The health care experience of adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis and influence of PNPLA3: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a progressive form of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, for which there is limited information about patient experience, including the patient journey. METHODS: In this study, we conducted interviews with patients with MASH to qualitatively evaluate the patient journey and help elucidate the experiences of this patient population. We also investigated if the patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 (PNPLA3) I148M variant (non-Hispanic) or being of Hispanic ethnicity may influence patient experiences because these 2 subgroups develop advanced liver disease more frequently than other patient groups. RESULTS: One-to-one interviews were conducted with 28 adults (with PNPLA3 I148M genetic variant, n = 10; Hispanic, n = 8) living in the United States who had been diagnosed with MASH with liver fibrosis. Patients were asked open-ended questions about their experiences before, at, and after their diagnosis. The data collected found that patients experienced a long process of misdiagnoses before their diagnosis of MASH, a lack of clear information provided by clinicians, and limited accessibility to support groups. Hispanic patients reported "impact on family/friends" (75%) and "fear of disease progression" (75%) more frequently than the other patient cohorts interviewed. This is the first report of "fear of progression" in patients with MASH. No patients who were White and had the PNPLA3 I148M variant reported nausea/vomiting, in contrast to other patient cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative study identified key aspects of the patient journey that are important for clinical providers and medical teams to recognize. We also propose a new algorithm that could be developed to help screen relatives of patients who are found to carry the PNPLA3 I148M variant.

The Bronchiectasis Exacerbation Diary: a novel patient-reported outcome for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.

Bronchiectasis is a chronic, progressive lung disease believed to result from a vicious cycle of infection and inflammation, with symptoms of chronic cough with sputum production, chronic fatigue, rhinosinusitis, chest pain, breathlessness and haemoptysis. There are currently no established instruments to monitor daily symptoms and exacerbations for use in clinical trials. Following a literature review and three expert clinician interviews, we conducted concept elicitation interviews with 20 patients with bronchiectasis to understand their personal disease experience. Findings from literature and clinician feedback were used to develop a draft version of the Bronchiectasis Exacerbation Diary (BED), which was designed to monitor key symptoms on a daily basis and during exacerbations. Patients were eligible to be interviewed if they were US residents aged ≥18 years, had a computed tomography scan-confirmed diagnosis of bronchiectasis with ≥two exacerbations in the previous 2 years and had no other uncontrolled respiratory conditions. Four waves of five patient interviews each were conducted. Patients (n=20) had a mean±SD age of 53.9±12.8 years, and most were female (85%) and white (85%). A total of 33 symptoms and 23 impacts arose from the patient concept elicitation interviews. The BED was revised and finalised based upon patient feedback. The final BED is a novel, eight-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for monitoring key exacerbation symptoms on a daily basis with content validity established through comprehensive qualitative research and direct patient insight. The BED PRO development framework will be completed following psychometric evaluations of the data from a phase 3 bronchiectasis clinical trial.

A qualitative patient interview study to understand the experience of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

NASH is a potentially progressive form of NAFLD characterized by hepatocyte injury and liver inflammation which can cause fibrosis. Currently, there are limited data on the patient experience of NASH. Our aim was to use both literature review and patient interviews to understand the signs/symptoms and life impacts of NASH fibrosis stages F1-F4 that are important to patients, as well as begin to investigate the applicability of an instrument (ie, questionnaire) that may be used to capture patients' experiences. The literature review identified concepts (signs/symptoms and impacts) related to NASH fibrosis stages F1-F4 and the NASH-specific patient-reported outcome instrument (NASH-CHECK) for reporting patient experience of NASH. Interviews with 22 patients from Canada and the USA with NASH fibrosis stages F1-F4 revealed 27 signs/symptoms and 32 impacts that they felt were important, including fatigue, pain in the abdomen, worry, and frustration. Three concepts reported during patient interviews were not identified in the literature review. No concepts appeared to be exclusive to a specific fibrosis stage or presence/absence of obesity and no linear trends were identified between fibrosis stage or presence/absence of obesity and level of disturbance reported for concepts. The patient interviews supported the concepts included in the NASH-CHECK overall, demonstrating that it could be used to report the patient experience of NASH fibrosis stages F1-F4. Interviews with patients with NASH fibrosis stages F1-F4 revealed patients can self-report and elaborate on signs/symptoms and impacts related to the disease regardless of fibrosis stage. The NASH-CHECK was identified as a suitable instrument that could be used by patients with fibrosis stages F1-F4.

