Grupos de riesgo de recidiva bioquímica tras prostatectomía radical de la Asociación Europea de Urología: validación externa e identificación de factores de riesgo de progresión y mortalidad / European Association of Urology biochemical recurrence risk groups after radical prostatectomy: external validation and identification of independent risk factors for progression and death

Contexto La EAU propuso una clasificación del riesgo de progresión y muerte en pacientes con recidiva bioquímica tras prostatectomía radical (PR). Objetivo Validar la clasificación de riesgo de RB de la EAU en nuestro contexto e identificar los factores asociados con la progresión y la muerte. Material y métodos Estudio multicéntrico, retrospectivo y observacional que incluyó a 2140 pacientes sometidos a PR entre 2011 y 2015. Los pacientes con RB fueron identificados y estratificados en grupos de riesgo bajo (TD-PSA >1 año y pGS <8) o alto (TD-PSA <=1 año o pGS=>8). Se calcularon la supervivencia libre de progresión por PSA y supervivencia libre de metástasis (SLP-PSA, SLM), la supervivencia cáncer específica y la supervivencia global (curvas de Kaplan Meier y log-rank test). Se identificaron factores de riesgo independientes (regresión de Cox). Resultados Un total de 427 pacientes experimentaron RB (32,3% de bajo riesgo y 67,7% de alto riesgo). La mediana de SLP-PSA fue de 135,0 m (IC 95% 129,63-140,94) y 115,0 m (IC 95% 104,02-125,98) (p < 0,001) para los grupos de bajo y alto riesgo, respectivamente. Hubo diferencias significativas en la SLM y la supervivencia global entre ambos grupos. El grupo de riesgo de RB de la EAU fue un factor independiente de progresión del PSA (HR 2,55; p 0,009). El tiempo transcurrido entre la PR y la RB fue un factor independiente de aparición de metástasis (HR 0,43; IC 95%: 0,18-0,99; p 0,044) y muerte (HR 0,17; IC 95%: 0,26-0,96; 23 p 0,048). Se hallaron diferencias en la SLM (p 0,001) y la supervivencia cáncer específica (p 0,004) para <12, ≥ 12-<36 y ≥36 meses transcurridos entre la PR y la RB. Otros factores independientes fueron la radioterapia de rescate precoz y el PSA en el momento de aparición de la RB (AU)

Background The EAU proposed a progression and death risk classification in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (PR). Objective To validate the EAU BCR-risk classification in our setting and to find factors related to progression and death. Material and methods Multicenter, retrospective, observational study including 2140 patients underwent RP between 2011 and 2015. Patients with BCR were identified and stratified in low risk (PSA-DT>1 yr and pGS <8) or high-risk (PSA-DT <=1 yr or pGS=>8) grouping. PSA and metastatic free survival (PSA-PFS, MFS), cancer specific survival and overall survival were calculated (Kaplan Meier curves and log-rank test). Independent risk factors were identified (Cox regression). Results 427 patients experienced BCR (32.3% low-risk and 67.7% high-risk). Median PSA-PFS was 135.0 mo (95% CI 129.63-140.94) and 115.0 mo (95% CI 104.02-125.98) (p < .001), for low and high-risk groups, respectively. There was also significant differences in MFS and overall survival. The EAU BCR risk grouping was independent factor for PSA-progression (HR 2.55, p 0.009). Time from PR to BCR, was an independent factor for metastasis onset (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.18-0.99; p 0.044) and death (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.26.0.96; 23 p 0.048). Differences in MFS (p 0.001) and cancer specific survival (p 0.004) were found for <12, ≥12-<36 and≥36 months from PR to BCR. Others independent factors were early salvage radiotherapy and PSA at BCR. Conclusions High-risk group is a prognostic factor for biochemical progression, but it has a limited accuracy on MP and death in our setting. The inclusion of other factors could increase its predictive power (AU)

European Association of Urology biochemical recurrence risk groups after radical prostatectomy: External validation and identification of independent risk factors for progression and death.

