The Effect of the Time Interval Between Radiation and Hyperthermia on Clinical Outcome in 400 Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma Patients.

Background: Addition of deep hyperthermia to radiotherapy results in improved local control (LC) and overall survival compared to radiotherapy alone in cervical carcinoma patients. Based on preclinical data, the time interval between radiotherapy, and hyperthermia is expected to influence treatment outcome. Clinical studies addressing the effect of time interval are sparse. The repercussions for clinical applications are substantial, as the time between radiotherapy and hyperthermia should be kept as short as possible. In this study, we therefore investigated the effect of the time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia on treatment outcome. Methods: We analyzed all primary cervical carcinoma patients treated between 1996 and 2016 with thermoradiotherapy at our institute. Data on patients, tumors and treatments were collected, including the thermal dose parameters TRISE and CEM43T90. Follow-up data on tumor status and survival as well as late toxicity were collected. Data was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards analysis and Kaplan Meier analysis. Results: 400 patients were included. Kaplan Meier and univariate Cox analysis showed no effect of the time interval (range 30-230 min) on any clinical outcome measure. Besides known prognostic factors, thermal dose parameters TRISE and CEM43T90 had a significant effect on LC. In multivariate analysis, the thermal dose parameter TRISE (HR 0.649; 95% CI 0.501-0.840) and the use of image guided brachytherapy (HR 0.432; 95% CI 0.214-0.972), but not the time interval, were significant predictors of LC and disease specific survival. Conclusions: The time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia, up to 4 h, has no effect on clinical outcome. These results are re-ensuring for our current practice of delivering hyperthermia within maximal 4 h after radiotherapy.

Prognostic value and kinetics of circulating endothelial cells in patients with recurrent glioblastoma randomised to bevacizumab plus lomustine, bevacizumab single agent or lomustine single agent. A report from the Dutch Neuro-Oncology Group BELOB trial.

BACKGROUND: Angiogenesis is crucial for glioblastoma growth, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents are widely used in recurrent glioblastoma patients. The number of circulating endothelial cells (CECs) is a surrogate marker for endothelial damage. We assessed their kinetics and explored their prognostic value in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS: In this side study of the BELOB trial, 141 patients with recurrent glioblastoma were randomised to receive single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine, or bevacizumab plus lomustine. Before treatment, after 4 weeks and after 6 weeks of treatment, CECs were enumerated. RESULTS: The number of CECs increased during treatment with bevacizumab plus lomustine, but not during treatment in the single-agent arms. In patients treated with lomustine single agent, higher absolute CEC numbers after 4 weeks (log10CEC hazard ratio (HR) 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.91) and 6 weeks (log10CEC HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.56) of treatment were associated with improved overall survival (OS). Absolute CEC numbers in patients receiving bevacizumab plus lomustine or bevacizumab single agent were not associated with OS. CONCLUSION: CEC numbers increased during treatment with bevacizumab plus lomustine but not during treatment with either agent alone, suggesting that this combination induced the greatest vascular damage. Although the absolute number of CECs was not associated with OS in patients treated with bevacizumab either alone or in combination, they could serve as a marker in glioblastoma patients receiving lomustine single agent.

A randomized phase II study comparing two schedules of the 21-day regimen of gemcitabine and carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 ml/min on day 1 with gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) on day 1 and day 8 is a widely used regimen in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia are frequent. The aim of this study is to investigate whether toxicity of gemcitabine/carboplatin could be reduced by administering carboplatin on day 8 instead of day 1 without a decrease in response rate (RR). METHODS: Patients received gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 (arm A) or day 8 (arm B). Drugs were administered over a 21-day cycle. Toxicity and RR were evaluated weekly and every second cycle, respectively. RESULTS: 71 patients were enrolled into the study. We found 79% (95% CI 61-91%) grade 3-4 toxicity (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) in arm A and 50% (95% CI 32-68%) in arm B; 66% grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in arm A and 26% in arm B. We observed 30% grade 4 hematological toxicity in arm A and 3% in arm B. In arm A an overall RR of 20% (95% CI 7.7-38.6%) was seen, and 18.2% (95% CI 7-35.5%) in arm B. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study was prematurely closed, the current data are of interest. The schedule with carboplatin on day 8 is associated with substantially lower grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia with comparable dose intensity and RR.

Endovascular brachytherapy for the prevention of restenosis after femoropopliteal angioplasty. Results of the VARA Trial.

AIM: Endovascular brachytherapy (EBT) has been proposed as a method to prevent restenosis. We performed a prospective randomised multicenter study to determine its efficacy for prophylaxis of restenosis after femoropopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). METHODS: Patients with symptomatic stenotic or totally occluding lesions in the femoropopliteal artery were randomised to be treated with PTA plus EBT or PTA alone. In case of EBT, 14 Gy was applied by an 192Ir source to the vessel wall. Clinical examination, ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) and duplex ultrasound were planned after 6 and 12 months. The primary endpoint was significant restenosis of the treated segment at duplex ultrasound after 12 months. RESULTS: Fifty-three of the 60 patients who eventually met the inclusion criteria could be studied. After 12 months, restenosis rates were 44% (12/27) in the PTA group versus 35% (8/23) in the PTA + EBT group (c2 test, P=0.51). There was no difference in mandatory reintervention between the 2 groups. Overall, EBT resulted in an absolute risk reduction of significant restenosis of 9%, yet in patients with totally occlusive disease this reduction was 32%. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests an effect of EBT on the occurrence of restenosis only after PTA of occluded femoropopliteal lesions. Due to a too small number of patients analysed this difference is not statistically significant.