Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
1.
Curr Oncol ; 20(5): 258-64, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24155630

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Small-cell carcinomas (sccs) of the genitourinary (gu) tract are rare systemic diseases, and there is no standard treatment strategy for patients with this malignancy. The objectives of the present study were to report the management and outcome of patients with scc of the gu tract treated at a tertiary-care institution from 1982 to 2009. METHODS: In a chart review of all patients diagnosed with scc of the gu tract between 1982 and 2009, data on demographics, clinical and pathologic characteristics, treatment, and patient outcomes were collected. RESULTS: The 58 patients identified had scc in the following primary sites: urinary bladder (n = 35), prostate (n = 17), and upper urinary tract (n = 6). In 38 patients (66%), the scc was of pure histology; in the remainder, histology was mixed. Overall, 28 patients had limited-stage disease; 24 had extensive-stage disease; and staging was unknown in 6 patients. Median survival for the entire cohort was 7.5 months, with extensive-stage disease being identified as a poor prognostic factor (survival was 22.0 months for limited-stage patients and 4.1 months for extensive-stage patients, p < 0.001). Based on site, prostate patients fared worst, with a median survival of only 5.1 months. Compared with best supportive care, treatment was associated with better outcomes (median survival: 12.3 months vs. 2.3 months, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Small-cell cancer of the gu tract is an aggressive cancer, with a poor prognosis overall. Although there is no standard of care, patients should be treated using a multimodality approach analogous to that used in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer.

2.
Ann Oncol ; 23(1): 53-58, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21765178

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical activity of patupilone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had progressive disease within 6 months of receiving docetaxel. Patupilone was administered 10 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a confirmed≥50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were enrolled. At baseline, the median time to progression after prior docetaxel was 1.4 months (range 0-5.7). Gastrointestinal serious adverse events occurred in four of the six initial patients leading to a reduction of the starting dose of patupilone to 8 mg/m2 for subsequent patients. Grade 3-4 toxicity at this dose included diarrhea (22%), fatigue (21%), and anorexia (10%). One patient experienced grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity. A PSA decline of ≥50% occurred in 47% of patients. A partial measurable disease response occurred in 24% of assessable patients. A patient-reported pain response was observed in 59% of assessable patients. Median time to PSA progression was 6.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.7-8.0] and median overall survival was 11.3 months (95% CI 9.8-15.4). CONCLUSIONS: Patupilone at 8 mg/m2 was tolerable, had antitumor activity, and was associated with symptomatic improvement in patients previously treated with docetaxel.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Epotilonas/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canadá , Castração , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Docetaxel , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Taxoides/uso terapêutico
3.
Curr Oncol ; 18 Suppl 2: S11-9, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21969807

RESUMO

Traditionally, overall survival (os) has been considered the "gold standard" for evaluating new systemic oncologic therapies, because death is easy to define, is easily compared across disease sites, and is not subject to investigator bias. However, as the available options for continuing therapy increase, the use of os as a clinical trial endpoint has become problematic because of the increasing crossover and contamination of trials. As a result, the approval of promising new therapies may be delayed.Many clinicians believe that progression-free survival (pfs) is a more viable option for evaluating new therapies in metastatic and advanced renal cell carcinoma. As with all endpoints, pfs has inherent biases, and those biases must be addressed to ensure that trial results are not compromised and that they will be accepted by regulatory authorities. In this paper, we examine the issues surrounding the use of pfs as a clinical trial endpoint, and we suggest solutions to ensure that data integrity is maintained.

