Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with COPD.

PURPOSE: COPD fits the profile of disabling health conditions. This study aims to validate the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with COPD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 100 participants with COPD responded to the Brazilian 36-item version of the WHODAS 2.0, as well as the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Spirometric data was extracted from medical records. RESULTS: The internal consistency analysis showed coefficients for all WHODAS 2.0 domains with a strong correlation (0.70-0.85) except for Life activities, which had a moderate correlation (coefficient = 0.60). In the construct analysis, the coefficients for the WHODAS and SGRQ domains presented a consistent correlation among them, varying from 0.40 to 0.69. No correlation was evidenced among the WHODAS domains and the spirometric data, highlighting that linear measures fail when associated with the functioning of an individual with COPD. Discriminative analysis revealed a capacity for the WHODAS 2.0 to distinguish among COPD different levels of clinical impact obtained from CAT excluding the Getting along domain. CONCLUSION: The WHODAS 2.0 shows as a valid instrument that can sensibly assess functioning differences related to the clinical impact classification level in subjects with COPD.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONWHODAS 2.0 is a valid tool to assess functioning in subjects with COPD.WHODAS 2.0 is sensitive to functioning differences related to classification level and to clinical impact in individuals with COPD.As a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM), WHODAS 2.0 offers the opportunity to develop clinical patient-centered interventions, improving the health care.As a low-cost, easy-to-use tool, WHODAS can be a useful resource in the process of clinical assessment of patient functioning.

Acute effects of noninvasive ventilation on sleep physiology in patients with moderate to severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Changes in sleep architecture in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) can be explained by a combination of physiological changes in breathing during sleep, with impairment of respiratory mechanics and reduction of arterial oxygenation. This study aimed to evaluate the acute effects of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) - compared to spontaneous breathing - on sleep latency and stages, and on the occurrence of sleep-related respiratory events, nocturnal hypoxemia, and changes in heart rate (HR) in patients with moderate to severe stable COPD. PATIENTS/METHODS: Patients completed two polysomnography (PSG) studies: one during spontaneous breathing and one while receiving NIV in bilevel mode and with backup respiratory rate (RR.) setting. Sleepware G3 software was used for the analysis of PSG and pressure, volume, and ventilator flow curves × time. RESULTS: Participants were 10 female patients with a mean age of 68.1 ± 10.2 years. NIV during sleep decreased sleep onset latency (17 ± 18.8 min vs 46.8 ± 39.5 min; p = 0.02), increased REM sleep time (41.2 ± 24.7 min vs 19.7 ± 21.7 min; p = 0.03), and decreased the obstructive apnea index (OAI) (0 vs 8.7 ± 18.8; p = 0.01). Lower mean HR (66.6 ± 4.1 bpm vs 70.6 ± 5.9 bpm; p = 0.03) and lower maximum HR (84.1 ± 7.3 bpm vs 91.6 ± 7.8 bpm; p = 0.03) were observed in PSG with NIV. CONCLUSIONS: The use of NIV in patients with moderate to severe stable COPD while they were sleeping increased REM sleep time and decreased sleep onset latency, the number of obstructive respiratory events, and the mean and maximum HR.

Comparison of the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation with chest physical therapy on the levels of fibrinogen and albumin in patients with lung cancer awaiting lung resection: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation plays an important role in the initiation, promotion, and progression of lung carcinogenesis. In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), fibrinogen levels correlate with neoplasia. Here we compared the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) with chest physical therapy (CPT) on fibrinogen and albumin levels in patients with LC and previous inflammatory lung disease awaiting lung resection. METHODS: We conducted a randomized clinical trial with 24 patients who were randomly assigned to Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) and Chest Physical Therapy (CPT) groups. Each group underwent training 5 days weekly for 4 weeks. All patients were assessed before and after four weeks of training through clinical assessment, measurement of fibrinogen and albumin levels, spirometry, 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT), quality of life survey, and anxiety and depression scale. PR involved strength and endurance training, and CPT involved lung expansion techniques. Both groups attended educational classes. RESULTS: A mixed between-within subjects analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant interaction between time (before and after intervention) and group (PR vs. CPT) on fibrinogen levels (F(1, 22)=0.57, p<0.0001) and a significant main effect of time (F(1, 22)=0.68, p=0.004). Changes in albumin levels were not statistically significant relative to the interaction effect between time and group (F(1, 22)=0.96, p=0.37) nor the main effects of time (F(1, 22)=1.00, p=1.00) and group (F(1, 22 )=0.59, p=0.45). A mixed between-within subjects ANOVA revealed significant interaction effects between time and group for the peak work rate of the unsupported upper limb exercise (F(1, 22)=0.77, p=0.02), endurance time (F(1, 22)=0.60, p=0.001), levels of anxiety (F(1, 22)=0.60, p=0.002) and depression (F(1, 22)=0.74, p=0.02), and the SF-36 physical component summary (F(1, 22)=0.83, p=0.07). CONCLUSION: PR reduced serum fibrinogen levels, improved functional parameters, and quality of life of patients with LC and inflammatory lung disease awaiting lung resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials RBR-3nm5bv.

