Calidad de los registros electrónicos de enfermería de un hospital de alta complejidad de la ciudad de Corrientes. Año 2021 / Quality of the electronic nursing records of a highly complex hospitalin the city of Corrientes. Year 2021

Introducción: hacer el registro de los cuidados que la Enfermería proporciona diariamente a los pacientes, es una tarea esencial, tanto para dar una adecuada calidad sanitaria como para el desarrollo de la profesión. Objetivo: identificar la calidad de los registros electrónicos de Enfermería de un hospital de alta complejidad de la ciudad de Corrientes. Metodología: se realizó un estudio cuantitativo de tipo descriptivo transversal donde se revisaron 133 historias clínicas digitales mediante una herramienta adaptada y previamente validada. Resultados: de forma específica, la variable identificación del paciente obtuvo calidad buena, en cuanto al registro de la valoración se identificó que el 92% de las historias clínicas registraron menos de 6 indicadores, una calidad deficiente, y el 8% restante registró calidad regular, y la variable intervenciones obtuvo una calidad deficiente con un 87% de registro de los indicadores. Conclusión: en los resultados de la investigación se llegó a la conclusión de que, la calidad de los registros electrónicos de enfermería del servicio de terapia intensiva del hospital es de calidad deficiente respecto al registro electrónico del proceso enfermero[AU]

Introduction: recording the care that nursing provides daily to patients is an essential task, both for providing adequate health quality and for the development of the profession. Objective:to identify the quality of the electronic nursing records of a highly complex hospital in the city of Corrientes. Methodology: a cross-sectional descriptive quantitative study was carried out where 133 digital medical records were reviewed using an adapted and previously validated tool. Results: specifically, the patient identification variable obtained good quality, regarding the assessment record, it was identified that 92% of the medical records re-gistered less than 6 indicators, a poor quality, and the remaining 8% re-gistered regular quality, and the variable interventions obtained a poorquality with 87% registering the indicators. Conclusion: in the results of the investigation, it was concluded that the quality of the electronic nursing records of the hospital's intensive care service is of poor quality compared to the electronic record of the nursing process[AU]

Introdução: registrar os cuidados que a enfermagem presta diaria-mente aos pacientes é tarefa essencial, tanto para a prestação de uma saúde de qualidade adequada, quanto para o desenvolvimento da profissão. Objetivo: identificar a qualidade dos registros eletrônicos de enfermagem de um hospital de alta complexidade da cidade de Corrientes. Metodologia: realizouse um estudo quantitativo descritivo transversal onde foram revistos 133 prontuários digitais por meio de um instrumento adaptado e previamente validado. Resultados: especificamente, a variável identificação do paciente obteve qualidade boa, quanto ao registro de avaliação, identificouse que 92% dos prontuários registraram menos de 6 indicadores, a qualidade ruim, e os 8% restantes registraram qualidade regular, e a variável as intervenções obtiveram uma qualidade ruim com 87% registrando os indicadores. Conclusão: nos resultados da investigação concluiuse que a qualidade do prontuário eletrônico de enfermagem do serviço de terapia intensiva do hospital é de baixa qualidade em relação ao prontuário eletrônico do processo de enfermagem[AU]

Effectiveness of the second COVID-19 booster against Omicron: a large-scale cohort study in Chile.

In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants, understanding the effectiveness of various booster vaccination regimens is pivotal. In Chile, using a prospective national cohort of 3.75 million individuals aged 20 or older, we evaluate the effectiveness against COVID-19-related intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and death of mRNA-based second vaccine boosters for four different three-dose background regimes: BNT162b2 primary series followed by a homologous booster, and CoronaVac primary series followed by an mRNA booster, a homologous booster, and a ChAdOx-1 booster. We estimate the vaccine effectiveness weekly from February 14 to August 15, 2022, by determining hazard ratios of immunization over non-vaccination, accounting for relevant confounders. The overall adjusted effectiveness of a second mRNA booster shot is 88.2% (95%CI, 86.2-89.9) against ICU admissions and 90.5% (95%CI 89.4-91.4) against death. Vaccine effectiveness shows a mild decrease for all regimens and outcomes, probably linked to the introduction of BA.4 and BA.5 Omicron sub-lineages and the waning of immunity. Based on our findings, individuals might not need additional boosters for at least 6 months after receiving a second mRNA booster shot in this setting.