4.
Can J Urol ; 14(5): 3692-6, 2007 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17949524

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of etoposide dose in a 3-day cisplatin/etoposide/bleomycin (PEB) regimen on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives were to determine the impact of a paclitaxel-based salvage regimen on OS and to compare the risk distribution of germ cell patients seen at a tertiary care center to that quoted in the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCC). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all 302 metastatic germ cell patients requiring cisplatin-based chemotherapy between January 1980 and December 2004 was conducted. Data collected on initial treatment included the dose of etoposide: 500 mg/m2/cycle (E500) or 360 mg/m2/cycle (E360) and whether the salvage treatment contained paclitaxel or not. PFS and OS were calculated. Patients were risk stratified as per IGCCC variables. RESULTS: The relapse rate and overall survival for E500 was 3% and 97% respectively compared to a relapse rate and OS rate of 29% and 80% respectively for E360. The addition of paclitaxel to salvage chemotherapy regimens for patients that relapsed results were 1/5 (20%) of patients dying compared to 26/39 (67%) for those who received a non-paclitaxel based salvage regimen. Ninety percent of seminoma patients were good risk and 10% were intermediate risk. Non-seminoma (NSGCT) patients were skewed to the good-risk category: 71% good risk, 10% intermediate risk and 18% poor risk as compared to 56%, 28% and 16% respectively as reported by the IGCCC. Five-year PFS and OS were comparable to those documented by the IGCCC with the exception of the intermediate risk NSGCT patients. CONCLUSION: This review demonstrated that PEB treatment containing higher dose etoposide was superior in terms of PFS and OS. Although the sample size was small, it appeared that paclitaxel containing salvage regimens resulted in superior outcomes compared to previously used salvage regimens. Our center had a similar risk distribution of patients as that quoted by the IGCCC.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/administração & dosagem , Etoposídeo/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamento farmacológico , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Bleomicina/uso terapêutico , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Masculino , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia de Salvação , Prevenção Secundária , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
J Urol ; 176(1): 91-5, 2006 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16753376

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Men with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy have few therapeutic options other than androgen deprivation therapy. Targeted therapies in this group are appropriate because the optimal timing of the initiation of hormonal therapy in this patient population is unknown. A single institution pilot trial was performed using BLP25 liposome vaccine in hormone naïve patients with prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy to determine if prostate specific antigen progression could be halted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy were enrolled. Primary end points were efficacy and safety of the MUC1 BLP25 liposomal vaccine. Changes in prostate specific antigen doubling time were also evaluated. Patients received a single intravenous dose of cyclophosphamide, followed by vaccinations with BLP25 liposome vaccine for up to 1 year. Prostate specific antigen was measured at baseline and during treatment, and prostate specific antigen doubling time was calculated for these intervals. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients with a median age of 60 years were enrolled. All patients received cyclophosphamide and 15 of 16 completed the primary treatment period. Ten patients completed the maintenance period. After the 8-week primary treatment period 8 of 16 patients had stable or decreased prostate specific antigen. At the last on-study prostate specific antigen measurement 1 patient maintained stable prostate specific antigen but all others had progression. However, 6 of the 16 patients had greater than 50% prolongation of prostate specific antigen doubling time compared to pre-study prostate specific antigen doubling time. CONCLUSIONS: BLP25 liposome vaccine shows promise for prolonging prostate specific antigen doubling time in hormone naïve men with biochemical failure after prostatectomy and little morbidity. This could potentially translate into the deferral of hormonal therapy. Further testing in this population of patients is warranted.


Assuntos
Vacinas Anticâncer/uso terapêutico , Mucina-1/imunologia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Idoso , Vacinas Anticâncer/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Lipossomos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Falha de Tratamento
6.
J Clin Oncol ; 21(17): 3335-42, 2003 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12947070

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the incidence of palliative response in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC) treated with mitoxantrone and prednisone (MP) plus clodronate with that of patients treated with MP plus placebo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men with HRPC, bone metastases, and bone pain were randomly assigned to receive clodronate 1,500 mg administered intravenously (IV) or placebo every 3 weeks, in combination with mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks and prednisone 5 mg orally bid. Patients completed the present pain intensity (PPI) index and Prostate Cancer-Specific Quality-of-Life Instrument at each treatment visit and used a diary to record analgesic use on a daily basis. The primary end point was a reduction to zero or of two points in the PPI or a decrease of 50% in analgesic intake, without increase in either. RESULTS: The study accrued 209 eligible patients over 44 months. One hundred sixty patients (77%) had mild PPI scores (1 or 2), and 49 (24%) had moderate PPI scores (3 or 4). The primary end point of palliative response was achieved in 46 (46%) of 104 patients on the clodronate arm and in 41 (39%) of 105 patients on the placebo arm (P =.54). The median duration of response, symptomatic disease progression-free survival, overall survival, and overall quality of life were similar between the arms. Subgroup analysis suggested possible benefit in patients with more severe pain. CONCLUSION: MP provides useful palliation in symptomatic men with HRPC. Clodronate does not increase the rate of palliative response or overall quality of life. Clodronate may be beneficial to patients who have moderate pain, but this requires further confirmation.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Dor/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Ácido Clodrônico/administração & dosagem , Progressão da Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mitoxantrona/administração & dosagem , Medição da Dor , Cuidados Paliativos , Prednisona/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Qualidade de Vida , Análise de Regressão , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 51(1): 23-30, 2001 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11516847

