Initial experience with ovarian vein embolization for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian vein embolization was recently suggested as the preferred treatment for chronic pelvic pain syndrome. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the technical feasibility, complications and early clinical and radiographic results of ovarian vein embolization in women with pelvic pain syndrome. METHODS: Percutaneous transcatheter ovarian vein embolization with coils was performed in six patients aged 27-53 years who presented with pelvic pain syndrome. All had lower abdominal pain, and pelvic varicosities were found on Doppler ultrasound and retrograde ovarian vein venography. Embolization was done unilaterally in three patients (on the left side) and bilaterally in three. Mean follow-up by telephone questionnaire was 7.3 months. RESULTS: The procedure was technically successful in all patients. Two patients reported partial relief of symptoms (33.3%) and three had complete relief (50%), for a total of 5 patients (83.3%) with some measure of improvement. There were no complications following the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous transcatheter ovarian vein embolization seems to be safe and feasible for the treatment of pelvic pain syndrome. The procedure is performed on an outpatient basis and is well tolerated by patients.

Intra-arterial catheter directed therapy for severe graft-versus-host disease.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), resulting in death in the majority of steroid-resistant patients. We assessed the efficacy of regional intra-arterial treatment in patients with resistant hepatic and/or gastrointestinal (GI) GVHD. In total, 15 patients with steroid resistant grade 3-4 hepatic (n = 4), gastrointestinal (GI) (n = 8) GVHD or both (n = 3) were given intra-arterial treatment. Patients with hepatic GVHD received methotrexate and methylprednisolone into the hepatic artery. Patients with GI GVHD were treated with infusions of methylprednisolone into the superior and inferior mesenteric arteries. Two patients with pronounced upper GI symptoms also received upper GI treatment. In total, 25 procedures were carried out (range 1-3 per patient). Hepatic response was observed in four out of seven (57%) patients with hepatic GVHD, three (43%) featuring good response. Complete responses were observed in nine (82%) GI GVHD patients, with median time to initial and complete response of 3 d (range 1-7) and 15.8 d (range 4-33) respectively. Regional treatment of severe GVHD with intra-arterial treatment appears to be effective and safe. GI treatment maybe more effective than intrahepatic treatment. Early administration of isolated intra-arterial therapy in high-risk patients may further improve the outcome and reduce untoward effects of systemic immunosuppressive treatment.