BACKGROUND: The EAU proposed a progression and death risk classification in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (PR). OBJECTIVE: To validate the EAU BCR-risk classification in our setting and to find factors related to progression and death. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study including 2140 patients underwent RP between 2011 and 2015. Patients with BCR were identified and stratified in low risk (PSA-DT >1yr and pGS <8) or high-risk (PSA-DT ≤1yr or pGS ≥8) grouping. PSA and metastatic free survival (PSA-PFS, MFS), cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated (Kaplan Meier curves and log-rank test). Independent risk factors were identified (Cox regression). RESULTS: 427 patients experienced BCR (32.3% low-risk and 67.7% high-risk). Median PSA-PFS was 135,0 mo (95% CI 129,63-140,94) and 115,0 mo (95% CI 104,02-125,98) (p<0,001), for low and high-risk groups, respectively. There were also significant differences in MFS and OS. The EAU BCR risk grouping was independent factor for PSA-progression (HR 2.55, p 0.009). Time from PR to BCR, was an independent factor for metastasis onset (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.18-0.99; p 0.044) and death (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.26.0.96; 23 p 0.048). Differences in MFS (p 0.001) and CSS (p 0.004) were found for <12, ≥12-<36 and ≥36 months from PR to BCR. Others independent factors were early salvage radiotherapy and PSA at BCR. CONCLUSIONS: High-risk group is a prognostic factor for biochemical progression, but it has a limited accuracy on MP and death in our setting. The inclusion of other factors could increase its predictive power.

Single-port retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: Initial description and standardisation of technique.

Introduction: Minimally invasive surgery has been established as the gold standard for the treatment of localised renal tumours. A retroperitoneal approach is a feasible option with advantages in posterior tumours and patients with previous abdominal surgeries. In this context, single-port retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy (SPOR-PN) has not been widely explored and developed. We present this technique's description and our first results. Methods: We present a case series of nine patients undergoing SPOR-PN in a single institution. We used a multi-channel single-port access dispositive through a 35 mm incision below the 12th rib, a 30° two-dimensional laparoscope, curved graspers and needle drivers on the left hand and standard rigid material in the right hand. In all surgeries, we performed a complete renorrhaphy with the sliding-clip technique. The pain was evaluated through visual analogue scale (VAS) the day after surgery. Results: Patients' age ranged from 44 to 78 years. The median RENAL score was 5p, and the mean surgical time was 134 min. We performed an 'off-clamp' procedure on three patients. Among the patients who had renal artery clamped, the median ischaemia time was 18 min. The median in-hospital stay time was 48 h. Median VAS the day after surgery was 2. None of the anatomical pieces had positive borders. Only one complication was reported (Clavien IIIa). Conclusions: SPOR-PN is a feasible minimally invasive and nephron-sparing technique. The advantages of this procedure may not be only a better cosmetic appearance but also less post-operative pain. Further development and larger studies are needed.

Cirugía retroperitoneal asistida por robot por puerto único: un abordaje factible / Single-port robot-assisted retroperitoneal surgery: A feasible approach

Introducción: La cirugía mediante una única incisión ha sido un concepto perseguido en el campo de la mínima invasión para el tratamiento de diferentes afecciones. Este concepto, sumado a un abordaje retroperitoneal, puede suponer una disminución de la agresión al paciente a diferentes niveles. Describimos los primeros casos de cirugía retroperitoneal asistida por robot mediante puerto único de nuestro entorno. Material y métodos Presentamos 2 casos de pacientes con masas suprarrenales derechas con un tamaño superior a 4cm. El primer caso se trataba de una mujer de 55 años con diagnóstico incidental de angiomiolipoma, y el segundo, de un varón de 62 años con adenoma suprarrenal no funcionante. Ambos casos se operaron a través de una única incisión subcostal de 4cm mediante el sistema Da Vinci Xi®, anulando el brazo 4 sin realizar reasignaciones de lateralidad en consola. Resultados Los tiempos de consola para las cirugías fueron de 75 y 150min, con tiempos de acceso y acoplamiento robótico inferiores a 30min. El sangrado fue inferior a 100cc en ambas cirugías, sin necesidad de realizar incisiones accesorias o dejar tubo de drenaje. Las piezas quirúrgicas fueron extraídas por la misma incisión sin necesidad de ampliación. En ningún caso fue necesaria analgesia intravenosa postoperatoria (EVA 0) y la estancia fue inferior a 24h en ambos pacientes, sin reportarse ninguna complicación. Conclusiones La cirugía retroperitoneal asistida por robot mediante puerto único es un abordaje factible a través del sistema Da Vinci Xi® (AU)

