Phase I dose-escalation study and population pharmacokinetic analysis of fixed dose rate gemcitabine plus carboplatin as second-line therapy in patients with ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This phase I study of fixed dose rate (FDR) gemcitabine and carboplatin assessed the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), safety, pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) profile and preliminary anti-tumor activity in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC). METHODS: Patients with recurrent OC after first line treatment were treated with carboplatin and FDR gemcitabine (infusion speed 10mg/m(2)/min) on days 1, 8 and 15, every 28 days. Pharmacokinetics included measurement of platinum concentrations in plasma ultrafiltrate (pUF) and plasma concentrations of gemcitabine (dFdC) and metabolite dFdU. Intracellular levels of dFdC triphosphate (dFdC-TP), the most active metabolite of gemcitabine, were determined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation were performed to further investigate the optimal schedule. RESULTS: Twenty three patients were enrolled. Initial dose escalation was performed using FDR gemcitabine 300 mg/m(2) (administered at infusion speed of 10 mg/m(2)/min) combined with carboplatin AUC 2.5 and 3. Excessive bone marrow toxicity led to a modified dose escalation schedule: carboplatin AUC 2 and dose escalation of FDR gemcitabine (300 mg/m(2), 450 mg/m(2), 600 mg/m(2) and 800 mg/m(2)). DLT criteria as defined per protocol prior to the study were not met with carboplatin AUC 2 in combination with FDR gemcitabine 300-800 mg/m(2) because of myelosuppressive dose-holds (especially thrombocytopenia and neutropenia). CONCLUSIONS: FDR gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin administered in this 28 days schedule resulted in increased grade 3/4 toxicity compared to conventional 30-minute infused gemcitabine. A two weekly schedule (chemotherapy on days 1 and 8) would be more appropriate.

Renal glucose handling: impact of chronic kidney disease and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition in patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Ipragliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, stimulates glycosuria and lowers glycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacodynamics of ipragliflozin in T2DM patients with impaired renal function. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Glycosuria was measured before and after a single ipragliflozin dose in 8 nondiabetic subjects and 57 T2DM patients (age 62 ± 9 years, fasting glucose 133 ± 39 mg/dL, mean ± SD) with normal renal function (assessed as the estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) (eGFR1 ≥90 mL · min(-1) · 1.73 m(-2)), mild (eGFR2 ≥60 to <90), moderate (eGFR3 ≥30 to <60), or severe reduction in eGFR (eGFR4 ≤15 to <30). RESULTS: Ipragliflozin significantly increased urinary glucose excretion in each eGFR class (P < 0.0001). However, ipragliflozin-induced glycosuria declined (median [IQR]) across eGFR class (from 46 mg/min [33] in eGFR1 to 8 mg/min [7] in eGFR4, P < 0.001). Ipragliflozin-induced fractional glucose excretion (excretion/filtration) was 39% [27] in the T2DM patients (pooled data), similar to that of the nondiabetic subjects (37% [17], P = ns). In bivariate analysis of the pooled data, ipragliflozin-induced glycosuria was directly related to eGFR and fasting glucose (P < 0.0001 for both, r(2) = 0.55), predicting a decrement in 24-h glycosuria of 15 g for each 20 mL/min decline in eGFR and an increase of 7 g for each 10 mg/dL increase in glucose above fasting normoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: In T2DM patients, ipragliflozin increases glycosuria in direct, linear proportion to GFR and degree of hyperglycemia, such that its amount can be reliably predicted in the individual patient. Although absolute glycosuria decreases with declining GFR, the efficiency of ipragliflozin action (fractional glucose excretion) is maintained in patients with severe renal impairment.

