RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of measuring receptive anal intercourse (RAI) sensation and associated satisfaction and bother. METHODS: Between July 2022 and January 2023, we conducted a survey on sensations during RAI among people with prostates (ie, cisgender men and transgender women). The survey content was developed based on our previous qualitative study. We assessed internal reliability and consistency through time. Sensations experienced during RAI were correlated with health-related quality-of-life measures to ensure construct validity. RESULTS: The final index contained four scales: pleasure (four items), pain (seven items), urinary (four items), and bowel (four items). Overall, 1084 individuals filled out the questionnaire. The internal consistency for all subscales was at or above 0.79. Scores tended to be stable across time with all test-retest coefficients at or above 0.72. Pleasure scores were inversely correlated with pain scores (r = -0.46). Pleasure was positively correlated with erections (r = 0.36) and orgasms (r = 0.44) during RAI, and sexual satisfaction (r = 0.39). Notable positive correlations for pain scores were with bowel scores (r = 0.49), internalized homophobia (r = 0.35), and prostatitis symptoms (r = 0.37). Urinary scores were moderately associated with IPSS scores (r = 0.22). Bowel scores were positively correlated with GI symptoms (r = 0.24), mental health symptoms (r = 0.28), and chronic prostatitis symptoms (r = 0.29). CONCLUSION: The results of the current study provide evidence that the Anorectal Sexual Function Index is both reliable and valid. The Anorectal Sexual Function Index may be a particularly useful health-related quality-of-life measure to assess outcomes regarding a host of urologic issues that may affect RAI.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Receptive anal intercourse (RAI) is commonly practiced among individuals of all sexual orientations. However, negative stigmatization by society and health care professionals leads to the underreporting or this practice. AIM: We sought to assess and describe the subjective role of the prostate as a pleasure center in participants with diverse RAI experiences. The secondary aim was to describe nonprostatic areas within the anorectal region that produce erotic sensation and/or pain. METHODS: The exploratory sequential multimethod study design included focus groups and semistructured interviews with 30 individuals with prostates who had engaged in RAI. We used graphic elicitation of natal male anatomy to enhance visualization and assess participant perspectives. OUTCOMES: The main outcome of interest was the identification of anatomic locations of erogenous sensation and pain during RAI. RESULTS: Among the participants (median age 38, range 24-77 years), most participants (90%) identified as cisgender male. Three major themes emerged within the motivations for RAI, including (1) deriving intrinsic pleasure, (2) providing both pleasure for a partner and a way to improve intimacy/connection, and (3) an inability to be the insertive partner due to physical or mental challenges. The data suggest that the anorectal region produces a variety of erogenous sensations which participants find pleasurable. Overall, 2 major areas of erogenous sensation occur along the anterior rectal wall and within the anus. Within the context of RAI, 2 distinct categories of pain emerged, including pain with insertion and pain at other times. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Understanding where erogenous sensation originates for each individual may predict sexual functioning after various surgical interventions. Timing and location of pain may aid in further characterizing anodyspareunia. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Our study utilized a sequential design (from focus groups to interviews) with diverse RAI experiences, especially regarding age, geographic location, and prostate pathology. We included individuals of diverse gender identities, but too few to evaluate these groups independently from cisgender men. CONCLUSION: People with prostates experience pleasure in multiple areas during RAI. Contrary to some lay literature, the prostate region is not the subjective pleasure center for all individuals. Timing and location of pain during RAI may inform areas for intervention. Providing a language for pleasure and pain during RAI may improve communication between not only sexual partners but also clinicians and patients.