Introduction: The concept of surgery through a single incision has been pursued in the field of minimal invasion for the treatment of different pathologies. This, added to a retroperitoneal approach, implies less aggression for the patient at different levels. We describe the first cases of single-port robot-assisted retroperitoneal surgery (SP-RARS) in our country using the Da Vinci Xi® system. Material and methods We present 2 cases of patients with right adrenal masses larger than 4cm. The first case was a 55-year-old woman with an incidental diagnosis of angiomyolipoma, and the second case was a 62-year-old man with a non-functioning adrenal adenoma. Both cases were operated through a single 4cm subcostal incision using the Da Vinci Xi® system, annulling arm 4 without reallocating laterality on the surgeon's console. Results Console times for surgeries were 75 and 150min, with access and docking times below 30min. Bleeding was less than 100cc in both surgeries with no need of accesory trocars, make new incisions or leave a drainage tube. The surgical specimens were removed through the same initial incision without the need for enlargement. Postoperative intravenous analgesia was not necessary in any case (VAS 0) and hospital stay was less than 24h in both patients, without reporting any complications. Conclusions SP-RARS is a feasible approach using the Da Vinci Xi® system (AU)

Single-port robot-assisted retroperitoneal surgery: A feasible approach.

INTRODUCTION: The concept of surgery through a single incision has been pursued in the field of minimal invasion for the treatment of different pathologies. This, added to a retroperitoneal approach, implies less aggression for the patient at different levels. We describe the first cases of single-port robot-assisted retroperitoneal surgery (SP-RARS) in our country using the da Vinci Xi® system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present two cases of patients with right adrenal masses larger than 4 cm. The first case was a 55-year-old woman with an incidental diagnosis of angiomyolipoma, and the second case was a 62-year-old man with a non-functioning adrenal adenoma. Both cases were operated through a single 4-cm subcostal incision using the da Vinci Xi® system, annulling arm 4 without reallocating laterality on the surgeon's console. RESULTS: Both surgeries were performed with console times of 75 and 150 min, respectively, with access and docking times below 30 min. Bleeding was less than 100 cc in both surgeries without the need to make accessory incisions or leave a drainage tube. The surgical specimens were removed through the same initial incision without the need for enlargement. Postoperative intravenous analgesia was not necessary in any case (VAS 0) and hospital stay was less than 24 h in both patients without reporting any complications. CONCLUSIONS: SP-RARS is a feasible approach using the da Vinci Xi® system.

Suprarrenalectomía retroperitoneoscópica por puerto único: experiencia inicial y estandarización de la técnica / Single-port retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: Initial experience and standardization of the technique

Introducción y objetivo: El abordaje mediante cirugía mínimamente invasiva de la patología de la glándula suprarrenal es el más extendido hoy en día, en donde la retroperitoneoscopia ocupa un lugar a tener muy en cuenta; sin embargo, la evolución de estas técnicas hacia abordajes todavía menos invasivos a través de puerto único es anecdótica.La finalidad de este trabajo es describir nuestra experiencia inicial en cirugía retroperitoneoscópica por puerto único (SPORS) de la glándula suprarrenal centrándonos en los datos perioperatorios y dolor postoperatorio.Material y métodosRecogimos y analizamos los datos demográficos y operatorios de una serie de pacientes tratados mediante suprarrenalectomía mediante SPORS. Todos los procedimientos se realizaron mediante una única incisión subcostal de 3-4cm a través de un puerto multicanal. Se recogen diferentes datos quirúrgicos como tiempo operatorio, sangrado, estancia o presencia de complicaciones. Empleamos la escala visual analógica (EVA) para la valoración del dolor postoperatorio.ResultadosEntre diciembre del 2018 y agosto del 2020, 6 pacientes con diferentes patologías suprarrenales fueron intervenidos en nuestro Departamento de forma consecutiva por el mismo cirujano mediante SPORS. Todas las cirugías se realizaron sin requerir colocación de trocares accesorios o reconversión a cirugía abierta. El tiempo medio de las intervenciones fue de 91,6±16,3 min, con un sangrado <150ml, una estancia media de 35,8±13,3 h y un dolor postoperatorio analizado EVA ≤ 3 (mediana de 0,5). El tamaño medio de las piezas fue de 57,8±18mm. No se reportó ninguna complicación según la escala Clavien-Dindo.

