Racial/ethnic differences in health-related quality of life among female breast cancer survivors: cross-sectional findings from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

OBJECTIVES: Breast cancer survivors have reported worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes on some subscales when compared with members of the general population. However, the increased attention to breast cancer survivorship should have improved the HRQoL of these survivors. Our aim was to examine whether physical and mental component scores (PCS-12 and MCS-12) using the Short Form (SF-12) questionnaire were different for racial/ethnic minorities, specifically for Black and Hispanic women relative to White women. Furthermore, we stratified the data by age group to evaluate these racial/ethnic differences in HRQoL of breast cancer survivors. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Pooled cross-sectional analyses using data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey between 2008 and 2016 were conducted. Pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) regression was used to examine the racial/ethnic differences in PCS-12 and MCS-12 scores of breast cancer survivors. Furthermore, stratified analyses by age group were conducted to evaluate racial/ethnic differences in HRQoL by the age of breast cancer survivors. RESULTS: After adjusting for confounders, there was no association between race/ethnicity and PCS-12 scores. However, Hispanic breast cancer survivors had statistically significantly lower MCS-12 scores (by 1.9 points [95% confidence interval {CI}: -3.53 to -0.37]) when compared with White breast cancer survivors. For PCS-12, after stratifying by age, the adjusted analyses showed no significant differences in PCS-12 scores when White female breast cancer survivors were compared with the other racial/ethnic categories. On the other hand, Black female survivors aged <50 years had 4.3 points (95% CI: 0.46-8.13) higher MCS-12 scores when compared with their White counterparts, while Hispanic breast cancer survivors aged <50 years had 3.1 points (95% CI: -0.40-6.69) higher MCS-12 scores relative to White women. Furthermore, among female breast cancer survivors aged ≥50 years, Hispanic women had 3.2 points (95% CI: -4.98 to -1.40) lower MCS-12 scores than White women. CONCLUSION: Our study generated findings showing the racial/ethnic differences in HRQoL of breast cancer survivors and presented results stratified by age group. These findings provide the much-needed rationale for targeted and racial/ethnic-specific HRQoL improvement strategies among breast cancer survivors.

Surveillance mammography use after treatment of primary breast cancer and racial disparities in survival.

Racial and ethnic minority patients continue to die disproportionately from breast cancer compared with their white counterparts, even after adjusting for insurance status and income. No studies have examined whether surveillance mammography reduces racial disparities in survival among elderly breast cancer survivors following active treatment for breast cancer. This study included 28,117 cases diagnosed with primary breast cancer at age 66 years and over, identified from SEER data during 1992-2005. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models were used for survival analysis. A higher proportion of whites received surveillance mammograms during the surveillance period compared with nonwhites: 71.7% of African-Americans, 72.5% of Hispanics, and 69.3% of Asians had mammograms compared with 74.9% of whites. In propensity-score-adjusted analysis, women who had a mammogram within 2 years were less likely (hazard ratio 0.84; 95% CI 0.78-0.82) to die from any cause compared with women who did not have any mammograms during this time period. The hazard ratio of cancer-specific mortality elevated for Hispanics compared with whites (hazard ratio 1.5; 95% CI 0.6-3.2) and was reduced after adjusting for surveillance mammography (hazard ratio 1.4; 95% CI 0.5-2.9). Similar pattern in the reduction in disease-specific hazard ratio was observed for blacks: After controlling for patient and tumor characteristics, hazard ratio was elevated but not significantly different from that in whites (hazard ratio 2.0; 95% CI 0.9-3.7), and hazard ratio adjusting for surveillance mammography further reduced the point estimate (hazard ratio 1.5; 95% CI 0.7-2.8). Asian and Pacific Islanders and Hispanics appeared to have lower risks of all-cause mortality compared with whites after controlling for patient and tumor characteristics and surveillance mammogram received. Our findings indicates that while surveillance mammograms and physician visits may play a contributory role in achieving equal outcomes for breast cancer-specific mortality for women with breast cancer, searching for other factors that might help achieve national goals to eliminate racial disparities in healthcare, and outcomes is warranted.

Changes in screening behaviors and attitudes toward screening from pre-test genetic counseling to post-disclosure in Lynch syndrome families.

