RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine antibiotic susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae isolates from community-acquired respiratory tract infections (CA-RTIs) collected in 2015-17 from Argentina, Chile and Costa Rica. METHODS: MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and susceptibility was assessed using CLSI, EUCAST (dose-specific) and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) breakpoints. RESULTS: A total of 170 S. pneumoniae and 218 H. influenzae isolates were collected at five centres in Argentina, Chile and Costa Rica in 2015-17. Small S. pneumoniae isolate numbers from Costa Rica (n = 2) meant that these could only be included in the penicillin susceptibility analysis; they were excluded from further country analyses. Around one-third of pneumococcal isolates from Argentina and two-thirds from Chile were non-susceptible to penicillin by CLSI oral or EUCAST low-dose IV breakpoints, but most (≥89%) were susceptible by CLSI IV or EUCAST high-dose breakpoints. Amongst pneumococci from Argentina, about 80% or more were susceptible to most other antibiotics except cefaclor (all breakpoints), cefixime (PK/PD breakpoints), cefuroxime (EUCAST breakpoints) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (CLSI and PK/PD breakpoints). S. pneumoniae isolates from Chile showed significantly lower susceptibility (P < 0.05) using CLSI breakpoints compared with those from Argentina for many of the antibiotics tested. Among isolates of H. influenzae from Latin America, more than 90% were susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (high dose), cefixime, cefpodoxime, ceftriaxone and fluoroquinolones, irrespective of the breakpoints used. The application of different EUCAST breakpoints for low and higher doses for some of the antibiotics (amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin, penicillin, ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, erythromycin, levofloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) allowed, for the first time in a SOAR study, the effect of raising the dosage on susceptibility to be quantified. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic susceptibility of H. influenzae isolates was generally high in the Latin American countries studied; however, susceptibility profiles varied for S. pneumoniae by country and depending on the breakpoints used, especially for cefaclor. These factors are important in decision making for empirical therapy of bacterial infections.
Assuntos
Haemophilus influenzae , Infecções Respiratórias , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Argentina/epidemiologia , Chile/epidemiologia , Costa Rica/epidemiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologiaRESUMO
The in vitro activity of moxifloxacin was compared with that of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin and trovafloxacin against 710 strains (180 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 180 Haemophilus influenzae, 160 Moraxella catarrhalis and 190 Streptococcus pyogenes) isolated from patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections. MIC values for moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin were 0.25/0.25, 0.03/0.03, 0.06/0.03 and 0.125/0.0125 mg/l for S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, M. catharralis and S. pyogenes. Based upon the MIC(90) values and the MIC distributions, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin were the most active of the quinolones tested. They showed enhanced activity against Gram-positive organisms including penicillin non susceptible S. pneumoniae strains. Moxifloxacin was also highly active against ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologia , Compostos Aza , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Fluoroquinolonas , Quinolinas , Infecções Respiratórias/microbiologia , Ciprofloxacina/farmacologia , Haemophilus influenzae/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Levofloxacino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Moraxella catarrhalis/efeitos dos fármacos , Moxifloxacina , Naftiridinas/farmacologia , Ofloxacino/farmacologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Streptococcus pyogenes/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
The in vitro activity of gemifloxacin against 1,000 clinical isolates of 147 Streptococcus pneumoniae (115, penicilin susceptible; 26, intermediate penicillin-resistant and 6, penicillin-resistant), 127 Hemophilus influenzae (109, beta lactamasa non-producer; 18, beta lactamase producers), 95 Streptococcus pyogenes (6, azytromycin-resistant), 84 Moraxella catarrhalis (79, beta lactamase producers), 110 Staphilococcus aureus (89, methicillin-susceptible; 21, methicilin-resistant), 98 Eenterococcus faecalis and 339 Enterobacteriacea, (recovered from patients with respiratory tract infection; skin and soft tissue infection and urinary tract infection), was compared with the activities of four fluorquinolones and five other antimicrobial agents. Of the quinolones tested, gemifloxacin was the most potent against Streptococcus pneumoniae, including penicillin intermediate and resistant strains. Mic(90) values obtained for gemifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin and trvafloxacin were 0.03, 2, 2, 1 and 0.25 mg/L respectively. Gemifloxacin was 16 fold more potent than ciprofloxacin against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and 32 fold more potent than ciprofloxacin against Streptococcus pyogenes. When tested against Hemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and Enterobacteriaceae, all the quinolones showed similar activity. Our results demonstrate that gemifloxacin has similar activity than the other quinolones tested against Gram-negative organisms and is considerably more potent against Gram-positive organisms.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologia , Fluoroquinolonas , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/efeitos dos fármacos , Naftiridinas/farmacologia , Argentina , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Gemifloxacina , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade MicrobianaRESUMO
The in vitro activity of gatifloxacin and levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, penicillin, ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, ceftriaxone and clarithromycin was evaluated against 173 S. pneumoniae strains (128, penicillin-susceptible strains; 32, intermediate penicillin- resistant strains and 13, penicillin-resistant strains), 163 H. influenzae strains (128, beta-lactamase non-producer; 35, beta-lactamase producers), 111 M. catarrhalis (9, beta-lactamase non-producer; 102, beta-lactamase producers), 95 Streptococcus pyogenes and 116 S. aureus strains (96, methicillin-susceptible; 20, methicillin-resistant) recovered from outpatients with respiratory tract infection. Based upon the MICs at which 50% and 90% of the isolates were inhibited we concluded that gatifloxacin proved to be the most active antibiotic against respiratory pathogens, including all the penicillin-resistant pneumococci and H. influenzae or M. catarrhalis producing beta-lactamase. Furthermore, their MICs against S. pneumoniae and methicillin-resistant S. aureus were lower than those of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin.Therefore, this new fluoroquinolone displayed in vitro features that make it suitable for treating community-acquired respiratory tract infections.