Anaesthetic management during open and percutaneous irreversible electroporation.

BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel tumour ablation technique involving repetitive application of electrical energy around a tumour. The use of pulsed electrical gradients carries a risk of cardiac arrhythmias, severe muscle contractions, and seizures. We aimed to identify IRE-related risks and the appropriate precautions for anaesthetic management. METHODS: All patients who were treated with IRE were prospectively included. Exclusion criteria were arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, active coronary artery disease, and epilepsy. All procedures were performed under general anaesthesia with complete muscle relaxation during ECG-synchronized pulsing. Adverse events, cardiovascular effects, blood samples, cerebral activity, and post-procedural pain were analysed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients underwent 30 IRE sessions for tumours in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and lesser pelvis. No major adverse events occurred during IRE. Median systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased by 44 mm Hg (range -7 to 108 mm Hg) and 19 mm Hg (range 1-50 mm Hg), respectively. Two transient minor cardiac arrhythmias without haemodynamic consequences were observed. Muscle contractions were mild and IRE caused no reactive brain activity on a simplified EEG. Pain in the first 24 h after percutaneous IRE was generally mild, but higher pain scores were reported after pancreatic treatment (mean VAS score 3; range 0-9). CONCLUSIONS: Side-effects during IRE on tumours in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and lesser pelvis seem mild and manageable when current recommendations for anaesthesia management, including deep muscle relaxation and ECG synchronized pulsing, are followed. Electrical pulses do not seem to cause reactive cerebral activity and evidence for pre-existing atrial fibrillation as an absolute contra-indication for IRE is questionable.

Ablation of colorectal liver metastases by irreversible electroporation: results of the COLDFIRE-I ablate-and-resect study.

OBJECTIVES: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a new ablation technique that relies on high-voltage electrical pulses. This clinical study evaluates the pathological response of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) treated with IRE and the clinical safety and feasibility. METHODS: Ten patients with resectable CRLM were included. During laparotomy, the metastases were treated with IRE and resected 60 min later. Safety and feasibility were assessed based on adverse events, laboratory values, technical success and intra-operative ultrasound findings. Tissue response was assessed using triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) vitality staining and (immuno)histochemical stainings (HE, complement-3d and caspase-3). RESULTS: Ten lesions with a mean diameter of 2.4 cm were successfully electroporated and resected, on average, 84 min later (range 51-153 min). One minor transient cardiac arrhythmia occurred during IRE. Ultrasound showed a sharply demarcated hypoechoic ablation zone around the tumour. TTC showed avitality of all lesions, covering the complete tumour in 8/10 lesions. Although immunohistochemistry proved heterogeneous and difficult to interpret within the tumours, it confirmed irreversible cell damage in the tumour-free margin of all specimens. CONCLUSIONS: This ablate-and-resect study demonstrated avitality caused by IRE of CRLM in humans. Further characterisation of tissue- and tumour-specific electrical properties is warranted to improve ablation protocols for maximised tissue ablation. KEY POINTS: • Irreversible electroporation induces cell death in colorectal liver metastases within 1 h. • The ablation zone shows a sharp demarcation between avital and vital tissue. • Apoptosis is involved in cell death of colorectal liver metastases after IRE. • Effects of IRE can be monitored real-time using intraoperative ultrasound. • Local electrical heterogeneities of tumour tissue may require tumour-specific ablation protocols.

Prehospital endotracheal intubation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: guidelines versus reality.

The international Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines recommend prehospital endotracheal intubation in all patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)< or =8. Close adherence to these guidelines is associated with improved outcome, but not all severely injured TBI patients receive adequate prehospital airway support. Here we hypothesized that guideline adherence varies when skills are involved that rely on training and expertise, such as endotracheal intubation. We retrospectively studied the medical records of CT-confirmed TBI patients with a GCS< or =8 who were referred to a level 1 trauma centre in Amsterdam (n=127). Records were analyzed for demographic parameters, prehospital treatment modalities, involvement of an emergency medical service (EMS) and respiratory and metabolic parameters upon arrival at the hospital. Patients were mostly male, aged 45+/-21 years with a median injury severity score (ISS) of 26. Of all patients for whom guidelines recommend endotracheal intubation, only 56% were intubated. In 21 out of 106 severe cases an EMS was not called for, suggesting low guideline adherence. Especially those TBI patients treated by paramedics tended to develop higher levels of stress markers like glucose and lactate. We observed a low degree of adherence to intubation guidelines in a Dutch urban area. Main reasons for low adherence were the unavailability of specialized care, scoop and run strategies and absence of a specialist physician in cases where intubation was recommended. The discrepancy between guidelines and reality warrants changing practice to improve guideline compliance and optimize outcome in TBI patients.