The purpose of this study was to examine colonoscopy adherence and attitudes toward colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in individuals who underwent Lynch syndrome genetic counseling and testing. We evaluated changes in colonoscopy adherence and CRC screening attitudes in 78 cancer-unaffected relatives of Lynch syndrome mutation carriers before pre-test genetic counseling (baseline) and at 6 and 12 months post-disclosure of test results (52 mutation negative and 26 mutation positive). While both groups were similar at baseline, at 12 months post-disclosure, a greater number of mutation-positive individuals had had a colonoscopy compared with mutation-negative individuals. From baseline to 12 months post-disclosure, the mutation-positive group demonstrated an increase in mean scores on measures of colonoscopy commitment, self-efficacy, and perceived benefits of CRC screening, and a decrease in mean scores for perceived barriers to CRC screening. Mean scores on colonoscopy commitment decreased from baseline to 6 months in the mutation-negative group. To conclude, adherence to risk-appropriate guidelines for CRC surveillance improved after genetic counseling and testing for Lynch syndrome. Mutation-positive individuals reported increasingly positive attitudes toward CRC screening after receiving genetic test results, potentially reinforcing longer term colonoscopy adherence.

Impact of timing of adjuvant chemotherapy initiation and completion after surgery on racial disparities in survival among women with breast cancer.

While large differences by race/ethnicity in breast cancer survival are well established, it is unknown whether differences in quality of chemotherapy delivered explain the racial/ethnic disparities in survival among black, Hispanic, Asian, and white women with breast cancer. We evaluated factors associated with time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and chemotherapy completion and examined outcomes data among women with breast cancer. Patients who initiated chemotherapy later than 3 months after surgery were 1.8 times more likely to die of breast cancer (95 % CI 1.3-2.5) compared with those who initiated chemotherapy less than a month after surgery, even after controlling for known confounders or controlling for race/ethnicity. Women who completed chemotherapy had significantly higher survival compared with those who have not completed chemotherapy. Despite correcting for chemotherapy initiation and completion and known predictors of outcome, African American women still had worse disease-specific survival than their Caucasian counterparts. While a complete and timely adjuvant treatment among various ethnic populations would help to reduce racial disparities in survival, there are still other factors to be identified that may explain the remaining differences in survival between ethnic women with breast cancer.

Development of a life events/icon calendar questionnaire to ascertain occupational histories and other characteristics of migrant farmworkers.

BACKGROUND: Specialized methods are necessary to collect data from migrant farmworkers for epidemiologic research. METHODS: We developed a questionnaire that collected lifetime occupational histories and other lifestyle risk factors via a life events/icon calendar, and administered the questionnaire to a convenience sample of 162 migrant farmworkers in nine areas of the U.S. RESULTS: The average duration of the interviews was about 1 h 30 min, with an average of 45 min for the work history section. The occupational histories covered a median of 27.6 years per person for men and 20.8 years per person for women. The median number of years spent in farm jobs was 11.3 for men and 5.8 for women. The median number of farm jobs (crop/task combination) per person was 59 among men and 27 among women. Many farmworkers performed the same crop/task combinations at multiple times throughout their lives, yielding a median of 13 unique farm jobs and 8 unique crops among men and 7 jobs and 5 crops among women. CONCLUSIONS: The project demonstrated that it is feasible to collect detailed work histories and other risk factor data from farmworkers, documented the complexity of work histories encountered among farmworkers, and yielded recommendations for refining a questionnaire that will facilitate future epidemiologic research on farmworkers.

Ascertainment of pesticide exposures of migrant and seasonal farmworker children: findings from focus groups.

BACKGROUND: To design questionnaires for epidemiologic research among children of migrant farmworkers, researchers need to consider ways to best solicit information about pesticide exposures. METHODS: Bilingual facilitators conducted five focus groups with either migrant farmworker mothers or their children (age range 8-16 years) in southern Texas and northeastern Colorado. Guided questions were used to assess activities of migrant farmworker children and the ways to best elicit information about exposure to pesticides. RESULTS: Participants reported a large number of activities that may potentially expose children to pesticides through both direct and indirect routes. Prompting, indirect questions about chemical use, and use of local and trusted facilitators increased information elicited from focus group participants. CONCLUSIONS: These focus groups helped to provide information for developing questionnaire items related to pesticide exposure among migrant farmworker children, and highlighted the importance of using bilingual community interviewers and including children as respondents.

Tracing migrant farmworkers in Starr County, Texas.

