Mismatch repair deficiency, chemotherapy and survival for resectable gastric cancer: an observational study from the German staR cohort and a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: In a post hoc analysis of the MAGIC trial, patients with curatively resected gastric cancer (GC) and mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (MMRd) had better median overall survival (OS) when treated with surgery alone but worse median OS when treated with additional chemotherapy. Further data are required to corroborate these findings. METHODS: Between April 2013 and December 2018, 458 patients with curatively resected GC, including cancers of the esophagogastric junction Siewert type II and III, were identified in the German centers of the staR consortium. Tumor sections were assessed for expression of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 by immunohistochemistry. The association between MMR status and survival was assessed. Similar studies published up to January 2021 were then identified in a MEDLINE search for a meta-analysis. RESULTS: MMR-status and survival data were available for 223 patients (median age 66 years, 62.8% male), 23 patients were MMRd (10.3%). After matching for baseline clinical characteristics, median OS was not reached in any subgroup. Compared to perioperative chemotherapy, patients receiving surgery alone with MMRd and MMRp had a HR of 0.67 (95% CI 0.13-3.37, P = 0.63) and 1.44 (95% CI 0.66-3.13, P = 0.36), respectively. The meta-analysis included pooled data from 385 patients. Compared to perioperative chemotherapy, patients receiving surgery alone with MMRd had an improved OS with a HR of 0.36 (95% CI 0.14-0.91, P = 0.03), whereas those with MMRp had a HR of 1.18 (95% CI 0.89-1.58, P = 0.26). CONCLUSION: Our data support a positive prognostic effect for MMRd in GC patients treated with surgery only and a differentially negative prognostic effect in patients treated with perioperative chemotherapy. MMR status determined by preoperative biopsies may be used as a predictive biomarker to select patients for perioperative chemotherapy in curatively resectable GC.

Oncological outcome after hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion for primarily unresectable versus locally recurrent soft tissue sarcoma of extremities.

INTRODUCTION: The management of locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcomas, particularly in terms of a limb salvage strategy, represents a challenge, especially in recurrent tumors. In the context of a patient-tailored multimodal therapy, hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a promising limb-saving treatment option. We report the outcome of patients with primarily irresectable and locally recurrent soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treated by ILP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data about patient demographics, clinical und histopathological characteristics, tumor response, morbidity and oncological outcome of all patients with STS, who underwent an ILP at our institution in a 10-year period, were retrospectively detected and analyzed. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 30 patients. Two patients were treated with ILP for palliative tumor control, 13 patients because of a local recurrent soft tissue sarcoma (rSTS) and 15 patients because of primarily unresectable soft tissue sarcoma (puSTS). 25 of the 28 patients with curative intention received surgery after ILP (11 pts with rSTS and 14 pts with puSTS). Histopathologically we observed complete response in 6 patients (24%) and partial responses in 19 patients (76%) with a significant better remission in patients with puSTS (p = 0,043). Limb salvage rate was 75%. Mean follow-up was 69 months [range 13-142 months]. Seven (7/11; 64%) patients with rSTS and one (1/14; 7%) patient with puSTS developed local recurrence after ILP and surgery, whereas eight (8/13; 62%) rSTS patients and seven (7/15; 47%) puSTS patients developed distant metastasis. During follow-up, eight patients (28.5%) died of disease (5/13; 38%) rSTS and 3/15 (20%) puSTS. ILP in the group of previously irradiated sarcoma patients (n = 13) resulted in a limb salvage rate of 69% and was not associated in an increased risk for adverse events. DISCUSSION: ILP for advanced extremity STS is a treatment option for both puSTS and rSTS resulting in good local control and should be considered in multimodal management. ILP is also a good option for patients after radiation history.

