High-throughput transcriptome profiling indicates ribosomal RNAs to be associated with resistance to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

BACKGROUND: Despite the impressive outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), only a minority of the patients show long-term benefits from ICI. In this study, we used retrospective cohorts of ICI treated patients with NSCLC to discover and validate spatially resolved protein markers associated with resistance to programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) axis inhibition. METHODS: Pretreatment samples from 56 patients with NSCLC treated with ICI were collected and analyzed in a tissue microarray (TMA) format in including four different tumor regions per patient using the GeoMx platform for spatially informed transcriptomics. 34 patients had assessable tissue with tumor compartment in all 4 TMA spots, 22 with leukocyte compartment and 12 with CD68 compartment. The patients' tissue that was not assessable in fourfold redundancy in each compartment was designated as the validation cohort; cytokeratin (CK) (N=22), leukocytes CD45 (N=31), macrophages, CD68 (N=43). The human whole transcriptome, represented by~18,000 individual genes assessed by oligonucleotide-tagged in situ hybridization, was sequenced on the NovaSeq platform to quantify the RNAs present in each region of interest. RESULTS: 54,000 gene variables were generated per case, from them 25,740 were analyzed after removing targets with expression lower than a prespecified frequency. Cox proportional-hazards model analysis was performed for overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS, respectively). After identifying genes significantly associated with limited survival benefit (HR>1)/progression per spot per patient, we used the intersection of them across the four TMA spots per patient. This resulted in a list of 12 genes in the tumor-cell compartment (RPL13A, GNL3, FAM83A, CYBA, ACSL4, SLC25A6, EPAS1, RPL5, APOL1, HSPD1, RPS4Y1, ADI1). RPL13A, GNL3 in tumor-cell compartment were also significantly associated with OS and PFS, respectively, in the validation cohort (CK: HR, 2.48; p=0.02 and HR, 5.33; p=0.04). In CD45 compartment, secreted frizzled-related protein 2, was associated with OS in the discovery cohort but not in the validation cohort. Similarly, in the CD68 compartment ARHGAP and PNN interacting serine and arginine rich protein were significantly associated with PFS and OS, respectively, in the majority but not all four spots per patient. CONCLUSION: This work highlights RPL13A and GNL3 as potential indicative biomarkers of resistance to PD-1 axis blockade that might help to improve precision immunotherapy strategies for lung cancer.

Biological and therapeutic implications of the cancer-related germline mutation landscape in lung cancer.

Although smoking is the primary cause of lung cancer, only about 15% of lifelong smokers develop the disease. Moreover, a substantial proportion of lung cancer cases occur in never-smokers, highlighting the potential role of inherited genetic factors in the cause of lung cancer. Lung cancer is significantly more common among those with a positive family history, especially for early-onset disease. Therefore, the presence of pathogenic germline variants might act synergistically with environmental factors. The incorporation of next-generation sequencing in routine clinical practice has led to the identification of cancer-predisposing mutations in an increasing proportion of patients with lung cancer. This Review summarises the landscape of germline susceptibility in lung cancer and highlights the importance of germline testing in patients diagnosed with the disease, which has the potential to identify individuals at risk, with implications for tailored therapeutic approaches and successful prevention through genetic counselling and screening.

Endocrine Immune-Related Adverse Events Are Independent Predictors of Survival in Patients with Lung Cancer.

Lung cancer (LC) is a serious health problem worldwide. Survival outcomes have improved over time due to the widespread use of novel therapeutic agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Endocrine immune-related adverse events (e-irAEs) are common in LC patients treated with ICIs. We performed a retrospective study of patients with LC who received treatment with ICIs at a tertiary referral center between January 2014 and October 2023. In total, 983 LC patients were included in the study. E-irAEs presented at a median time of 4.1 months and included hypothyroidism (15.6%), hyperthyroidism (4.3%), adrenal insufficiency (0.4%), hypophysitis (0.4%), and diabetes mellitus (0.2%). These toxicities were not related to the duration of treatment or the type of ICIs. Most (97.6%) e-irAEs were mild (grade 1-2). Median overall survival (OS) was higher in LC patients who experienced e-irAEs (31.6 months) compared to those who did not (10.8 months). The difference remained statistically significant in the 3-month (HR: 0.42) and 6-month landmark analysis (HR: 0.51). The OS advantage was observed in both patients with NSCLC (HR: 0.36) and SCLC (HR: 0.27). Additional research is needed to validate the role of e-irAEs as an independent predictor of survival outcomes in patients with LC.

Efficacy and Safety of Tinzaparin Thromboprophylaxis in Lung Cancer Patients with High Thromboembolic Risk: A Prospective, Observational, Single-Center Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to record and assess the efficacy and safety ofthromboprophylaxis with an intermediate dose of Tinzaparin in lung cancer patients with high thrombotic risk. METHODS: This was a non-interventional, single-arm, prospective cohort study of lung cancer patients who received thromboprophylaxis with Tinzaparin 10.000 Anti-Xa IU in 0.5 mL, OD, used in current clinical practice. Enrolled ambulatory patients signed informed consent. Anti-Xa levels were tested. RESULTS: In total, 140 patients were included in the study, of which 81.4% were males. The histology of the tumor was mainly adenocarcinoma. Lung cancer patients with high thrombotic risk based on tumor, patient, treatment, and laboratory-related factors were enrolled. Only one patient experienced a thrombotic event (0.7%), and 10 patients had bleeding events (7.1%), including only one major event. Anti-Xa levels measured at 10 days and 3 months did not differ significantly between patients who developed hemorrhagic events and those who did not (p = 0.26 and p = 0.32, respectively). CONCLUSION: Thromboprophylaxis with an intermediate Tinzaparin dose in high thrombotic-risk lung cancer patients is a safe and effective choice for the prevention of VTE.