Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the treatment of severe postfundoplication dysphagia.

Although uncommon, chronic postfundoplication dysphagia (PFD) is a serious complication of antireflux surgery. Currently, reoperation is the only possible solution as endoscopic pneumatic or hydraulic dilation are not effective. At present, POEM represents a standard method for the treatment of esophageal achalasia; however, in patients with PFD it is an experimental approach whose clinical effectiveness is unknown. Our case report describes a female patient who suffered from severe PFD after two surgeries (fundoplication and subsequent reoperation). Dysphagia and progressive weight loss had developed over the years and all treatment attempts (several sessions of dilation) were unsuccessful. Subsequently, esophageal resection was considered as the last resort. After a discussion in a multidisciplinary team and additional examinations (EndoFLIP), POEM was performed without any complications, and the procedure had an excellent effect without any adverse events.

A switch from originator-adalimumab to the biosimilar SB5 in patients with Crohn's disease: an analysis of two propensity score-matched cohorts.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Originator-adalimumab, an established treatment for patients with Crohn's disease (CD), showed no difference in efficacy or adverse events versus adalimumab biosimilar SB5 (SB5-adalimumab) over 10 weeks (W) of treatment. To understand the long-term effectiveness of SB5-adalimumab in CD, patients switched from originator-adalimumab to SB5-adalimumab were compared with patients remaining on originator-adalimumab over 104 W. METHODS: Data on patients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with CD and treated at ISCARE, were collected prospectively from July 2018 to January 2021. Primary outcome: clinical disease activity at W52, measured by Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI). Secondary outcomes: C-reactive protein (CRP), faecal calprotectin (FC) and adalimumab concentrations at W10, 26, 52 and 104, and treatment persistence. To ensure comparable cohorts, patients were propensity score (PS)-matched for age, gender and disease activity. RESULTS: After matching, 54 patients remained per cohort. At W52, mean (SD) HBI score was 3.2 (2.5) for originator-adalimumab and 4.0 [3.6] for SB5-adalimumab (difference [95% CI] -0.78 [-2.8, 1.3]; n = 18/cohort); no clinically meaningful differences in CRP, FC or drug concentrations were noted. Kaplan-Meier's estimates (95% CI) of remaining on treatment were originator-adalimumab: 0.870 (0.785-0.965) versus SB5-adalimumab: 0.648 (0.533-0.789) at W52 and significantly lower for SB5-adalimumab versus originator-adalimumab (p < .001) over 104 W. Local skin reaction events/pain was the main reason for treatment discontinuation in the SB5-adalimumab cohort (n = 20/54 [37%]). CONCLUSIONS: These long-term results of CD patients receiving originator-adalimumab or following nonmedical switch to SB5-adalimumab show similar therapeutic effects on clinical disease activity, biological parameters and pharmacokinetic profile in both cohorts from 52 to 104 W. A separation in persistence was observed beyond W26, mainly due to differences in local reactions at the injection site.

Switching From Originator Adalimumab to the Biosimilar SB5 in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Short-term Experience From a Single Tertiary Clinical Centre.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients' perspectives after switching from originator to biosimilar adalimumab have yet to be assessed. We evaluated the efficacy of switching from the originator adalimumab to a biosimilar compound [SB5] in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. METHODS: Data on IBD patients who were switched from the originator to biosimilar adalimumab [SB5] at IBD Center ISCARE were analysed. Disease activity was assessed using standard clinical indices (Harvey-Bradshaw index [HBI] for Crohn's disease [CD] and partial Mayo score for ulcerative colitis [UC]), and laboratory parameters (C-reactive protein [CRP] and faecal calprotectin [FC]). Trough levels and anti-drug antibodies were measured. Patients were evaluated 10 weeks [W10] after the switch, and results were compared with the control group of patients on originator compound. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients switched to biosimilar adalimumab were included [CD 86%] and were matched to 93 controls for age, gender, diagnosis, and disease activity. There was no difference in the disease activity in either SWITCH or ORIGINATOR cohorts between Weeks 0 and 10. Similarly, no difference was found between cohorts at both prespecified time points. Moreover, no significant differences in CRP or FC concentrations were seen between W0 and W10 either in the SWITCH, or in the ORIGINATOR cohort [p >0.05]. Adalimumab serum trough levels remained stable after the switch. No new safety signals were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that switching IBD patients from the originator adalimumab to a biosimilar compound [SB5] does not affect treatment efficacy.