrating these operations in a limited team of surgeons and restricting inexperienced surgeons from operating on these fractures without supervision. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Epidemiology and risk factors for premature physeal closure in distal femur fractures.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Premature physeal closure (PPC) is a common and concerning complication to distal femoral fractures as the distal growth plate accounts for 70% of the growth of the femur. The literature is not unanimous in determining the risk factors of PPC, and the epidemiological characterization of these fractures is limited. Our aim was to calculate the population-based incidence and investigate risk factors for PPC in these fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this register-based study, between 2014 and 2021, 70 children with distal femoral physeal fractures presented to our hospital. Demographic data, and fracture- and treatment-related details were collected using the Kids' Fracture Tool. A directed acyclic graph (DAG) was constructed to determine confounding factors used in the risk analysis. RESULTS: Physeal fractures of the distal femur occurred with an annual incidence of 6/105 children, and a resulting PPC occurred in 16/70 (23%) with an annual incidence of 1.3/105 children. In multivariable analysis, dislocation exceeding 10 mm was a risk factor for PPC (OR 6.3, CI 1.4-22). CONCLUSION: One-fourth of distal femoral physeal fractures developed PPC. Greater dislocation and higher injury energy were significant risk factors, whereas choice of fracture treatment was not an independent risk factor. All patients with PPC belonged in the age group 11-16 years.

Higher Soong grade predicts flexor tendon issues after volar plating of distal radius fractures - a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Soong classification is used to estimate volar locking plate prominence and evaluate the risk for flexor tendon ruptures after surgical treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs). However, the scientific community has questioned the Soong classification due to lacking evidence. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Soong grading as a predictor for flexor tendon issues and plate removal. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center review of adult distal radius fracture patients treated with a volar locking plate between 2009 and 2019. In total, 2779 patients were included in the study. The primary outcome was a flexor tendon issue (flexor tendon rupture, tendinitis, or flexor irritation), whereas plate removal was a secondary outcome. Using Soong grade 0 as a reference, we used univariable and multivariable logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for flexor tendon issues and plate removal. RESULTS: In total, 756 (27%) patients were graded as Soong 0, 1679 (60%) Soong 1, and 344 (12%) Soong 2, respectively. There were 32 (1.2%) patients with flexor tendon issues, of which 4 were flexor tendon ruptures, 8 tendinitises, and 20 flexor irritations. The adjusted OR for flexor tendon issues was 4.4 (CI 1.1-39.7) for Soong grade 1 and 9.7 (CI 2.2-91.1) for Soong grade 2. The plate was removed from 167 (6.0%) patients. Soong grade 1 had a univariable OR of 1.8 (CI 1.2-2.8) for plate removal, and Soong grade 2 had an OR of 3.5. (CI 2.1-5.8), respectively. CONCLUSION: Flexor tendon ruptures are rare complications after the volar plating of DRFs. A higher Soong grade is a risk factor for flexor tendon issues and plate removal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered.

Characteristics and costs of electric scooter injuries in Helsinki: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The incidence of electric scooter (e-scooter) injuries has increased drastically in numerous countries after widespread availability of shared e-scooters. The economic impact on society from a broader perspective has not been studied. We aimed to estimate the incidence of e-scooter injuries, describe the injury patterns, and estimate the costs of e-scooter injuries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including all e-scooter-related injuries presented in the three adult emergency departments in Helsinki in 2021. We collected the patient data from the university hospital information system. Injury severity was evaluated based on the Abbreviated Injury Score. The cost of the hospital treatment was analyzed based on our hospital district's service price listing. In addition, we recorded the total amount of sick leave days and estimated their economic impact. RESULTS: In total, 446 e-scooter injuries were identified and taken into the analysis (434 affecting riders and 12 non-riders). The median age of the patients was 26 (IQR 22-33), and 59% were male. 257 (58%) of the of the injuries were minor, whereas 155 (35%) were moderate, 30 (7%) serious, 3 (0.7%) severe, and one (0.2%) critical. Furthermore, 220 (49%) of the patients sustained head injuries. A major spike in accident incidence was seen during the weekend (Friday to Sunday) nights, accompanied by a proportional increase in patients with alcohol intoxication. Including both the costs of the hospital care and absence from work, the approximated total cost of e-scooter injuries was 1.7 million euros, with a median cost of a single accident being 1148 euros (IQR 399-4263 €). INTERPRETATION: Considerable number of the injuries are moderate, severe, or worse. Comprehensive preventive measures must be conducted to decrease the incidence of e-scooter injuries. The use of helmets should be strongly encouraged to prevent severe head injuries. The nighttime bans during weekends and speed limits on e-scooters appear to be justifiable.