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Population-based cancer registries can permit the study of the survivorship of all patients with a particular diagnosis regardless of patterns of referral and practice within a specific geographic distribution. The purpose of this study is to describe the patterns of care, outcome, and prognostic factors for bladder cancer in the northern region of the province of Alberta, Canada, between 1984 and 1993. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1984 and 1993, 184 patients from northern Alberta were identified from the Alberta Cancer Registry as having undergone curative treatment for biopsy-proven muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Data were obtained, by retrospective chart review, regarding the staging, pathology, treatment, and outcome of patients treated in the northern Alberta cities of Edmonton, Grande Prairie, and Red Deer, regardless of the responsible treating institution. The prognostic significance of patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related variables were tested using univariate and multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional-hazard model. RESULTS: As the primary treatment modality, 74 patients (40%) received radical radiotherapy (RT) without surgery; surgery was used alone in 81 patients (44%), and was combined with preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy in 29 patients (16%). Seventy-three (40%) patients also received concurrent, neoadjuvant, or adjuvant chemotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of median survival was 2.2 years, and the 5-year overall survival was 30%. Univariate analysis demonstrated the prognostic significance of T classification (p < 0.001), lymph node involvement (p < 0.001), complete response to RT (p = 0.001), hydronephrosis (p = 0.017), and vascular/lymphatic involvement (p = 0.035). Multivariate analysis revealed the following to have a significant association with survival: T classification (p = 0.001), lymph node involvement (p = 0.004), complete response to RT (p = 0.054), hydronephrosis (p = 0.019), and use of chemotherapy in the treatment regimen (p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: The strongest prognostic factors in this study were tumor related, and no significant differences in survival were detected between patients treated with primary surgery vs. organ-preservation approaches. A survival advantage associated with the incorporation of chemotherapy into the management schema was detected on multivariate, but not univariate, analysis. Stratification of patients based on tumor characteristics is imperative in clinical trials for invasive bladder cancer. Novel treatment approaches are required to improve survival further in patients with apparently localized disease.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/terapia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise de Variância , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Terapia Combinada , Cistectomia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Radioterapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia
8.
BJU Int ; 86(6): 613-8, 2000 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11069364

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of using an historical maximum spontaneous regression rate (reportedly 0-1.1% in those with lung metastases after nephrectomy) in clinical trials of treatments for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as the eligibility criteria for most studies will select patients with better performance status (and thus excluding those who are unlikely to respond) and more modern staging methods would potentially reduce the number of false-positives. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicentre randomized,placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was recently completed in which 197 patients with metastatic RCC from 17 study centres across Canada were randomized to receive placebo or recombinant interferon gamma-1b (60 microg/m2) subcutaneously once every 7 days until disease progression. All tumour responses were validated by an independent response committee unaware of the treatment. RESULTS: The median (95% confidence interval) overall response rate (complete, CR, and partial, PR) for those on interferon-gamma was 4 (1.4-11.5)% and for those on placebo was 6 (2. 5-13.2)% (P = 0.75). In the six patients who were receiving placebo the CR and PR (three each) was considered to represent spontaneous remission. Of these six patients (aged 44-64 years) five had undergone nephrectomy, one a tumour embolization, four had clear cell carcinoma and one an adenocarcinoma, and all had regression of lung and/or lymph node metastases. CONCLUSION: The lack of efficacy of interferon-gamma in this trial underlines the importance of continued research to identify alternative therapeutic agents or combinations of agents in phase II studies. However, the threshold response rate for initiating phase III trials should be increased to 18% in the phase II trials, i.e. three times the response rate on placebo.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/terapia , Interferon gama/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Placebos , Adulto , Carcinoma de Células Renais/secundário , Intervalos de Confiança , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Renais/secundário , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Regressão Neoplásica Espontânea , Proteínas Recombinantes
9.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 19(3): 193-9, 2000 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10760624