Combination treatment with ipragliflozin and metformin: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Ipragliflozin (ASP1941) is a selective sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor in clinical development for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to evaluate the safety profile and tolerability of ipragliflozin as a glucose-lowering agent in combination with stable metformin therapy in patients with T2DM. A secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of ipragliflozin on the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of metformin. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with T2DM stable on metformin therapy (850, 1000, or 1500 mg bid) were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive ipragliflozin (300 mg qd; n = 18) or matching placebo (n = 18) for 14 days. Safety profiles, including monitoring of hypoglycemic events, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), laboratory measurements, and vital signs were assessed throughout the study. The PK properties of metformin and ipragliflozin were determined in plasma. The geometric mean ratio and its 90% CI for the maximum plasma concentration and AUC(0-10) were calculated for metformin + ipragliflozin (day 14) versus metformin alone (day -1). Pharmacodynamic properties were assessed by measurement of urinary glucose excretion over 24 hours (UGE(0-24)). RESULTS: All the TEAEs, except 1, were mild. Fifteen TEAEs were observed in the ipragliflozin group (7 of 18 patients [38.9%]), and 19 TEAEs were observed in the placebo group in (8 of 18 patients [44.4%]). Treatment-related TEAEs were reported by 3 of 18 patients (16.7%) receiving metformin + ipragliflozin and by 5 of 18 patients (27.8%) receiving metformin + placebo. No hypoglycemic events (blood glucose level <54 mg/L [to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0555]) were observed. The geometric mean ratios for C(max) and AUC(0-10) of metformin + ipragliflozin versus metformin alone were 1.11 (90% CI, 1.03-1.19) and 1.18 (90% CI, 1.08-1.28), respectively. After ipragliflozin treatment, UGE(0-24) on day 14 (74.9 g) was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (3.6 g) and at baseline (3.3 g). CONCLUSIONS: Combination treatment for 14 days with ipragliflozin and metformin was well tolerated in patients withT2DM without hypoglycemia. The addition of ipragliflozin (300 mg qd) to metformin therapy did not result in a clinically relevant change in the PK properties of metformin. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01302145.

Effect of Ipragliflozin (ASP1941), a novel selective sodium-dependent glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, on urinary glucose excretion in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycaemia is associated with serious complications, significant morbidity and death. Despite the availability of a wide range of therapeutic options, many patients with diabetes mellitus fail to achieve or maintain recommended glycaemic goals. Ipragliflozin (ASP1941) is a novel, selective inhibitor of the sodium-dependent glucose co-transporter 2, which is highly expressed in the proximal tubules of the kidneys. It suppresses renal glucose reabsorption and increases urinary glucose excretion (UGE), potentially providing an insulin-independent treatment option for type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This multiple ascending-dose study assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ipragliflozin in healthy subjects after single doses and multiple once-daily doses for 10 days (dose levels: 5-600 mg). RESULTS: Ipragliflozin was well tolerated following single and multiple once-daily oral dosing. Ipragliflozin was rapidly absorbed with a median time to reach the maximum plasma concentration of 1.3 hours after the last dose. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve increased proportionally with increasing dose. The mean elimination half-life was 12 hours following the last dose. Ipragliflozin dose dependently increased UGE up to a maximum of approximately 59 g (327 mmol) of glucose excreted over 24 hours following multiple doses, without affecting plasma glucose levels in healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: Administration of ipragliflozin was well tolerated and resulted in a rapid, dose-dependent increase in glucosuria. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data suggest that ipragliflozin is suitable for prolonged once-daily oral treatment.

Clinical and pharmacologic study of the novel prodrug delimotecan (MEN 4901/T-0128) in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To investigate i.v. administration of delimotecan (MEN 4901/T-0128), a carboxymethyldextran polymer prodrug of the active camptothecin derivative T-2513, and to assess the maximum tolerated dose, safety profile, clinical pharmacology, and antitumor activity of delimotecan and metabolites. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with solid tumors refractory to standard therapy received i.v. delimotecan as 3-hour infusion once every 6 weeks. The starting dose was 150 mg/m2, followed by an accelerated dose escalation with at least one patient per dose level. The pharmacokinetics of delimotecan, T-2513, and its metabolites, SN-38, SN-38G, T-1335, T-0055, and T-3921, were assessed in plasma and urine, and their pharmacodynamics were determined by measuring the effect of the treatment on hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received 35 courses. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed at 5,400 mg/m2 (n = 1), 3,600 mg/m2 (n = 1), and 2,400 mg/m2 (n = 2). The dose level of 1,800 mg/m2 was determined as maximum tolerated dose. Two partial responses were observed in patients with anal cancer (1800 mg/m2) and head and neck cancer (2400 mg/m2). Delimotecan had a long terminal half-life of 109 h, and relatively high exposures to T-2513 and SN-38 were obtained. The percentage decrease in WBC and absolute neutrophil count significantly correlated with the dose of delimotecan. CONCLUSIONS: Based on its preliminary antitumor activity, safety profile, and pharmacokinetic profile, we recommend to evaluate delimotecan given as 3-hour infusion once every 6 weeks at a dose level of 1,800 mg/m2 in a phase II study.

