Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 16: 101, 2016 05 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27216309

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In a cross-sectional study we examined whether the haemodynamic response to upright posture could be divided into different functional phenotypes, and whether the observed phenotypes were associated with known determinants of cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Volunteers (n = 470) without medication with cardiovascular effects were examined using radial pulse wave analysis, whole-body impedance cardiography, and heart rate variability analysis. Based on the passive head-up tilt induced changes in systemic vascular resistance and cardiac output, the principal determinants of blood pressure, a cluster analysis was performed. RESULTS: The haemodynamic response could be clustered into 3 categories: upright increase in vascular resistance and decrease in cardiac output were greatest in the first (+45 % and -27 %, respectively), smallest in the second (+2 % and -2 %, respectively), and intermediate (+22 % and -13 %, respectively) in the third group. These groups were named as 'constrictor' (n = 109), 'sustainer' (n = 222), and 'intermediate' (n = 139) phenotypes, respectively. The sustainers were characterized by male predominance, higher body mass index, blood pressure, and also by higher pulse wave velocity, an index of large arterial stiffness, than the other groups (p < 0.01 for all). Heart rate variability analysis showed higher supine and upright low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF) ratio in the sustainers than constrictors, indicating increased sympathovagal balance. Upright LF/HF ratio was also higher in the sustainer than intermediate group. In multivariate analysis, independent explanatory factors for higher pulse wave velocity were the sustainer (p < 0.022) and intermediate phenotypes (p < 0.046), age (p < 0.001), body mass index (p < 0.001), and hypertension (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The response to upright posture could be clustered to 3 functional phenotypes. The sustainer phenotype, with smallest upright decrease in cardiac output and highest sympathovagal balance, was independently associated with increased large arterial stiffness. These results indicate an association of the functional haemodynamic phenotype with an acknowledged marker of cardiovascular risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01742702.


Assuntos
Sistema Nervoso Autônomo/fisiopatologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/fisiopatologia , Sistema Cardiovascular/inervação , Hemodinâmica , Postura , Rigidez Vascular , Adaptação Fisiológica , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Débito Cardíaco , Cardiografia de Impedância , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Análise por Conglomerados , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca , Humanos , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fenótipo , Pletismografia Total , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Análise de Onda de Pulso , Teste da Mesa Inclinada , Resistência Vascular , Adulto Jovem
2.
Metabolism ; 62(8): 1114-22, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23557592

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the hemodynamic characteristics of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in the absence and presence of hypertension. MATERIALS/METHODS: Altogether 166 subjects without previously diagnosed cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or antihypertensive medication, were allocated to four groups: control, hypertension only, MetS without hypertension, and MetS with hypertension (mean age 44-46 years). Cut-point for hypertension was blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg. Other criteria of MetS were as defined by Alberti et al. 2009. Hemodynamic variables were measured using whole-body impedance cardiography and pulse wave analysis. RESULTS: Pulse wave velocity was higher in hypertensive and normotensive subjects with MetS than controls (p<0.05), and in the hypertensive MetS group than subjects with hypertension only (p<0.05). Aortic pulse pressure was higher in the two hypertensive groups than the two normotensive groups (p<0.05). Systemic vascular resistance index was higher in the hypertensive than normotensive MetS group (p<0.05), and in the group with hypertension alone than in controls (p<0.05). Heart rate was higher in the hypertensive Mets group than in controls and subjects with hypertension only (p<0.05). Cardiac index did not differ, while stroke index was lower in both groups with MetS than groups without MetS. Augmentation pressure was higher in the hypertensive MetS group than in controls and normotensive MetS group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pulse wave velocity, an acknowledged marker of arterial stiffness, was associated with MetS even in the absence of hypertension. This emphasizes the importance of the prevention and treatment of MetS.


Assuntos
Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Síndrome Metabólica/patologia , Rigidez Vascular/fisiologia , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Glicemia/metabolismo , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Débito Cardíaco/fisiologia , Cardiografia de Impedância , Estudos de Casos e Controles , HDL-Colesterol/sangue , Creatinina/sangue , Feminino , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/sangue , Modelos Lineares , Lipídeos/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Onda de Pulso , Triglicerídeos/sangue , Circunferência da Cintura
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA