How are Canadian cannabis dispensaries counselling breastfeeding consumers?

Objectives: This study aimed to identify recommendations given to breastfeeding individuals by Canadian cannabis dispensary employees, since the legalization of recreational cannabis in 2018. Methods: This was a nationwide cross-sectional study conducted from November 2020 to January 2021. A mystery caller approach was used to identify recommendations given to breastfeeding individuals seeking a product for "relaxation." This study was modelled on similar studies which assessed recommendations given to pregnant women looking for cannabis products to manage nausea and vomiting (Vastis V, Shea AK, Vincent S, Metz TD. 275: Are canadian cannabis dispensaries counselling pregnant women appropriately? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020;222: S187.(Abst). Lusero I, Paltrow LM, Rosenbloom N. Recommendations from cannabis dispensaries about first-trimester cannabis use Obstet Gynecol 2018;132:781-2.). The primary outcome was the recommendation of a cannabis product. Secondary outcomes included stated benefits of cannabis, recommended discussion with health care provider, length of call, rationale for recommendation, and reported source of information on which the recommendation was based. Results: The majority (79.4%) of employees of the 714 Canadian dispensaries contacted recommended against a cannabis product for "relaxation" while breastfeeding. The recommendations from dispensary employees were often (80%) provided without a specific reason, whereas a minority referenced published research (2%) and opinion (17.6%). Cannabis products were rarely (3.3%) classified as safe in breastfeeding. Approximately 76.6% of dispensary employees recommended contacting a health care provider, while 2.4% recommended against. Conclusions: Although a high proportion of dispensary employees recommended against using a cannabis product during lactation, there were still 20.6% that did recommend use, which contrasts the current public health guidelines and is not supported by the paediatric and obstetric societies. These findings highlight the need for further education about the safety of cannabis products while breastfeeding.

Impact of Protocol Adjustments Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Infertility Treatment Outcomes.

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, our centre made adjustments that reduced the number of patient visits, ultrasound scans, laboratory investigations, and face-to face instructions. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether these changes had any effect on the pregnancy rate for patients undergoing infertility treatment. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rates from intrauterine insemination and frozen embryo transfer. Clinical pregnancy rates were not statistically different between patients who underwent either procedure before and after the protocols were put in place. It is reassuring to know our pandemic protocol adjustments did not have a negative impact on infertility treatment outcomes.

Are Canadian Cannabis Dispensaries Counselling Pregnant Women Appropriately?

Our objective was to examine the recommendations that Canadian dispensary employees are giving to women regarding cannabis use for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) since the legalization of recreational cannabis in 2018. We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study of licensed cannabis dispensaries in 2019, wherein a mystery caller stated they were 8 weeks pregnant and experiencing nausea and vomiting and asked for recommendations about cannabis. Our research was modeled after the primary study done in Colorado by Dickson and colleagues in 2018. An overwhelming majority of dispensaries (93%) in our study recommended against the use of a cannabis product for NVP, which contrasted significantly to the findings of the Colorado study, in which 70% of dispensaries recommended a cannabis product. These findings suggest that Canadian dispensary employees have been adequately educated about the dangers of cannabis use during pregnancy and are helpful from a public health lens.

The Short Performance Physical Battery Is Associated with One-Year Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization.

Les outils cliniques employés dans les établissements de soins peuvent fournir des informations pronostiques importantes aux professionnels de la santé. Dans cette étude observationnelle prospective d'un an, nous avons examiné l'association entre les scores au Short Performance Physical Battery (SPPB), d'une part, et les consultations à l'urgence et les hospitalisations au cours de l'étude, d'autre part. Au total, 191 patients ayant été nouvellement référés à une clinique gériatrique externe de Hamilton (Ontario) ont été contactés, et parmi eux, 120 pris part à l'étude. Le SPPB et d'autres évaluations ont été réalisés dans le cadre de consultations de routine. Les dossiers médicaux électroniques ont été examinés pour déterminer le nombre de consultations à l'urgence et d'hospitalisations dans l'année qui a suivi l'évaluation de base. Des analyses de régression logistique ont été utilisées pour identifier des prédicteurs des consultations à l'urgence et des hospitalisations. Le score moyen au SPPB dans la cohorte étudiée (moyenne d'âge = 80,6 ans, écart-type = 6,3 ans ; 53 % de femmes) était de 6,3 (écart-type = 3,2). Au cours de cette période d'un an, le score au SPPB était associé au nombre de consultations à l'urgence [RR = 0,90 (0,78-1,03)] et d'hospitalisations [RR = 0,84 (0,72-0,97)], après ajustement pour l'âge, le sexe et les comorbidités.Tools applied at the point of care can provide valuable prognostic information for practitioners. In this one-year, prospective observational study, we examined the association of the short performance physical battery (SPPB) and one-year emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. Overall, 191 new referrals attending an outpatient geriatric clinic in Hamilton, Ontario, were approached, and 120 were enrolled. SPPB and other assessments were completed during the routine clinical visit. ED visits and hospitalizations within one year of the baseline assessment were abstracted from electronic medical records. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine ED visits and hospitalization predictors. The mean SPPB score in the study cohort (mean age 80.6, SD 6.3 years; 53% female) was 6.3 (SD 3.2). SPPB score was associated with a one-year ED visit (OR = 0.90 [0.78­1.03]) and hospitalization (OR = 0.84 [0.72­0.97]) after adjusting for age, sex, and co-morbidities.

Assessing Palliative Care Content in Dementia Care Guidelines: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Families of persons with dementia continue to report unmet needs during end of life (EOL). Strategies to improve care and quality of life for persons with dementia include development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and an integrative palliative approach. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess palliative care content in dementia CPGs to identify the presence or limitations of recommendations and discussion pertaining to common issues or domains affected by illness as described by the Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association "Square of Care." DESIGN: A systematic review of databases and gray literature was conducted for recent CPGs. Guidelines meeting inclusion criteria were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. Quality CPGs were analyzed through organizational template analysis using illness domains described by the "Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association Model." The study protocol is registered at PROSPERO (CRD 42015025369). RESULTS: Eleven CPGs were selected and analyzed from 3779 citations. Nine guidelines demonstrated the maximum level of content regarding physical, psychological, and social care. Conversely, spiritual care was either absent (three) or minimal (three) in CPGs. Six CPGs did not address loss or grief, and seven CPGs did not address or had minimal content regarding EOL care. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of content surrounding grief represents a gap for this population at high risk for complicated grief and chronic sorrow. Results of this review require attention by CPG developers and researchers to develop evidence-based recommendations surrounding spiritual care, EOL, and grief.