Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer: radiation dosage constraint at the anterior mandible.

Because the survival of endosseous implants in irradiated bone is lower than in non-irradiated bone, particularly if the irradiation dose exceeds 50Gy, a study was carried out to assess the irradiation dose in the anterior mandible, when intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is used. The hypothesis was that adequate IMRT planning in oropharyngeal cancer patients is allowing sufficiently low anterior mandibular bone radiation dosages to safely insert endosseous implants. Ten randomly selected patients with oropharyngeal cancer, primarily treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), were included in this study. First, at five determined positions distributed over the anterior mandible, the appropriate radiation dosages were calculated according to the originally arranged fractionated radiation schedule. Second, for each patient an adjusted fractionated radiation schedule was established with an extra dose constraint which allowed a lower dose in the mandible taking into account that the anterior mandible needs protection against radiation-induced osteoradionecrosis. The goal for the adjusted fractionated radiation schedule was similar as that of the original fractionated radiation schedule, including a desired tumour target dosage of 70Gy and maximum mean local dosages for organs at risk. The data revealed a considerable and statistically significant, irradiation dose reduction in the anterior mandible without compromising the other constraints. As a result of this study it is strongly advised to maximize dose constraint to the anterior mandible when planning irradiation for oropharyngeal cancer patients, using IMRT. This would greatly facilitate successful implant treatment for this group of patients. The fractionated radiation schedules used, should also be used for the planning of the best implant positions by integrating them in the implant planning software.

Assessment of bone vascularity in the anterior mandible using laser Doppler flowmetry.

OBJECTIVES: In irradiated bone, a method assessing vascularity of intended implant recipient bone would be of clinical significance in preventing early implant loss and in reducing the risk of osteoradionecrosis due to surgical oral implant insertion. At present, assessing bone vascularity clinically, using laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF), seems to be realistic. The hypotheses of this study were that bone vascularity in the human anterior mandible can be assessed during implant insertion by LDF and that the recorded LDF values are providing standard data for bone vascularity in the human anterior mandible. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-three randomly selected non-irradiated edentulous patients scheduled for treatment with oral implants in the anterior mandible were assigned, 12 men and 11 women. The patients' history of edentulousness and resorption of the residual alveolar ridges were registered. In pilot osteotomy sites of planned implant insertion, the bone vascularity was registered, using LDF and expressed in perfusion units (PU). The statistical distribution and characteristics of the LDF values were explored, separately for men and women. RESULTS: A total of 41 pilot osteotomy sites were recorded with a mean LDF value of 25.80 PU. No obvious gender difference was found and LDF values did not show a relationship with patient's age or history of edentulousness. CONCLUSION: The hypotheses that bone vascularity in the human anterior mandible can be assessed during implant insertion by LDF and that the recorded LDF values are providing standard data for bone vascularity in the human anterior mandible, were confirmed.

Quantitative computed tomography bone mineral density measurements in irradiated and non-irradiated minipig alveolar bone: an experimental study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyse the effect of irradiation on bone mineral density (BMD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All maxillary and mandibular pre-molars and molars of six minipigs were extracted. After a 3-month healing period, the maxilla and mandibles of three minipigs received three irradiation exposures at a total dose of 24 Gy. At 3 months after irradiation, quantitative computed tomography (QCT) was performed. As a reference, a calibration bone phantom with pre-determined BMD was attached to the head of the minipigs. The QCT data were imported into a software program to calculate the BMD of the alveolar bone and the calibration bone phantom. In order to compare BMD values of individual minipigs, the so-called bone mineral density quotient (BMDQ) was created, dividing the BMD value of the alveolar bone by the BMD value of the calibration bone phantom. RESULTS: Mean BMDQ values appeared to be higher in irradiated than in non-irradiated minipigs. However, the difference was not significant. In both irradiated and non-irradiated minipigs, the average mandibular BMDQ values were statistically significantly higher than the average maxillary BMDQ values (P=0.003). The P-values of the Student t-test, determining the irradiation effect, were 0.11 for maxillary, 0.14 for mandibular, and 0.07 for overall peri-implant BMDQ. P-values of the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test were all 0.05. CONCLUSION: It could be concluded that, 3 months after irradiation, the BMD of irradiated alveolar minipig bone was increased, when compared with non-irradiated alveolar minipig bone. However, the increase was not statistically significant.

