Strategies to integrate oral health into primary care: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Integration of oral health into primary care has been proposed as a primary healthcare approach for efficient and sustainable delivery of oral health services, and the effective management of oral diseases. This paper aimed to synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of strategies to integrate oral health into primary care. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest, Cochrane and Google Scholar were searched without date limits until the third week of June 2022. Reference lists of eligible studies were also searched. Experts in the field and existing professional networks were consulted. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only studies that evaluated integration strategies were included in the review. Eligibility was restricted to English language studies published in academic peer-reviewed journals. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and performed the risk of bias assessments. A narrative synthesis approach was used to report review findings. Heterogeneity among included studies precluded a meta-analysis. RESULTS: The search identified 8731 unique articles, of which 49 were included in the review. Majority of the studies explored provision of oral healthcare by primary care professionals in primary care settings, where integration was primarily via training/education and/or policy changes. Most studies reported results favouring the integration strategy, such as improvements in referral pathways, documentation processes, operating efficiencies, number of available health staff, number of visits to non-dental primary care professionals for oral health issues, proportion of children receiving fluoride varnish applications/other preventive treatment, proportion of visits to an oral health professional and dental caries estimates. CONCLUSION: The findings from this review demonstrate that the majority of identified strategies were associated with improved outcomes and can be used to inform decision-making on strategy selection. However, more research and evaluation are required to identify best practice models of service integration. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020203111.

Patterns and predictors of public dental service utilisation among refugees in Victoria, Australia: a latent profile and multilevel analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to explore, analyse, and describe the patterns of public dental service utilisation among the refugee populations in Victoria, Australia, and determine their predictors at the individual and contextual levels. METHODS: Data on the refugees who attended Victorian public dental services between July 2016 to June 2020 was gathered from the Dental Health Program dataset. Latent profile analysis was used to identify discrete groups among the refugee clientele with similar mean utilisation patterns across six indicator variables describing the attributes of dental services received and the site of care provision, over the study period. Multilevel multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the individual and contextual level correlates of the identified utilisation patterns. RESULTS: Six distinct profiles of public dental service utilisation were identified among the study population (n = 25,542). The largest group comprised refugees predominantly using restorative services under general course of care (38.10%), followed by extraction services under emergency course of care (23.50%). Only a small proportion were estimated as having a higher mean utilisation of preventive services under general course of care (9.10%). Multilevel analysis revealed that the following variables had a significant association with refugee utilisation pattern: at the individual-level - demographic and ethnic attributes including age, gender, region of birth, preferred language for communication, use of language interpreter services, and type of eligibility card; at the contextual-level - characteristics of refugees' neighbourhood of residence including urbanicity, socioeconomic disadvantage, delivery of Refugee Health Program at the community health centres, and spatial accessibility to public dental services via driving and public transit modes of travel. CONCLUSIONS: The study represents a significant step towards the development of an evidence-based knowledge around public dental service utilisation among Victorian refugees. Overall, the study findings reiterate the critical need for targeted strategies to promote the importance of routine dental visits, oral disease prevention, and timely intervention among refugee groups.

Factors associated with access to dental care among refugees: A systematic review of quantitative studies.

OBJECTIVES: To identify, appraise and synthesize the published evidence from quantitative studies on the individual and contextual-level factors determining access to dental care among refugees worldwide. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted until the last week of February 2022 in four electronic databases - MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science (all databases) and APA PsycINFO - without any restrictions. Quantitative studies published in English language and meeting the a priori eligibility criteria were reviewed and data extracted. Quality assessment was conducted using the National Institutes of Health tool. The identified factors were stratified according to the framework of the Behavioural Model of Health Services Use, and the evidence related to each of these factors was summarized in tables. Narrative synthesis of the findings was conducted. RESULTS: The search retrieved 6776 unique records, of which 69 were deemed eligible for full-text screening and nine studies were included in the final data analysis and synthesis. The studies were rated to be of 'fair' quality at best. Self-reported previous dental visits was the most commonly used measure of access. Associations between individual-level factors and dental care access were most frequently examined (predisposing [n = 6], need [n = 2] and enabling [n = 1]), while the contextual-level factors were rarely examined (predisposing and enabling [n = 1, each]). CONCLUSIONS: Individual-level predisposing factors, such as English language proficiency, education, health and dental literacy and acculturation and integration, were shown to be significantly associated with refugees' access. There is limited evidence to determine the effect of individual enabling and need and contextual factors.

