DynamX Bioadaptor, a novel "uncaging" platform for coronary artery revascularization: final 36-month clinical results

BACKGROUND Compared with bare-metal stents, drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in the first year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but still have an ongoing 2% to 3% annual event rate reaching 20% at 5 years and 40% to 50% at 10 years. The DynamX Novolimus-Eluting Coronary Bio adaptor System is a 71-mm, cobalt-chromium platform with a novel "uncaging" mechanism of circumferential rings that maintains the axial links between the rings following uncaging. Conventional metallic DES "cage" the coronary artery, inhibiting positive adaptive remodeling and vasomotion and causing geometric distortion. These factors likely contribute to the persistent annual MACE rate after PCI. The DynamX Bioadaptor combines the acute performance of contemporary DES and unique benefits of arterial "uncaging" beyond 6 months, allowing positive adaptive remodeling, restoring compli ance, and allowing treated vessels to return toward native vessel geometry. METHODS In this study the DynamX Bioadaptor was available in di ameters of 2.5 to 3.5 mm and lengths of 14 to 28 mm. This mechanistic clinical study enrolled 50 patients (mean age 66.3 8.8 years) at 5 centers in Belgium and Italy. Multiple endpoints including target lesion failure were assessed, with clinical follow-up through 3 years. Multimodality imaging endpoint analyses using quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence to mography were performed at baseline and at 9 or 12 months in separate subgroups. RESULTS Mean area changes for Bioadaptor, reference vessel and lumen as well as percentage neointimal volume and neointimal thickness observed at 9 and 12 months demonstrate Bioadaptor per formance and ability to preserve positive adaptive remodeling. Through 24 months, target lesion failure events were observed in 4.3% of patients, which is in line with contemporary DES clinical outcomes. Detailed imaging and final clinical data through 36 months will be presented. CONCLUSION The DynamX Bioadaptor demonstrated performance attributes of contemporary metallic DES with the unique capacity to restore positive adaptive remodeling through vessel "uncaging." Final clinical data through 36 months demonstrate longer term safety and efficacy.

The REMEDEE trial: 5­Year results on a novel combined sirolimus­eluting and endothelial progenitor cells capturing stent

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the novel combined sirolimus-eluting endothelial progenitor cell capture Combo stent (OrbusNeich, Fort Lauderdale, FL) at 5 years in the REMEDEE (Randomized study to Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an abluMinal sirolimus coated bio-Engineered stEnt) trial. BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents have limited restenosis and reintervention but are complicated by late and very late thrombosis and accelerated neoatherosclerosis. Alternative or adjunctive technologies are needed to address these limitations. METHODS: A total of 183 patients with de novo lesions in native coronary arteries were randomized 2:1 to Combo (n = 124) or Taxus Liberté (n = 59). Primary endpoint was 9 month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss and the secondary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse events (MACE) through 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: Compared with Taxus, after 5 years the Combo stent was associated with similar rates of MACE (18.3% vs. 16.9%, p = .89), cardiac death (0.8% vs. 5.1%, p = .07), myocardial infarction (4.1% vs. 3.4%, p = .81), target lesion (9.4% vs. 10.2%, p = .78), and target vessel revascularization (14.4% vs. 11.9%, p = .73). No cases of definite stent thrombosis were reported in the Combo group. The follow-up rate at 5 years was 97.7%. CONCLUSION: At 5-year follow-up, the Combo stent remained clinically safe and effective with an overall low rate of MACE comparable to Taxus.

Safety and Clinical performance of the drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold in the treatment of subjects with de novo lesions in native coronary arteries at 36- month follow-up: BIOSOLVE-II and BIOSOLVE-III