BACKGROUND: In response to The National Cancer Institute (NCI) concerns about the ability to conduct studies among migrant farmworkers, this study evaluated the feasibility of identifying migrant farmworkers in their home state and tracing them over an extended period of time. METHODS: In 1995, a group of 196 persons who had classified themselves as "migrant farmworkers" in two earlier chronic disease studies was identified. The primary objective of the current study was to determine the proportion of these farmworkers who could be located in 1995-1996. RESULTS: Of these farmworkers, 163 were located and were living (83.2%), 15 had died (7.6%), and 18 (9.2%) were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The excellent follow-up rate was due in part to the high participation rates among persons contacted for information, stability of the farmworkers' permanent homes, predictable timing of migration, and a longstanding health research program with established community contacts.

Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians in two medical care organizations.

The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate self-reported practices of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among primary care physicians (PCPs) in medical organizations and (2) identify factors associated with screening performance. We surveyed a census sample of 204 PCPs from two medical organizations in Houston, TX. Outcomes were PCPs' self-reports of screening with fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and/or flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS).2-7 Independent variables included physician demographics, perception of screening efficacy, level of agreement with screening guidelines, and perceptions of screening barriers. Variables were compared using Student's t-tests, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests. Regression was used to examine factors associated with PCPs' reports of screening. Our response rate was 56% (n = 115). Many PCPs reported recommending and/or performing/ordering screening with both FOBT (82%) and FS (87%). They more often reported believing that FS was "very effective" for reducing mortality than was FOBT (76% vs. 37%). Physicians perceived that barriers to patient compliance with CRC screening were stronger than barriers to making screening recommendations. Significant test-specific differences in reported barriers to screening were found. Results revealed high awareness and self-reported practice of CRC screening in this study population. Further examination of how barriers influence CRC screening practices by PCPs in medical organizations will be important for improving population screening rates.

Factors associated with perceived risk in automotive employees at increased risk of colorectal cancer.

Risk perception may be an important motivator of health-related behaviors. To develop effective risk communication messages, it is important to understand both the patterns of association between perceived risk and health-related behaviors as well as the correlates of risk perception. Very little is known about whether correlates of risk perception are similar in cross-sectional data compared with prospective data. Furthermore, there are scant data on consistency of correlates of risk perception across groups who vary in objective medical risk. If correlates differ, it would underscore the need to tailor intervention messages based on subgroup characteristics as well as increase awareness of the limitations of basing intervention messages only on cross-sectional data. We analyzed data on a subset of 5042 employees who participated in The Next Step Trial, a randomized health promotion trial to encourage colorectal cancer screening and dietary change. We restricted our analysis to only those automotive workers who were white, male, and did not have colorectal cancer (4477/5042) and who returned surveys both at baseline (2,684/4,477) and at year 2 of follow-up (1955/2684). Initial analyses detected interactions between a history of polyps and several of the other covariates. Therefore, univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted separately for men with and without a personal history of colorectal polyps. Within each of the four subgroups (those with or without polyps in the baseline or follow-up analyses), we examined associations between perceived risk measured at baseline (cross-sectional analyses) and at year 2 of follow-up (prospective analyses) in relation to intervention group status, demographic, medical history, psychosocial, and worksite characteristics measured at baseline. To assess the predictive ability of the models, we computed sensitivity and specificity as measures of each model's ability to correctly classify men into their respective subgroup. Although there was no association between perceived risk and intervention group status in the four subgroups analyzed, we included intervention group status as a covariate in all analyses. At baseline (cross-sectional analyses) among men with and without a history of polyps, perceived risk was positively associated with family history of colorectal polyps or cancer, family support for screening, and worry about being diagnosed with colorectal cancer. In addition, for men without polyps, perceived risk was positively associated with being a current smoker. At year 2 of follow-up (prospective analyses) for men with and without polyps, perceived risk at year 2 was positively associated with family history and baseline perceived risk and was negatively associated with having a normal screening examination or no examinations during the trial. In addition, for men with polyps, perceived risk was positively associated with belief in the salience and coherence of screening and with intention to be screened and was negatively associated with access to screening at the worksite. Specificity was higher than sensitivity in three of four subgroups and was >65% in all subgroups. Except for family history, messages to influence perceived risk would emphasize different factors, depending on whether associations were based on baseline or follow-up data and depending on whether men reported a personal history of polyps. For example, although intervention messages using baseline data would emphasize the same factors for men with or without polyps, messages based on follow-up data would emphasize psychosocial characteristics, such as salience and coherence of screening and intention for men with a history of polyps but not for men without. Our findings support the need to delineate subgroups in the study population to target and tailor health-related messages based on respondent characteristics. Our findings also underscore the need to base health-related messages on prospective data as well as cross-sectional data to better address health-related beliefs and behaviors.

Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians in Texas: a rural-urban comparison.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening practices of primary care physicians (PCPs) in rural versus urban locations. METHODS: The authors surveyed 3,380 PCP members of the Texas Medical Association (TMA), stratified by specialty and rural/urban status. Factors associated with PCPs' self-reported practices of CRC screening by fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and/or flexible sigmoidoscopy (SIG) were examined using chi-square tests and multivariate regression. RESULTS: Over 80% of both rural and urban PCPs reported CRC screening with the FOBT, while 70% reported screening with SIG. Many reported doing FOBTs in the office versus using the take-home kit. Variations were found in recommended ages and screening intervals among all respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Geographic location was less important than knowledge and attitudes in predicting PCPs' CRC screening practices. More specific education regarding CRC screening guidelines needs to be directed towards all PCPs.

The annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This annual report to the nation addresses progress in cancer prevention and control in the U.S. with a special section on colorectal cancer. This report is the joint effort of the American Cancer Society, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), including the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). METHODS: Age-adjusted rates were based on cancer incidence data from the NCI and NAACCR and underlying cause of death as compiled by NCHS. Joinpoint analysis was based on NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program incidence rates and NCHS death rates for 1973-1997. The prevalence of screening examinations for colorectal cancer was obtained from the CDC's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and the NCHS's National Health Interview Survey. RESULTS: Between 1990-1997, overall cancer incidence and death rates declined. Joinpoint analyses of cancer incidence and death rates confirmed the declines described in earlier reports. The incidence trends for colorectal cancer have shown recent steep declines for whites in contrast to a leveling off of the rates for blacks. State-to-state variations occurred in colorectal cancer screening prevalence as well as incidence and death rates. CONCLUSIONS: The continuing declines in overall cancer incidence and death rates are encouraging. However, a few of the top ten incidence or mortality cancer sites continued to increase or remained level. For many cancer sites, whites had lower incidence and mortality rates than blacks but higher rates than Hispanics, Asian and Pacific Islanders, and American Indians/Alaska Natives. The variations in colorectal cancer incidence and death rates by race/ethnicity, gender, age, and geographic area may be related to differences in risk factors, demographic characteristics, screening, and medical practice. New efforts currently are underway to increase awareness of screening benefits and treatment for colorectal cancer.

Intention to learn results of genetic testing for hereditary colon cancer.

INTRODUCTION: This report investigates the correlates of intention to find out genetic test results in colorectal cancer patients undergoing genetic counseling and testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Specifically, we investigated whether intention to learn genetic test results was associated with sociodemographic factors, medical history, psychosocial factors, attitudes, beliefs, and decisional considerations related to genetic testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 342 colorectal cancer patients who went through an informed consent process and gave blood for genetic testing and who were eligible for a psychosocial questionnaire study, 269 cases completed a baseline interview. Patients were contacted in person during a routine clinic visit or by letter and follow-up telephone call and were interviewed either in person or by telephone. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, intention to learn test results was positively associated with income, quality of life, a belief that being tested will help family members prevent cancer, being worried about carrying an altered gene, and a belief that one has the ability to cope with test results. It was negatively associated with a belief that genetic counseling is too much trouble relative to the benefits. Intention also was positively associated with scales measuring the pros of learning test results and the pros of informing relatives about test results; it was negatively associated with the cons of learning test results. In multivariable analysis, the belief that testing would help family members prevent cancer, being worried about carrying an altered gene, and the pros of learning test results remained statistically associated with intention when other variables were included in the model. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that the positive aspects of genetic testing were more strongly associated with intention than were the negative aspects. They also showed that persons who stated an intention to learn their genetic test results were more likely than persons who did not to affirm both the benefits and the importance of such testing. These results are consistent with the literature on psychosocial aspects of genetic testing for breast cancer.

The Next Step Trial: impact of a worksite colorectal cancer screening promotion program.

