Testosterone recovery after androgen deprivation therapy in localised prostate cancer: Long-term data from two randomised trials.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the rate and time of testosterone (T) recovery in patients (pts) with localised prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy plus 0-, 6-, 18- or 36-month of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 1230 pts with prostate cancer randomised into two phase III trials, serum T was measured at baseline, then regularly. T recovery rate was compared between normal vs. abnormal baseline T and with ADT duration with Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A multivariable logistic regression model to predict the probability of recovering normal T was performed. RESULTS: Overall, 87.4 % (167/191), 75.9 % (293/386), 54.8 % (181/330) and 43.2 % (80/185) of pts, recovered normal T on the 0-, 6-, 18- or 36-month schedule, respectively (p < 0.001). In patients recovering normal T, the median time to T recovery increased with ADT duration ranging from 0.31, 1.64, 3.06 to 5.0 years for the 0-, 6-, 18- or 36-month schedules, respectively (p < 0.001) and was significantly faster for those with a normal T at baseline (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, older age and longer ADT duration are associated with a lower T recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Testosterone recovery rate after ADT depends on several factors including hormonal duration, normal baseline T, age and medical comorbidities. A longer ADT duration is the most important variable affecting T recovery. The data from this report might be a valuable tool to help physicians and patients in evaluating risks and benefits of ADT.

Optimizing Treatment in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Phase 3 Trial.

PURPOSE: To identify patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IRPC) benefiting from de-escalation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and/or dose escalated radiation therapy (DERT), we performed a secondary analysis of a phase 3 trial by measuring biochemical failure (BF), distant metastases, prostate cancer-specific mortality, overall survival (OS), and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) rates according to prognostic intermediate risk factors (IRF). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The initial trial randomized 600 patients with IRPC to a 3-arm trial with 200 patients per arm, consisting of 6 months of ADT plus 70 Gy radiation therapy (ADT + RT70) versus ADT plus a DERT of 76 Gy (ADT + DERT76) versus DERT of 76 Gy alone (DERT76). We performed an analysis based on IRF: clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score, percentage of positive biopsy cores (PBC) ≥50%, and Gleason pattern. Patients were allocated to 2 groups: favorable intermediate risk (FIR), defined as patients with only 1 IRF without Gleason pattern 4 + 3 or PBC ≥50%; and unfavorable intermediate risk (UIR), defined as all other patients. BF, distant metastases, prostate cancer-specific mortality, OS, and DMFS were compared between FIR and UIR. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 11.3 years (interquartile range, 10.9-11.7). In the FIR cohort, BF and OS were not significantly different between arms. UIR patients had significantly worse DMFS (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.61 [1.20-2.15]; P = .026) and OS (1.51 [1.12-2.04]; P = .0495) and a nonsignificant higher cumulative incidence of BF rate (1.55 [0.98-2.47]; P = .08). In UIR patients, a significant improvement in BF was seen in the arms receiving ADT compared to DERT76 alone. On multivariable analysis, Gleason pattern 4 + 3 and prostate-specific antigen >10 ng/mL independently affected BF and OS, regardless of the treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS: In IRPC, therapeutic optimization appears possible. To avoid ADT side effects, DERT76 alone appears sufficient in patients harboring only 1 risk factor without Gleason pattern 4 + 3 and PBC ≥50% (FIR). All other UIR patients seem to benefit from ADT + DERT76.

Androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A randomised phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: The role of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with radiotherapy (RT) in intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IRPC) remains controversial, particularly in patients receiving dose-escalated RT (DERT). We compared outcomes between patients with IRPC treated with ADT and two different doses of RT vs. RT alone. METHODS: From December 2000 to September 2010, 600 patients with IRPC were randomised to a three-arm trial consisting of 6 months of ADT plus RT 70 Gy (ADT + RT70) vs. ADT plus a DERT of 76 Gy (ADT + DERT76) vs. DERT of 76 Gy alone (DERT76). Primary end-point was biochemical failure (BF), and secondary end-points were overall survival (OS) and toxicity. RT toxicity was assessed by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. FINDINGS: With a median follow-up of 11.3 years (interquartile range: 10.9-11.7), patients receiving DERT76 alone, compared with patients receiving ADT + RT70 and ADT + DERT76, had higher rates of BF (32%, 18% and 14%, respectively, p < 0.001), higher rates of prostate cancer progression (12%, 4.5% and 3.3%, respectively, p = 0.001) and more deaths due to prostate cancer (6.5%, 3.0% and 1.5%, respectively, p = 0.03) with no significant difference seen between ADT + RT70 and ADT + DERT76. There was no significant difference in OS between the 3 arms. A higher dose of RT (76 Gy) increased late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity grade ≥ II compared with lower dose (70 Gy) (16% vs 5.3%, p < 0.001) with no statistical difference for late genitourinary toxicity. INTERPRETATION: In IRPC, the addition of 6 months of ADT to RT70 or DERT76 significantly improves BF and appears to decrease the risk of death from prostate cancer compared with DERT76 alone with no difference in OS. In the setting of IRPC, ADT plus RT 70 Gy yields effective disease control with a better GI toxicity profile. Clinicaltrials.gov#NCT00223145.

