RESUMO
Objectives: Pregnant women are at increased risk for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and adverse neonatal outcome, primarily preterm birth and stillbirth. Our study aimed to investigate to which extent SARS-CoV-2 affects placental tissue and if viral replication within the placenta is evident, thus if there is a correlation between placental damage and adverse pregnancy outcome such as stillbirth. Methods: We prospectively collected placentas from 61 SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women and 10 controls. Histopathological, immunohistochemical, and in situ hybridization studies were performed on all placentas with antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 proteins, ACE2, various immune cells, and inflammatory markers or probes for SARS-CoV-2 genes and an antisense strand. Results: The measured scores of SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein, nucleocapsid, and antisense strand indicating replication correlated with both the severity of maternal symptoms and presence of stillbirth. Specifically, 15/61 placentas exhibited replication, while the three cases with stillbirth had high or maximal replication scores. ACE2-H-score was significantly higher in COVID-19 patients, while the expression of various immune cells did not differ statistically. In multivariate analysis, presence of maternal comorbidities correlated with presence of severe COVID-19 infection. Conclusion: We report evidence of active in vivo SARS-CoV-2 replication in the placenta after maternal infection in pregnancy in a case-control setting in a large population. Intensity of placental viral replication as well as viral levels were higher in women with severe or critical COVID-19 disease, supporting the rationale that severity of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection could correlate with the severity of placentitis. Replication was maximal in cases of stillbirth, which suggests direct placental involvement in the pathophysiology of this dramatic outcome. Continuing to advocate for preventive measures against COVID-19 during pregnancy, including (re)vaccination, as well as appropriately counseling women with diagnosed infection, are of utter importance.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer has long been debated. In 2009, the Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique (FIGO) removed cytology as a staging criterion from the endometrial cancer staging system. However, there is still evidence that positive peritoneal cytology may decrease survival among patients with endometrial cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology among the different molecular subgroups. METHODS: This study included patients with endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgical treatment between 2004 and 2015 at the Bern University Hospital, Switzerland, with molecular classification of the primary tumor and peritoneal cytology performed. RESULTS: A total, 250 patients with endometrial cancer were enrolled. Peritoneal cytology was assessed in 206 patients, of whom 24% were positive: 25% of the POLEmut, 16% of the MMRd, 41% of the p53abn, and 24% of the NSMP cases. The mean follow-up was 128.7 months. Presence of positive peritoneal cytology was associated with significantly decreased mean recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with p53abn (p = .003 and p = .001) and NSMP (p = .020 and p = .049) endometrial cancer. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, positive peritoneal cytology remained an independent predictor of recurrence (p = .033) and death (p = .008) in p53abn endometrial cancer patients. CONCLUSION: Positive peritoneal cytology is associated with worse oncologic outcomes in NSMP and p53abn endometrial cancer and remains an independent predictor of recurrence and death in patients with p53abn endometrial cancer.