BACKGROUND: The Next Step Trial was a randomized trial of worksite colorectal cancer screening promotion and nutrition interventions for automobile industry employees at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Interventions were tested at 28 worksites with 5,042 employees. This report describes results of the screening promotion intervention. METHODS: Worksites randomized to the control group received a standard program including rectal examination, fecal occult blood testing, and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Intervention worksites received an enhanced program (i.e., standard program plus an educational booklet/telephone call). Compliance (i.e., completion of all recommended screening examinations) and coverage (i.e., completion of at least one screening examination), the primary and secondary outcomes, were measured over 2 years. RESULTS: In the 2 years prior to baseline, 61% of employees had been screened. After random assignment, baseline differences in several employee characteristics and worksite screening procedures were detected, including more past history of screening in control worksites. After adjusting for differences, we found modest, but higher, compliance and coverage in intervention compared with control worksites (odds ratio [95% confidence limits] = 1.46 [1.1-2.0] and 1.33 [1.1, 1.6], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Adding a personally tailored behavioral intervention to a standard colorectal cancer screening program can promote continued employee participation in screening as measured by compliance. Further research is needed to assess intervention effects in other populations.

Nutrition intervention for high-risk auto workers: results of the Next Step Trial.

BACKGROUND: The Next Step Trial tested interventions encouraging prevention and early detection practices in automotive-industry employees at increased colorectal cancer risk. This article describes results of the nutrition intervention promoting low-fat, high-fiber eating patterns. METHODS: Twenty-eight worksites (5,042 employees at baseline) were randomized to a 2-year nutrition intervention including classes, mailed self-help materials, and personalized dietary feedback. Control worksites received no intervention. Nutrition outcomes were assessed by mailed food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) Primary nutrition outcomes included percentage energy from fat and fiber density (g/1,000 kcal) at 1 year postrandomization. Secondary outcomes included servings of fruits/vegetables and dietary measures at 2 years postrandomization. Analyses were adjusted for within worksite correlations and baseline covariates. Fifty-eight percent of employees returned FFQs. RESULTS: At 1 year, there were modest but statistically significant intervention effects for fat (-0.9 %en), fiber (+0.5 g/1,000 kcal), and fruits/vegetables (+0.2 servings/day) (all P < 0.007). At 2 years, due to significant positive changes in control worksites, intervention effects were smaller, significant for fiber only. Intervention effects were larger in younger (<50 years), active employees and class attendees. CONCLUSION: The nutrition intervention produced significant but modest effects on dietary fat and fiber and fruits/vegetables in these high-risk employees. Age and dose effects suggest younger employees may be more responsive to this intervention.

Risk perception and risk communication for cancer screening behaviors: a review.

This review summarizes and synthesizes research findings on risk perception and risk communication related to cancer screening behaviors. The focus is on cancers for which there is evidence that screening reduces mortality, i.e., cervical, breast, and colorectal cancers. The following questions are addressed: 1) Is perceived risk associated with relevant cancer screening behaviors? 2) What factors are associated with perceived risk? 3) Is the relationship between perceived risk and cancer screening behaviors modified by other factors? 4) Have interventions to change perceived risk been effective in modifying risk perceptions? 5) Are these changes related to subsequent cancer screening behaviors? Methodologic issues are discussed, and future research needs are identified. There was consistent evidence that perceived risk was associated with mammography screening, but there were insufficient data on these associations for cervical or colorectal cancer screening behaviors. There was some evidence that perceived risk mediated the association between other variables and screening behaviors; however, because of the small number of studies, the findings are best viewed as hypothesis generating. Studies of interventions to modify risk perceptions provided some support for the view that they are modifiable, but there was conflicting evidence that these changes were related to subsequent cancer screening. Methodologic studies of how best to measure perceived risk are needed. Because most data on the correlates of perceived risk were cross-sectional, it is difficult to determine whether perceived risk is a cause or an effect in relation to cancer screening. Longitudinal studies that measure perceived risk in defined populations with different cancer screening histories and that include follow-up for screening and repeated measurements of risk perception are needed to clarify this relationship.