The effects of an intervention program on psychosocial factors and consequences during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Chilean technology services company: A quasiexperimental study.

Background and Aims: During the COVID-19 pandemic, mental health became a relevant factor in people's performance within organizations. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of an organizational intervention program on the psychosocial factors of demands, resources, and the consequences of psychosocial risks in a technology services company during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A quasiexperimental study was carried out with 105 employees who took part in an 8-week intervention program divided into two large stages. Pre- and postmeasurements were collected using the UNIPSICO Questionnaire, considering its factors of demands, resources, and consequences of psychosocial risks. The Spanish Burnout Inventory (SBI) was also included. Results: The results showed significant improvements in the perception of the following psychosocial demand factors: Role conflict (p < 0.001), Role ambiguity, workload, interpersonal conflicts (p < 0.05). In the resource factors: autonomy, work social support, feedback (p < 0.001) Resources at work, transformational leadership, and self-efficacy (p < 0.05). In addition, all the consequences of psychosocial risks have improvements: Indolence, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction (p < 0.001), Burnout syndrome, enthusiasm toward the job, and psychosomatic problems (p < 0.05), except the Guilt dimension of the SBI. Conclusion: We can conclude that the program was effective and that the study limitations should be improved in future studies.

Effectiveness of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in children and adolescents: a large-scale observational study.

Background: Policymakers urgently need evidence to adequately balance the costs and benefits of mass vaccination against COVID-19 across all age groups, including children and adolescents. In this study, we aim to assess the effectiveness of CoronaVac's primary series among children and adolescents in Chile. Methods: We used a large prospective national cohort of about two million children and adolescents 6-16 years to estimate the effectiveness of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in preventing laboratory-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19), hospitalisation, and admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) associated with COVID-19. We compared the risk of individuals treated with a complete primary immunization schedule (two doses, 28 days apart) with the risk of unvaccinated individuals during the follow-up period. The study was conducted in Chile from June 27, 2021, to January 12, 2022, when the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant was predominant but other variants of concern were co-circulating, including Omicron. We used inverse probability-weighted survival regression models to estimate hazard ratios of complete immunization over the unvaccinated status, accounting for time-varying vaccination exposure and adjusting for relevant demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical confounders. Findings: The estimated adjusted vaccine effectiveness for the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in children aged 6-16 years was 74.5% (95% CI, 73.8-75.2), 91.0% (95% CI, 87.8-93.4), 93.8% (95% CI, 87.8-93.4) for the prevention of COVID-19, hospitalisation, and ICU admission, respectively. For the subgroup of children 6-11 years, the vaccine effectiveness was 75.8% (95% CI, 74.7-76.8) for the prevention of COVID-19 and 77.9% (95% CI, 61.5-87.3) for the prevention of hospitalisation. Interpretation: Our results suggest that a complete primary immunization schedule with the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine provides effective protection against severe COVID-19 disease for children 6-16 years. Funding: Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID) Millennium Science Initiative Program and Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias (FONDAP).

[Adverse reactions to drugs used for COVID-19 in five Latin American countriesReações adversas a medicamentos utilizados para a COVID-19 em cinco países da América Latina]. / Reacciones adversas a medicamentos utilizados para la COVID-19 en cinco países de América Latina.

Objective: Characterize and describe reports of suspected adverse reactions to a group of drugs used in Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Chile, El Salvador, Mexico, and Peru to treat or prevent coronavirus disease (COVID-19) between 1 March and 31 August 2020. Methods: A list of the 13 drugs used to treat or prevent COVID-19 was prepared, based on official and unofficial sources. Drawing on the databases of the national pharmacovigilance programs of the participating countries, reports of suspected adverse reactions to these drugs were collected for the period from 1 March and 31 August 2020. Results: A total of 3 490 reports of suspected adverse reactions were received from the pharmacovigilance programs of Peru (n = 3 037), Cuba (n = 270), Colombia (n = 108), Chile (n = 72), and El Salvador (n = 3). The drugs with the highest number of reported adverse reactions were azithromycin, ivermectin, and hydroxychloroquine. Diarrhea was the most frequent event (15.0%). Of the total suspected adverse reactions, 11.9% were reported as serious. The most frequent was QT prolongation following use of hydroxychloroquine. Of these suspected serious adverse reactions, 54.5% occurred in people over 65 years of age. Conclusions: While it is not possible to establish a causal relationship from the evaluation of spontaneous reports, the present study confirms the presence of adverse reactions-some of them serious-involving drugs used to treat or prevent COVID-19.