Portuguese-language version of the COPD Assessment Test: validation for use in Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To validate a Portuguese-language version of the COPD assessment test (CAT) for use in Brazil and to assess the reproducibility of this version. METHODS: This was multicenter study involving patients with stable COPD at two teaching hospitals in the city of Fortaleza, Brazil. Two independent observers (twice in one day) administered the Portuguese-language version of the CAT to 50 patients with COPD. One of those observers again administered the scale to the same patients one week later. At baseline, the patients were submitted to pulmonary function testing and the six-minute walk test (6MWT), as well as completing the previously validated Portuguese-language versions of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) dyspnea scale, and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). RESULTS: Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93-0.97; p < 0.001; and ICC = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-0.98; p < 0.001, respectively). Bland Altman plots showed good test-retest reliability. The CAT total score correlated significantly with spirometry results, 6MWT distance, SGRQ scores, MMRC dyspnea scale scores, and HADS-depression scores. CONCLUSIONS: The Portuguese-language version of the CAT is a valid, reproducible, and reliable instrument for evaluating patients with COPD in Brazil.

Portuguese-language version of the COPD Assessment Test: validation for use in Brazil / Validacao do teste de avaliacao da DPOC em portugues para uso no Brasil

OBJECTIVE: To validate a Portuguese-language version of the COPD assessment test (CAT) for use in Brazil and to assess the reproducibility of this version. METHODS: This was multicenter study involving patients with stable COPD at two teaching hospitals in the city of Fortaleza, Brazil. Two independent observers (twice in one day) administered the Portuguese-language version of the CAT to 50 patients with COPD. One of those observers again administered the scale to the same patients one week later. At baseline, the patients were submitted to pulmonary function testing and the six-minute walk test (6MWT), as well as completing the previously validated Portuguese-language versions of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) dyspnea scale, and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). RESULTS: Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93-0.97; p < 0.001; and ICC = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-0.98; p < 0.001, respectively). Bland Altman plots showed good test-retest reliability. The CAT total score correlated significantly with spirometry results, 6MWT distance, SGRQ scores, MMRC dyspnea scale scores, and HADS-depression scores. CONCLUSIONS: The Portuguese-language version of the CAT is a valid, reproducible, and reliable instrument for evaluating patients with COPD in Brazil. .

OBJETIVO: Realizar a validação e verificar a reprodutibilidade da versão em português do Brasil do COPD Assessment Test (CAT). MÉTODOS: Estudo multicêntrico, no qual foram selecionados pacientes com DPOC estável em dois hospitais de ensino na cidade de Fortaleza, CE. A versão do CAT foi aplicada duas vezes a 50 pacientes com DPOC por dois observadores independentes no mesmo dia. Após uma semana, esse mesmo questionário foi aplicado novamente aos mesmos pacientes por um dos observadores. No primeiro dia, os pacientes foram submetidos à prova de função pulmonar e ao teste de caminhada de seis minutos (TC6) e responderam as versões validadas de qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde (QVRS). (SGRQ), escala de dispneia Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) e hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). RESULTADOS: As reprodutibilidades interobservador e intraobservador foram excelentes (coeficiente de correlação intraclasse [CCI] = 0,96; IC95%: 0,93-0,97; p < 0,001; e CCI = 0,98; IC95%: 0,96-0,98; p < 0,001, respectivamente). As disposições gráficas de Bland Altman demonstraram boa confiabilidade teste-reteste. Houve correlações significativas do escore total do CAT com os resultados de espirometria, TC6, SGRQ, escala de dispneia MMRC e HADS-depressão. CONCLUSÕES: A versão brasileira do CAT é um instrumento válido, reprodutível ...