Introduction and objective: The minimally invasive surgical approach to adrenal gland pathology is the most widely used nowadays, and retroperitoneoscopy occupies a relevant place. However, the evolution of these techniques towards even less invasive surgery through single-port access is anecdotal. The aim of this work is to describe our initial experience in single-port retroperitoneoscopic surgery (SPORS) of the adrenal gland focusing on perioperative data and postoperative pain.Material and methodsWe collected and analyzed the demographic and operative data of a series of patients undergoing adrenalectomy through SPORS. All procedures were performed through a single 3-4cm subcostal incision with a multichannel port. Surgical data such as operative time, bleeding, length of stay and presence of complications were collected. We used the visual analog scale (VAS) for postoperative pain assessment.ResultsFrom December 2018 to August 2020, 6 patients with different types of adrenal pathology underwent consecutive surgeries in our Department by the same surgeon using SPORS. All surgeries were performed without requiring accessory trocar placement or reconversion to open surgery. The mean operative time was 91.6±16.3minutes, with <150mL bleeding, mean length of stay of 35.8±13.3hours and postoperative pain of VAS ≤3 (median 0.5). The mean size of specimens was 57.8±18mm. No complications were reported according to the Clavien-Dindo scale. (AU)

Single-port retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: Initial experience and standardization of the technique.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The minimally invasive surgical approach to adrenal gland pathology is the most widely used nowadays, and retroperitoneoscopy occupies a relevant place. However, the evolution of these techniques towards even less invasive surgery through single-port access is anecdotal. The aim of this work is to describe our initial experience in single-port retroperitoneoscopic surgery (SPORS) of the adrenal gland focusing on perioperative data and postoperative pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We collected and analyzed the demographic and operative data of a series of patients undergoing adrenalectomy through SPORS. All procedures were performed through a single 3-4 cm subcostal incision with a multichannel port. Surgical data such as operative time, bleeding, length of stay and presence of complications were collected. We used the visual analog scale (VAS) for postoperative pain assessment. RESULTS: From December 2018 to August 2020, 6 patients with different types of adrenal pathology underwent consecutive surgeries in our Department by the same surgeon using SPORS. All surgeries were performed without requiring accessory trocar placement or reconversion to open surgery. The mean operative time was 91.6 ±â€¯16.3 min, with <150 mL bleeding, mean length of stay of 35.8 ±â€¯13.3 h and postoperative pain of VAS ≤3 (median 0.5). The mean size of specimens was 57.8 ±â€¯18 mm. No complications were reported according to the Clavien-Dindo scale. CONCLUSIONS: Even in initially adverse cases, SPORS adrenalectomy is a feasible and safe technique with good cosmetic and perioperative results.

Single-port retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: Initial experience and standardization of the technique. / Suprarrenalectomía retroperitoneoscópica por puerto único: experiencia inicial y estandarización de la técnica.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The minimally invasive surgical approach to adrenal gland pathology is the most widely used nowadays, and retroperitoneoscopy occupies a relevant place. However, the evolution of these techniques towards even less invasive surgery through single-port access is anecdotal. The aim of this work is to describe our initial experience in single-port retroperitoneoscopic surgery (SPORS) of the adrenal gland focusing on perioperative data and postoperative pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We collected and analyzed the demographic and operative data of a series of patients undergoing adrenalectomy through SPORS. All procedures were performed through a single 3-4cm subcostal incision with a multichannel port. Surgical data such as operative time, bleeding, length of stay and presence of complications were collected. We used the visual analog scale (VAS) for postoperative pain assessment. RESULTS: From December 2018 to August 2020, 6 patients with different types of adrenal pathology underwent consecutive surgeries in our Department by the same surgeon using SPORS. All surgeries were performed without requiring accessory trocar placement or reconversion to open surgery. The mean operative time was 91.6±16.3minutes, with <150mL bleeding, mean length of stay of 35.8±13.3hours and postoperative pain of VAS ≤3 (median 0.5). The mean size of specimens was 57.8±18mm. No complications were reported according to the Clavien-Dindo scale. CONCLUSIONS: Even in initially adverse cases, SPORS adrenalectomy is a feasible and safe technique with good cosmetic and perioperative results.