Training With Simulated Scotoma Leads to Behavioral Improvements Through at Least Two Distinct Mechanisms.

Purpose: Individuals with central vision loss due to macular degeneration (MD) often spontaneously develop a preferred retinal locus (PRL) outside the area of retinal damage, which they use instead of the fovea. Those who develop a stable PRL are more successful at coping with their vision loss. However, it is unclear whether improvements in visual performance at the PRL are specific to that retinal location or are also observed in other parts of the retina. Perceptual learning literature suggests that the retinal specificity of these effects provides insight about the mechanisms involved. Better understanding of these mechanisms is necessary for the next generation of interventions and improved patient outcomes. Methods: To address this, we trained participants with healthy vision to develop a trained retinal locus (TRL), analogous to the PRL in patients. We trained 24 participants on a visual search task using a gaze-contingent display to simulate a central scotoma. Results: Results showed retinotopically specific improvements in visual crowding only at the TRL; however, visual acuity improved in both the TRL and in an untrained retinal locus. Conclusions: These results suggest that training with an artificial scotoma involves multiple mechanistic levels, some location-specific and some not, and that simulated scotoma training paradigms likely influence multiple mechanisms simultaneously. Eye movement analysis suggests that the non-retinotopic learning effects may be related to improvements in the capability to maintain a stable gaze during stimulus presentation. This work suggests that effective interventions promoting peripheral viewing may influence multiple mechanisms simultaneously.

Oculomotor changes following learned use of an eccentric retinal locus.

People with bilateral central vision loss sometimes develop a new point of oculomotor reference called a preferred retinal locus (PRL) that is used for fixating and planning saccadic eye movements. How individuals develop and learn to effectively use a PRL is still debated; in particular, the time course of learning to plan saccades using a PRL and learning to stabilize peripheral fixation at the desired location. Here we address knowledge limitations through research describing how eye movements change as a person learns to adopt an eccentric retinal locus. Using a gaze-contingent, eye tracking-guided paradigm to simulate central vision loss, 40 participants developed a PRL by engaging in an oculomotor and visual recognition task. After 12 training sessions, significant improvements were observed in six eye movement metrics addressing different aspects involved in learning to use a PRL: first saccade landing dispersion, saccadic re-referencing, saccadic precision, saccadic latency, percentage of useful trials, and fixation stability. Importantly, our analyses allowed separate examination of the stability of target fixation separately from the dispersion and precision of the landing location of saccades. These measures explained 50% of the across-subject variance in accuracy. Fixation stability and saccadic precision showed a strong, positive correlation. Although there was no statistically significant difference in rate of learning, individuals did tend to learn saccadic precision faster than fixation stability. Saccadic precision was also more associated with accuracy than fixation stability for the behavioral task. This suggests effective intervention strategies in low vision should address both fixation stability and saccadic precision.