Binational confidential enquiry of maternal deaths due to postpartum hemorrhage in France and the Netherlands: Lessons learned through the perspective of a different context of care.

OBJECTIVE: To learn lessons for maternity care by scrutinizing postpartum hemorrhage management (PPH) in cases of PPH-related maternal deaths in France and the Netherlands. METHODS: In this binational Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths (CEMD), 14 PPH-related maternal deaths were reviewed by six experts from the French and Dutch national maternal death review committees regarding cause and preventability of death, clinical care and healthcare organization. Improvable care factors and lessons learned were identified. CEMD practices and PPH guidelines in France and the Netherlands were compared in the process. RESULTS: For France, new insights were primarily related to organization of healthcare, with lessons learned focusing on medical leadership and implementation of (surgical) checklists. For the Netherlands, insights were mainly related to clinical care, emphasizing hemostatic surgery earlier in the course of PPH and reducing the third stage of labor by prompter manual removal of the placenta. Experts recommended extending PPH guidelines with specific guidance for women refusing blood products and systematic evaluation of risk factors. The quality of CEMD was presumed to benefit from enhanced case finding, also through non-obstetric sources, and electronic reporting of maternal deaths to reduce the administrative burden. CONCLUSION: A binational CEMD revealed opportunities for improvement of care beyond lessons learned at the national level.

[Ante- and postnatal growth charts in France - guidelines for clinical practice from the Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF) and from the Société française de néonatologie (SFN)]. / Les courbes de croissance anté- et postnatales en France ­ recommandations pour la pratique clinique du Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF) et de la Société française de néonatologie (SFN).

OBJECTIVE: To recommend the most appropriate biometric charts for the detection of antenatal growth abnormalities and postnatal growth surveillance. METHODS: Elaboration of specific questions and selection of experts by the organizing committee to answer these questions; analysis of the literature by experts and drafting conclusions by assigning a recommendation (strong or weak) and a quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, very low) and for each question; all these recommendations have been subject to multidisciplinary external review (obstetrician gynecologists, pediatricians). The objective for the reviewers was to verify the completeness of the literature review, to verify the levels of evidence established and the consistency and applicability of the resulting recommendations. The overall review of the literature, quality of evidence and recommendations were revised to take into consideration comments from external reviewers. RESULTS: Antenatally, it is recommended to use all WHO fetal growth charts for EFW and common ultrasound biometric measurements (strong recommendation; low quality of evidence). Indeed, in comparison with other prescriptive curves and descriptive curves, the WHO prescriptive charts show better performance for the screening of SGA (Small for Gestational Age) and LGA (Large for Gestational Age) with adequate proportions of fetuses screened at extreme percentiles in the French population. It also has the advantages of having EFW charts by sex and biometric parameters obtained from the same perspective cohort of women screened by qualified sonographers who measured the biometric parameters according to international standards. Postnatally, it is recommended to use the updated Fenton charts for the assessment of birth measurements and for growth monitoring in preterm infants (strong recommendation; moderate quality of evidence) and for the assessment of birth measurements in term newborn (expert opinion). CONCLUSION: It is recommended to use WHO fetal growth charts for antenatal growth monitoring and Fenton charts for the newborn.

[Cesarean scare niche: Definition, diagnosis, risk factors, prevention, symptoms, adverse effects, and treatments]. / Isthmocèle : définition, diagnostic, facteurs de risque, prévention, symptômes, complications, et traitements.

OBJECTIVES: To review the definitions, diagnostic methods, risk factors, symptoms, and treatments for caesarean scar niche. METHODS: Review of the literature, critical reflection, and pragmatic advice. RESULTS: There is no consensus on the definition of caesarean scar niche. Some suggest an indentation≥2mm of the myometrium of the caesarean scar, but this is present in more than half of women with caesarean history and takes no account of woman's symptoms. The most popular diagnostic method is ultrasound±hysterosonography. Risks factors for niche are multiple Caesareans, Cesarean during labor with too low incision, and retroverted uterus. Symptoms include abnormal gynaecologic bleeding and pelvic pain, and their presence establish the "Caesarean scar syndrome". The risks of pregnancy with niche is poorly studied, but pregnancy is not contraindicated, even if the niche is untreated. The treatment of caesarean scar niche is mainly surgery and conservative. The former should be reserved for symptomatic patients, and those with secondary infertility and fertility treatment failure. Patients with residual myometrium thickness≥2.5mm may benefit from first-line hysteroscopic treatment, whereas a laparoscopic or vaginal approach could be offered in other cases. CONCLUSIONS: A pragmatic definition of caesarean scar niche as a disease including symptoms is the necessary prerequisite for the management of women. The treatment is mainly surgical, or conservative depending on the desire for subsequent pregnancy.