Objetivo: Caracterizar e descrever as notificações de suspeitas de reações adversas a um grupo de medicamentos utilizados na Colômbia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Chile, El Salvador, México e Peru, para tratar ou prevenir a doença do coronavírus (COVID-19), entre 1º de março e 31 de agosto de 2020. Métodos: Foi elaborada uma lista dos 13 medicamentos usados para tratar ou prevenir a COVID-19, segundo fontes oficiais e não oficiais. A partir das bases de dados dos programas nacionais de farmacovigilância dos países participantes, foram coletadas notificações de suspeitas de reações adversas a esses medicamentos, recebidas no período entre 1º de março e 31 de agosto de 2020. Resultados: Foram recebidas 3.490 notificações de suspeitas de reações adversas dos programas de farmacovigilância do Peru (n = 3.037), Cuba (n = 270), Colômbia (n = 108), Chile (n = 72) e El Salvador (n = 3). Os medicamentos com maior número de notificações de reações adversas foram azitromicina, ivermectina e hidroxicloroquina. A diarreia foi o evento mais frequente (15,0%). Do total de suspeitas de reações adversas, 11,9% foram notificadas como graves. A mais frequente foi o prolongamento do intervalo QT após o uso de hidroxicloroquina. Dessas suspeitas de reações adversas graves, 54,5% ocorreram em pessoas com mais de 65 anos. Conclusão: Embora não seja possível estabelecer uma relação causal com base na avaliação de relatos espontâneos, o presente estudo confirma a presença de reações adversas ­ algumas graves ­ a medicamentos que foram usados para tratar ou prevenir a COVID-19.

Reacciones adversas a medicamentos utilizados para la COVID-19 en cinco países de América Latina

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Caracterizar y describir las notificaciones de sospechas de reacciones adversas de un grupo de medicamentos que se utilizaron en Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Chile, El Salvador, México y Perú para tratar o prevenir la enfermedad por el coronavirus (COVID-19, por su sigla en inglés) entre el 1 de marzo y el 31 de agosto del 2020. Métodos. Se elaboró una lista de los 13 medicamentos utilizados para tratar o prevenir la COVID-19, según fuentes oficiales y no oficiales. Desde las bases de datos de los programas nacionales de farma- covigilancia de los países participantes, se recopilaron las notificaciones de sospechas de reacciones adversas a estos medicamentos recibidas en el período comprendido entre el 1 de marzo y 31 de agosto de año 2020. Resultados. Se recibieron 3 490 notificaciones de sospechas de reacciones adversas desde los programas de farmacovigilancia de Perú (n = 3 037), Cuba (n = 270), Colombia (n = 108), Chile (n = 72) y El Salvador (n = 3). Los medicamentos con mayor número de notificaciones de reacciones adversas fueron la azitromi- cina, la ivermectina y la hidroxicloroquina. La diarrea fue el evento más frecuente (15,0%). Del total de las sospechas de reacciones adversas, 11,9% fueron notificadas como graves. La más frecuente fue la prolon- gación del intervalo QT posterior al uso de hidroxicloroquina. De estas sospechas de reacciones adversas graves, 54,5% ocurrieron en personas mayores de 65 años. Conclusión. Si bien no es posible establecer una relación causal a partir de la evaluación de informes espon- táneos, el presente estudio confirma la presencia de reacciones adversas, algunas graves, con medicamentos que se utilizaron para tratar o prevenir la COVID-19.

