Traumatic spinal injury patterns of on vs. off-road motorcycle crashes.

OBJECTIVE: Two wheel motorized vehicles used in both street transportation and recreation are a common cause of severe injury in the United States (US). To date, there has been limited data describing the spinal injury patterns among these motorcycle injury patients in the US. The goal of this study is to characterize and compare differences in specific injury patterns of patients sustaining traumatic spinal injuries after motocross (off-road) and street bike (on-road) collisions in the southwestern US at a Level I Trauma Center. METHODS: Trauma registry data was queried for patients sustaining a spinal injury after motorcycle collision from 2010 to 2019 at a single Level I Trauma Center. Computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic imaging resonance imaging (MRI) reports from initial trauma evaluation were reviewed and data was manually obtained regarding injury morphology and location. RESULTS: A total of 1798 injuries were identified in 549 patients who sustained a motorcycle collision, specifically 67 off-road and 482 on-road motorcycle patients. Off-road motorcycle patients were found to be significantly younger (34.75 vs. 42.66, p = 0.00015). A total of 46.2% of the off-road injuries were determined to be from compression mechanisms, compared to 32.9% in the on-road cohort (p = 0.0027). The on-road cohort was more likely to have an injury classified as insignificant, such as transverse and spinous process fractures (60.1% vs. 42.5%, p = 00.25). There was no significant difference in regards to junctional, mobile, and semirigid spine segments between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Different fracture patterns were seen between the off-road and on-road motorcycle cohorts. Off road motorcyclists experienced significantly more compression and translational injuries, while on road motorcyclists experienced more frequent insignificant injury patterns. Data on the different fracture patterns may help professionals develop safety equipment for motorcyclists.

The Sensitivity and Specificity of Preoperative History, Physical Examination, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict Articular Cartilage Injuries in Symptomatic Discoid Lateral Meniscus.

BACKGROUND: Discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) is a morphologic variant in which concomitant articular cartilage defects lead to poor outcomes. The purpose of this study was to quantify the prognostic ability of history, physical examination, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify arthroscopically confirmed articular cartilage injury in pediatric and adolescent DLM patients. METHODS: An analysis of 34 consecutive patients (mean, 12.5 y) who underwent surgical treatment for DLM. Patients were grouped based on arthroscopic findings for the presence or absence of articular cartilage injury. All patients underwent standard preoperative history and physical examination, and MRI of their symptomatic knee. Separate discriminant functional analyses were performed using history (age, sex, symptoms lasting >6 mo, traumatic history), physical examination (presence of clunk, extension block, mechanical symptoms), and MRI findings (chondral injury, meniscal degeneration, meniscal morphology) to determine their sensitivity and specificity in prediction of articular cartilage lesions. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of history alone was 71.4% and 75.0%, respectively; physical examination alone was 64.3% and 60%, respectively; and of MRI findings alone was 60% and 66.7%, respectively. A stepwise discriminant functional analysis found that duration of symptoms and extension block were the optimal contributors with a 78.5% sensitivity and 80% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative history had the highest sensitivity and specificity compared with physical examination and MRI findings for predicting articular cartilage injury at the time of DLM surgery. These findings may assist in setting expectations for patients with regard to surgical planning and recovery and also to counsel patients with asymptomatic, incidental DLM which factors may risk chondral injury and warrant early return for evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-retrospective prognostic comparative study.

Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in a Safety Net Hospital: Substance Abuse and Other Factors Affecting Short-term Complications.

BACKGROUND: Arthroplasty outcomes and patient risk factors have not been studied in detail in safety net hospital settings. This study examines the relationship between selected risk factors and short-term complications in such a population, including a large subgroup with treated substance abuse. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study contains 486 consecutive patients after primary hip and knee arthroplasty. One hundred three of these had a history of substance abuse and completed a 1-year sobriety pathway preoperatively. Primary outcomes included the presence of any complication, deep infection, and reoperation. Bivariable analyses were used to compare outcomes with demographic and health risk factors. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors. RESULTS: Adverse outcomes were more common in patients with higher rates of substance abuse, mental illness, and infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). Substance abuse alone was not an independent risk factor for the occurrence of complications, but infections with HIV and HCV were. In the substance abuse subgroup, with its higher prevalence of risk factors, complications were more frequent (31.1% vs 16.4%, P = .0009), and, in particular, deep infections (5.8% vs 1.8%, P = .0256). CONCLUSIONS: Specific risk factors were associated with short-term complications in safety net arthroplasty patients. Despite having completed a preoperative sobriety pathway, substance abuse patients had more complications than did others. However, substance abuse alone was not an independent risk factor for adverse surgical outcomes. Other factors, notably HCV and HIV infection that were more common in patients with substance abuse, were most closely associated with adverse outcomes.