Antithymocyte globulin is associated with a lower incidence of de novo donor-specific antibodies in moderately sensitized renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) are associated with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and graft failure after kidney transplantation. The effects of induction immunosuppression on dnDSA are unknown. METHODS: The study population comprised 114 consecutive moderately sensitized (positive DSA and negative flow crossmatch) recipients who received deceased donor renal transplants between December 2009 and November 2011. Patients were divided into two groups based on induction immunosuppression: antithymocyte globulin (ATG) (n=85) or basiliximab (n=29) and were followed up for 36 months. RESULTS: Patients in the ATG group received a mean dose of 4.98 mg/kg ± 7.9 mg/kg, had a significantly higher PRA, and received more plasmapheresis and IVIG at the time of transplant. The incidence of dnDSA (P=0.02, HR=0.33, 95% CI 0.09-1.24) and ABMR (P=0.002, HR=0.2, 95% CI 0.04-0.87) was significantly lower in the ATG group. In multivariate regression analyses, ATG induction was the single most important variable associated with both ABMR and dnDSA. CONCLUSIONS: In moderately sensitized deceased donor renal transplant recipients, induction with ATG is associated with a reduction in the occurrence of dnDSA and ABMR when compared with basiliximab.

Increased C4d in post-reperfusion biopsies and increased donor specific antibodies at one-week post transplant are risk factors for acute rejection in mild to moderately sensitized kidney transplant recipients.

In order to define the intensity of immunosuppression, we examined risk factors for acute rejection in desensitization protocols that use baseline donor-specific antibody levels measured as mean fluorescence intensity (MFImax). The study included 146 patients transplanted with a negative flow crossmatch and a mean follow-up of 18 months with the majority (83%) followed for at least 1 year. At the time of transplant, mean-calculated panel-reactive antibody and MFImax ranged from 10.3-57.2% and 262-1691, respectively, between low- and high-risk protocols. Mean MFImax increased significantly from transplant to 1 week and 1 year. The incidence of acute rejection (mean 1.65 months) as a combination of clinical and subclinical rejection was 32%, including 14% cellular, 12% antibody-mediated, and 6% mixed rejection. In regression analyses, only C4d staining in post-reperfusion biopsies (hazard ratio 3.3, confidence interval 1.71-6.45) and increased specific antibodies at 1-week post transplant were significant predictors of rejection. A rise in MFImax by 500 was associated with a 2.8-fold risk of rejection. Thus, C4d staining in post-reperfusion biopsies and an early rise in donor specific antibodies after transplantation are risk factors for rejection in moderately sensitized patients.

Chronic kidney disease stage progression in liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is little information on chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage progression rates and outcomes in liver transplant recipients. Identifying modifiable risk factors may help prevent CKD progression in liver transplant recipients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We performed a retrospective review of 1151 adult, deceased-donor, single-organ primary liver transplants between July 1984 and December 2007 and analyzed kidney outcomes and risk factors for CKD stage progression. Seven hundred twenty-nine patients had an available estimated GFR at 1 year posttransplant to establish a baseline stage. The primary end point was the CKD progression from one stage to a higher stage (lower GFR). RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier estimates of patient survival were 91%, 74%, and 64% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Estimates of liver allograft survival were 89%, 71%, and 60% at the same time points. At 1 year, 7%, 34%, 56%, 3%, and 1% of patients were in CKD stages 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. The incidence of stage progression was 28%, 40%, and 53% at 3, 5, and 10 years. The incidence of ESRD was 2.6%, 7.5%, and 18% at 5, 10, and 20 years. Multivariable Cox regression analyses demonstrated that CKD stage at 1 year, pretransplant diabetes and urinary tract infections/hypercholesterolemia in the first year proved to be independent risk factors for stage progression (hazard ratio 1.9, 0.28, 1.39, and 1.46, respectively, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Future studies will determine whether treatment of risk factors in the first posttransplant year prevent CKD progression in liver transplant recipients.

Post-transplant DSA monitoring may predict antibody-mediated rejection in sensitized kidney transplant recipients.

We examined whether changes in posttransplant highest intensity donor specific anti-HLA antibody specificity (DSAmax) measured by single antigen bead via Luminex (One Lambda, Inc.) were associated with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). We conducted a retrospective analysis examining risk factors for AMR in 116 consecutive patients who underwent desensitization between 1/1/2009 and 9/1/2010. All patients had a negative flow cytometry crossmatch. The mean patient age at transplant was 46.4 +/- 4 years. The mean peak PRA (panel reactive antibody) and DSAmax at transplant were 40 +/- 6% and 894 +/- 150 mean fluorescent intensity (MFI), respectively. The mean time to rejection was 1.5 +/- 0.4 months. Cox regression analyses demonstrated that an increase in DSAmax by one week after transplant was significantly associated with AMR (pure or mixed). A rise in DSAmax greater than 500 MFI at 1 week was associated with a 2.6 times greater risk of rejection (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1 - 6.3, p = 0.02). We conclude that a rise in DSAmax at one week is an independent risk factor forAMR and that posttransplant DSA monitoring strategies may reduce the risk of AMR in sensitized patients.

Fatty acid transduction of nitric oxide signaling: nitrolinoleic acid potently activates endothelial heme oxygenase 1 expression.

Nitroalkenes are a class of cell signaling mediators generated by NO and fatty acid-dependent redox reactions. Nitrated fatty acids such as 10- and 12-nitro-9,12-octadecadienoic acid (nitrolinoleic acid, LNO(2)) exhibit pluripotent antiinflammatory cell signaling properties. Heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) is up-regulated as an adaptive response to inflammatory mediators and oxidative stress. LNO(2) (1-10 microM) induced HO-1 mRNA and protein up to 70- and 15-fold, respectively, in human aortic endothelial cells. This induction of HO-1 occurred within clinical LNO(2) concentration ranges, far exceeded responses to equimolar amounts of linoleic acid and oxidized linoleic acid, and rivaled that induced by hemin. Ex vivo incubation of rat aortic segments with 25 microM LNO(2) resulted in a 40-fold induction of HO-1 protein that localized to endothelial and smooth muscle cells. Actinomycin D inhibited LNO(2) induction of HO-1 in human aortic endothelial cells, and LNO(2) activated a 4.5-kb human HO-1 promoter construct, indicating transcriptional regulation of the HO-1 gene. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) receptor antagonist GW9662 did not inhibit LNO(2)-mediated HO-1 induction, and a methyl ester derivative of LNO(2) with diminished PPARgamma binding capability also induced HO-1, affirming a PPARgamma-independent mechanism. The NO scavengers 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide and oxymyoglobin partially reversed induction of HO-1 by LNO(2), revealing that LNO(2) regulates HO-1 expression by predominantly NO-independent mechanisms. In summary, the metabolic and inflammatory signaling actions of nitroalkenes can be transduced by robust HO-1 induction.