RESUMO

Ascites is a common complication of advanced cancer and frequently requires paracentesis to reduce symptoms of pain, anorexia, and dyspnea. For many patients repeat paracenteses are required at short intervals. We prospectively studied 15 patients with recurrent ascites of malignancy to determine if intraperitoneal triamcinolone hexacetonide, a slowly metabolized corticosteroid, produced objective and symptomatic responses. After biochemical, radiological, and symptom assessment and the establishment of the interval between paracenteses, patients underwent large-volume paracentesis followed by intraperitoneal triamcinolone hexacetonide 10 mg/kg. Patients were followed after treatment for assessment of symptoms and physical signs of ascites. Repeat paracentesis was performed when symptomatic ascites recurred. Symptomatic ascites recurred in 13 of 15 patients, but the interval between paracenteses was extended from 9.5 +/- 1.6 days to 17.5 days (P = 0.0086). Symptom questionnaire scores assessing well-being, nausea, abdominal pain, dyspnea, appetite, appearance, and change in abdominal size on a scale from 0 to 6 averaged 3.2 +/- 0.3 at entry and 2.5 +/- 0.2 at the 2-week assessment (P = 0.026). Self-assessed symptoms, feeling of well-being, abdominal distention, and physical appearance improved significantly. The mean serum cortisol decreased from baseline, suggesting that some systemic corticosteroid absorption occurred. Thirteen of 15 patients have died, with a median survival of 42 days. Potential adverse effects included 1 episode each of transient abdominal pain, bacterial peritonitis, and localized herpes zoster infection. In patients with ascites of malignancy, intraperitoneal triamcinolone hexacetonide appears to postpone the requirement for repeat paracentesis and improve symptoms of malignant ascites.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Ascite/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicações , Triancinolona Acetonida/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Ascite/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paracentese , Recidiva
11.
Prostate ; 40(4): 218-24, 1999 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10420149

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Black race has been associated with a significantly increased risk of prostate cancer mortality. This exploratory analysis investigated the effect of race on the clinical outcome of combined androgen blockade (CAB). METHODS: Data for analysis were obtained from a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial comparing CAB in the form of bicalutamide (50 mg once daily) or flutamide (250 mg three times daily) plus luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs (LHRHa; goserelin acetate 3.6 mg, or leuprolide acetate 7.5 mg) in 813 patients with stage D(2) prostate cancer (median follow-up, 160 weeks). Patients were analyzed according to race (African American [AA], white, or other). The primary clinical events were disease progression and survival. RESULTS: Four hundred and four patients received bicalutamide/LHRHa and 409 received flutamide/LHRHa. Although treatment with bicalutamide/LHRHa resulted in slightly longer time to progression and survival time in white and AA males than treatment with flutamide/LHRHa, the differences between the treatment groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: No marked effect of race on clinical outcome was observed regardless of antiandrogen, suggesting that similar treatment benefits are to be expected in either race.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Anilidas/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Flutamida/uso terapêutico , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inibidores , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antagonistas de Androgênios/efeitos adversos , Anilidas/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , População Negra , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Estudos de Coortes , Progressão da Doença , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Flutamida/efeitos adversos , Gosserrelina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Leuprolida/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitrilas , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Compostos de Tosil , População Branca
12.
CMAJ ; 160(2): 225-32, 1999 Jan 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9951446

RESUMO

A 70-year-old man is referred to a urologist for recommendations on the management of metastatic prostate cancer. His cancer was diagnosed 5 years ago, and he underwent radical prostatectomy at that time. The tumour was confined to the prostate gland (Gleason score 7), and during surgery the lymph nodes were assessed as being clear of cancer. Before the surgery, the patient's prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level had been 8 ng/mL. After the prostatectomy, PSA was at first undetectable, but recently the PSA level rose to 2 ng/mL and then, at the most recent test, to 16 ng/mL. A bone scan was ordered to investigate back discomfort, which has been persistent but easily controlled with acetaminophen. Unfortunately, the bone scan shows several sites of metastatic disease. The man's medical history includes type 2 diabetes, which has developed during the past 3 years and which is controlled by diet, as well as asymptomatic hypertension, which is managed by means of a thiazide diuretic. The patient asks what treatments are available, what impact they are likely to have on his disease and what risks are associated with the therapies.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Neoplasias Ósseas/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Idoso , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Masculino , Orquiectomia/métodos , Seleção de Pacientes , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/imunologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
J Clin Oncol ; 16(11): 3576-83, 1998 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9817278