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the safety and clinical performance of the Sirolimus-Eluting Bioabsorbable Magnesium Scaffold (DREAMS 2G) from the combined analysis of BIOSOLVE- II and -III studies at 36 months. METHODS A total of 184 subjects have been enrolled in the BIOSOLVE-II and -III studies. Clinical follow-ups are scheduled at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months plus 60 months for BIOSOLVE-II. Angiographies are planned at 6 months and voluntarily at 12 and 36 months in BIOSOLVE-II, and 1 angiography is mandatory at 12 months in the BIOSOLVE-III study. Dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended for a minimum of 6 months. The angiographic results are analyzed by an independent core laboratory and all clinical events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee. RESULTS A total of 117 men and 67 women with 189 lesions, mean age 65.5 _ 10.8 years, were enrolled at 18 sites in Europe, Brazil, and Singapore. Hypertension was presente in 79.3% of the subjects and 62% had hyperlipidemia. The mean lesion length was 12.6 _ 5.1 mm with a mean reference vessel diameter of 2.70 _ 0.43 mm. At 12 months, 97 patients had available angiographic follow-up. There was no difference in late lumen loss between the 2 studies; in the overall population, it was 0.25 _ 0.31 mm in-segment and 0.39 _ 0.34 mm in-scaffold. The target lesion failure (TLF) rate of the combined population was 3.3%, including 2 cardiac deaths (1.1%), 1 target vessel myocardial infarction (0.6%), and 3 clinically driven target lesion revascularizations (1.7%). The 36-month clinical data of BIOSOLVE- II study are available. Target lesion failure occurred in 8 patients (6.8%) and included 2 cardiac deaths (1.7%), 1 target vessel myocardial infarction (0.9%), and 5 clinically driven target lesion revascularizations (4.3%). No definite or probable scaffold thrombosis was observed. The 36- month clinical visits are ongoing for BIOSOLVE-III patients and data of the combined cohort will be available upon presentation. CONCLUSION The 36-month results of DREAMS 2G, meaning 2 years beyond the completion of resorption, are encouraging on safety and clinical performance standpoints. They will be presented for a larger population of subjects enrolled in the BIOSOLVE-II and -III studies. (AU)

Comparison of clinical outcomes between Magmaris and Orsiro drug eluting stent at 12 months: Pooled patient level analysis from BIOSOLVE II-III and BIOFLOW II trials

Background The aim of this study was to compare the 12-month clinical outcomes of patients treated with Magmaris or Orsiro. Second generation drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold Magmaris (Dreams 2G) has proved to be safe and effective in the BIOSOLVE-II study. Similarly, biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent, Orsiro has shown notable clinical results even in all-comer populations. Methods Magmaris group patients were taken from the BIOSOLVE-II and BIOSOLVE-III trials, while the patients from Orsiro group were enrolled in BIOFLOW-II trial. The primary outcome was explored using a time-to-event assessment of the unadjusted clinical outcomes for target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months, followed by a multivariate analysis adjusting for all the significantly different covariates between the groups. Results The study population consisted of 482 patients (521 lesions), 184 patients (189 lesions) in Magmaris group and 298 patients (332 lesions) in Orsiro group. The mean age was 65.5 ±â€¯10.8 and 62.7 ±â€¯10.4 years in Magmaris and Orsiro groups, respectively ( p = 0.005). Magmaris and Orsiro unadjusted TLF rates were 6.0 and 6.4% with no significant difference between the groups ( p = 0.869). In the multivariate analysis, there were no meaningful differences between Magmaris and Orsiro groups. Finally, none of the groups presented device thrombosis cases at 12 months. Conclusion At 12 months there were no significant differences between Magmaris and Orsiro groups neither in the unadjusted assessment nor in the multivariate analysis for target lesion failure. These results should be taken as hypothesis generating and may warrant a head to head comparison on a randomized fashion.

Safety and clinical performance of a drug eluting absorbable metal scaffold in the treatment of subjects with de novo lesions in native coronary arteries: Pooled 12-month outcomes of BIOSOLVE-II and BIOSOLVE-III