New insights into the pharmacology and cytotoxicity of gemcitabine and 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine.

In a clinical study with oral gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine, dFdC), 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) was extensively formed and accumulated after multiple oral dosing. Here, we have investigated the in vitro cytotoxicity, cellular uptake, efflux, biotransformation, and nucleic acid incorporation of dFdC and dFdU. Short-term and long-term cytotoxicity assays were used to assess the cytotoxicity of dFdC and dFdU in human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2, human lung carcinoma A549, and Madin-Darby canine kidney cell lines transfected with the human concentrative or equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hCNT1 or hENT1), or empty vector. Radiolabeled dFdC and dFdU were used to determine cellular uptake, efflux, biotransformation, and incorporation into DNA and RNA. The compounds dFdC, dFdU, and their phosphorylated metabolites were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV and radioisotope detection. dFdU monophosphate, diphosphate, and triphosphate (dFdU-TP) were formed from dFdC and dFdU. dFdU-TP was incorporated into DNA and RNA. The area under the intracellular concentration-time curve of dFdC-TP and dFdU-TP and their extent of incorporation into DNA and RNA inversely correlated with the IC(50) of dFdC and dFdU, respectively. The cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of dFdU were significantly enhanced by hCNT1. dFdU inhibited cell cycle progression and its cytotoxicity significantly increased with longer duration of exposure. dFdU is taken up into cells with high affinity by hCNT1 and phosphorylated to its dFdU-TP metabolite. dFdU-TP is incorporated into DNA and RNA, which correlated with dFdU cytotoxicity. These data provide strong evidence that dFdU can significantly contribute to the cytotoxicity of dFdC.

Oral administration of gemcitabine in patients with refractory tumors: a clinical and pharmacologic study.

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicity, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antitumor activity of oral gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine; dFdC) in patients with cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced or metastatic cancer refractory to standard therapy were eligible. Gemcitabine was administered p.o. starting at 1 mg once daily using dose escalation with three patients per dose level. Patients received one of two dosing schemes: (a) once daily dosing for 14 days of a 21-day cycle or (b) every other day dosing for 21 days of a 28-day cycle. Pharmacokinetics were assessed by measuring concentrations of dFdC and 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) in plasma and gemcitabine triphosphate in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and pharmacodynamics by measuring the effect on T-cell proliferation. RESULTS: Thirty patients entered the study. Oral gemcitabine was generally well-tolerated. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Mainly moderate gastrointestinal toxicities occurred except for one patient who died after experiencing grade 4 hepatic failure during cycle two. One patient with a leiomyosarcoma had stable disease during 2 years and 7 months. Systemic exposure to dFdC was low with an estimated bioavailability of 10%. dFdC was highly converted to dFdU, probably via first pass metabolism and dFdU had a long terminal half-life ( approximately 89 h). Concentrations of dFdCTP in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were low, but high levels of gemcitabine triphosphate, the phosphorylated metabolite of dFdU, were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic exposure to oral gemcitabine was low due to extensive first-pass metabolism to dFdU. Moderate toxicity combined with hints of activity warrant further investigation of the concept of prolonged exposure to gemcitabine.

Extensive metabolism and hepatic accumulation of gemcitabine after multiple oral and intravenous administration in mice.

