Augmented Safety Profile of Ultrasound-Guided Gluteal Fat Transfer: Retrospective Study With 1815 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Gluteal augmentation with autologous fat transfer is one of the fastest growing aesthetic surgical procedures worldwide over the past decade. However, this procedure can be associated with high mortality from fatal pulmonary fat embolism events caused by intramuscular injection of fat. Ultrasound-guided fat grafting allows visualization of the transfer in the subcutaneous space, avoiding intramuscular injection. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of gluteal fat grafting performed with ultrasound-guided cannulation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing ultrasound-guided gluteal fat grafting at the authors' center between 2019 and 2022 was performed. All cases were performed by board-certified and board-eligible plastic surgeons under general anesthesia in ASA Class I or II patients. Fat was only transferred to the subcutaneous plane when over the gluteal muscle. Patients underwent postoperative follow-up from a minimum of 3 months up to 2 years. Results were analyzed with standard statistical tests. RESULTS: The study encompassed 1815 female patients with a median age of 34 years. Controlled medical comorbidities were present in 14%, with the most frequent being hypothyroidism (0.7%), polycystic ovarian syndrome (0.7%), anxiety (0.6%), and asthma (0.6%). Postoperative complications occurred in 4% of the total cohort, with the most common being seroma (1.2%), local skin ischemia (1.2%), and surgical site infection (0.8%). There were no macroscopic fat emboli complications or mortalities. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that direct visualization of anatomic plane injection through ultrasound guidance is associated with a low rate of complications. Ultrasound guidance is an efficacious adjunct to gluteal fat grafting and is associated with an improved safety profile that should be considered by every surgeon performing this procedure.

Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant versus Staged Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Complications.

BACKGROUND: Direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction has multiple advantages over a staged tissue expander (TE) approach. However, its use may be limited by concerns of increased complications. This study is the largest series to date comparing postoperative outcomes for DTI versus TE reconstruction in the prepectoral plane. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 348 patients that received 536 total immediate, prepectoral implant-based breast reconstructions between January 2018 and December 2021. The authors compared the presence of risk factors and the rate of six separate complications between patients that received DTI versus TE reconstruction up to one year after surgery. RESULTS: Of 348 patients, 147 (42%) and 201 (58%) underwent TE and DTI reconstruction (p=0.1813), respectively. Overall infection rate was 16.4% (n=57). DTI patients had a significantly greater incidence of wounds (p<0.0001), including minor (p<0.0011) and major wounds (p<0.0053). Significantly greater mastectomy resection weights were found for DTI patients that experienced any complication (p<0.0076), postoperative wounds (p<0.0001), and major wounds specifically (p<0.0035). Compared to medium thickness, extra-thick acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was associated with significantly increased rates of infection (p<0.0408) and wounds (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Prepectoral DTI reconstruction in patients with adequate flap perfusion may have comparable complication rates to staged TE reconstruction apart from a higher incidence of postoperative wounds. Greater mastectomy resection weights and thickness of ADM may specifically contribute to infectious and wound-healing complications. Prepectoral DTI reconstruction is encouraged in the patients with adequate flap perfusion and moderate to low mastectomy resection weights that desire comparable or smaller implant volumes.