OBJECTIVES: Based on outcomes of the BIOSOLVE-II study, a novel second generation drug eluting absorbable metal scaffold gained CE-mark in 2016. The BIOSOLVE-III study aimed to confirm these outcomes and to obtain additional 12-month angiographic data. BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable scaffolds are intended to overcome possible long-term effects of permanent stents such as chronic vessel wall inflammation, stent crushing, and fractures. METHODS: The prospective, multicenter BIOSOLVE-II and BIOSOLVE-III studies enrolled 184 patients with 189 lesions (123 patients in BIOSOLVE-II and 61 patients in BIOSOLVE-III). Primary endpoints were in-segment late lumen loss at 6 months (BIOSOLVE-II) and procedural success (BIOSOLVE-III). RESULTS: Mean patient age was 65.5 6 10.8 years and mean lesion reference diameter was 2.70 6 0.43 mm. In BIOSOLVE-III, there were significantly more type B2/C lesions than in BIOSOLVE-II (80.3% versus 43.4%, P < 0.0001) and significantly more moderate-to-severe calcifications (24.2% versus 10.7%, P 5 0.014). At 12 months, there was no difference in late lumen loss between the two studies; in the overall population, it was 0.25 6 0.31 mm in-segment and 0.396 0.34 mm in scaffold. Target lesion failure occurred in six patients (3.3%) and included two cardiac deaths, one target-vessel myocardial infarction, and three clinically driven target lesion revascularizations. No definite or probable scaffold thrombosis was observed. CONCLUSION: The pooled outcomes of BIOSOLVE-II and BIOSOLVE-III provide further evidence on the safety and performance of a novel drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold with constant clinical and angiographic performance parameters at 12 months and no definite or probable scaffold thrombosis.

Sustained safety and clinical performance of a drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold up to 24 months: pooled outcomes of BIOSOLVE-II and BIOSOLVE-III

AIMS: We aimed to assess the safety and performance of the DREAMS 2G scaffold up to 24 months post implant. METHODS AND RESULTS: The present study population comprises a total of 184 patients with 189 lesions who were enrolled in the prospective, multicentre BIOSOLVE-II and BIOSOLVE-III trials. Clinical follow-up was scheduled at one, six, 12, 24 and 36 months. The present report includes pooled follow-up data at six months and BIOSOLVE-II data at 24 months. Patients were 65.5±10.8 years old, and lesions were 12.5±5.1 mm long with reference diameters of 2.7±0.4 mm. Procedural success was obtained in 97.8%. At six months, the composite clinical endpoint target lesion failure was 3.3% (95% CI: 1.2-7.1), based on two cardiac deaths (1.1%, one unknown and one not device-related), one target vessel myocardial infarction (0.6%), and three clinically driven target lesion revascularisations (1.7%). For BIOSOLVE-II at 24 months, the target lesion failure rate was 5.9% (95% CI: 2.4-11.8), based on two cardiac deaths (1.7%), one target vessel myocardial infarction (0.9%) and four target lesion revascularisations (3.4%). There was no definite or probable scaffold thrombosis...

Serial Multimodality Imaging and 2-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Novel DESolve Novolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold System for the Treatment of Single De Novo Coronary Lesions.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to report the late multimodality imaging and clinical outcomes of the novel poly-l-lactic-acid-based DESolve novolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable scaffolds are an alternative to drug-eluting metallic stents and provide temporary vascular scaffolding, which potentially may allow vessel restoration and reduce the risk of future adverse events. METHODS: Overall, 126 patients were enrolled at 13 international sites between November 2011 and June 2012. The primary endpoint was in-scaffold late lumen loss at 6 months. Major adverse cardiac events, the main safety endpoint, were defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. All patients underwent angiography at 6 months. Serial intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography were performed in a subset of patients. RESULTS: The scaffold device success rate was 97% (n = 122 of 126), and procedural success was 100% (n = 122 of 122). The major adverse cardiac event rate was 3.3% (n = 4 of 122) at 6 months and 7.4% (n = 9 of 122) at 24 months, including 1 probable stent thrombosis within the first month. At 6-month angiographic follow-up, in-scaffold late lumen loss was 0.20 ± 0.32 mm. Paired intravascular ultrasound analysis demonstrated a significant increase in vessel, lumen and scaffold dimensions between post-procedure and 6-month follow-up, and strut-level optical coherence tomography analysis showed full strut coverage in 99 ± 1.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed favorable performance of the DESolve scaffold, effective inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia, and for the first time, early luminal and scaffold growth at 6 months with sustained efficacy and safety through 2 years. (Elixir Medical Clinical Evaluation of the DESolve Novolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold System-The DESolve Nx Trial; NCT02086045).