The effect of physician recommendation on enrollment in the Breast Cancer Chemoprevention Trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of physician recommendation on whether to enroll in a randomized controlled chemoprevention trial for breast cancer. METHODS: We surveyed 360 women who were at increased risk for breast cancer regarding social and behavioral factors that could influence their decision to enroll or not to enroll in the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT). Respondents completed a questionnaire following attendance at an informational session about the trial. The analysis was restricted to 175 women who discussed the possibility of their participation in the trial with their primary care physician (PCP) and who reported what their physician advised them to do regarding participation. RESULTS: Logistic regression modeling showed that among women who discussed the trial with their physician, physician recommendation was the most important factor that influenced the respondent's decision to enroll in the BCPT. Women who reported that their physician advised them to enroll in the trial were 13 times more likely to participate than were women who reported that their physicians advised them not to participate. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that PCPs play an important role in influencing preventive health behavior, specifically, regarding enrollment in a randomized breast cancer chemoprevention trial. Efforts to increase recruitment to a trial should include enlisting the support of PCPs.

Validation of a model predicting enrollment status in a chemoprevention trial for breast cancer.

We evaluated the performance of a regression model in predicting enrollment status in a chemoprevention trial for breast cancer using a population independent of that from which the model was derived. In years 1 and 2 of recruitment, questionnaires were completed by eligible participants following attendance at informational meetings about the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. The variables in the original model, based on women recruited in year 1, included not being able to take estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), concern about the side effects of tamoxifen, the possibility of getting a placebo, the out-of-pocket expenses associated with the trial, and disagreement with the statement "significant others would be reassured if the respondent was taking tamoxifen." These variables were used to predict enrollment status of women newly recruited to the trial in year 2. Among the 89 women in the study population who responded to the questionnaire, 66% did not enroll in the trial. By applying the original logistic regression model, enrollment status in the trial was correctly predicted for 72% of year 2 questionnaire respondents. Age and risk scores, as binary variables, were used in a derived logistic model to determine whether they provided additional predictive information on enrollment status. The resulting four-factor model, which predicted nonenrollment, included: age of > or = 50 years, not being able to take ERT, expressed concern that significant others would not be reassured if the respondent was taking tamoxifen, and concern about out-of-pocket expenses associated with the trial. This model correctly classified 76% of the respondents. The logistic regression models performed reasonably well in predicting enrollment status. Not being able to take ERT remained the strongest factor predicting nonenrollment. More research is needed to evaluate factors that motivate persons to seek participation in primary chemoprevention trials in culturally diverse populations.

Intention to screen for colorectal cancer among white male employees.

BACKGROUND: This study identifies factors associated with employee intention to participate in a company-sponsored program of continuous screening for colorectal cancer. Automobile industry pattern and model makers who had been offered screening for over a decade were included in the study. METHODS: Data were collected at the outset of a randomized trial of screening and nutrition interventions. A baseline survey was mailed to 4,490 white men without a history of colorectal cancer. This mailing generated complete responses from 2,693 (60%) individuals. Survey data obtained for these men, including measures of cognitive and psychological representations related to colorectal screening, social influence, and intention to screen, were supplemented by background information gathered from employment records of these men. Workplace screening services were documented via a survey of plant health care professionals. RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of respondents reported a high level of intention to screen. Multivariate analyses showed that intention to screen was positively associated with employee past participation in screening, belief in the salience and coherence of screening, belief in screening efficacy, perceived self-efficacy, belief that polyp removal prevents colorectal cancer, perceived personal susceptibility to colorectal cancer or polyps, receptivity to family member support for screening, and workplace scheduling of screening examinations. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with intention to screen may contribute to participation in continuous screening programs. Research is needed to assess the impact of interventions that facilitate appointment scheduling, provide tailored education about screening, and encourage lay support.

Assessing the burden of cancer in Texas using vital statistics data.

BACKGROUND: Vital statistics data were used to describe the burden of cancer in Texas. METHODS: Average annual age-adjusted mortality data in Texas (1986 to 1990) for 17 cancer types were compared with the US data for whites and blacks and with California data for Hispanics. Trends were examined from 1980 to 1990 for the entire state and from 1976 to 1989 for 24 geographic regions within the state. RESULTS: Mortality excesses were detected for lung and liver cancer, and deficits for colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers. Rates were generally stable from 1980 to 1990 with several exceptions (lung, liver, colon). Six areas of Texas, including four areas along the Gulf Coast, had relatively more excesses of various cancers, without a discernible pattern by cancer type. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, Texas has fared favorably in cancer mortality when compared with the United States. Enhanced evaluation of the frequency of cancer, as well as the conduct of etiologic research, must await the availability of statewide long-term cancer incidence data.