[Maternal mortality due to cardiovascular disease in France 2013-2015]. / Mortalité maternelle par maladies cardiovasculaires en France 2013­2015.

Between 2013 and 2015, cardiovascular diseases became one of the two leading causes of maternal mortality, with 36 deaths (13.7% of maternal deaths). The overall maternal mortality ratio for cardiovascular diseases is 1.5 per 100,000 live births, stable compared to the 2010-2012 period. The etiologies in order of decreasing frequency are: pre-existing cardiomyopathies (n=10), aortic dissections (n=9), peripartum cardiomyopathies (n=6), myocardial infarction (n=4), valvular cardiopathies (n=4). Non-optimal care occurred in 72% of cases, increasing since the previous triennium (50%). Similarly, there is a significant increase in the proportion of preventable deaths (possibly or probably) from 35% to 66%. In women with known cardiovascular disease, the lack of multidisciplinary prepregnancy assessment and pregnancy follow-up is most frequent. In patients with unknown cardiovascular disease, the lack of diagnosis of a cardiac event is the most common failure. Cardiovascular conditions or cardiovascular risk factors should be investigated in early pregnancy in order to monitor and refer women to appropriate maternity hospitals. Recent dyspnea, worsening at the end of pregnancy and postpartum, should suggest a cardiac complication. In presence of chest pain, aortic dissection should be considered with the same degree of emergency as myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolism. Cardiac ultrasonography, chest CT, Nt-proBNP and troponin should be considered in case of chest pain or recent dyspnea. Women with cardiac symptoms should be referred to an emergency department (not necessarily to the local maternity) for a complete cardiovascular check-up.

[Maternal mortality due to venous thromboembolism in France 2013-2015]. / Mortalité maternelle par thromboembolie veineuse en France 2013­2015.

Pregnancy and postpartum represent periods at very high risk of venous thromboembolism disease which appears to extend well beyond the classic 6-8 weeks after childbirth. Pulmonary embolism (PE) is still one of the three leading causes of direct maternal death (MM) in most developed countries. Between 2013 and 2015, 23 maternal deaths were caused by a venous thromboembolic complication (VTE) (20 pulmonary embolism and 3 cerebral thrombophlebitis), representing 8.8 % of maternal deaths and a Maternal Mortality Ratio of 1.0 per 100,000 live births (95 % CI 0.6-1, 4) which is stable over the last 10 years. Regarding the timing of death, 1 death occurred after abortion, 35 % (8/23) during an ongoing pregnancy (including four before 22 WG), and 61 % (14/23) after childbirth. Among the 23 deaths from VTE, 17 % (5/23) occurred outside a healthcare center (home, street). The mean age was 32.3 and 7 women (30 %) were≥35 years old. Six patients were obese (27 %). The preventability rate is 34.8 % (compared to 50 % in 2007-2009 and 2010-2012), The preventability factors involve the inadequacy of care in 34.8 % of cases (8/23), organizational factors in one case (1/23) and a lack of interaction of the patient with the health care system in two cases (2/23). Care was considered non-optimal in 59 % of these deaths. This proportion is higher than the preventability rate because suboptimal care sometimes did not influence the final outcome.

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis and pregnancy: A case report and review of the literature.