Disparities in spatial accessibility to public dental services relative to estimated need for oral health care among refugee populations in Victoria.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the spatial accessibility to public dental services (PDS) relative to the estimated oral health needs of refugee populations within the state of Victoria, Australia. METHODS: The study employed enhanced two-step floating catchment area method to measure spatial accessibility to PDS by driving and public transit modes at statistical area level 2 (SA2). Principal component analysis of select census-derived socioeconomic variables specific to the refugee population was conducted to derive an area-based indicator of refugee oral health needs, also at SA2 level. Individual indices were then developed for each of these components using standardized z-scores. Finally, an integrated need-accessibility index was developed to identify low-accessibility areas associated with high needs. RESULTS: The results show clear contrast in spatial accessibility to PDS for the refugee populations between metropolitan and rural areas as well as between driving and public transit modes. There are critical limitations in accessibility for refugees living in the rural areas and those dependent on public transit mode for travel. Also, there is evident disparity between the estimated oral health needs of refugees in metropolitan and rural areas. Overall, approximately 29% of all SA2s with refugee population are in the 'High' needs category, which comprise 19.8% of the total Victorian refugee population. Integrating accessibility and oral health needs measures revealed that about 30% and 18% of refugee population are identified as under-serviced, when considering driving and public transit modes respectively. CONCLUSION: The findings provide implications for researchers and policy makers to address the inequalities in access to PDS among the refugee population in Victoria. The methodology outlined in this study provides a complementary approach in planning oral health service provision in the absence of population level data at a small-area scale on access to dental services or need for oral health care.

An overview of methodological approaches in systematic reviews.

AIM: The aim of this overview is to identify and collate evidence from existing published systematic review (SR) articles evaluating various methodological approaches used at each stage of an SR. METHODS: The search was conducted in five electronic databases from inception to November 2020 and updated in February 2022: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and APA PsycINFO. Title and abstract screening were performed in two stages by one reviewer, supported by a second reviewer. Full-text screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal were performed by two reviewers independently. The quality of the included SRs was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 checklist. RESULTS: The search retrieved 41,556 unique citations, of which 9 SRs were deemed eligible for inclusion in final synthesis. Included SRs evaluated 24 unique methodological approaches used for defining the review scope and eligibility, literature search, screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal in the SR process. Limited evidence supports the following (a) searching multiple resources (electronic databases, handsearching, and reference lists) to identify relevant literature; (b) excluding non-English, gray, and unpublished literature, and (c) use of text-mining approaches during title and abstract screening. CONCLUSION: The overview identified limited SR-level evidence on various methodological approaches currently employed during five of the seven fundamental steps in the SR process, as well as some methodological modifications currently used in expedited SRs. Overall, findings of this overview highlight the dearth of published SRs focused on SR methodologies and this warrants future work in this area.

Effect of pharmacological agents on relapse following orthodontic tooth movement.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate and synthesize systematically the evidence from animal studies pertaining to the effect of pharmacological agents on tooth movement relapse following cessation of orthodontic force application. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search was conducted in seven online databases (including gray sources) without restrictions until the third week of April 2019, followed by a hand search in the reference lists of eligible articles. Controlled animal studies investigating the effect of pharmacological agents on tooth movement relapse following orthodontic treatment were selected. Relevant data were extracted from eligible studies and the risk of bias assessment was done using SYRCLE's risk of bias tool. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool. RESULTS: The search identified 2354 records, of which 7 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in the qualitative synthesis, with the majority presenting an unclear risk of bias. Orthodontic relapse was shown to decrease with the administration of pamidronate disodium, atorvastatin, aspirin, and chemically modified tetracycline-3. Inconsistent effects on relapse were observed after the use of simvastatin. The overall quality of retrieved evidence was assessed as low at best. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence shows that the investigated pharmacological agents may demonstrate variable effects on tooth movement relapse following cessation of orthodontic force. Additional evidence of higher quality is required to draw definitive conclusions on their effects and to make potential recommendations for clinical application.

Oral health interventions for people living with mental disorders: protocol for a realist systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The increasing number of people who experience mental disorders is a global problem. People with mental disorders have high rates of co-morbidity and significantly poorer oral health outcomes than the general public. However, their oral health remains largely a hidden and neglected issue. A complex range of factors impact the oral health of this group. These include anxiety and dental phobia, dietary habits, including the heavy consumption of sugary drinks, substance misuse of tobacco, alcohol, and/or psychostimulants, the adverse orofacial side effects of anti-psychotic and anti-depression medications, and financial, geographic, and social barriers to accessing oral health care. METHODS: The aim of this realist systematic review is to (a) identify and synthesise evidence that explores oral health interventions for people living with mental disorders; (b) explore the context and mechanisms that have contributed to the success of interventions or the barriers and challenges; (c) produce program theories on causal, contextual and mechanistic factors to facilitate outcomes and (d) produce recommendations and guidelines to guide future oral health interventions for people with mental disorders at both the policy and practice level. Using a five-step process, that incorporates primary data collection from key stakeholders, a beginning theoretical framework will be developed to describe contextual and mechanistic factors and how they might impact on the success or failure of oral health interventions for people with mental disorders. Key database searches will be conducted, with data extraction focused on the factors that might have impacted on intervention implementation and outcomes. Quality appraisal of studies will occur, and the theoretical framework will be populated with extracted data. Stakeholder input will support the development and refinement of a theory on oral health interventions for people with mental disorders. DISCUSSION: This will be the first review to take a realist approach to explore the broad scope of causal factors that impact on the success or failure of oral health interventions for people with mental disorders. The approach includes extensive stakeholder engagement and will advance realist systematic review methodology. Review outcomes will be important in guiding policy and practice to ensure oral health interventions better meet the needs of people with mental disorders.Systematic review registration This review protocol is registered with PROSPERO (Number) 155969.