Implant stability during osseointegration in irradiated and non-irradiated minipig alveolar bone: an experimental study.

OBJECTIVES: Primary implant stability is related to local bone density. After insertion of an implant, implant stability is subject to changes due to bone remodeling. In patients who have undergone radiotherapy in the head and neck region, implant stability is impaired because irradiation reduces bone vitality. The current study was designed to monitor and test implant stability immediately after implant placement and during osseointegration in irradiated and non-irradiated minipig alveolar bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All maxillary and mandibular premolars and molars of six adult Göttingen minipigs were extracted. The maxilla and mandible of three minipigs received three irradiation exposures at a total dose of 24 Gy. After irradiation, five initial implant holes were drilled in the residual alveolar ridge of each edentulous site. In order to assess bone vascularity, laser Doppler flowmetry recordings were carried out in the initial holes. A total of 120 implants were placed in the six minipigs. Subsequently, and at 8, 16, and 24 weeks after implant placement, implant stability was recorded by resonance frequency analysis (RFA). RFA values were expressed as an implant stability quotient (ISQ). RESULTS: ISQ values recorded immediately after implant placement showed no differences between irradiated and non-irradiated minipigs. Repeated measurements at the four recording moments showed a decrease of ISQ values in all minipigs, being more pronounced in irradiated bone, when compared with non-irradiated bone. The results at the third and fourth recording moments showed a stabilization or even a slight increase of ISQ values. CONCLUSIONS: The results document the negative effect of irradiation on bone vascularity and hence on implant stability.

Assessment of vascularity in irradiated and nonirradiated maxillary and mandibular minipig alveolar bone using laser doppler flowmetry.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this animal study was to confirm that laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) is a reproducible method for the assessment of maxillary and mandibular alveolar bone vascularity and that there is less vascularity in irradiated mandibular and maxillary bone compared to nonirradiated bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All maxillary and mandibular premolars and molars of 6 Göttingen minipigs were extracted. After a 3-month healing period, 3 minipigs received irradiation at a total dose of 24 Gy. Three months after irradiation, 5 holes were drilled in the residual alveolar ridge of each edentulous site in each minipig. Local microvascular blood flow around all 120 holes was recorded by LDF prior to implant placement. In 1 irradiated and 1 nonirradiated minipig, an additional hole was drilled in a right maxillary site to enable repeated LDF recordings. RESULTS: The alveolar bone appeared less vascularized in irradiated than in nonirradiated minipigs. The effect of radiation appeared more pronounced in the mandible than in the maxilla. LDF was demonstrated to be a reproducible method for assessing alveolar bone vascularity. However, recordings varied by edentulous site as well as by minipig. CONCLUSION: The authors' hypotheses regarding LDF and vascularity were supported. Further research validating the use of LDF in human beings, especially in those who have undergone radiation therapy for head and neck cancer, is necessary.

Computer-assisted maxillofacial prosthodontics: a new treatment protocol.

PURPOSE: This article presents a new treatment protocol in maxillofacial prosthodontics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A case report of a patient suffering from an orbital defect after tumor resection is presented. To explain the treatment protocol, the procedure of fabricating an implant-retained orbital prosthesis for this patient is discussed. RESULTS: After tumor resection, implants were placed and a prosthesis was made based on both a CT scan and computer-supported technology. CONCLUSION: The integration of several existing techniques in and outside the field of maxillofacial prosthodontics led to a treatment protocol that was shown to be beneficial in the presented case and others.