Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol ; 4(2): 181-189, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29749935

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare patient response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using fusion-optimized atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) intervals versus nominal settings. BACKGROUND: The additional benefit obtained by AV- and VV-interval optimization in patients undergoing CRT remains controversial. Previous studies show short-term benefit in hemodynamic parameters; however, midterm randomized comparison between electrocardiogram optimization and nominal parameters is lacking. METHODS: A group of 180 consecutive patients with left bundle branch block treated with CRT were randomized to fusion-optimized intervals (FOI) or nominal settings. In the FOI group, AV and VV intervals were optimized according to the narrowest QRS, using fusion with intrinsic conduction. Clinical response was defined as an increase >10% in the 6-min walk test or an increment of 1 step in New York Heart Association functional class. The left ventricular (LV) remodeling was defined as >15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) at 12-month follow-up. Additionally, patients with LVESV reduction >30% relative to baseline were considered super-responders; by contrast, negative responders had increased LVESV relative to baseline. RESULTS: Participant characteristics included a mean age of 65 ± 10 years, 68% male, 37% with ischemic cardiomyopathy, LV ejection fraction 26 ± 7%, and QRS 180 ± 22 ms. Baseline QRS was shortened significantly more by FOI, compared with nominal settings (-56.55 ± 17.65 ms vs. -37.81 ± 22.07 ms, respectively; p = 0.025). At 12 months, LV reverse remodeling was achieved in a larger proportion of the FOI group (74% vs. 53% [odds ratio: 2.02 (95% confidence interval: 1.08 to 3.76)], respectively; p = 0.026). No significant differences were observed in clinical response (61% vs. 53% [odds ratio: 1.43 (95% confidence interval: 0.79 to 2.59)], respectively; p = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Device optimization based on FOI achieves greater LV remodeling, compared with nominal settings. (ECG Optimization of CRT: Evaluation of Mid-Term Response [BEST]; NCT01439529).


Assuntos
Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca , Eletrocardiografia/métodos , Remodelação Ventricular/fisiologia , Idoso , Bloqueio de Ramo/terapia , Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/métodos , Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia
2.
Europace ; 18(1): 57-63, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26333377

RESUMO

AIMS: The role of high-intensity exercise and other emerging risk factors in lone atrial fibrillation (Ln-AF) epidemiology is still under debate. The aim of this study was to analyse the contribution of each of the emerging risk factors and the impact of physical activity dose in patients with Ln-AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with Ln-AF and age- and sex-matched healthy controls were included in a 2:1 prospective case-control study. We obtained clinical and anthropometric data transthoracic echocardiography, lifetime physical activity questionnaire, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, Berlin questionnaire score, and, in patients at high risk for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) syndrome, a polysomnography. A total of 115 cases and 57 controls were enrolled. Conditional logistic regression analysis associated height [odds ratio (OR) 1.06 [1.01-1.11]], waist circumference (OR 1.06 [1.02-1.11]), OSA (OR 5.04 [1.44-17.45]), and 2000 or more hours of cumulative high-intensity endurance training to a higher AF risk. Our data indicated a U-shaped association between the extent of high-intensity training and AF risk. The risk of AF increased with an accumulated lifetime endurance sport activity ≥ 2,000 h compared with sedentary individuals (OR 3.88 [1.55-9.73]). Nevertheless, a history of <2000 h of high-intensity training protected against AF when compared with sedentary individuals (OR 0.38 [0.12-0.98]). CONCLUSION: A history of ≥ 2,000 h of vigorous endurance training, tall stature, abdominal obesity, and OSA are frequently encountered as risk factors in patients with Ln-AF. Fewer than 2000 total hours of high-intensity endurance training associates with reduced Ln-AF risk.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Tolerância ao Exercício , Exercício Físico , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/epidemiologia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/fisiopatologia , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/diagnóstico , Espanha/epidemiologia , Esportes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...