Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-short form in cancer patients: a Bayesian structural equation modeling approach.

BACKGROUND: Mindfulness has emerged as an important correlate of well-being in various clinical populations. The present study evaluated the psychometric properties of the 20-item short form of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-SF) in the Chinese context. METHODS: The study sample was 127 Chinese colorectal cancer patients who completed the FFMQ-SF and validated physical and mental health measures. Factorial validity of the FFMQ-SF was assessed using Bayesian structural equation modeling (BSEM) via informative priors on cross-loadings and residual covariances. Linear regression analysis examined its convergent validity with the health measures on imputed datasets. RESULTS: The five-factor BSEM model with approximate zero cross-loadings and one residual covariance provided an adequate model fit (PPP = 0.07, RMSEA = 0.06, CFI = 0.95). Satisfactory reliability (ω = 0.77-0.85) was found in four of the five facets (except nonjudging). Acting with awareness predicted lower levels of perceived stress, negative affect, anxiety, depression, and illness symptoms (ß = - 0.37 to - 0.42) and better quality of life (ß = 0.29-0.32). Observing, nonjudging, and nonreacting did not show any significant associations (p > .05) with health measures. Acting with awareness was not significantly correlated (r < 0.15) with the other four facets. CONCLUSION: The present findings provide partial support for the psychometric properties of the FFMQ-SF in colorectal cancer patients. The nonjudging facet showed questionable validity and reliability in the present sample. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to elucidate the viability of FFMQ-SF as a measure of mindfulness facets in cancer patients.

Addressing holistic health and work empowerment through a body-mind-spirit intervention program among helping professionals in continuous education: A pilot study.

To examine the effectiveness of a body-mind-spirit (BMS) intervention program in improving the holistic well-being and work empowerment among helping professionals in continuous education. Forty-four helping professionals, who were in their first-year part-time postgraduate study, participated in the present study. All participants attended a 3-day BMS intervention program which emphasized a holistic approach to health and well-being. Ratings on their levels of physical distress, daily functioning, affect, spirituality, and psychological empowerment at work were compared before and immediately after the intervention. Participants reported significantly lower levels of negative affect and physical distress, and were less spiritually disoriented after the intervention. Enhanced levels of daily functioning, positive affect, spiritual resilience, and tranquility were also reported. Results also suggested that participants were empowered at work, and specifically felt more able to make an impact on work outcomes. The 3-day BMS intervention program produced a positive and measurable effect on participants' holistic well-being and empowerment at work. Educators in related fields could incorporate holistic practices into the curriculum to better prepare the future practitioners, leading to better outcomes both to the professionals themselves and their clients or patients.

Use of home hemoglobin A1c test kits to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes care.

BACKGROUND: Periodic measurement of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is highly recommended for people with diabetes to determine whether their blood glucose is adequately controlled. Quality improvement programs initiated by health plans often focus on ensuring that HbA1c is being monitored in members with diabetes. To focus improvement efforts on members with poor blood glucose control, health plans need to know which members have high HbA1c levels. Recent development of home test kits provides another opportunity for health plans to help members measure their HbA1c and to identify members with high levels. METHODS: A sample of members from two health plans who were sent HbA1c self-test kits in January 2000 participated in a telephone interview. To understand why members did or did not use self-test kits sent by their health plans, the survey focused on perceived ease of use, outcomes, and normative beliefs. RESULTS: In the group of 380 members who were interviewed, 170 (45%) used the kit. HbA1c values were > 8 mg/dl in 43%. Among the 170 who used the kit, 160 said that they would use the kit. Their most common reason for using the kit was to find out how well their blood glucose was being controlled (48%). Convenience (12%) was the next most frequent reason for using the kit. Among the 210 members who did not use the kit, 81 members said that they would not or were not sure if they would when interviewed. Their most frequent reason for not using the kit was duplication of tests done by physicians (34%). Others were too busy (12%), wanted to talk with their physician (11%), or had difficulty using the kit (11%). CONCLUSIONS: Because the majority of health plan members did not use the kit and the majority who did use the kit had HbA1c levels < 8 mg/dl, sending home test kits to members did not result in a high yield of members with elevated HbA1c levels. Physicians' support for use of the kits and efforts to make kits easier to use might increase use. Efforts to avoid duplication of physicians' measurements could make this strategy to identify members with poorly controlled levels of blood glucose more cost-effective, although health plans would not know which monitored members might benefit most from programs to improve care of diabetes.