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. Characterize and describe reports of suspected adverse reactions to a group of drugs used in Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Chile, El Salvador, Mexico, and Peru to treat or prevent coronavirus disease (COVID-19) between 1 March and 31 August 2020. Methods. A list of the 13 drugs used to treat or prevent COVID-19 was prepared, based on official and unofficial sources. Drawing on the databases of the national pharmacovigilance programs of the participating countries, reports of suspected adverse reactions to these drugs were collected for the period from 1 March and 31 August 2020. Results. A total of 3 490 reports of suspected adverse reactions were received from the pharmacovigilance programs of Peru (n = 3 037), Cuba (n = 270), Colombia (n = 108), Chile (n = 72), and El Salvador (n = 3). The drugs with the highest number of reported adverse reactions were azithromycin, ivermectin, and hydroxychlo- roquine. Diarrhea was the most frequent event (15.0%). Of the total suspected adverse reactions, 11.9% were reported as serious. The most frequent was QT prolongation following use of hydroxychloroquine. Of these suspected serious adverse reactions, 54.5% occurred in people over 65 years of age. Conclusion. While it is not possible to establish a causal relationship from the evaluation of spontaneous reports, the present study confirms the presence of adverse reactions—some of them serious—involving drugs used to treat or prevent COVID-19.

[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Caracterizar e descrever as notificações de suspeitas de reações adversas a um grupo de medica- mentos utilizados na Colômbia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Chile, El Salvador, México e Peru, para tratar ou prevenir a doença do coronavírus (COVID-19), entre 1o de março e 31 de agosto de 2020. Métodos. Foi elaborada uma lista dos 13 medicamentos usados para tratar ou prevenir a COVID-19, segundo fontes oficiais e não oficiais. A partir das bases de dados dos programas nacionais de farmacovigilância dos países participantes, foram coletadas notificações de suspeitas de reações adversas a esses medicamentos, recebidas no período entre 1o de março e 31 de agosto de 2020. Resultados. Foram recebidas 3.490 notificações de suspeitas de reações adversas dos programas de far- macovigilância do Peru (n = 3.037), Cuba (n = 270), Colômbia (n = 108), Chile (n = 72) e El Salvador (n = 3). Os medicamentos com maior número de notificações de reações adversas foram azitromicina, ivermectina e hidroxicloroquina. A diarreia foi o evento mais frequente (15,0%). Do total de suspeitas de reações adversas, 11,9% foram notificadas como graves. A mais frequente foi o prolongamento do intervalo QT após o uso de hidroxicloroquina. Dessas suspeitas de reações adversas graves, 54,5% ocorreram em pessoas com mais de 65 anos. Conclusão. Embora não seja possível estabelecer uma relação causal com base na avaliação de relatos espontâneos, o presente estudo confirma a presença de reações adversas – algumas graves – a medicamen- tos que foram usados para tratar ou prevenir a COVID-19.

Effectiveness of CoronaVac in children 3-5 years of age during the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron outbreak in Chile.