In a clinical study with oral gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine, dFdC), we found that gemcitabine was hepatotoxic and extensively metabolized to 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) after continuous oral dosing. The main metabolite dFdU had a long terminal half-life after oral administration. Our hypothesis was that dFdU and/or phosphorylated metabolites of gemcitabine accumulated in the liver after multiple oral dosing. In this study, mice were treated with oral or i.v. dFdC at a single dose (1qdx1d) or at multiple doses once daily for 7 days (1qdx7d) or seven times daily (7qdx1d). Blood, liver, kidneys, and lungs were collected at several time points. Urine samples were collected after i.v. dFdC, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected 7qdx1d dosing of dFdC. The nucleosides dFdC and dFdU as well as the nucleotides gemcitabine monophosphate (dFdC-MP), diphosphate, and triphosphate (dFdC-TP) and dFdU monophosphate, diphosphate (dFdU-DP), and triphosphate (dFdU-TP) were simultaneously quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and radioisotope detection. We demonstrate that phosphorylated metabolites of both dFdC and dFdU are formed in mice, primarily consisting of dFdC-MP, dFdC-TP, and dFdU-TP. Multiple dosing of dFdC leads to substantial hepatic and renal accumulation of dFdC-TP and dFdU-TP, which have a more pronounced liver accumulation after oral than after i.v. dosing. The presence of dFdC-MP, dFdC-TP, and dFdU-TP in plasma and urine suggests efflux of these potentially toxic metabolites. Our results show that dFdU, dFdC-TP, and dFdU-TP accumulate in the liver after multiple dosing of dFdC in mice and might be associated with hepatotoxicity of oral dFdC in patients.

Prolonged versus standard gemcitabine infusion: translation of molecular pharmacology to new treatment strategy.

Gemcitabine is frequently used in the treatment of patients with solid tumors. Gemcitabine is taken up into the cell via human nucleoside transporters (hNTs) and is intracellularly phosphorylated by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) to its monophosphate and subsequently into its main active triphosphate metabolite 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine triphosphate (dFdCTP), which is incorporated into DNA and inhibits DNA synthesis. In addition, gemcitabine is extensively deaminated to 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine, which is largely excreted into the urine. High expression levels of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter type 1 were associated with a significantly longer overall survival duration after gemcitabine treatment in patients with pancreatic cancer. Clinical studies in blood mononuclear and leukemic cells demonstrated that a lower infusion rate of gemcitabine was associated with higher intracellular dFdCTP levels. Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine at a fixed dose rate (FDR) of 10 mg/m2 per minute was associated with a higher intracellular accumulation of dFdCTP, greater toxicity, and a higher response rate than with the standard 30-minute infusion of gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer. In the current review, we discuss the molecular pharmacology of nucleoside analogues and the influence of hNTs and dCK on the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine, which is the basis for clinical studies on FDR administration, and the results of FDR gemcitabine administration in patients. These findings might aid optimal clinical application of gemcitabine in the future.

A phase I safety and pharmacologic study of a twice weekly dosing regimen of the oral taxane BMS-275183.

PURPOSE: BMS-275183, an orally administered C-4 methyl carbonate paclitaxel analogue, showed promising activity in a phase I trial investigating a weekly treatment regimen, but was associated with a relatively high incidence of neuropathic side effects. The current dose escalation phase I trial was initiated to investigate whether twice weekly administration of BMS-275183 would improve its safety and tolerability. Additionally, the pharmacokinetics and possible antitumor activity were studied. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A cycle consisted of 4 weeks (i.e., eight twice weekly oral doses). The starting dose was 60 mg/m(2) and the dose was increased by 20 mg/m(2) increments. Cohorts consisted of three patients and were expanded to at least six patients when toxicity was encountered. Plasma pharmacokinetics were done on days 1 and 15. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were enrolled. The maximum tolerated dose was 100 mg/m(2) twice weekly. Seventeen patients were treated at the maximum tolerated dose; 3 of 17 patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity, consisting of a combination of neutropenia, neuropathy, and diarrhea. BMS-275183 seemed to have a considerably lower incidence of neuropathic side effects compared with the weekly treatment regimen. Confirmed partial responses were observed in two patients with non-small cell lung cancer, one patient with prostate cancer, and one patient with melanoma. In addition, a long-lasting prostate-specific antigen response was observed in a patient with prostate carcinoma with nonmeasurable disease. CONCLUSIONS: BMS-275183 is preferably given in a twice weekly regimen and has considerable antitumor activity. A phase II trial in non-small cell lung cancer using the twice weekly schedule has been initiated.