The association of granulomatosis with polyangiitis and pregnancy is rare and therapeutic options are limited by the risk of teratogenicity and fetotoxicity. There is a paucity of published literature to guide clinical decision-making in these cases. We report the case of a 26-year-old woman with no medical history who presented at 21 weeks of gestation with a bilateral sudden loss of hearing and erosive rhinitis. The diagnosis of granulomatosis with polyangiitis was confirmed radiologically and biologically. Corticosteroids were not enough to stabilize the disease and she received intravenous immunoglobulins with remission. A successful delivery of a healthy male newborn was done at 36 weeks. A review of all published literature on granulomatosis with polyangiitis in pregnancy between 1970 and 2017 is presented. Trial registration: Not applicable.

[Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Short Text]. / Présentation du siège. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF ­ Texte court.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the optimal management of singleton breech presentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PubMed database, the Cochrane Library and the recommendations from the French and foreign obstetrical societies or colleges have been consulted. RESULTS: In France, 5% of women have breech deliveries (Level of Evidence [LE3]). One third of them have a planned vaginal delivery (LE3) of whom 70% deliver vaginally (LE3). External cephalic version (ECV) is associated with a reduced rate of breech presentation at birth (LE2), and with a lower rate of cesarean section (LE3) without increases in severe maternal (LE3) and perinatal morbidity (LE3). It is therefore recommended to inform women with a breech presentation at term that ECV could be attempted from 36 weeks of gestation (Professional consensus). In case of breech presentation, planned vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery might be associated with an increased risk of composite perinatal mortality or serious neonatal morbidity (LE2). No difference has been found between planned vaginal and planned cesarean delivery for neurodevelopmental outcomes at two years (LE2), cognitive and psychomotor outcomes between 5 and 8 years (LE3), and adult intellectual performances (LE4). Short and long term maternal complications appear similar in case of planned vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in the absence of subsequent pregnancies. A previous cesarean delivery results for subsequent pregnancies in higher risks of uterine rupture, placenta accreta spectrum and hysterectomy (LE2). It is recommended to offer women who wish a planned vaginal delivery a pelvimetry at term (Grade C) and to check the absence of hyperextension of the fetal head by ultrasonography (Professional consensus) to plan their mode of delivery. Complete breech presentation, previous cesarean, nulliparity, term prelabor rupture of membranes do not contraindicate planned vaginal delivery (Professionnal consensus). Term breech presentation is not a contraindication to labor induction when the criteria for acceptance of vaginal delivery are met (Grade C). CONCLUSION: In case of breech presentation at term, the risks of severe morbidity for the child and the mother are low after both planned vaginal and planned cesarean delivery. For the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (CNGOF), planned vaginal delivery is a reasonable option in most cases (Professional consensus). The choice of the planned route of delivery should be shared by the woman and her caregiver, respecting the right to woman's autonomy.

Perineal prevention and protection in obstetrics: CNGOF clinical practice guidelines.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of these clinical practice guidelines was to analyse all of the interventions during pregnancy and childbirth that might prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and postnatal pelvic floor symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: These guidelines were developed in accordance with the methods prescribed by the French Health Authority (HAS). RESULTS: A prenatal clinical examination of the perineum is recommended for women with a history of Crohn's disease, OASIS, genital mutilation, or perianal lesions (professional consensus). Just after delivery, a perineal examination is recommended to check for OASIS (Grade B); if there is doubt about the diagnosis, a second opinion should be requested (Grade C). In case of OASIS, the injuries (including their severity) and the technique for their repair should be described in detail (Grade C). Perineal massage during pregnancy must be encouraged among women who want it (Grade B). No intervention conducted before the start of the active phase of the second stage of labour has been shown to be effective in reducing the risk of perineal injury. The crowning of the baby's head should be manually controlled and the posterior perineum manually supported to reduce the risk of OASIS (Grade C). The performance of an episiotomy during normal deliveries is not recommended to reduce the risk of OASIS (Grade A). In instrumental deliveries, episiotomy may be indicated to avoid OASIS (Grade C). When an episiotomy is performed, a mediolateral incision is recommended (Grade B). The indication for episiotomy should be explained to the woman, and she should consent before its performance. Advising women to have a caesarean delivery for primary prevention of postnatal urinary or anal incontinence is not recommended (Grade B). During pregnancy and again in the labour room, obstetrics professionals should focus on the woman's expectations and inform her about the modes of delivery.

