Enablers and barriers to non-dispensing pharmacist integration into the primary health care teams of Aboriginal community-controlled health services.

BACKGROUND: The primary health care management of chronic disease affecting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples requires healthcare quality and equity demands to be met, and systems that foster better team-based care. Non-dispensing pharmacists (NDPs) integrated within primary healthcare settings can enhance the quality of patient care, although factors that enable or challenge integration within these settings need to be better understood. OBJECTIVES: To investigate enabling factors and barriers influencing integration of NDPs within Aboriginal community-controlled health services delivering primary health care. This was achieved through qualitative evaluation of the Integrating Pharmacists within Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (IPAC) Trial exploring the perceptions of NDPs, community pharmacists, healthcare staff, managers, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients of these services. METHODS: NDPs were employed across twenty urban, rural, and remote services in three Australian states and provided pre-defined medication-related roles to adult Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients. Perceptions were elicited from online surveys, interviews, and focus groups. Transcripts were thematically analyzed using the constant comparison method to identify, compare, and refine emerging themes. RESULTS: One hundred and four participants informed the findings, including 24 NDPs, 13 general practitioners, 12 service managers, 10 community pharmacists, 17 health service staff, and 17 patients. Enablers of integration included: personal (previous experience with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, cultural awareness, skills, individual attributes); health service-related (induction programs, Aboriginal Health Worker support, team-building initiatives); and community-related factors (engaged community elders, leaders, cultural mentors, community pharmacy champions). Barriers to NDP integration included a lack of systems supports for patients and staff to adapt to NDP roles, health service factors, travel requirements, a lack of community linkages, and time and budget constraints. CONCLUSIONS: NDP integration within primary health care services has potential to enhance medication-related services to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples if enabling factors are supported and health systems and adequate resources facilitate the integration of pharmacists within these settings.

Integrating pharmacists into Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (IPAC project): Protocol for an interventional, non-randomised study to improve chronic disease outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples experience a higher burden of chronic disease yet have poorer access to needed medicines than other Australians. Adverse health outcomes from these illnesses can be minimised with improved prescribing quality. This project aims to improve quality of care outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adult patients with chronic disease by integrating a pharmacist within primary health care teams in Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (ACCHSs). METHODOLOGY: This non-randomised, prospective, pre and post quasi-experimental study, will be pragmatic, community-based and participatory, comparing outcomes and costs using paired patient data. Pharmacists will be integrated at 22 sites for approximately 15 months to conduct patient-related and practice-related activities through 10 core roles: providing medication management reviews, assessing adherence and medication appropriateness, providing medicines information and education and training, collaborating with healthcare teams, delivering preventive care, liaising with stakeholders, providing trnsitional care, and undertaking a drug utilisation review. With patients' consent, de-identified client-level data will be extracted from clinical information systems and pharmacists will record deidentified activity in an electronic logbook. Primary expected outcomes include improvements in biometric indices (glycated haemoglobin, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, lipids, cardiovascular risk, albumin-creatinine ratio) from baseline to end of study. Expected secondary outcomes include improvements in estimated glomerular filtration rate, prescribing indices (appropriateness, overuse and underuse), medication adherence, self-assessed health, and health service utilisation indices. A qualitative assessment of stakeholder and patient perceptions and a cost-effectiveness analysis will be undertaken. DISCUSSION: Numerous inquiries have recommended evaluating the impact of pharmacists integrated within primary health care settings. This study is the first to explore this impact on the health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples who are medically underserved. Evaluation of innovative integrated workforce models is necessary to address the challenges of delivering quality care together with this population.

Evaluating the long-term effectiveness of the Maternity Emergency Care course in remote Australia.

BACKGROUND: The Council for Remote Area Nurses of Australia deliver the MEC course which is the only short-course on maternity emergencies offered to non-midwifery qualified remote area nurses and Aboriginal Health Workers. The aim of the course is to improve the maternity emergency skills and knowledge of health service providers who do not have midwifery qualifications. There has been no long-term evaluation of the course since its inception. RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: To review the longer-term effectiveness of the maternity emergency care (MEC) course which was developed in consultation with the Australian College of Midwives (ACM) and rural and remote practitioners in 2003. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven clinicians who completed the MEC course since 2003 responded to a survey. Seven remote area health managers and two course facilitators were interviewed. RESULTS: This study provides an evaluation of the experiences of non-midwives who manage maternity emergencies in the rural and remote setting; their perception of the skills, knowledge and confidence acquired through participation in the MEC program. CONCLUSIONS: The MEC course is valued by both remote health managers and practitioners. The learning activities, skills and knowledge gained are reported to be very beneficial and used by remote health practitioners.