The outbreak of the B.1.1.529 lineage of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (Omicron) has caused an unprecedented number of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases, including pediatric hospital admissions. Policymakers urgently need evidence of vaccine effectiveness in children to balance the costs and benefits of vaccination campaigns, but, to date, the evidence is sparse. Leveraging a population-based cohort in Chile of 490,694 children aged 3-5 years, we estimated the effectiveness of administering a two-dose schedule, 28 days apart, of Sinovac's inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac). We used inverse probability-weighted survival regression models to estimate hazard ratios of symptomatic COVID-19, hospitalization and admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) for children with complete immunization over non-vaccination, accounting for time-varying vaccination exposure and relevant confounders. The study was conducted between 6 December 2021 and 26 February 2022, during the Omicron outbreak in Chile. The estimated vaccine effectiveness was 38.2% (95% confidence interval (CI), 36.5-39.9) against symptomatic COVID-19, 64.6% (95% CI, 49.6-75.2) against hospitalization and 69.0% (95% CI, 18.6-88.2) against ICU admission. The effectiveness against symptomatic COVID-19 was modest; however, protection against severe disease was high. These results support vaccination of children aged 3-5 years to prevent severe illness and associated complications and highlight the importance of maintaining layered protections against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Effectiveness of homologous and heterologous booster doses for an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: a large-scale prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Several countries have authorised or begun using a booster vaccine dose against COVID-19. Policy makers urgently need evidence of the effectiveness of additional vaccine doses and its clinical spectrum for individuals with complete primary immunisation schedules, particularly in countries where the primary schedule used inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. METHODS: Using individual-level data, we evaluated a prospective, observational, national-level cohort of individuals (aged ≥16 years) affiliated with the Fondo Nacional de Salud insurance programme in Chile, to assess the effectiveness of CoronaVac (Sinovac Biotech), AZD1222 (Oxford-AstraZeneca), or BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine boosters in individuals who had completed a primary immunisation schedule with CoronaVac, compared with unvaccinated individuals. Individuals administered vaccines from Feb 2, 2021, to the prespecified study end date of Nov 10, 2021, were evaluated; we excluded individuals with a probable or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (RT-PCR or antigen test) on or before Feb 2, 2021, and individuals who had received at least one dose of any COVID-19 vaccine before Feb 2, 2021. We estimated the vaccine effectiveness of booster doses against laboratory-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 (symptomatic COVID-19) cases and COVID-19 outcomes (hospitalisation, admission to the intensive care unit [ICU], and death We used inverse probability-weighted and stratified survival regression models to estimate hazard ratios, accounting for time-varying vaccination status and adjusting for relevant demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical confounders. We estimated the change in hazard from unvaccinated status to vaccinated status associated with the primary immunisation series and a booster vaccine. FINDINGS: 11 174 257 individuals were eligible for this study, among whom 4 127 546 completed a primary immunisation schedule (two doses) with CoronaVac and received a booster dose during the study period. 1 921 340 (46·5%) participants received an AZD1222 booster, 2 019 260 (48·9%) received a BNT162b2 booster, and 186 946 (4·5%) received a homologous booster with CoronaVac. We calculated an adjusted vaccine effectiveness (weighted stratified Cox model) in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 of 78·8% (95% CI 76·8-80·6) for a three-dose schedule with CoronaVac, 96·5% (96·2-96·7) for a BNT162b2 booster, and 93·2% (92·9-93·6) for an AZD1222 booster. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-related hospitalisation, ICU admission, and death was 86·3% (83·7-88·5), 92·2% (88·7-94·6), and 86·7% (80·5-91·0) for a homologous CoronaVac booster, 96·1% (95·3-96·9), 96·2% (94·6-97·3), and 96·8% (93·9-98·3) for a BNT162b2 booster, and 97·7% (97·3-98·0), 98·9% (98·5-99·2), and 98·1% (97·3-98·6) for an AZD1222 booster. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that a homologous or heterologous booster dose for individuals with a complete primary vaccination schedule with CoronaVac provides a high level of protection against COVID-19, including severe disease and death. Heterologous boosters showed higher vaccine effectiveness than a homologous booster for all outcomes, providing additional support for a mix-and-match approach. FUNDING: Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo through the Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico, Millennium Science Initiative Program, and Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias.

Reacciones adversas a medicamentos utilizados para la COVID-19 en cinco países de América Latina / Adverse reactions to drugs used for COVID-19 in five Latin American countries / Reações adversas a medicamentos utilizados para a COVID-19 em cinco países da América Latina

RESUMEN Objetivo. Caracterizar y describir las notificaciones de sospechas de reacciones adversas de un grupo de medicamentos que se utilizaron en Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Chile, El Salvador, México y Perú para tratar o prevenir la enfermedad por el coronavirus (COVID-19, por su sigla en inglés) entre el 1 de marzo y el 31 de agosto del 2020. Métodos. Se elaboró una lista de los 13 medicamentos utilizados para tratar o prevenir la COVID-19, según fuentes oficiales y no oficiales. Desde las bases de datos de los programas nacionales de farmacovigilancia de los países participantes, se recopilaron las notificaciones de sospechas de reacciones adversas a estos medicamentos recibidas en el período comprendido entre el 1 de marzo y 31 de agosto de año 2020. Resultados. Se recibieron 3 490 notificaciones de sospechas de reacciones adversas desde los programas de farmacovigilancia de Perú (n = 3 037), Cuba (n = 270), Colombia (n = 108), Chile (n = 72) y El Salvador (n = 3). Los medicamentos con mayor número de notificaciones de reacciones adversas fueron la azitromicina, la ivermectina y la hidroxicloroquina. La diarrea fue el evento más frecuente (15,0%). Del total de las sospechas de reacciones adversas, 11,9% fueron notificadas como graves. La más frecuente fue la prolongación del intervalo QT posterior al uso de hidroxicloroquina. De estas sospechas de reacciones adversas graves, 54,5% ocurrieron en personas mayores de 65 años. Conclusión. Si bien no es posible establecer una relación causal a partir de la evaluación de informes espontáneos, el presente estudio confirma la presencia de reacciones adversas, algunas graves, con medicamentos que se utilizaron para tratar o prevenir la COVID-19.

