Downregulation of topoisomerase IIbeta in myeloid leukemia cell lines leads to activation of apoptosis following all-trans retinoic acid-induced differentiation/growth arrest.

Among the topoisomerase (topo) II isozymes (alpha and beta), topo IIbeta has been suggested to regulate differentiation. In this study, we examined the role of topo IIbeta in all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA)-induced differentiation of myeloid leukemia cell lines. Inhibition of topo IIbeta activity or downregulation of protein expression enhanced ATRA-induced differentiation/growth arrest and apoptosis. ATRA-induced apoptosis in topo IIbeta-deficient cells involved activation of the caspase cascade and was rescued by ectopic expression of topo IIbeta. Gene expression profiling led to the identification of peroxiredoxin 2 (PRDX2) as a candidate gene that was downregulated in topo IIbeta-deficient cells. Reduced expression of PRDX2 validated at the mRNA and protein level, in topo IIbeta-deficient cells correlated with increased accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) following ATRA-induced differentiation. Overexpression of PRDX2 in topo IIbeta-deficient cells led to reduced accumulation of ROS and partially reversed ATRA-induced apoptosis. These results support a role for topo IIbeta in survival of ATRA-differentiated myeloid leukemia cells. Reduced expression of topo IIbeta induces apoptosis in part by impairing the anti-oxidant capacity of the cell owing to downregulation of PRDX2. Thus, suppression of topo IIbeta and/or PRDX2 levels in myeloid leukemia cells provides a novel approach for improving ATRA-based differentiation therapy.

Absence of CCND1 gene amplification in breast tumours of BRCA1 mutation carriers.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It was recently reported that significantly fewer breast tumours of BRCA1 mutation carriers overexpressed cyclin D1 and HER2 protein than tumours of age matched breast cancer cases unselected for family history. This study aimed to examine the genetic basis of this reduction by determining the frequency of tumours within this cohort showing DNA amplification of these genes. METHODS: Paraffin wax embedded sections of breast tumours from BRCA1 mutation carriers and age, grade, histological type, and tumour size matched non-familial controls that had previously been stained for cyclin D1 and HER2 protein overexpression were analysed for CCND1 and HER2 gene amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridisation. RESULTS: CCND1 amplification was detected in none of the 30 tumours of the BRCA1 mutation carriers and in 19 of 74 tumours of the matched controls. Of those samples previously determined to overexpress the HER2 protein, HER2 amplification was detected in one of three tumours from BRCA1 mutation carriers and in 13 of 17 tumours of the age matched non-familial cases. CONCLUSION: None of the tumours of BRCA1 mutation carriers showed CCND1 amplification and only one tumour showed HER2 amplification. In contrast, a large proportion of cyclin D1 and HER2 overexpression in tumours of non-familial breast cancer cases could be accounted for by amplification of these genes. These data suggest that breast tumorigenesis in BRCA1 mutation carriers occurs by a molecular mechanism distinct from that of age matched non-familial cases.

Breast tumor immunophenotype of BRCA1-mutation carriers is influenced by age at diagnosis.

PURPOSE: Breast tumors of BRCA1 mutation carriers and those of early onset breast cancer cases share similar histological features, being generally high-grade, highly proliferative, aneuploid tumors that are predominantly estrogen- and progesterone-receptor negative. Because histological features of tumors of premenopausal women differ from those of tumors of older women, we sought to determine whether the immunophenotype of breast tumors of BRCA1 mutation carriers was influenced by age at diagnosis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We examined 31 breast tumors from BRCA1 mutation carriers and compared them with 81 tumors of age-matched (plus or minus 5 years) breast cancer patients unselected for family history. Tumors were further matched for histology, grade, and size. Paraffin-embedded tumor tissues were examined for protein expression of estrogen receptor (ER), PR, Ki-67, cyclin D1, TP53, HER2, beta-catenin, and cyclin E using immunohistochemical approaches. RESULTS: ER (P = 0.01), PR (P = 0.06), and cyclin D1 (P = 0.002) were less frequently expressed and Ki-67 (P = 0.01) and beta-catenin (P = 0.04) were more frequently expressed in tumors of BRCA1 mutation carriers than controls. After age stratification, we found a significant difference in the frequency of tumors of BRCA1 mutation carriers diagnosed before 50 years of age compared with age-matched controls that stained positive for ER (P = 0.01), PR (P = 0.03), Ki-67 (P = 0.008), cyclin D1 (P < 0.001), HER2 (P = 0.04), and beta-catenin (P = 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in tumors of BRCA1 mutation carriers diagnosed at age 50 or older compared with age-matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that age at diagnosis, possibly related to menopausal status, may be an important factor in the expression of specific proteins in breast tumors of BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Variation in enzymes of arylamine procarcinogen biotransformation among bladder cancer patients and control subjects.

Arylamines such as 2-naphthylamine and 4-aminobiphenyl are suspected human bladder procarcinogens that require bioactivation to DNA-reactive species to exert their carcinogenic potential. The goals of the present study were (i) to assay for the presence of the arylamine acetyltransferases NAT1 and NAT2, and of the cytochrome P450 isoform CYP1A2, in human bladder epithelium; and (ii) to determine whether the activities of these arylamine biotransforming enzymes differ between bladder cancer patients and control subjects. We measured in-vitro enzyme activities in biopsies of normal, undiseased bladder epithelium obtained from 103 bladder cancer patients. NAT1 activity was detectable in all samples, with mean levels higher than those found in human liver. Kinetic evidence also suggested low levels of NAT2 expression in this tissue, but there was no detectable CYP1A2 by either enzymatic or immunochemical measurements. We also compared several probe drug indices of in-vivo NAT1, NAT2 and CYP1A2 activity between 53 bladder cancer patients and 96 cancer-free control subjects who were carefully matched for age, gender and smoking status. NAT1 and NAT2 genotypes were also determined. No significant differences were found between bladder cancer patients and control subjects for a number of individual phenotypic or genotypic predictors of enzyme function. Our results suggest that although expression of particular arylamine biotransforming enzymes within the bladder tissue could play a significant role in locally bioactivating arylamine procarcinogens in theory, interindividual variations in CYP1A2, NAT1 and NAT2 activities do not significantly differ between bladder cancer patients and control subjects when potential arylamine exposures are controlled for

Frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a clinic-based series of breast and ovarian cancer families.

Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for a significant proportion of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer cases. In this study, we sought to determine the frequency of BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutation carrier families in a hospital-based cancer family registry. The frequency of families with germline truncating mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 was 17.3% (18/104) and 1.9% (2/104), respectively. Two novel truncating mutations, BRCA1 1848delGA and BRCA2 5694insT, were identified. We also sought to determine the carrier frequency of other affected family members for which the mutation lineage could be established within these families. Not including the probands, 72% (18/25) of the affected family members within the BRCA1 mutation-associated families were carriers, and all four affected members of the BRCA2 families were carriers. These data imply that risk evaluation based on cancer family history alone may result in inaccurate estimates, and where possible, mutation testing should be considered in other affected family members to verify carrier status.