Intrinsic capacity and frailty in older adults with end-stage kidney disease undergoing pre-kidney transplant comprehensive geriatric assessment.

OBJECTIVE: Frailty has been extensively studied in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and kidney transplant (KT) patients. The identification of frailty is useful to predict adverse outcomes among ESKD and KT patients. The recent concept of intrinsic capacity (IC) appears as a good and easy-to-understand tool to screen for and monitor frailty in older adults with ESKD. This study aims to assess the relationships between frailty and IC in older adults with ESKD awaiting KT. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 236 patients from a day-care geriatric unit undergoing pre-KT geriatric assessment between 2017 and 2022 were included in the main sample, and 151 patients in an independent multicentric replication sample. MEASUREMENTS: Frailty was evaluated using the physical frailty phenotype (PFP) and IC measures using the World Health Organization's screening (step 1) and diagnostic (step 2) tools for five IC domains (vitality, locomotion, audition, cognition, psychology). Multivariate regressions were run to assess relationships between PFP and IC domains, adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidities. Analyses were replicated using another independent multicenter cohort including 151 patients with ESKD to confirm the results. RESULTS: Impairments in the locomotion, psychology, and vitality IC domains according to WHO screening tools were associated with frailty (odds ratio 9.62 [95% CI 4.09-24.99], 3.19 [95% CI 1.11-8.88], and 3.11 [95% CI 1.32-7.29], respectively). When IC were measured linearly with z-scores, all IC domains except hearing were inversely associated with frailty. In the replication cohort, results were overall similar, with a greater association between psychology domain and frailty. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the relationship between frailty and IC in ESKD patients. We assume that IC may be assessed and monitored in ESKD patients, to predict and prevent future frailty, and post-KT adverse outcomes.

Potentially inappropriate medications and anticholinergic and sedative burden in older community-dwelling patients with advanced chronic kidney disease

Objective: Regarding older patients, multiple chronic conditions lead to the intake of multiple medications, involving a higher risk of adverse drug events. In older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, the medication exposure was poorly explored. The aim of this study was to describe the use of potentially inappropriate medications and medications with anticholinergic and sedative properties in older community-dwelling patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Methods: An observational study was conducted in a geriatric day-care unit. All patients aged over 65 years with advanced chronic kidney disease, defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate < 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 or estimated glomerular filtration rate > 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 with rapid progression, and referred by nephrologist for pretransplant comprehensive geriatric assessment, were included in the study. Potentially inappropriate medications were identified using the EU(7)-PIM list, and he anticholinergic and sedative drug exposure was measured using the Drug Burden Index. Results: Overall, 139 patients were included in the study (mean age 74.4 ± 3.3 years, 32.4% females, 61.9% on dialysis). Potentially inappropriate medications were used by 74.1% (103/139) of patients and were mainly represented by proton pump inhibitors, alpha-1-blockers and central antihypertensive drugs. Regarding anticholinergic and / or sedative medications, 79.9% (111/139) of older patients were exposed. Conclusion: In older community-dwelling patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication exposure and anticholinergic and sedative exposure was high. Interventions focusing on deprescription of these inappropriate medications should be conducted in this specific population.

Objectif: Chez le patient âgé, la polypathologie est souvent associée à la prise de plusieurs médicaments, impliquant un risque élevé d'iatrogénie médicamenteuse. L'exposition médicamenteuse a été peu explorée chez les patients âgés atteints d'insuffisance rénale chronique. L'objectif de cette étude est de décrire l'exposition aux médicaments potentiellement inappropriés et aux médicaments présentant des propriétés anticholinergiques et sédatives chez ces patients. Méthodes: Il s'agit d'une étude observationnelle conduite au sein d'un hôpital de jour gériatrique. Tous les patients âgés de plus de 65 ans avec une maladie rénale chronique avancée, définie par un débit de filtration glomérulaire estimé inférieur à 20 mL/min/1,73 m² ou supérieur à 20 mL/min/1,73 m² avec une progression rapide, et adressés par un néphrologue pour la réalisation d'une évaluation gériatrique standardisée pré-transplantation rénale, ont été inclus dans l'étude. Les médicaments potentiellement inappropriés ont été identifiés à partir de la liste EU(7)-PIM, et l'exposition aux médicaments anticholinergiques et sédatifs a été mesurée à partir du Drug Burden Index. Résultats: Un total de 139 patients a été inclus dans l'étude (74,4 ± 3,3 ans, 32,4 % de femmes, 61,9 % dialysés). Des médicaments potentiellement inappropriés ont été retrouvés chez 74,1 % (103/139) des patients. Ils étaient principalement représentés par les inhibiteurs de la pompe à protons, les alpha-1-bloquants et les antihypertenseurs centraux. Concernant les médicaments anticholinergiques et/ou sédatifs, 79,9 % (111/139) des patients âgés étaient exposés. Conclusion: L'étude montre que la prévalence de l'exposition aux médicaments potentiellement inappropriés et aux médicaments anticholinergiques et/ou sédatifs est élevée chez les patients âgés atteints de maladie rénale chronique avancée. Des interventions portant sur la déprescription de ces médicaments devraient être menées auprès de cette population spécifique.