Impact of mailing information about nonurgent care on emergency department visits by Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in managed care.

CONTEXT: Emergency department services may be used more appropriately if laypeople's knowledge of managing minor medical problems could be enhanced, especially since Medicaid applies a "prudent layperson" standard for providing access to emergency care. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of mailing a booklet, First Look, that informed Medicaid beneficiaries about care of common nonurgent conditions and encouraged use of alternatives to emergency care including care by office-based physicians, telephonic nursing assistance, and self-care. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, parallel group study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Administrative data from 2 health plans serving urban Medicaid populations were used to identify households with a history of emergency department utilization (n = 3101 and n = 3822). Within each health plan, households were randomly assigned to receive First Look. The number of emergency department visits during 6.5 months of follow-up was the primary study endpoint. RESULTS: Compared with controls, 1% fewer members of households that were mailed First Look visited an emergency department in each health plan (23% versus 24% in Plan A; 27% versus 28% in Plan B). The 95% confidence intervals on the observed differences were -3% to 1% and -4% to 1% in Plans A and B, respectively. The proportion of emergency department visits for conditions discussed in First Look was not significantly reduced in households that were mailed the booklet (62% versus 60% in Plan A and 51% versus 48% in Plan B). CONCLUSION: Mailing First Look to Medicaid beneficiaries did not have a significant effect on use of emergency departments. Medicaid programs need to evaluate other, perhaps more multifaceted, interventions to promote appropriate use of emergency departments.

Utilities for major stroke: results from a survey of preferences among persons at increased risk for stroke.

BACKGROUND: Patient beliefs, values, and preferences are crucial to decisions involving health care. In a large sample of persons at increased risk for stroke, we examined attitudes toward hypothetical major stroke. METHODS AND RESULTS: Respondents were obtained from the Academic Medical Center Consortium (n = 621), the Cardiovascular Health Study (n = 321 ), and United Health Care (n = 319). Preferences were primarily assessed by using the time trade off (TTO). Although major stroke is generally considered an undesirable event (mean TTO = 0.30), responses were varied: although 45% of respondents considered major stroke to be a worse outcome than death, 15% were willing to trade off little or no survival to avoid a major stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Providers should speak directly with patients about beliefs, values, and preferences. Stroke-related interventions, even those with a high price or less than dramatic clinical benefits, are likely to be cost-effective if they prevent an outcome (major stroke) that is so undesirable.

Using claims data for epidemiologic research. The concordance of claims-based criteria with the medical record and patient survey for identifying a hypertensive population.

In this study, a method was developed to identify health plan members with hypertension from insurance claims, using medical records and a patient survey for validation. A sample of 2,079 patients from two study sites with medical service or pharmacy claims indicating a diagnosis of essential hypertension were surveyed, and the medical records of 182 of the 1,275 survey respondents were reviewed. Where the criteria to identify hypertensive patients used both the medical and pharmacy claims, there was 96% agreement with either the medical record or the patient survey. Where the criteria relied on medical claims alone, the agreement rate decreased to 74% with the medical record and 64% with the patient survey. Where the criteria relied on the pharmacy claims alone, the agreement rate was 67% with the medical record and 75% with the patient survey. Combined evidence from medical service and pharmacy claims yielded a high level of agreement with alternative, more costly sources of data in identifying patients with essential hypertension. As it is more thoroughly investigated, claims data should become a more widely accepted resource for epidemiologic research.