The impact of smoking cessation on patient quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after twelve months of smoking cessation. METHODS: This was a prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of a smoking cessation program on the quality of life of 60 self-referred subjects, at a public hospital, during the period of August 2006 to December 2007. The program consisted of 2-h group sessions once a week during the first month and then every 15 days over six months, followed by monthly phone contacts for another six months. The treatment was based on behavior modification and the use of bupropion in combination with nicotinic replacement therapy. Abstinence was verified by exhaled CO measurements. Patient HRQoL was quantified using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire. Differences in quality of life scores between quitters and non-quitters at twelve months after the initial intervention were evaluated using analysis of covariance with baseline characteristics as covariates. RESULTS: Self-reported quality of life scores were significantly higher among the 40 quitters than among the 20 non-quitters. The following SF-36 domains were most affected: role-emotional (p = 0.008); general health (p = 0.006); vitality (p < 0.001); and mental health (p = 0.002). At twelve months after the smoking cessation intervention, the SF-36 mental component and physical component summary scores were higher among quitters than among non-quitters (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings illustrate that smoking abstinence is related to better HRQoL, especially in aspects of mental health.

The impact of smoking cessation on patient quality of life / Impacto da cessação tabágica na qualidade de vida dos pacientes

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after twelve months of smoking cessation. METHODS: This was a prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of a smoking cessation program on the quality of life of 60 self-referred subjects, at a public hospital, during the period of August 2006 to December 2007. The program consisted of 2-h group sessions once a week during the first month and then every 15 days over six months, followed by monthly phone contacts for another six months. The treatment was based on behavior modification and the use of bupropion in combination with nicotinic replacement therapy. Abstinence was verified by exhaled CO measurements. Patient HRQoL was quantified using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire. Differences in quality of life scores between quitters and non-quitters at twelve months after the initial intervention were evaluated using analysis of covariance with baseline characteristics as covariates. RESULTS: Self-reported quality of life scores were significantly higher among the 40 quitters than among the 20 non-quitters. The following SF-36 domains were most affected: role-emotional (p = 0.008); general health (p = 0.006); vitality (p < 0.001); and mental health (p = 0.002). At twelve months after the smoking cessation intervention, the SF-36 mental component and physical component summary scores were higher among quitters than among non-quitters (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings illustrate that smoking abstinence is related to better HRQoL, especially in aspects of mental health.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar alterações na qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde (QVRS) doze meses após a cessação tabágica. MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo para avaliar a efetividade de um programa de tratamento de fumantes, em relação à qualidade de vida, com 60 pacientes atendidos em um hospital público no período de agosto de 2006 a dezembro de 2007. O programa consistiu de sessões em grupo semanais com 2 h de duração durante o primeiro mês e quinzenais até o sexto mês, seguidas por telefonema mensal durante mais seis meses. O tratamento foi baseado na mudança comportamental e no uso de bupropiona associada à terapia de reposição nicotínica. A abstinência foi aferida pela medida de CO exalado. A QVRS dos pacientes foi quantificada através do questionário Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Diferenças nos escores de qualidade de vida entre ex-fumantes e fumantes ativos doze meses após a intervenção inicial foram analisadas utilizando-se a análise de covariância com as características basais como covariáveis. RESULTADOS: Os escores de qualidade de vida autorrelatados foram significativamente maiores nos 40 ex-fumantes do que nos 20 fumantes ativos. Os seguintes domínios do SF-36 foram mais afetados: papel emocional (p = 0,008); saúde geral (p = 0,006); vitalidade (p < 0,001) e saúde mental (p = 0,002). Doze meses após a intervenção para a cessação tabágica, os escores dos componentes físico e mental sumarizados foram maiores nos ex-fumantes do que nos fumantes (p = 0,004 e p = 0,001, respectivamente). CONCLUSÕES: Nossos achados ilustram que a abstinência tabágica está relacionada à melhora da QVRS, especialmente nos aspectos relacionados à saúde mental.