Sonoelastographic Findings in Clubfeet.

PURPOSE: One of the main features of congenital idiopathic clubfoot is the increased stiffness of soft tissues. With the growing popularity and availability of sonoelastography as a method to assess the stiffness of different tissues, we considered applying it to congenital clubfeet in order to to determine whether sonoelastography can be a useful imaging method for the evaluation of clubfeet, to assess whether there are any differences in stiffness of specific tendons between clubfeet and normal contralateral feet and to observe which treatment methods have an impact on the aspect of these structures on the elastograms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A case-control study was performed involving 10 adolescent patients with unilateral idiopathic congenital clubfeet who were treated either with the Ponseti method or surgically with posteromedial release (PMR) during early infancy. Using compression sonoelastography, we obtained semi-quantitative data expressed as fat to tendon ratios in treated clubfeet and normal contralateral feet. The tendons of the following muscles were examined: tibialis anterior, tibialis posterior, flexor hallucis longus, peroneus longus and Achilles tendon at three levels (calcaneal insertion, lengthened zone and musculotendinous junction). RESULTS: The only statistically significant difference in the strain ratio (p = 0.023) between clubfeet and normal feet was at the level of the calcaneal insertion of the Achilles tendon, which was stiffer in clubfeet. Although other differences were not statistically significant, they may reflect some of the pathological modifications of clubfeet. CONCLUSION: Overall, sonoelastography may be a useful examination tool in the quantitative and qualitative assessment of soft tissue stiffness in clubfeet, but further research is necessary.

Posteromedial Release versus Ponseti Treatment of Congenital Idiopathic Clubfoot: A Long-Term Retrospective Follow-Up Study into Adolescence.

PURPOSE: Although many short-term studies have shown the superiority of Ponseti treatment to surgical treatment, studies with long-term follow-up of patients into adolescence are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the morphological, functional and radiological results of the two methods into and during adolescent age, when both soft tissue and bony procedures can be performed to correct residual deformities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated two groups of patients diagnosed with congenital idiopathic clubfoot and treated with either the Ponseti method (34 clubfeet) and surgery in the form of posteromedial release (31 clubfeet). All included clubfeet were clinically fully corrected after initial treatment and final plaster removal. Evaluation was performed with the International Clubfoot Study Group (ICFSG) score. RESULTS: The age at follow-up was 12.8±1.6 years in the Ponseti group and 13.5±1.7 years in the surgical group. Excellent or good results were obtained in 26 feet (76%) of the Ponseti group and in 14 feet (45%) in the surgical group. The Ponseti treatment was significantly superior to posteromedial release in terms of the final score (10.58±6.49 versus 17.26±8.83, p<0.001), functional score (p<0.001) and radiological score (p<0.001). Residual deformities were clinically present in both groups but were less frequent and less severe in Ponseti-treated patients. Flat-top talus was found to be present in both groups, but the Ponseti method was more protective than surgical treatment against this outcome (relative risk=0.494, p=0.002). The overall foot and ankle mobility was significantly better in the Ponseti group (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The Ponseti method was superior to surgery for treatment of clubfoot and achieved better long-term morphological, functional and radiological results. It preserves better mobility of the foot and ankle, and results in less frequent and less severe residual deformities than surgical treatment.

Ultrasonography of borderline and asymmetric infant hips - a challenge in the management of developmental dysplasia of the hip.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a potentially disabling disease. There are many diagnostic approaches, Graf method ultrasonography being the most popular imaging method. Although considered as a healthy condition, the existence of hips at the 60 degree limit or the asymmetries higher than 4 degrees between left and right side may be a source of unfavorable evolution and consequently of late diagnosed dysplasia cases. METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted in the Radiology Department of the Emergency Clinical County Hospital Cluj-Napoca, by retrospective analysis of the database containing 3013 records of the subjects presented for DDH assessment between January 2008 and December 2014. The study focuses on investigating two possible sources of missed cases by clinical-ultrasound management of DDH: borderline and asymmetric hips. Two conditions were studied in patients considered healthy according to Graf method: borderline hips (those with α angle value of 60° and 61°) and asymmetric hips (left to right difference between the α angle values exceeds 4°). Three study groups were formed: healthy subjects, asymmetric/borderline subjects and patients with immature or mild dysplasia. The incidence of risk factors, clinical suspicion and the success of therapy were evaluated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the three groups regarding the role of the risk factors in DDH pathogenesis. Data reveal a high suspicion rate after the clinical examination, in groups II and III, compared to the healthy population. This means that from this point of view, Group II might be considered having at least a dysplastic prognosis. An increased correlation in the therapeutic results was observed between Group II patients and those from mild delayed maturation subgroups from Group III (IIa-, IIa+). CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetric and borderline hips should be approached similarly to immature hips, clinical suspicion and the therapeutic outcome being similar.