Serial multimodality imaging and 2-Year clinical outcomes of the novel DESolve novolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold system for the treatment of single de novo coronary lesions

OBJECTIVES:This study sought to report the late multimodality imaging and clinical outcomes of the novel poly-l-lactic-acid-based DESolve novolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable scaffolds are an alternative to drug-eluting metallic stents and provide temporary vascular scaffolding, which potentially may allow vessel restoration and reduce the risk of future adverse events...

DESyne novolimus-eluting coronary stent is superior to Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent at five-year follow-up: final results of the multicentre EXCELLA II randomised controlled trial

Aims: Newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have been shown to be superior to first-generation DES. Current-generation DES have zotarolimus, everolimus or biolimus as antiproliferative drugs. Novolimus, a metabolite of sirolimus, has been specifically developed to provide efficacy similar to currently available agents at a lower dose and thus requires a lower polymer load. We report the final five-year outcomes of the EXCELLA II trial comparing a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) with a novolimus-eluting stent (NES).Methods and results: EXCELLA II is a prospective, multicentre, single-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial. Patients (n=210) with a maximum of two de novo lesions in two different epicardial vessels were randomised (2:1) to treatment with either NES (n=139) or ZES (n=71). At five-year follow-up, patients in the NES group had a significantly lower incidence of the patient-oriented (HR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32-0.87, p=0.013) and device-oriented (HR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17-0.83, p=0.011) composite endpoints. There was no difference in cardiac death and definite/probable stent thrombosis between the two groups; however, there was a trend towards reduction in myocardial infarction and repeat revascularisation in the NES group at five-year follow-up.Conclusions: At five-year follow-up, the incidence of device- and patient-oriented events was significantly lower in the NES group. Further studies, adequately powered for clinical outcomes, are warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00792753.

A randomised comparison of novolimus-eluting and zotarolimuselutingcoronary stents: 9-month follow-up results of the EXCELLA II study

Aims: Novolimus, a macrocyclic lactone with anti-proliferative properties, has asimilar efficacy to currently available agents; however it requires a lower dose,and less polymer, and is therefore conceivably safer.Methods and results: The EXCELLA II study was a prospective, multicentre,single-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial which randomised 210 patients with a maximum of two de novo coronary artery lesions in two different epicardialvessels in a ratio of 2:1 to treatment with either the Elixir DESyne NovolimusEluting Coronary Stent System (NES n=139, Elixir Medical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA)or the Endeavor zotarolimus eluting stent (ZES n=71, Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA,USA). The primary endpoint was in-stent mean late lumen loss (LLL) at 9-monthsfollow-up. In-stent percent volume obstruction (%VO) was measured in asub-group of 65 patients having 9-month intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) follow-up.Clinical secondary endpoints included a device orientated composite of cardiacdeath, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically indicated target lesionrevascularisation (CI-TLR) assessed at 9-months follow-up. At 9-months, thein-stent LLL was 0.11±0.32 mm in the NES arm, as compared to 0.63±0.42 mm inthe ZES (p<0.0001 non-inferiority, p<0.0001 superiority). In-stent%VO was4.5±5.1% and 20.9±11.3% for NES and ZES, respectively (p<0.001). There wasno significant difference between stent groups in the device orientated compositeendpoint (NES 2.9% vs. ZES 5.6%, –2.8% [-8.8%, 3.3%], p=0.45) or its individualcomponents of cardiac death, target vessel MI and CI-TLR.Conclusions: This non-inferiority randomised study not only met its primaryendpoint, but also demonstrated superiority of NES compared to the ZES in terms of in-stent LLL.