Intramedullary Fixation of Trochanteric Fractures Can Be Safely Performed by Senior Residents Without Immediate Consultant Supervision.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of senior residents performing trochanteric hip fracture surgery without immediate consultant supervision DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of trochanteric hip fractures (AO-OTA 31-A) operated in a single center between years 2011 and 2016 (inclusive). Operations were divided into three groups: Group 1 - surgeon was a senior resident without any immediate supervision; Group 2 - surgeon was a consultant and Group 3 - surgeon was a senior resident supervised by a consultant. The follow-up period was a minimum of 2 years or until death. All re-operations and surgical related mortality were assessed. SETTING: Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. A tertiary level trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: 987 consecutive trochanteric fractures on 966 patients treated by operative fixation of an intertrochanteric fracture with an intramedullary nail between 2011and 2016 (inclusive). RESULTS: The total number of reoperations was smaller in Group 1 where the surgeon was a senior resident without any immediate supervision compared to Group 2 where the surgeon was a consultant (5.5 % vs 8.8 %, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in mortality or length of surgery. The total rate of mechanical complications was 2.0 %, with no significant differences between groups. The observed blade cut-out rate was low: 1.3 %, suggesting a good overall quality of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Senior residents can safely perform intramedullary nailing of trochanteric fractures without immediate supervision.

Peri-implant fracture: a rare complication after intramedullary fixation of trochanteric femoral fracture.

INTRODUCTION: Trochanteric femoral fractures are among the most common operatively treated fractures. Intramedullary fixation has become the treatment of choice in many centers around the world. Nevertheless, the knowledge of rare complications of these fractures is limited. In this study, the incidence and treatment strategies for peri-implant fractures (PIF) were assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was done on 987 consecutive operatively treated trochanteric fractures. PFNA cephalomedullary nail was used as a fixation method. All patients were followed up from patient records for peri-implant fractures. Plain radiographs as well as different salvage methods were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The total rate of peri-implant fractures was 1.4% (n = 14). The rate of PIF for patients treated with short (200 mm) nails, intermediate-length (240 mm) nails, and long nails was 2.7% (n = 2), 1.5% (n = 11), and 0.7% (n = 1), respectively (ns, p > 0.05 for difference). Treatment of choice for PIF was either ORIF with locking plate (57%, n = 8) or exchange nailing (43%, n = 6). None of the PIF patients needed additional surgeries for non-union, malunion, or delayed union. CONCLUSIONS: A PIF is a rare complication of intramedullary fixation of trochanteric fractures. It can be treated with either locking plates or exchange nailing with sufficient results. There are no grounds for favoring long nails to avoid PIFs.

Infections after intramedullary fixation of trochanteric fractures are uncommon and implant removal is not usually needed.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Infections after intramedullary fixation of trochanteric femoral fractures are rare, but potentially life-threatening complications. There are limited data available to support decision making in these cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 995 consecutive operatively treated trochanteric fractures was made to find out different risk factors for infection and to describe the results of treatment. RESULTS: 28 patients developed a surgical site infection (2.8%) after intramedullary fixation of trochanteric fracture. 15 patients (1.5%) had a deep and 13 patients (1.3%) a superficial surgical site infection. Cigarette smoking (p<0.05) and prolonged operative time (p<0.05) were significant risk factors for an infection. 15 of 28 patients needed revision surgeries. Implant removal or exchange was needed only for 4 of 28 patients: 1 exchange of the blade, 1 removal of additional cable used to assist reduction and 2 removals of distal locking screws. None of the patients needed additional surgeries for problems with fracture healing. Mortality was not increased among patients with an infection. INTERPRETATION: Infection after intramedullary fixation of trochanteric fractures can be successfully treated without removal or exchange of the fixation material.

Routine follow-up is unnecessary after intramedullary fixation of trochanteric femoral fractures-Analysis of 995 cases.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Approximately 2000 trochanteric fractures are operated in Finland annually. These fractures make a major burden to health care system and affected individuals. The role of routine follow-up has been questioned in multiple fracture types. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed routine follow-up visits after intramedullary fixation of trochanteric fractures (n = 995). Patients were followed up from patient registries until 2 years or death. Planned and unplanned follow-up visits were analyzed. RESULTS: Altogether 9 patients (0.9%) had a change in treatment at planned outpatient visit. 6 of these were due to mechanical complication, 1 due to refracture and 2 due to delayed unions. 64 (6.4%) patients had a change in treatment plan because of an unplanned visit: 28 infections, 6 pressure sores, 15 mechanic complications and 14 refractures and 1 AVN, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Routine follow-up visits are a burden both to the patients and health care system, with less than 1% leading to changes in treatment. Our suggestion is to give good instructions to patients and rehabilitation facilities instead of routine follow-up.