[Perineal tears and episiotomy: Surgical procedure - CNGOF perineal prevention and protection in obstetrics guidelines]. / Déchirures périnéales obstétricales et épisiotomie : aspects techniques. RPC prévention et protection périnéale en obstétrique CNGOF.

OBJECTIVES: To recommend the episiotomy procedure, repair of perineal or vaginal tears and episiotomy. METHODS: Published Literature was retrieved using PubMed and Cochrane Library computer databases up to May 2018 and recommendations issued from international societies. RESULTS: A midline episiotomy increases the risk of OASIS compared with a mediolateral procedure (LE2). OASIS rates are similar for mediolateral and lateral episiotomies (LE1). A scar angle of at least 45° (measured in relation to the midline after suturing) is associated with a lower risk of OASIS (LE3). To obtain this final angle, the episiotomy must be performed at a 60° angle (LE1). Current data are insufficient to recommend the length, the timing, and the modalities procedure during instrumental delivery for mediolateral episiotomy. Suturing the superficial plane of a perineal tear provides no benefits when the edges touch and do not bleed (LE2). The techniques for suturing perineal lacerations by continuous sutures are associated with a reduction in immediate pain, reduced use of analgesics, and less frequent removal of stitches, compared with interrupted stitches (LE1). Synthetic suture materials with either standard or rapid absorption provide similar results for perineal pain and women's satisfaction: rapid absorption polyglactin has the advantage of a reduced need for later stitch removal, but it increases the risk of scar dehiscence (LE1). There are not enough published studies to recommend the use of biological glues in the repair of first-degree perineal tears or skin in second-degree tears. Delaying repair of OASIS for several hours does not aggravate the subsequent prognosis for anal continence (LE1). Internal sphincter injury lead to significant further anal incontinence (LE3). There is no study comparing methods for internal sphincter repair. To repair the external sphincter, overlap and end-to-end suture techniques yield similar results for anal continence (LE2). Use of polydioxanone 3/0 or polyglactin 2/0 to repair the EAS produces similar results for perineal pain and anal incontinence scores (LE2) CONCLUSIONS: A mediolateral incision is recommended for an episiotomy (Grade B). The angle of incision recommended for a mediolateral episiotomy is 60° (GradeC). It is recommended that continuous running sutures be preferred for the repair of episiotomies and second-degree tears (Grade A). It is recommended that obstetrics professionals optimise surgical conditions to the extent possible for repair of OASIS (professional consensus); a detailed report of the extent of the injuries, the techniques of repair, and the material used is recommended (GradeC). The external anal sphincter can be repaired with either overlap or end-to-end suture techniques (Grade B).

[Perineal prevention and protection in obstetrics: CNGOF Clinical Practice Guidelines (short version)]. / Prévention et protection périnéale en obstétrique : Recommandations pour la Pratique Clinique du CNGOF (texte court).

INTRODUCTION: The objective of these clinical practice guidelines was to analyse all of the interventions during pregnancy and childbirth that might prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and postnatal pelvic floor symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: These guidelines were developed in accordance with the methods prescribed by the French Health Authority (HAS). RESULTS: A prenatal clinical examination of the perineum is recommended for women with a history of Crohn's disease, OASIS, genital mutilation, or perianal lesions (professional consensus). Just after delivery, a perineal examination is recommended to check for OASIS (Grade B); if there is doubt about the diagnosis, a second opinion should be requested (GradeC). In case of OASIS, the injuries (including their severity) and the technique for their repair should be described in detail (GradeC). Perineal massage during pregnancy must be encouraged among women who want it (Grade B). No intervention conducted before the start of the active phase of the second stage of labour has been shown to be effective in reducing the risk of perineal injury. The crowning of the baby's head should be manually controlled and the posterior perineum manually supported to reduce the risk of OASIS (GradeC). The performance of an episiotomy during normal deliveries is not recommended to reduce the risk of OASIS (Grade A). In instrumental deliveries, episiotomy may be indicated to avoid OASIS (GradeC). When an episiotomy is performed, a mediolateral incision is recommended (Grade B). The indication for episiotomy should be explained to the woman, and she should consent before its performance. Advising women to have a caesarean delivery for primary prevention of postnatal urinary or anal incontinence is not recommended (Grade B). During pregnancy and again in the labour room, obstetrics professionals should focus on the woman's expectations and inform her about the modes of delivery.