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant methotrexate, cisplatin, and vinblastine (MCV) chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invading bladder cancer treated with selective bladder preservation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-three eligible patients with tumor, node, metastasis system clinical stage T2 to T4aNXMO bladder cancer were randomized to receive (arm 1, n=61 ) two cycles of MCV before 39.6-Gy pelvic irradiation with concurrent cisplatin 100 mg/m2 for two courses 3 weeks apart. Patients assigned to arm 2 (n=62) did not receive MCV before concurrent cisplatin and radiation therapy. Tumor response was scored as a clinical complete response (CR) when the cystoscopic tumor-site biopsy and urine cytology results were negative. The CR patients were treated with an additional 25.2 Gy to a total of 64.8 Gy and one additional dose of cisplatin. Those with less than a CR underwent cystectomy. The median follow-up of all patients who survived is 60 months. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of the patients completed the protocol with, at most, minor deviations; 67% on arm 1 and 81% on arm 2. The actuarial 5-year overall survival rate was 49%; 48% in arm 1 and 49% in arm 2. Thirty-five percent of the patients had evidence of distant metastases at 5 years; 33% in arm 1 and 39% in arm 2. The 5-year survival rate with a functioning bladder was 38%, 36% in arm 1 and 40% in arm 2. None of these differences are statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Two cycles of MCV neoadjuvant chemotherapy were not shown to increase the rate of CR over that achieved with our standard induction therapy or to increase freedom from metastatic disease. There was no impact on 5-year overall survival.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/radioterapia , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Doenças Hematológicas/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Invasividade Neoplásica , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Vimblastina/administração & dosagem
14.
Urology ; 52(1): 82-8, 1998 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9671875

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To perform exploratory analyses of data from a controlled trial that assessed the efficacy and tolerability of two antiandrogens, bicalutamide and flutamide, each combined with monthly depot preparations of leuprolide or goserelin, in patients with Stage D2 prostate cancer. One analysis compared goserelin plus antiandrogen therapy with leuprolide plus antiandrogen therapy; a second analysis compared the four combined androgen blockade (CAB) regimens. METHODS: This was a randomized, multicenter trial, open-label for luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analogue (LHRH-A) therapy, double-blind for antiandrogen therapy, with a two-by-two factorial design. Eight-hundred thirteen patients were allocated in a ratio of 2:1 to goserelin therapy (3.6 mg every 28 days) or leuprolide therapy (7.5 mg every 28 days) and 1:1 to bicalutamide therapy (50 mg once a day) or flutamide therapy (250 mg three times a day). The end points of time to progression and survival were assessed with a median of 160 weeks of follow-up. RESULTS: The percentages of progression events (70.9% versus 73.3%) and deaths (54.3% versus 56.8%) were similar for goserelin plus antiandrogen and leuprolide plus antiandrogen therapies. The hazard ratios for goserelin plus antiandrogen therapy to leuprolide plus antiandrogen therapy were 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84 to 1.18; P = 0.92) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.11; P = 0.34) for time to progression and survival, respectively. Goserelin plus antiandrogen and leuprolide plus antiandrogen therapies were generally well tolerated, and the side effects associated with depot administration occurred with a low frequency in the two groups. There were no significant differences among the goserelin plus bicalutamide, goserelin plus flutamide, or leuprolide plus bicalutamide therapy groups, but leuprolide plus flutamide therapy had a significantly poorer outcome than the other three therapies. The side-effect profiles for the four CAB groups were generally similar; diarrhea was more common among patients treated with flutamide and hematuria was more common among patients treated with bicalutamide. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results of these exploratory analyses should be interpreted with caution, they indicate that goserelin plus antiandrogen and leuprolide plus antiandrogen therapies are similarly well tolerated and have equivalent time to progression and survival, and that leuprolide plus flutamide therapy appears to be the least effective of the four CAB regimens.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antagonistas de Androgênios/administração & dosagem , Anilidas/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/administração & dosagem , Progressão da Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Flutamida/administração & dosagem , Gosserrelina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Leuprolida/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitrilas , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Compostos de Tosil
15.
Urology ; 51(6): 1043-5, 1998 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9609651