Hypofractionation for prostate cancer: an update.

INTRODUCTION: Recent advances in image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) has prompted much interest in the use of high-dose-per-fraction regimens for prostate cancer. Furthermore, from a radiobiological standpoint, there is increasing evidence that prostate tumors have a relatively low ɑ/ß ratio therefore, the use of hypofractionation may potentially offer acceptable tumor control while minimizing late toxicity to critical structures. Areas covered: This expert review explores the current evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. A particular emphasis was placed on large, randomized phase III trials as these are most likely to influence clinical practice. The authors discuss the use of both moderate and extreme hypofractionation. Expert commentary: The recent publication of 5-year outcomes from large prospective trials of moderate hypofractionation enhances our confidence that these techniques are both safe and effective. We recommend the fractionation scheme of 60 Gy in 20 fractions as this regimen was not associated with any notable increase in late toxicity. With respect to extreme hypofractionation, mature phase III trials are needed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of these techniques. For now, the use of radiosurgery should be limited to participation in prospective clinical trials.

The Influence of Treatment Position (Prone vs. Supine) on Clip Displacement, Seroma, Tumor Bed and Partial Breast Target Volumes: Comparative Study.

To analyse the displacement of surgical clips in prone (Pr) position and assess the consequences on target volumes and integral dose of partial breast irradiation (PBI). 30 post-lumpectomy breast cancer patients underwent CT imaging in supine (Su) and Pr. Clip displacements were measured by the distances from the clips to a common fix bony reference point. On each dataset, the tumour bed (TB = clips ± seroma), clinical target volume (CTV = TB + 1.5 cm) and planning target volumes (PTV = CTV + 1 cm) for PBI were determined and the volume pairs were compared. Furthermore estimation of integral dose ratio (IDR) within the breast from tangential treatment was performed as the ratio of the irradiated breast volume and the volume encompassing all clips. Clips close to the chest wall (CW) in Su showed significantly less displacement in Pr. The mean volumes of seroma, CTV and PTV were significantly higher in Pr than in Su. The PTV volume difference (Pr-Su) was significantly higher in patients with presence of seroma, deep clips and TB location in the superior-internal-quadrant (SIQ) and at the junction of superior quadrants (jSQ). In a multivariate analysis two factors remained significant: seroma and TB localization in SIQ-jSQ. The IDR was significantly larger in Su than in Pr (7.6 vs. 4.1 p < 0.01). Clip displacements varied considerably with respect to their relative position to the CW. In selected patients Pr position potentially leads to a significant increase in target volumes of PBI. Tangential beam arrangement for PBI should be avoided, not only in Su but in Pr as well in case of clip-based target volume definition.

Partial kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography, complete kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography, and electronic portal images for breast radiation therapy: A dose-comparison study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare absorbed dose with the treated breast and organs at risks (OARs) with weekly image guidance using electronic portal imaging (EPI), complete kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (kV CBCT), and partial kV CBCT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using a thorax female phantom, we determined absorbed doses to treated and contralateral breast, ipsilateral and contralateral lung, heart, and skin for tangential EPI, complete kV CBCT, and partial kV CBCT. Doses were measured by use of ionization chambers and compared with treatment planning system calculations. With simulation of breast tangential irradiation to a standard dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, dose to each organ was measured for each image guidance technique. RESULTS: Use of weekly EPI was associated with a significantly increased dose to the treated breast compared with weekly complete and partial kV CBCT (4.44 ± 0.04 vs 1.00 ± 0.07 vs 0.576 ± 0.003 cGy, respectively). Dose to the contralateral breast, ipsilateral and contralateral lung, heart, and contralateral skin was lower with EPI than with either complete or partial kV CBCT (0.042 ± 0.004 vs 0.36 ± 0.01 vs 0.23 ± 0.01 cGy, 0.06 ± 0.04 vs 0.42 ± 0.02 vs 0.31 ± 0.01 cGy, 0.004 ± 0.002 vs 0.29 ± 0.01 vs 0.22 ± 0.01 cGy, 0.03 ± 0.08 vs 0.36 ± 0.02 vs 0.25 ± 0.01 cGy, and 0.20 ± 0.02 vs 0.80 ± 0.06 vs 0.40 ± 0.03 cGy, respectively). Compared with complete CBCT, the use of partial CBCT allowed dose reductions of 42%, 37%, 27%, 24%, and 28% to the ipsilateral breast, contralateral breast, ipsilateral lung, contralateral lung, and heart, respectively. Additional dose from weekly CBCT was significantly lower than treatment-related scatter dose for all OARs. CONCLUSIONS: Use of CBCT was associated with decreased dose to ipsilateral breast and increased dose to all OARs compared with EPI. Significant dose reduction can be achieved with the use of partial CBCT, while generally maintaining image quality.

Respiratory Motion, Anterior Heart Displacement and Heart Dosimetry: Comparison Between Prone (Pr) and Supine (Su) Whole Breast Irradiation.