Maternal complications induced by digoxin treatment of fetal tachycardia: A retrospective series of 18 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate maternal tolerance to digoxin, used alone or associated to other antiarrhythmic drugs in the management of fetal tachycardia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at Rouen University Hospital between January 2009 and July 2016. All women who have received a treatment by either digoxin alone or associated with another antiarrhythmic drug for fetal tachycardia were included in the study. Maternal cardiac and extracardiac adverse effects were reported and comparisons between electrocardiograms before and during treatment with digoxin alone were performed. RESULTS: Eighteen women were treated by digoxin, either alone or associated with another antiarrhythmic (sotalol, flecainide or amiodarone). During treatment, digoxin overdosing (>2ng/mL) was observed in 11 women (61%), among which 4 women had toxic levels of digoxinemia (>3ng/mL) that was symptomatic in 3 women. Cardiac complications such as sinus bradycardia, first-degree auriculo-ventricular block and Mobitz I second-degree auriculo-ventricular block were reported in four women (18.2%). Extracardiac side effects i.e. neurosensorial or digestive were diagnosed in 35.3% of women. The parameters of the electrocardiogram were not altered before and after treatment with digoxin alone. CONCLUSION: Antiarrhythmics can cause maternal cardiac complications and extracardiac side effects that can sometimes be severe but rapidly reversible upon treatment arrest.

[Maternal deaths due to sudden death. Results from the French confidential enquiry into maternal deaths, 2010-2012]. / Mortalité maternelle par mort subite. Résultats de l'enquête nationale française confidentielle sur la mortalité maternelle, 2010­2012.

Sudden death is defined as unexpected cardiac arrest occurring less than one hour after the onset of the first symptoms. Between 2010 and 2012, 23 maternal deaths were considered as unexplained sudden deaths and three of them were not evaluated due to a lack of clinical data. In addition, 13 maternal deaths with an identified cause occurred in a clinical context of sudden death (7 cases of pulmonary embolism, 2 cases of epilepsy, and 2 cases of cardiomyopathy). The first maneuvers of resuscitation in the presence of bystanders were attempted in 8 of 22 cases (36%). This emphasizes the importance of teaching the non-medical resuscitation modalities of cardiac arrest in pregnant women. Pregnant women must receive accurate resuscitation as the whole population. An autopsy was performed in 10 of 33 cases (30%) and was considered incomplete in 3 patients. This result emphasizes the necessity to perform a systematic and specialized autopsy in the context of sudden maternal death, which is mostly unexplained.

[Maternal deaths due to cardiovascular disease. Results from the French confidential enquiry into maternal deaths, 2010-2012]. / Mortalité maternelle par pathologies cardiovasculaires. Résultats de l'enquête nationale française confidentielle sur la mortalité maternelle, 2010­2012.

Between 2010 and 2012, 29 maternal deaths were caused by cardiovascular disease, i.e. an overall maternal mortality ratio of 1.2 per 100,000 live births. Deaths occurred in pre-existing heart disease (n=19), peripartum cardiomyopathy (n=5), or arterial rupture (n=5). Care was considered non-optimal in three of five patients with congenital heart disease and due to delayed management by specialized teams. Pregnant patients with heart disease should be considered to be at high risk of mortality or severe cardiovascular complications and therefore reoriented as soon as possible to a perinatal center with the expertise of these pathologies. A delay in the management related to incorrect diagnosis was reported in three patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy. Peripartum cardiomyopathy should be considered in patients with severe left ventricular failure on cardiac ultrasound and particularly in women without pre-existing cardiac disease. A diagnosis of myocardial infarction was never suspected despite suggestive clinical and paraclinical criteria. A suggestive symptomatology of myocardial infarction reported in any pregnant woman and during the immediate postpartum period, and regardless of cardiovascular risk factors, should be promptly investigated and managed.