[Surgery of colorectal lung metastases : Results of a survey in Germany]. / Chirurgie pulmonaler Metastasen des kolorektalen Karzinoms : Ergebnisse einer Umfrage in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: There is no evidence from randomized trials on the prognostic significance of pulmonary metastasectomy of colorectal cancer. The objective of this study was to assess the current criteria for indications, preoperative diagnostics and preferred operative techniques of pulmonary metastasectomy in Germany. METHODS: An anonymous survey was carried out in 239 German centers performing thoracic surgery in October 2015. RESULTS: Chest computed tomography (CT, 98%), liver CT (62%), pelvis CT (39%) and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET, 37%) were used by the respondents (65% of participants) for preoperative staging. Pulmonary metastasectomy was most commonly performed for solitary lung metastasis without extrathoracic disease (96%), >1 ipsilateral lung metastases without extrathoracic disease (94.8%), solitary lung metastasis with resectable hepatic metastases (92%) and resectable bilateral lung metastases without extrathoracic disease (91%). Of the respondents 95% performed open lung metastasectomy, 82% video-assisted thoracic surgery, 18% radiofrequency ablation, 53% used laser-assisted open resection and 46% indicated that there was no scientific consensus on pulmonary metastasectomy. CONCLUSION: The majority of respondents performed pulmonary metastasectomy for solitary and multiple, unilateral and bilateral lung metastases without extrathoracic disease and/or local recurrence of primary tumors. The coexistence of resectable liver metastases was not an absolute contraindication for surgery. Of the respondents 46% expressed the need for prospective randomized studies to improve the evidence on pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer.

Effective local control of advanced soft tissue sarcoma with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery: A single institutional experience.

PURPOSE: There is a sound theoretical basis but little clinical evidence substantiating the benefits of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with two-drug chemotherapy for locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Our five-year data on the feasibility and effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with systemically effective doses of adriamycin and ifosfamide combined is presented here. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2000 and 2011, 53 patients with UICC (2010) stage I (n=1, 1.9%), II (n=12, 22.7%) or III (n=40, 75.5%) nonmetastatic soft tissue sarcoma received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with ifosfamide (1.5 g/m(2)/day, d1-5, q28) and doxorubicin (50mg/m(2)/day, d3, q28) plus concurrent radiotherapy with a target dose of 50-64 Gy (median 60 Gy). The treatment of 34 patients (64.2%) was combined with hyperthermia. RESULTS: At five years, the local control rate was 89.9% (± 5.7%), distant metastasis-free survival 66.6% (± 7.6%), and survival 83.3% (± 6%). The R0 resection rate was 81.1%. Radiotherapy was completed as planned in all patients and chemotherapy in 42/53 (70.2%). Grades III (n=21, 29.6%) and IV (n=18, 34%) leukopenia was the main acute adverse event. All acute and chronic non-hematologic toxicities were moderate. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma is associated with good feasibility, manageable acute and late toxicities, and high local efficacy.

Liver transplantation for hepatitis B-induced liver disease: long-term outcome and effectiveness of antiviral therapy for prevention of recurrent hepatitis B infection.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of preoperative, perioperative, and long-term treatment in liver transplant (OLT) patients suffering hepatitis B (HBV)-induced liver disease, in terms of graft and survivals as well as disease recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 19 HBV-infected patients who underwent OLT between 2000 and 2010 using antiviral treatment with either lamivudine (LAM, n = 14) and/or adefovir/entecavir/tenofovir (n = 8) before OLT. Fifteen subjects showed a HBV DNA-negative status prior to OLT. All patients were administered HBIG (antiHBs immunoglobulin) perioperatively: 10,000 international units (IU) in the anhepatic phase and 2.000 IU/d until day 7 after OLT. The preoperative antiviral regimen was continued as maintenance prophylaxis from day 1 after OLT. In cases of the YMMD mutation the antiviral treatment was switched to combination therapy with entecavir and tenofovir. RESULTS: Patient follow-up as of December 2011 or till time of death ranged from 6 to 129 months (median = 47). All patients were prescribed tacrolimus. None of them experienced HBV-related graft dysfunction or graft loss. All subjects were HBV DNA negative at 6 months after OLT. HBV recurrence in the post-OLT phase was discovered in 3 patients, 2 of whom had undergone OLT because of acute liver failure due to hepatitis B. They showed LAM-resistant mutations at the time of recurrence and underwent entecavir/tenofovir therapy to achieve HBV DNA negative status. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated excellent long-term outcomes among patients after successful preoperative antiviral treatment for HBV. Patients should be given a high dosage of HBIG during the first week after OLT in combination with the preoperatively established antiviral treatment. In presence of a LAM-resistance mutation, antiviral treatment should be adapted individually to achieve HBV recurrence freedom and graft survival.