RESUMO

We report a case of a patient with isolated central nervous system relapse of classical seminoma, refractory to intrathecal and systemic chemotherapy, but successfully salvaged with craniospinal axis irradiation. A 44-year-old man with bulky Stage II classic seminoma obtained complete remission with four cycles of cisplatin etoposide combination chemotherapy, but relapsed with lumbar vertebral metastases with epidural spinal cord compression 5 months after completion of primary treatment. He underwent laminectomy, local radiotherapy, and salvage chemotherapy. Two months later he developed cranial nerve palsies, and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed leptomeningeal disease. After brain radiotherapy, systemic and intrathecal chemotherapies were begun but tumor recurred around the cauda equina, producing paraparesis. The patient received salvage craniospinal irradiation, with resolution of paraparesis and cranial nerve palsies. Thirty months after completion of craniospinal radiotherapy, he remains in complete remission. We suggest consideration of craniospinal axis irradiation as salvage therapy in patients with isolated central nervous system relapse of seminoma.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/radioterapia , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/secundário , Irradiação Craniana , Seminoma/radioterapia , Seminoma/secundário , Neoplasias Testiculares/patologia , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino
16.
N Engl J Med ; 338(18): 1265-71, 1998 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9562580

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most trials of immunomodulators in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma have been uncontrolled and subject to selection bias. The objective of this blinded, placebo-controlled study was to compare overall response rates, time to disease progression, and survival of patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma treated with recombinant human interferon gamma-1b or placebo. METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proved metastatic renal-cell carcinoma were randomly assigned to receive interferon gamma-1b (60 microg per square meter of body-surface area subcutaneously once weekly) or placebo. The primary tumor had been treated by nephrectomy or angioinfarction at least three weeks previously. Patients were evaluated for radiologic evidence of progression, and all responses were independently reviewed by a committee that was unaware of the treatment. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma were enrolled at 17 centers in Canada. One hundred eighty-one patients could be evaluated; of these, 91 were assigned to receive interferon gamma-1b and 90 were given placebo. The groups were well balanced in terms of prognostic factors. Two thirds of all patients had Karnofsky scores of 90 or 100, and more than half had two or more metastatic sites. Grade I and II toxicity, mostly chills, fever, asthenia, or headaches, was reported in 91 percent and 61 percent, respectively, of the patients in the interferon group, as compared with 76 percent and 63 percent in the placebo group. Life-threatening drug-related events were rare, occurring in 1 percent of patients in the interferon group. No significant differences between groups were observed in overall response rates, time to disease progression, or survival. The overall response rate was 4.4 percent (3.3 percent complete response and 1.1 percent partial response) in the interferon group and 6.6 percent (3.3 percent complete response and 3.3 percent partial response) in the placebo group (P=0.54), with a rate of durable complete response of 1 percent in both groups. The median time to disease progression was 1.9 months in both groups (P=0.49), and there was no significant difference in median survival (12.2 months with interferon vs. 15.7 months with placebo, P=0.52). CONCLUSIONS: No difference in outcome was observed in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma who were treated with interferon gamma-1b as compared with placebo. These results emphasize the necessity of testing the efficacy of immunomodulators in randomized studies.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/secundário , Carcinoma de Células Renais/terapia , Interferon gama/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Progressão da Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Interferon gama/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas Recombinantes , Indução de Remissão , Análise de Sobrevida , Falha de Tratamento
17.
J Urol ; 159(5): 1624-9, 1998 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9554367

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We assessed the prognostic impact of genitourinary small cell carcinoma tumor and patient characteristics, and therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 180 patients with genitourinary small cell carcinoma in which patient and tumor characteristics, therapy, followup duration and survival status had been documented. Patient age, sex, primary site, histological features, tumor size, stage, locoregional therapy, systemic chemotherapy and hormonal manipulations were analyzed for association with survival. RESULTS: There were 106 cases of bladder, 60 prostatic, 8 renal and 6 ureteral small cell carcinoma. Median survival was 10.5 months overall, and 7 and 13 months for prostatic and bladder small cell carcinoma, respectively (p <0.0001 log rank analysis). In all cases metastatic disease at presentation (p <0.008, risk ratio 1.9) predicted poor survival on multivariate analysis. Radical surgery (p <0.0001, risk ratio 0.34) and cisplatin chemotherapy (p <0.0001, risk ratio 0.20) were the only factors that predicted improved survival on multivariate analysis. For prostatic small cell carcinoma primary surgical therapy (p <0.012, risk ratio 0.46) was the only parameter that predicted survival on univariate analysis. For bladder small cell carcinoma only cisplatin chemotherapy (p <0.0001, risk ratio 0.15) predicted survival on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Genitourinary small cell carcinoma has a poor prognosis, which is worse in prostatic than bladder disease. Patient and tumor characteristics were not determinants of survival when prostatic and bladder small cell carcinoma were analyzed individually. For prostatic disease only primary surgical therapy was associated with prolonged survival, while for bladder disease cisplatin chemotherapy was associated with a favorable prognosis. We recommend considering primary surgical therapy for prostatic and cisplatin based chemotherapy for bladder small cell carcinoma.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/terapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/cirurgia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Neoplasias Ureterais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ureterais/terapia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia
19.
Urology ; 50(3): 330-6, 1997 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9301693