A Next-Generation Bioresorbable CoronaryScaffold System: From Bench toFirst Clinical Evaluation

This study sought to perform clinical and imaging assessments of the DESolveBioresorbable Coronary Scaffold (BCS).Background BCS, which is drug eluting, may have potential advantages compared with conventionalmetallic drug-eluting stents. The DESolve system, designed to provide vessel support and neointimalsuppression, combines a poly-L-lactic acid–based scaffold with the antiproliferative myolimus.Methods The DESolve First-in-Man (A NON-RANDOMIZED, CONSECUTIVE ENROLLMENT EVALUATIONOF THE DESolve MYOLIMUS ELUTING BIORESORBABLE CORONARY STENT IN THE TREATMENT OFPATIENTS WITH DE NOVO NATIVE CORONARY ARTERY LESIONS) trial was a prospective multicenterstudy enrolling 16 patients eligible for treatment. The principal safety endpoint was a composite ofcardiac death, myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. Theprincipal imaging endpoint was in-scaffold late lumen loss (LLL) assessed by quantitative coronaryangiography (QCA) at 6 months. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography(OCT) imaging was performed at baseline and 6 months; multislice computed tomography (MSCT) wasperformed at 12 months.Results Acute procedural success was achieved in 15 of 15 patients receiving a study scaffold. At12 months, there was no scaffold thrombosis and no major adverse cardiac events directly attributableto the scaffold. At 6 months, in-scaffold LLL (by QCA) was 0.19 0.19 mm; neointimal volume (by IVUS)was 7.19 3.56%, with no evidence of scaffold recoil or late malapposition. Findings were confirmedwith OCT and showed uniform, thin neointimal coverage (0.12 0.04 mm). At 12 months, MSCTdemonstrated excellent vessel patency.

The REMEDEE trial: a randomized comparison of a combination sirolimus-eluting endothelial progenitor cell capture stent with a paclitaxel-eluting stent.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the efficacy and safety results after coronary implantation of a combined sirolimus-eluting CD34 antibody coated Combo stent (OrbusNeich Medical, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida) with the paclitaxel-eluting Taxus Liberté stent (PES) (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts). This report summarizes the first-in-man randomized, controlled multicenter REMEDEE trial (Randomized study to Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an abluMinal sirolimus coatED bio-Engineered StEnt) angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical results up to 12 months. BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents have limited restenosis and reintervention but are complicated by especially late and very late stent thrombosis and accelerated neoatherosclerosis. Alternative or adjunct technologies should address these limitations. METHODS: One hundred eighty-three patients with de novo native coronary artery stenoses were randomized 2:1 to Combo stent or PES implantation. The primary endpoint is the angiographic in-stent late lumen loss at 9 months, which was tested for noninferiority between the 2 stent groups. Secondary endpoints include the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events. RESULTS: The Combo stent was found to be noninferior to the PES in 9-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss with 0.39 ± 0.45 mm versus 0.44 ± 0.56 mm (pnoninferiority = 0.0012). At 12 months, the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events was 8.9% in the Combo group and 10.2% in the PES group (p = 0.80) with no difference in mortality, occurrence of myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization. No stent thrombosis was reported in either group. CONCLUSIONS: In the REMEDEE trial the Combo stent has shown to be effective by meeting the primary noninferiority angiographic endpoint and safe, with an overall low rate of clinical events in both stent groups, including no stent thrombosis up to 12 months.

Two-year follow-up of the NEVO ResElution-I(NEVO RES-I) trial: a randomised, multicentre comparison of the NEVO sirolimus-eluting coronary stent with the TAXUS Liberté paclitaxel-eluting stent in de novo native coronary artery lesions.

AIMS: To assess the two-year clinical follow-up of the NEVO RES-1 study, a randomised comparison between the NEVO™ sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system (NEVO SES) and the TAXUS Liberté™ paclitaxel-eluting stent (TAXUS PES). METHODS AND RESULTS: NEVO RES-I randomised 394 patients with single de novo lesions with a maximum length of 28 mm and diameter of 2.5-3.5 mm to NEVO SES (n=202) versus TAXUS PES (n=192). Six-month angiographic results demonstrated the superiority of the NEVO SES over the TAXUS PES for the primary endpoint, in-stent late loss. At one year, MACE (death, emergent CABG, TLR, and MI) in the NEVO SES group was 6.1% versus 10.6% in the TAXUS PES group (p=0.139). After two years, MACE was 7.2% in the NEVO SES group versus 13.0% in TAXUS PES group (p=0.086). Corresponding rates of TLR were 3.6% versus 7.6% (p=0.116). No ARC-defined definite or probable stent thromboses (ST) were reported with NEVO SES while two occurred with TAXUS PES. CONCLUSIONS: While not designed or powered for clinical endpoints, individual and composite clinical endpoints numerically favoured the NEVO SES over the TAXUS PES, with continued separation over time up to two years. No ARC-defined definite or probable ST was reported in the NEVO SES group at two years. Clinical trial identifier: NCT00606333 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Two-year follow-up of the NEVO ResElution-I(NEVO RES-I)trial: a randomised, multicentre comparison of the NEVOsirolimus-eluting coronary stent with the TAXUS Libertépaclitaxel-eluting stent in de novo native coronary arterylesions