Development of the Patient- and Observer-Reported PRUCISION Instruments to Assess Pruritus and Sleep Disturbance in Pediatric Patients with Cholestatic Liver Diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding how patients experience their disease is a vital step in optimal disease management, and patient- and observer-reported outcome (PRO and ObsRO, respectively) measures can add important details to clinical information that is obtained as novel treatments are developed. Instruments that measure meaningful symptoms and impacts from the perspective of pediatric patients with cholestatic liver disease or their caregivers are needed. This study aimed to identify salient concepts in pediatric cholestatic liver disease, develop novel PRO and ObsRO instruments, and establish the instruments' content validity. METHODS: Relevant signs, symptoms, and impacts of cholestatic liver disease were identified through a literature review, interviews with expert clinicians, and concept elicitation interviews with children and caregivers of children who had progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC), Alagille syndrome, biliary atresia, or primary sclerosing cholangitis. Additional cognitive debriefing interviews with patients and caregivers were performed to ensure that participants could understand the instructions, questions, and response scales of the PRO and ObsRO instruments, with modifications made as necessary to improve comprehension and/or usability. RESULTS: A total of 36 interviews with patients and caregivers were conducted. Pruritus and sleep disturbance (e.g., difficulty falling or staying asleep due to itch) were identified as the most problematic symptom and significant impact, respectively, of the pediatric cholestatic liver diseases assessed. The ObsRO and PRO instruments, called PRUCISION, focus on these key disease features in the morning and evening. Several modifications were made to the draft instruments following cognitive interviews. The final PRUCISION PRO and ObsRO measures are designed as an electronic diary to be completed twice daily. The response scales include pictorial, verbal, and numeric scales. CONCLUSION: Novel PRO and ObsRO PRUCISION instruments were created that evaluate the patient experience of cholestatic pruritus in children with PFIC and other cholestatic liver diseases. The content validity of the PRUCISION instruments is established.

Bile, a greenish liquid that is made in the liver, is released into the gut to help digest food. In cholestatic liver disease (CLD), bile flow is interrupted, and bile can build up in the body. One potential effect of this buildup is pruritus, or itchiness of the skin, which can be so intense that it interferes with daily activities. In this study, interviews were done with doctors, patients, and their caregivers to develop new tools to evaluate the most impactful symptoms of CLD in children. After interviewing five doctors and 36 patients and caregivers, two questionnaires called PRUCISION were developed and refined. During this process, participants were first asked about the frequency, severity, duration, and impact of their or their child's symptoms; pruritus was identified as the most common and disruptive symptom associated with CLD, even interfering with sleep. Then, the wording of the questionnaires was modified to make them easier to understand, particularly for younger children. The researchers also had patients do a card-sorting task to ensure that they understood the picture-based responses used in the questionnaires. Finally, more details were added to the instructions for caregivers to more clearly define scratching behaviors. In summary, the questionnaires developed in this study include the perspective of the patient or their caregiver and may be useful to see if new treatments can impact the most prominent symptoms and impacts associated with CLD.

Patient Global Impression of Benefit-Risk (PGI-BR): Incorporating Patients' Views of Clinical Benefit-Risk into Assessment of New Medicines.

INTRODUCTION: There is a need to understand how patients assess perceived benefits and risks of treatments. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to (i) elucidate how patients evaluate treatment experiences and (ii) develop a brief patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for use across disease areas for perceived benefit-risk evaluation of a new medicine in a clinical trial setting. METHODS: Concepts relating to patient-perceived benefit-risk were identified from literature reviews and qualitative concept elicitation interviews with patients across a variety of primary medical conditions. Draft instrument items were developed from identified concepts and evaluated for clarity, relevance and appropriateness of response options in cognitive interviews. Items were iteratively revised to address patient feedback. RESULTS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 47 patients (primary condition: 20 oncological, 12 respiratory, 10 metabolic, 5 cardiovascular), of whom 32 contributed to concept elicitation and 42 to cognitive debriefing. Elicited concepts could be grouped into four medication-related categories: effectiveness of treatment, burden of side effects, convenience of use and overall acceptance/satisfaction. Cost, trial experience and altruism were additional concept categories unrelated to medication. The final instrument contained one item each on the medication's effectiveness, side effects and convenience, and an overall item capturing patient benefit-risk assessment. An upfront question was included to separate out non-medication aspects of patients' experiences. CONCLUSION: We developed a brief PRO instrument, the Patient Global Impression of Benefit-Risk (PGI-BR), which can be applied across disease areas to assess patient views of benefit-risk of a new medicine in the clinical trial setting.