To analyze respiratory motion of surgical clips, chest wall (CW) and the anterior displacement of the heart and its impact on heart dosimetry between prone (Pr) and supine (Su) positions during whole breast radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery. Sixteen patients underwent 4D-CT for radiotherapy planning in Pr and Su positions. Maximum inhale and maximum exhale phases were analyzed. Mean 3D vectorial displacements ± standard deviations (SD) of the surgical clips were measured. Volumetric changes of the CW were recorded and compared. Cardiac displacement was assessed by a volume between the inner surface of CW and the myocardium of the heart (CW/H-V). For left-sided cases, comparative dosimetry was performed in each position simulating no- (Pr-noC, Su-noC) versus daily correction protocols (Pr-C, Su-C). The movements of 81 surgical clips were analyzed. Prone positioning significantly reduced both the mean 3D vectorial displacements (1.1 ± 0.6 (Pr) vs. 2.0 ± 0.9 mm (Su), p < 0.01) and their variability (0.3 ± 0.2 vs. 0.5 ± 0.3 mm, p = 0.01). Respiration-induced volumetric changes of CW were also significantly lower in Pr (2.3 ± 4.9 vs. 9.6 ± 7.1 cm(3), p < 0.01). The CW/H-V was significantly smaller in Pr than in Su (39.9 ± 14.6 vs. 64.3 ± 28.2 cm(3), p < 0.01). Besides identical target coverage heart, left-anterior-descending coronary artery (LADCA) and ipsilateral lung dose parameters were lowered with Pr-C compared to Pr-noC, Su-C and Su-noC. Prone position significantly reduced respiration-related surgical clip movements, their variability as well as CW movements. Significant anterior heart displacement was observed in Pr. Prone position with daily online correction could maximize the heart and LADCA protection.

Hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

PURPOSE: Conventional radiation therapy (RT) administered in 25 fractions after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the standard treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. Although accelerated hypofractionated regimens in 16 fractions have been shown to be equivalent to conventional RT for invasive breast cancer, few studies have reported results of using hypofractionated RT in DCIS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this multicenter collaborative effort, we retrospectively reviewed the records of all women with DCIS at 3 institutions treated with BCS followed by hypofractionated whole-breast RT (WBRT) delivered in 16 fractions. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2010, 440 patients with DCIS underwent BCS followed by hypofractionated WBRT in 16 fractions for a total dose of 42.5 Gy (2.66 Gy per fraction). Boost RT to the surgical bed was given to 125 patients (28%) at a median dose of 10 Gy in 4 fractions (2.5 Gy per fraction). After a median follow-up time of 4.4 years, 14 patients had an ipsilateral local relapse, resulting in a local recurrence-free survival of 97% at 5 years. Positive surgical margins, high nuclear grade, age less than 50 years, and a premenopausal status were all statistically associated with an increased occurrence of local recurrence. Tumor hormone receptor status, use of adjuvant hormonal therapy, and administration of additional boost RT did not have an impact on local control in our cohort. On multivariate analysis, positive margins, premenopausal status, and nuclear grade 3 tumors had a statistically significant worse local control rate. CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated RT using 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions provides excellent local control for patients with DCIS undergoing BCS.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer.

In regards to prostate cancer, the classic radiotherapy dose ranges from 70-80 Gy, administered in daily 2-Gy fractions. However, when taking into account the particular radiobiological model of prostate cancer cells, one realizes that there is a potential theoretical advantage to delivering a greater biological effective dose per treatment in a lower number of fractions. Both recent and older publications have attempted to explore this treatment option. This critical review comprehensively examines the current state of knowledge concerning hypofractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer.

Phase 2 study of silver leaf dressing for treatment of radiation-induced dermatitis in patients receiving radiotherapy to the head and neck.

OBJECTIVE: The use of silver leaf dressing is common in the treatment of burn victims owing to its capacity to improve healing and inherent antimicrobial properties. The goal of this study was to investigate its effectiveness in the treatment of radiation-induced dermatitis in a patient population receiving radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy for various carcinomas of the head and neck compared with our current standard of care, silver sulfadiazine (Flamazine). METHODS: Twelve patients presenting with cancers of the head and neck region with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 2 or more skin toxicity were offered topical treatment of silver sulfadiazine and silver leaf dressing. Each patient applied silver-leaf dressing on one side of the neck and silver sulfadiazine on the other. Three independent observers evaluated the patients based on standardized digital photography and regular follow-up by the treating physician. The sign test was used to evaluate whether the observed difference was statistically significant. RESULTS: There was no improvement in RTOG grade skin toxicity. However, within the same grade, two of three observers agreed on some degree of improvement in the dermatitis with silver leaf dressing compared with silver sulfadiazine. As well, 67% of patients reported improved pain control on the side treated with silver leaf dressing. Sign test analysis indicated that the use of silver-leaf dressing gave significantly superior results when compared with silver sulfadiazine (p = .035). CONCLUSION: Silver leaf dressing does not appear to be superior to our standard treatment for radiation-induced dermatitis when the RTOG grading system is used. It does, however, seem to reduce the severity of reaction within the same grade, accelerate healing, and provide improved pain control over standard treatment. It shows promise regarding symptom control and merits further investigation.