Aims: To assess the two-year clinical follow-up of the NEVO RES-1 study, a randomised comparisonbetween the NEVO™ sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system (NEVO SES) and the TAXUS Liberté™ paclitaxel-eluting stent (TAXUS PES).Methods and results: NEVO RES-I randomised 394 patients with single de novo lesions with a maximumlength of 28 mm and diameter of 2.5-3.5 mm to NEVO SES (n=202) versus TAXUS PES (n=192). Six-monthangiographic results demonstrated the superiority of the NEVO SES over the TAXUS PES for the primaryendpoint, in-stent late loss. At one year, MACE (death, emergent CABG, TLR, and MI) in the NEVO SESgroup was 6.1% versus 10.6% in the TAXUS PES group (p=0.139). After two years, MACE was 7.2% in theNEVO SES group versus 13.0% in TAXUS PES group (p=0.086). Corresponding rates of TLR were 3.6%versus 7.6% (p=0.116). No ARC-defined definite or probable stent thromboses (ST) were reported withNEVO SES while two occurred with TAXUS PES.Conclusions: While not designed or powered for clinical endpoints, individual and composite clinical endpointsnumerically favoured the NEVO SES over the TAXUS PES, with continued separation over time upto two years. No ARC-defined definite or probable ST was reported in the NEVO SES group at two years.

Intravascular ultrasound comparison of small coronary lesions between novel guidewire-based sirolimus-eluting stents and conventional sirolimus-eluting stents

The Sparrow stent system (Biosensors International) consists of a self-expanding, ultra-thin nitinol stent mounted within a 0.014½ guidewire designed for small or tortuous coronary lesions. We compared the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings between the novel self-expanding sirolimus-eluting stent (Sparrow-SES) and a conventional balloon-expandable sirolimus-eluting stent (Cypher-SES) in patients with small coronary disease. Methods. We examined 14 lesions treated with the Sparrow-SES from CARE II, compared with 22 small vessel lesions treated with Cypher-SES. IVUS examination was performed post-procedure and 8 months later. Volumetric data were standardized by length as volume index (VI; mm3/mm). Results. While baseline stent VI trended smaller in Sparrow-SES, follow-up stent VI became similar between the 2 groups due to a significant increase of stent VI in self-expanding Sparrow-SES during the follow-up period. At 8 months, Sparrow-SES showed greater neointima than Cypher-SES (0.8 ± 0.6 mm3/mm vs 0.2 ± 0.2 mm3/mm; P<.001). However, the decrease in lumen VI was only 0.3 ± 0.7 mm3/mm in Sparrow-SES, as compared to 0.1 ± 0.3 mm3/mm in Cypher-SES (P=.259), since the late loss due to neointimal hyperplasia was partly counterbalanced by the chronic stent expansion in Sparrow-SES. Conclusion. While 8-month follow-up of Sparrow-SES revealed greater amounts of neointimal hyperplasia compared with conventional Cypher-SES, chronic stent expansion preserved the lumen by increasing stent volume. This novel, guidewire-based, self-expanding stent system designed to be delivered through complex anatomies may be useful to treat patients with small-caliber coronary lesions by offering sufficient lumen preservation at follow-up.

