Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 42(3): 309-18, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25039918

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the postoperative analgesic effects of a constant rate infusion (CRI) of either fentanyl (FENT), lidocaine (LIDO), ketamine (KET), dexmedetomidine (DEX), or the combination lidocaine-ketamine-dexmedetomidine (LKD) in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, blinded, clinical study. ANIMALS: Fifty-four dogs. METHODS: Anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane. Treatments were intravenous (IV) administration of a bolus at start of anesthesia, followed by an IV CRI until the end of anesthesia, then a CRI at a decreased dose for a further 4 hours: CONTROL/BUT (butorphanol 0.4 mg kg(-1), infusion rate of saline 0.9% 2 mLkg(-1) hour(-1)); FENT (5 µg kg(-1), 10 µg kg(-1) hour(-1), then 2.5 µg kg(-1) hour(-1)); KET (1 mgkg(-1) , 40 µg kg(-1) minute(-1), then 10 µg kg(-1) minute(-1) ; LIDO (2 mg kg(-1), 100 µg kg(-1) minute(-1), then 25 µg kg(-1) minute(-1)); DEX (1 µgkg(-1), 3 µg kg(-1) hour(-1), then 1 µg kg(-1) hour(-1)); or a combination of LKD at the aforementioned doses. Postoperative analgesia was evaluated using the Glasgow composite pain scale, University of Melbourne pain scale, and numerical rating scale. Rescue analgesia was morphine and carprofen. Data were analyzed using Friedman or Kruskal-Wallis test with appropriate post-hoc testing (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Animals requiring rescue analgesia included CONTROL/BUT (n = 8), KET (n = 3), DEX (n = 2), and LIDO (n = 2); significantly higher in CONTROL/BUT than other groups. No dogs in LKD and FENT groups received rescue analgesia. CONTROL/BUT pain scores were significantly higher at 1 hour than FENT, DEX and LKD, but not than KET or LIDO. Fentanyl and LKD sedation scores were higher than CONTROL/BUT at 1 hour. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: LKD and FENT resulted in adequate postoperative analgesia. LIDO, CONTROL/BUT, KET and DEX may not be effective for treatment of postoperative pain in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy.


Assuntos
Analgesia/veterinária , Dexmedetomidina/farmacologia , Fentanila/farmacologia , Ketamina/farmacologia , Lidocaína/farmacologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/veterinária , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/farmacologia , Anestésicos Dissociativos/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Dissociativos/farmacologia , Anestésicos Inalatórios/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Intravenosos/farmacologia , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/farmacologia , Animais , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Cães , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Fentanila/administração & dosagem , Histerectomia/veterinária , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Ovariectomia/veterinária , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle
2.
PLoS One ; 9(9): e106620, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25232737

RESUMO

The effects of intravenous (i.v.) lidocaine, dexmedetomidine and their combination delivered as a bolus followed by a constant rate infusion (CRI) on the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane (MACISO) in dogs were evaluated. Seven healthy adult dogs were included. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane. For each dog, baseline MAC (MACISO/BASAL) was determined after a 90-minute equilibration period. Thereafter, each dog received one of the following treatments (loading dose, CRI): lidocaine 2 mg kg(-1), 100 µg kg(-1) minute(-1); dexmedetomidine 2 µg kg(-1), 2 µg kg(-1) hour(-1); or their combination. MAC was then determined again after 45- minutes of treatment by CRI. At the doses administered, lidocaine, dexmedetomidine and their combination significantly reduced MACISO by 27.3% (range: 12.5-39.2%), 43.4% (33.3-53.3%) and 60.9% (46.1-78.1%), respectively, when compared to MACISO/BASAL. The combination resulted in a greater MACISO reduction than the two drugs alone. Their use, at the doses studied, provides a clinically important reduction in the concentration of ISO during anaesthesia in dogs.


Assuntos
Anestesia por Inalação , Dexmedetomidina/farmacologia , Isoflurano/análise , Lidocaína/farmacologia , Alvéolos Pulmonares/efeitos dos fármacos , Anestésicos Combinados/farmacologia , Anestésicos Inalatórios/farmacologia , Animais , Gasometria , Cães , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Distribuição Aleatória
3.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 40(6): 599-609, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23910822

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the isoflurane-sparing effects of an intravenous (IV) constant rate infusion (CRI) of fentanyl, lidocaine, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, or lidocaine-ketamine-dexmedetomidine (LKD) in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, blinded, clinical study. ANIMALS: Fifty four dogs. METHODS: Anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane with one of the following IV treatments: butorphanol/saline (butorphanol 0.4 mg kg(-1), saline 0.9% CRI, CONTROL/BUT); fentanyl (5 µg kg(-1), 10 µg kg(-1) hour(-1), FENT); ketamine (1 mg kg(-1), 40 µg kg(-1) minute(-1), KET), lidocaine (2 mg kg(-1), 100 µg kg(-1) minute(-1), LIDO); dexmedetomidine (1 µg kg(-1), 3 µg kg(-1) hour(-1), DEX); or a LKD combination. Positive pressure ventilation maintained eucapnia. An anesthetist unaware of treatment and end-tidal isoflurane concentration (Fe'Iso) adjusted vaporizer settings to maintain surgical anesthetic depth. Cardiopulmonary variables and Fe'Iso concentrations were monitored. Data were analyzed using anova (p < 0.05). RESULTS: At most time points, heart rate (HR) was lower in FENT than in other groups, except for DEX and LKD. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was lower in FENT and CONTROL/BUT than in DEX. Overall mean ± SD Fe'Iso and % reduced isoflurane requirements were 1.01 ± 0.31/41.6% (range, 0.75 ± 0.31/56.6% to 1.12 ± 0.80/35.3%, FENT), 1.37 ± 0.19/20.8% (1.23 ± 0.14/28.9% to 1.51 ± 0.22/12.7%, KET), 1.34 ± 0.19/22.5% (1.24 ± 0.19/28.3% to 1.44 ± 0.21/16.8%, LIDO), 1.30 ± 0.28/24.8% (1.16 ± 0.18/32.9% to 1.43 ± 0.32/17.3%, DEX), 0.95 ± 0.19/54.9% (0.7 ± 0.16/59.5% to 1.12 ± 0.16/35.3%, LKD) and 1.73 ± 0.18/0.0% (1.64 ± 0.21 to 1.82 ± 0.14, CONTROL/BUT) during surgery. FENT and LKD significantly reduced Fe'Iso. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: At the doses administered, FENT and LKD had greater isoflurane-sparing effect than LIDO, KET or CONTROL/BUT, but not at all times. Low HR during FENT may limit improvement in MAP expected with reduced Fe'Iso.


Assuntos
Anestesia Geral/veterinária , Anestésicos Combinados , Anestésicos Inalatórios , Anestésicos Intravenosos , Dexmedetomidina , Cães/cirurgia , Fentanila , Histerectomia/veterinária , Isoflurano/administração & dosagem , Ketamina , Lidocaína , Ovariectomia/veterinária , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Anestésicos Combinados/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Inalatórios/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administração & dosagem , Animais , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Fentanila/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...