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of bicalutamide and flutamide, each combined with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LHRH-A) therapy, in patients with metastatic (Stage D2) prostate cancer. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind (for antiandrogen therapy), multicenter study with a two-by-two factorial design. Eight hundred thirteen patients were allocated 1:1 to bicalutamide (50 mg once daily) and flutamide (250 mg three times daily) and 2:1 to goserelin acetate (3.6 mg every 28 days) and leuprolide acetate (7.5 mg every 28 days). RESULTS: The median times to progression and death were 97 and 180 weeks for the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group compared with 77 and 148 weeks for the flutamide plus LHRH-A group. The hazard ratio for time to progression for bicalutamide plus LHRH-A to flutamide plus LHRH-A was 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79 to 1.10, P = 0.41) and that for survival time was 0.87 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.05, P = 0.15). The therapies were generally well tolerated. The most common adverse event in the two groups was hot flashes. The incidence of hematuria was significantly higher for the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group than for the flutamide plus LHRH-A group (12% versus 6%, P = 0.007), but no patient withdrew from therapy because of hematuria. There was a significantly (26% versus 12%, P < 0.001) higher incidence of diarrhea and more withdrawals for diarrhea (25 patients versus 2) for the flutamide plus LHRH-A group relative to the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group. CONCLUSIONS: With a median follow-up time of 160 weeks, the combination of bicalutamide plus LHRH-A was well tolerated and had equivalent time to progression and survival compared with flutamide plus LHRH-A. Treatment with bicalutamide plus LHRH-A resulted in longer median survival than treatment with flutamide plus LHRH-A.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antagonistas de Androgênios/administração & dosagem , Anilidas/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Flutamida/administração & dosagem , Seguimentos , Gosserrelina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Leuprolida/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitrilas , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Compostos de Tosil
20.
J Urol ; 157(5): 1731-5, 1997 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9112515

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We determined whether decreases in prostate specific antigen (PSA) would occur after withdrawal of double-blinded antiandrogen therapy with flutamide or bicalutamide for clinical progression or increasing PSA concentration in patients receiving combined androgen blockade for advanced prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PSA concentrations were determined weekly for at least 6 weeks and then every other week for 6 weeks in 22 patients with stage D2 prostate cancer. All patients were withdrawn from antiandrogen therapy (8 flutamide and 14 bicalutamide) due to progression or an increasing PSA concentration. Objective response was evaluated before antiandrogen withdrawal and at week 12. RESULTS: In 4 of 8 patients (50%) withdrawn from flutamide and 4 of 14 (29%) withdrawn from bicalutamide serum PSA concentrations decreased by 50% or more. PSA responses after withdrawal of flutamide therapy occurred within the first few days, whereas those after withdrawal of bicalutamide therapy occurred within 4 to 8 weeks. Of 4 patients assessed for objective response 2 had stable disease and 2 had progression. A PSA response was observed in the 2 patients with stable disease but not the 2 with progression. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with stage D2 prostate cancer and disease progression or an increasing PSA concentration, withdrawal of antiandrogen therapy with bicalutamide or flutamide may result in a PSA response. The time to PSA response is longer with bicalutamide than with flutamide. The clinical significance of the antiandrogen withdrawal phenomenon is unknown.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios/administração & dosagem , Anilidas/administração & dosagem , Flutamida/administração & dosagem , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitrilas , Antígeno Prostático Específico/efeitos dos fármacos , Compostos de Tosil
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...