Six-month results of the NEVO RES-ELUTION I (NEVO RES-I) trial: randomized, multicenter comparison of the NEVO Sirolimus-Eluting coronary stent vith the TAXUS libert paclitaxel-eluting stent in de novo native coronary artery lesions

Background—Drug-eluting stents reduce restenosis and reintervention rates but are complicated by stent thrombosis,which may be related to polymer coating. The NEVO sirolimus-eluting coronary stent (NEVO SES) is designed to improve long-term percutaneous coronary intervention safety by combining sirolimus release from reservoirs withbioabsorbable polymer to reduce spatial and temporal polymer exposure.Methods and Results—NEVO ResElution-I was a prospective randomized study in 394 patients with coronary arterydisease comparing the NEVO SES with the TAXUS Liberte´ paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent (TAXUS Liberte´ PES)stent. The primary end point was in-stent angiographic late loss at 6 months. Six months after percutaneous coronaryintervention (PCI), the primary end point favored NEVO SES (0.13 0.31 mm versus 0.36 0.48 mm, P 0.001 fornoninferiority and superiority). The study was not powered for clinical end points and showed no significant differencefor NEVO SES versus TAXUS Liberte´ PES: death: 0.5 versus 1.6%, P 0.36; myocardial infarction: 2.0 versus 2.6%,P 0.75; target lesion revascularization: 1.5 versus 3.2%, P 0.33; major adverse cardiac events: 4.0 versus 7.4%, P 0.19.No stent thrombosis was observed with NEVO SES, whereas 2 cases occurred in TAXUS Liberte´ PES. Intravascularultrasound showed lower percent volume obstruction for NEVO SES (5.5 11% versus 11.5 9.7%, P 0.016).Conclusions—This trial proved the superiority of NEVO SES over TAXUS Liberte´ PES for the primary angiographic endpoint of in-stent late loss. No stent thrombosis occurred in the NEVO SES group.

One-year clinical outcome of various doses and pharmacokinetic release formulations of paclitaxel elutedfrom an erodable polymer - Insight in the PaclitaxelIn-Stent Controlled Elution Study (PISCES)

The one year clinical benefit of various doses and release durations of paclitaxel eluted from an erodablepolymer has not been evaluated so far.Methods and results: Conor paclitaxel-eluting stents have intra-stent wells in which drug and polymer aredeposited. Stents with six different release formulations (dose: 10 μg or 30 μg, duration: 5, 10 or 30 days,direction: mural or bidirectional) were implanted in 6 patient cohorts. Clinical follow-up was conducted at4 and 12 months. Quantitative angiography and IVUS were performed at 4 months, and additional angiographicand IVUS follow-up were performed for groups D5 (10μg/30days/mural) and D6(30μg/30days/mural), as they had shown the most favorable results at 4 months. At one year, the lowestmajor adverse cardiac event rates were observed in the slow release (30 day) group (5.1% in D5 and 6.9%in D6). One-year in-stent late loss was 0.52±0.34 mm in D5 and 0.36±0.50mm in D6 (p=0.20) whileneointimal area was 0.99±0.54 mm2 in D5 and 0.77±0.92 mm2 in D6 (p=0.42). Corresponding in-stentbinary restenosis at one year was 0% and 5.6% respectively (p=0.36).Conclusions: Patients who received the slow release formulation stent had better clinical outcome at oneyear than those who received the fast release formulation. However, the effect on neointimal suppressionrequires investigation in a larger population to determine whether the high dose formulation confers anadditional clinical benefit.

The effect of variable dose and release kinetics on neointimal hyperplasia using a novel paclitaxel-eluting stent platform

The aim of this study was to evaluate th effect of variable dose and release kinetics of paclitaxel on neointimal hyperplasia.Conventional paclitaxel-eluting stents use a durable polymer coating as vehicle for drug delivery.The Conor stent (Conor Medsystem, Menlo Park, Califórnia) with intra-strut wells and erodable polymer is specifically designed for drug delivery with programmable pharmakocinetics.Two hundred and forty-four patients with single vessel disease received either a bare metal Conor stent(n=53) or one of six different release formulations that varied in dose (10 or 30yg) and elution release kinetics (first order, zero oder), direction (abluminal, luminal), and duration (5, 10, and 30 days)...