The modified Dunn procedure for slipped capital femoral epiphysis does not reduce the length of the femoral neck.

OBJECTIVE: The treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is evolving, with the development of new surgical techniques. |We wanted to study if modified Dunn procedure restores the normal alignment of the proximal femur and the risk of avascular necrosis is increased. METHODS: This is a single centre, retrospective study, comparing the outcomes of in situ pinning and modified Dunn procedure. Between 2001 and 2014, 7 children (7 hips) underwent the modified Dunn procedure and 10 children (10 hips) pinning in situ for stable and unstable SCFE. Mean age of the patients was 12.7 years with a median follow-up of 18 months. RESULTS: The radiological parameters improved in the modified Dunn procedure group, while the length of the femoral neck didn't change significantly (p=0.09). Postoperative clinical outcomes were slightly better in the modified Dunn procedure group (6 hips out of 7 had good and excellent results) compared to the pinning in situ group (8 good and excellent results out of 10 hips) (p=0.04). No avascular necrosis was found and there were no cases of chondrolysis. CONCLUSION: Radiographic parameters of the proximal femur assessed in our study improved in all hips that underwent modified Dunn procedure, without the creation of secondary deformities.

A new sign in the standard hip ultrasound image of the Graf method.

AIM: The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of obtaining a 900 angle between the plane of the osteochondral plate and the surface of the transducer during standard hip ultrasonography according to Graf method. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study 1078 patients (2156 hips) were included examined between 2008 and 2014 for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) ultrasound screening. The patients were divided in two groups. Group I consisted of 402 patients examined between January 2008 and December 2011 using the standard Graf method. Group II consisted of 676 patients examined from January 2012 to December 2014 using the Graf method with an additional criterion: 900 angle between the plane of the osteochondral plate and the surface of the transducer. RESULTS: We found more dysplastic patients in group I comparing to group II: 55 (13.7%) and 38 (5.6%) respectively. The difference in the incidence of patients diagnosed with DDH was highly significant (p<0.001). The mean alpha angle value in group I was 65.310, respectively 67.520 for group II (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The new osteochondral plate sign has the potential to reduce the overdiagnosis of DDH and provide a better tailored approach to borderline hips.

A Clinical Evaluation of the Pirani and Dimeglio Idiopathic Clubfoot Classifications.

The clubfoot classifications described by Pirani and by Dimeglio are in widespread use today in foot and ankle surgical practice and are used to differentiate between lesions and compare treatment results. The aim of the present study was to determine whether in an independent center, one or both classification systems can be implemented practically and in a reproducible manner. From January 2004 to January 2014, we conducted a prospective study concerning the classification systems for clubfoot. The study group included 280 children (411 feet). The mean Dimeglio score noted by the 2 examiners was 10.3 ± 0.69 and 10.6 ± 0.81 points for the 411 feet, respectively. The mean difference in the Dimeglio scoring system was 1.11 ± 0.43 points (95% confidence interval 1.5 points). The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.85. The corresponding mean Pirani scores were 5.1 ± 0.23 and 5.3 ± 0.17 points for the 411 feet. The mean difference in the Pirani score was 0.65 points (95% confidence interval 0.45 points). The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.89. The good correlation coefficient for the Dimeglio and Pirani systems recommends their simultaneous use in clubfoot examinations, because the aspects under investigation (reducibility and foot aspect) are both different and complementary.

Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing for Fractures in Children - Principles, Indications, Surgical Technique.

Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is a minimally invasive technique. According to this technique, two elastic nails are introduced through the metaphysis into the medullary canal, advanced through the fracture site and impacted into the opposite metaphysis. These nails are preformed in a C-shaped manner, which allows for their precise orientation and the creation of an elastic system that resists deformation.

Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing for Fractures in Children - Specific Applications.

Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is a new minimally invasive technique for the treatment of pediatric fractures. It approximates the physiological healing process of bone, without opening the fracture site. Also, the operative stress is minimal because of the minimally invasive nature of the procedure, and the volume of implants is small, offering a very good stability without plaster cast immobilization.