Drug-related problems in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease identified during pretransplant comprehensive geriatric assessment.

BACKGROUND: Older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease may be exposed to a higher risk of adverse drug events due to chronic kidney disease and aging. The integration of clinical pharmacist into pretransplant comprehensive geriatric assessment is an opportunity to perform medication optimization. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to describe drug-related problems in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. METHODS: Observational study was conducted with retrospective data from July 2017 to April 2019. Patients≥65 years with advanced chronic kidney disease, referred by nephrologists for pretransplant comprehensive geriatric assessment were included. During medication optimization, the pharmacist evaluated the appropriateness of each medication prescribed and identified drug-related problems. Any drug-related problem identified lead to a pharmaceutical intervention. RESULTS: In total, 103 patients were included (74.5±2.9 years, 26.2% female, 47.6% on dialysis). Overall, 394 drug-related problems were identified in 93.2% of patients (3.8±2.4 drug-related problems per patient) during the medication optimization. Cardiovascular medications (25.1%), antithrombotics (13.5%) and drugs for peptic ulcer and reflux disease (10.2%) were the most involved drugs in drug-related problems. Drug-related problems mainly concerned drugs without indication (27.1%), inappropriate method of administration (24.4%) and non-conformity to guidelines (20.1%). CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of drug-related problems in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease was identified during medication optimization. The systematic integration of a clinical pharmacist in the multidisciplinary team performing pretransplant comprehensive geriatric assessment may be relevant to detect inappropriate prescriptions and to prevent from adverse drug events.

Pretransplant Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: In older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), the decision of kidney transplantation (KT) is a challenge for nephrologists. The use of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is increasingly gaining interest into the process of decision-making about treatment modality choice for CKD. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of geriatric impairment and frailty in older dialysis and nondialysis patients with advanced CKD using a pretransplant CGA model and to identify geriatric impairments influencing the geriatricians' recommendations for KT. METHODS: An observational study was conducted with retrospective data from July 2017 to January 2020. Patients aged ≥65 years with advanced CKD, treated or not with dialysis, and referred by the nephrologist were included in the study. The CGA assessed comorbidity burden, cognition, mood, nutritional status, (instrumental) activities of daily living, physical function, frailty, and polypharmacy. Geriatric impairments influencing the geriatricians' recommendations for KT were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: 156 patients were included (74.2 ± 3.5 years and 62.2% on dialysis). Geriatric conditions were highly prevalent in both dialysis and nondialysis groups. The rate of geriatric impairments was higher in dialysis patients regarding comorbidity burden, symptoms of depression, physical function, autonomy, and frailty. Geriatrician's recommendations for KT were as follows: favorable (79.5%) versus not favorable or multidisciplinary discussion needed with nephrologists (20.5%). Dependence for Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) (odds ratio [OR] = 3.01 and 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30-7.31), physical functions (OR = 2.91 and 95% CI = 1.08-7.87), and frailty (OR = 2.66 and 95% CI = 1.07-6.65) were found to be independent geriatric impairments influencing geriatrician's recommendations for KT. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the burden of geriatric impairment provides an opportunity to direct KT decision-making and to guide interventions to prevent functional decline and preserve quality of life.

What Could Be the Main Levers to Promote a Timely Diagnosis of Neurocognitive Disorders?

BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive disorders (NCD) are a growing health issue and the importance of diagnosis is still debated despite the benefits of making a diagnosis appearing to be greater than the risks. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to explore the perception of the main benefits and risks to perform a diagnosis workup of NCD in a population of general practitioners (GPs), specialized physicians (SPs), other healthcare professionals (OHPs), and informal caregivers (ICs), and to identify the lowest perceived benefits and the highest perceived risks that could be levers to promote a diagnosis of NCD. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was submitted to GPs, SPs, OHPs, and ICs aiming to evaluate the importance of eight benefits and eight risks related to NCD diagnosis (selected from the literature) for four prototypical clinical cases at different stages of the disease: subjective cognitive impairment/mild NCD, major NCD at mild/moderate stage, moderate stage with behavioral and psychotic symptoms, and severe stage. RESULTS: The lowest perceived benefits of making an NCD diagnosis were "access to medical research", "patient's right to know", and "initiation of symptomatic drug treatment". The highest perceived risks of making an NCD diagnosis were "negative psychological impact for the patient", "absence of disease-modifying treatment", and "absence of suitable institution". CONCLUSION: This study highlights the lowest perceived benefits and the highest perceived risks of making an NCD diagnosis. These benefits and risks could be modified to become levers to promote a personalized diagnosis of NCD.

Medication exposure and frailty in older community-dwelling patients: a cross-sectional study.

Objective To investigate the association between the medication exposure, measured by the polypharmacy/excessive polypharmacy and the anticholinergic and/or sedative drug exposure, on frailty status among French older community-dwelling patients. Setting day-care unit in France (Lyon), with retrospective data from July, 2017 to March, 2018. Method This monocentric cross-sectional study included community-dwelling patients aged 65 years and over and admitted at the day-care unit for a geriatric evaluation. Frailty was assessed according to the frailty phenotype, described by Fried et al. Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were defined as the concomitant use of 5-9 and 10 or more drugs, respectively. The cumulative anticholinergic and sedative exposure was measured using the drug burden index (DBI). The DBI score was presented in 4 differentiated scores: a null score (DBI = 0), a combined score (anticholinergic and sedative score), an anticholinergic score, and a sedative score. The association between medication and frailty was assessed by logistic regression models controlled for multiple potential confounders. Main outcome measure Association between medication exposure (polypharmacy, anticholinergic and sedative exposure) and frailty. Results In this study, 403 patients were included: 44.7% were frail and 40.7% were pre-frail. Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy affected 44.7% and 17.1% of the population respectively. The mean DBI was 0.33 ± 0.43, with 16.4% of patients with only sedative exposure, 9.7% with only anticholinergic exposure and 33.0% with both exposures. After adjustment, polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were associated with frailty with adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 2.18 (1.03-4.22) and 2.72 (1.01-7.37) respectively. The cumulative exposure to anticholinergic and sedative drugs (combined score) was significantly associated to an increased risk for frailty with adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 3.54 (1.47-8.57). Conclusion The study showed that polypharmacy and cumulative anticholinergic and sedative exposure are associated with frailty. Further research should address the potential benefit of collaborative medication review for preventing medication-associated frailty.

Perception of Benefits and Risks of Neurocognitive Disorders Diagnosis: A French National Survey.

BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive disorders (NCD) are underdiagnosed in primary care, mainly because of the misunderstanding of benefits associated with timely diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the benefits and risks of diagnosis in a population of general practitioners (GPs), specialized physicians (SPs), other healthcare professionals (HPs), and informal caregivers (ICs). METHODS: A questionnaire was submitted to GPs, SPs, HPs. and ICs. It aimed at evaluating benefits and risks related to NCD diagnosis associated with four prototypical clinical cases at different stages: isolated cognitive complaint/mild NCD, major NCD at mild/moderate stage, moderate stage with behavioral and psychotic symptoms, and severe stage. The concepts of early, timely, and personalized diagnosis were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 719 completed surveys were collected from 183 GPs, 176 SPs, 281 HPs, and 79 ICs. More than 90% of the participants considered initiating a diagnosis as relevant except at the severe stage. Benefits were superior to risks for all groups and all four cases alike (p < 0.001). Benefits were lower according to GPs and higher for SPs than the other groups at the first two stages (p < 0.001). At the moderate stage, there were few differences between groups. At the severe stage, GPs and SPs claimed it was less relevant to carry out a diagnosis than the other groups (p < 0.001). Risks were higher for ICs and lower for SPs (p < 0.001). The best diagnosis concept was the personalized diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Benefits appeared more relevant than risks with differences according to the stage of the disease and type of respondents.