Mechanosensation and transduction in osteocytes.

The human skeleton is a miracle of engineering, combining both toughness and light weight. It does so because bones possess cellular mechanisms wherein external mechanical loads are sensed. These mechanical loads are transformed into biological signals, which ultimately direct bone formation and/or bone resorption. Osteocytes, since they are ubiquitous in the mineralized matrix, are the cells that sense mechanical loads and transduce the mechanical signals into a chemical response. The osteocytes then release signaling molecules, which orchestrate the recruitment and activity of osteoblasts or osteoclasts, resulting in the adaptation of bone mass and structure. In this review, we highlight current insights in bone adaptation to external mechanical loading, with an emphasis on how a mechanical load placed on whole bones is translated and amplified into a mechanical signal that is subsequently sensed by the osteocytes.

Osteocyte morphology in human tibiae of different bone pathologies with different bone mineral density--is there a role for mechanosensing?

Matrix strains due to external loading are different in bones of different pathologies with different bone mineral density (BMD), and are likely sensed by the osteocytes, the putative bone mechanosensors. The mechanosensitivity of osteocytes appears to be strongly influenced by their morphology. In this study, we explored the possibility that osteocyte morphology might play a role in various bone pathologies with different BMD. Confocal laser scanning microscopy and nano-CT were used to quantitatively determine 3D morphology and alignment of osteocytes and osteocyte lacunae in human proximal tibial bone with relatively low (osteopenic), medium (osteoarthritic), and high (osteopetrotic) BMD. Osteopenic osteocytes were relatively large and round (lengths 8.9:15.6:13.4 microm), osteopetrotic osteocytes were small and discoid shaped (lengths 5.5:11.1:10.8 microm), and osteoarthritic osteocytes were large and elongated (lengths 8.4:17.3:12.2 microm). Osteopenic osteocyte lacunae showed 3.5 fold larger volume and 2.2 fold larger surface area than osteoarthritic lacunae, whereas osteopetrotic lacunae were 1.9 fold larger and showed 1.5 fold larger surface area than osteoarthritic lacunae. Osteopetrotic osteocyte lacunae had lower alignment than osteopenic and osteoarthritic lacunae as indicated by their lower degree of anisotropy. The differences in 3D morphology of osteocytes and their lacunae in long bones of different pathologies with different BMD might reflect an adaptation to matrix strain due to different external loading conditions. Moreover, since direct mechanosensing of matrix strain likely occurs by the cell bodies, the differences in osteocyte morphology and their lacunae might indicate differences in osteocyte mechanosensitivity. The exact relationship between osteocyte morphology and bone architecture, however, is complex and deserves further study.

Osteocyte morphology in fibula and calvaria --- is there a role for mechanosensing?

INTRODUCTION: External mechanical forces on cells are known to influence cytoskeletal structure and thus cell shape. Mechanical loading in long bones is unidirectional along their long axes, whereas the calvariae are loaded at much lower amplitudes in different directions. We hypothesised that if osteocytes, the putative bone mechanosensors, can indeed sense matrix strains directly via their cytoskeleton, the 3D shape and the long axes of osteocytes in fibulae and calvariae will bear alignment to the different mechanical loading patterns in the two types of bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used confocal laser scanning microscopy and nano-computed tomography to quantitatively determine the 3D morphology and alignment of long axes of osteocytes and osteocyte lacunae in situ. RESULTS: Fibular osteocytes showed a relatively elongated morphology (ratio lengths 5.9:1.5:1), whereas calvarial osteocytes were relatively spherical (ratio lengths 2.1:1.3:1). Osteocyte lacunae in fibulae had higher unidirectional alignment than the osteocyte lacunae in calvariae as demonstrated by their degree of anisotropy (3.33 and 2.10, respectively). The long axes of osteocyte lacunae in fibulae were aligned parallel to the principle mechanical loading direction, whereas those of calvarial osteocyte lacunae were not aligned in any particular direction. CONCLUSIONS: The anisotropy of osteocytes and their alignment to the local mechanical loading condition suggest that these cells are able to directly sense matrix strains due to external loading of bone. This reinforces the widely accepted role of osteocytes as mechanosensors, and suggests an additional mode of mechanosensing besides interstitial fluid flow. The relatively spherical morphology of calvarial osteocytes suggests that these cells are more mechanosensitive than fibular osteocytes, which provides a possible explanation of efficient physiological load bearing for the maintenance of calvarial bone despite its condition of relative mechanical disuse.