ABSTRACT Objective. Characterize and describe reports of suspected adverse reactions to a group of drugs used in Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Chile, El Salvador, Mexico, and Peru to treat or prevent coronavirus disease (COVID-19) between 1 March and 31 August 2020. Methods. A list of the 13 drugs used to treat or prevent COVID-19 was prepared, based on official and unofficial sources. Drawing on the databases of the national pharmacovigilance programs of the participating countries, reports of suspected adverse reactions to these drugs were collected for the period from 1 March and 31 August 2020. Results. A total of 3 490 reports of suspected adverse reactions were received from the pharmacovigilance programs of Peru (n = 3 037), Cuba (n = 270), Colombia (n = 108), Chile (n = 72), and El Salvador (n = 3). The drugs with the highest number of reported adverse reactions were azithromycin, ivermectin, and hydroxychloroquine. Diarrhea was the most frequent event (15.0%). Of the total suspected adverse reactions, 11.9% were reported as serious. The most frequent was QT prolongation following use of hydroxychloroquine. Of these suspected serious adverse reactions, 54.5% occurred in people over 65 years of age. Conclusions. While it is not possible to establish a causal relationship from the evaluation of spontaneous reports, the present study confirms the presence of adverse reactions—some of them serious—involving drugs used to treat or prevent COVID-19.

RESUMO Objetivo. Caracterizar e descrever as notificações de suspeitas de reações adversas a um grupo de medicamentos utilizados na Colômbia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Chile, El Salvador, México e Peru, para tratar ou prevenir a doença do coronavírus (COVID-19), entre 1º de março e 31 de agosto de 2020. Métodos. Foi elaborada uma lista dos 13 medicamentos usados para tratar ou prevenir a COVID-19, segundo fontes oficiais e não oficiais. A partir das bases de dados dos programas nacionais de farmacovigilância dos países participantes, foram coletadas notificações de suspeitas de reações adversas a esses medicamentos, recebidas no período entre 1º de março e 31 de agosto de 2020. Resultados. Foram recebidas 3.490 notificações de suspeitas de reações adversas dos programas de farmacovigilância do Peru (n = 3.037), Cuba (n = 270), Colômbia (n = 108), Chile (n = 72) e El Salvador (n = 3). Os medicamentos com maior número de notificações de reações adversas foram azitromicina, ivermectina e hidroxicloroquina. A diarreia foi o evento mais frequente (15,0%). Do total de suspeitas de reações adversas, 11,9% foram notificadas como graves. A mais frequente foi o prolongamento do intervalo QT após o uso de hidroxicloroquina. Dessas suspeitas de reações adversas graves, 54,5% ocorreram em pessoas com mais de 65 anos. Conclusão. Embora não seja possível estabelecer uma relação causal com base na avaliação de relatos espontâneos, o presente estudo confirma a presença de reações adversas - algumas graves - a medicamentos que foram usados para tratar ou prevenir a COVID-19.

[Non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult men: systematic review]. / Intervenciones no farmacológicas para el tratamiento de la disfunción eréctil en varones adultos: revisión sistemática.

OBJECTIVE: To review current evidence on the non-pharmacological (non-invasive) treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). METHOD: We performed a systematic review of research articles that included adult men diagnosed with ED who had undergone some type of non-pharmacological and non-surgical intervention for this disorder. Free-access, complete texts with an available summary published between 2000 and 2006 were sought. Studies not published in English were excluded. RESULTS: A total for 124 articles were found, and after critical analysis only 8 matched the inclusion criteria (of the 8 articles, 2 were classified as showing quality criterion 1-B and none met the criterion for 1-A). Four types of non-pharmacological, non-surgical therapy were found, which could reverse or improve ED in patients with organic, psychological or mixed impairment and could be applied by nurses. Among these therapies were lifestyle changes (losing weight, pelvic musculature strengthening, psychotherapy and/or psychoeducation and the use of Internet and/or other multimedia devices. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative therapies are available for men with ED. These therapies help to improve or reverse ED and guarantee satisfactory and lasting Results. Nevertheless, we stress that our aim is not to compete with invasive and non-invasive therapies but rather to provide a greater number of treatment alternatives. The low quality of studies could be attributed to the lack of economic resources and the fact that ED is still an emerging subject in current medicine.