Relapse risk of endometrial hyperplasia after treatment with the levonorgestrel-impregnated intrauterine system or oral progestogens.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate relapse rates after the successful treatment of patients with non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia who were randomised to either a levonorgestrel-impregnated intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; Mirena(®) ) or two regimens of oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) after primary histological response. DESIGN: A multicentre randomised trial. SETTING: Ten different outpatient clinics localised in hospitals and seven gynaecological private practices in Norway. POPULATION: One hundred and fifty-three women aged 30-70 years with low- or medium-risk endometrial hyperplasia met the inclusion criteria, and 153 completed the therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to one of the following three treatment arms: LNG-IUS; 10 mg of oral MPA administered for 10 days per cycle for 6 months; or 10 mg of oral MPA administered daily for 6 months. The women were followed for 24 months after ending therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Histological relapse of endometrial hyperplasia. RESULTS: Histological relapse was observed in 55/135 (41%) women who had an initial complete treatment response. The relapse rates were similar in the three therapy groups (P = 0.66). In the multivariable analyses relapse was dependent on menopausal status (P = 0.0005) and estrogen level (P = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of histological relapse of non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia is high within 24 months of ceasing therapy with either the LNG-IUS or oral MPA. Continued endometrial surveillance and prolonging progestogen therapy should be considered. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Relapse of endometrial hyperplasia after successful treatment is independent of therapy regime.

Fertility and gonadal function after adjuvant therapy in women diagnosed with a malignant ovarian germ cell tumor (MOGCT) during the "cisplatin era".

PURPOSE: By self-report and serum levels of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) this study aims to assess post-treatment fertility after modern treatment of women with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 2013 a questionnaire-based survey was performed in 61 MOGCT patients diagnosed at age <40years from 1980-2009. Forty-nine of them also attended the out-patient clinic. The event of first post-treatment pregnancy ("fertility") was documented as cumulative estimates for all 61 patients and within each of 4 treatment groups: Group 1: Surgery only (n=10); Group 2: ≤3cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CBCT) (n=20); Group 3: >3cycles of CBCT (n=15) and Group 4: other adjuvant treatment (n=16). AMH was determined in 22 women <40years at survey. Statistics were based on Kaplan Meier procedure, log-rank test and a significance level p<0.05. RESULTS: At least one post-treatment pregnancy was reported by 34 of 39 MOGCT survivors who attempted motherhood after treatment. The 15-year cumulative post-treatment fertility estimate was 28% (95% CI: 26-30) for all 61 survivors and was significantly higher in patients treated with 3 or fewer cycles of CBCT (53% [95% CI: 50-55]) than those treated with more than 3cycles (20% [95% CI: 17-22]) (P=0.03). Of 22 AMH levels, two were <3pmol/l, with one women being pregnant at survey. CONCLUSION: After fertility-sparing surgery and modern cisplatin-based chemotherapy, fertility is preserved in most MOGCT survivors though dependent on the number of cycles. AMH's role as a biomarker of gonadal function seems promising but requires further research.

Nuclear morphometric changes and therapy monitoring in patients with endometrial hyperplasia: a study comparing effects of intrauterine levonorgestrel and systemic medroxyprogesterone.

OBJECTIVE: To show that local application of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device was a better therapy for endometrial hyperplasia (EH) compared to per-oral gestagen treatment based on subjective (WHO criteria) and objective (prognostic data-based morphometric and stereological method/D score, predicting the risk of cancer development for each single patient) evaluation. METHODS: Women between 30 and 70 years with EH and D score > 0 were treated with levonorgestrel intrauterine device (n = 26) and the results compared to a historic group of women treated with per-oral gestagen (n = 31). In both treatment groups only patients with low risk (D score > 1) and uncertain risk (D score = 0-1) of cancer development were included. Endometrial specimens were investigated prior to treatment and after 3 months of therapy. The endometrial samples from the two groups were examined by light microscopy and objective data-based morphometry to assess tissue characteristics and to evaluate nuclear size variation. RESULTS: After 3 months all patients treated with levonorgestrel intrauterine device showed regression of hyperplasia, whereas 14 of 31 patients in the per-oral group still had persisting disease. The objective morphometric analysis showed reduction in nuclear size for both treatment groups, including the D score > 1 as well as the D score 0-1 patients. However, the reduction was most obvious for the levonorgestrel intrauterine device-treated patients with initial D score of 0-1. CONCLUSION: The present study indicates that levonorgestrel intrauterine device is a superior alternative to per oral treatment of endometrial hyperplasia. By using objective morphometric treatment monitoring we have shown that the hyperplasia patients with the highest malignant potential (D score = 0-1) were those taking most benefit from local high-dose levonorgestrel therapy.