Extracellular NO signalling from a mechanically stimulated osteocyte.

Bone remodelling is a dynamic process that requires the coordinated interaction of osteocytes, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts, collaborating in basic multicellular units (BMUs). Communication between these cells can be by extracellular soluble molecules as well as directly propagating intercellular signalling molecules. Key to the understanding of bone remodelling is osteocyte mechanosensing and chemical signalling to the surrounding cells, since osteocytes are believed to be the mechanosensors of bone, responding to mechanical stresses. Nitric oxide (NO) is an important parameter to study osteocyte activation following mechanical loading. It is a small short-lived molecule, which makes its real-time, quantitative monitoring difficult. However, recently we demonstrated that DAR-4M AM chromophore can be used for real-time quantitative monitoring of intracellular NO production in individual cells following mechanical loading. Here we studied if a single mechanically stimulated osteocyte communicates with, and thus activates its surrounding cells via extracellular soluble factors. We monitored quantitatively intracellular NO production in the stimulated osteocyte and in its surrounding osteocytes, which were not interconnected. Mechanical stimulation by microneedle of a single-MLO-Y4 osteocyte-like cell upregulated the average intracellular NO production by 94% in the stimulated cell, and by 31-150% in the surrounding osteocytes. In conclusion, a single osteocyte can disseminate a mechanical stimulus to its surrounding osteocytes via extracellular soluble signalling factors. This reinforces the putative mechanosensory role of osteocytes, and demonstrates a possible mechanism by which a single mechanically stimulated osteocyte can communicate with other cells in a BMU, which might help to better understand the intricacies of intercellular interactions in BMUs and thus bone remodelling.

Bio imaging of intracellular NO production in single bone cells after mechanical stimulation.

UNLABELLED: We show the intracellular upregulation of NO production after mechanical stimulation, an essential chemical signal in bone remodeling. This is done in real time using the fluorescent chromophore DAR-4M AM. Differences in cellular response to mechanical stimulation of different regions of a single cell were observed. INTRODUCTION: Osteocytes are the most abundant bone cells that are believed to be the mechanosensors of bone, responding to mechanical stresses in interstitial fluid flow through the canaliculi. Under mechanical load, chemical signals such as NO play a key role in the activity of osteoblasts/osteoclasts that regulate bone remodeling. Despite the importance of NO in signaling, its real-time detection has proved challenging. This is largely because of the short NO half-life (typically approximately 0.1-5 s). Here, we show the upregulation of intracellular NO production in single osteocytes under localized mechanical stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the chromophore DAR-4M AM for NO detection. This is loaded into surface-attached MLO-Y4 osteocyte-like and MC3T3-E1 osteoblast-like cells that are subjected to a localized mechanical stimulation using optical tweezers or a microneedle tip. DAR-4M AM is membrane-permeable and chelates NO, forming a stable, fluorescent compound, which is visible with a rhodamine filter. RESULTS: Nonstimulated MLO-Y4 and MC3T3-E1 cells showed basal NO production levels, as indicated by a gradual increase in their fluorescence intensity. Localized mechanical stimulation of single MC3T3-E1 cells and MLO-Y4 cells by optical tweezers (150-550 pN, 0.5-3 Hz, 1 minute) showed a nearly 15-30% increase, whereas MLO-Y4 cells stimulated by a microneedle (10-20 nN, 1 minute) showed nearly 15-16% increase relative to their nonstimulated state. Furthermore, stimulation of a single cell process by a microneedle resulted in a 2-10% increase in the fluorescence intensity. CONCLUSIONS: NO is essential for mechanically induced bone remodeling and is a meaningful parameter for measuring bone cell activation after mechanical loading. Here we show NO upregulation in individual bone cells after a localized mechanical stimulation. We also show that both the cell body and the cell processes might be involved in mechanosensing. This technique allows characterization of the mechanosensitivity of different parts of a single osteocyte. This opens up the possibility to uncover the complexities and function of single osteocytes in the dynamic process of bone remodeling.