Revealing the Relational Mechanisms of Research for Development Through Social Network Analysis.

Achieving impact through research for development programmes (R4D) requires engagement with diverse stakeholders across the research, development and policy divides. Understanding how such programmes support the emergence of outcomes, therefore, requires a focus on the relational aspects of engagement and collaboration. Increasingly, evaluation of large research collaborations is employing social network analysis (SNA), making use of its relational view of causation. In this paper, we use three applications of SNA within similar large R4D programmes, through our work within evaluation of three Interidsiplinary Hubs of the Global Challenges Research Fund, to explore its potential as an evaluation method. Our comparative analysis shows that SNA can uncover the structural dimensions of interactions within R4D programmes and enable learning about how networks evolve through time. We reflect on common challenges across the cases including navigating different forms of bias that result from incomplete network data, multiple interpretations across scales, and the challenges of making causal inference and related ethical dilemmas. We conclude with lessons on the methodological and operational dimensions of using SNA within monitoring, evaluation and learning (MEL) systems that aim to support both learning and accountability. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s41287-023-00576-y.

Pour que les programmes de recherche pour le développement (R4D ou Research for Developmement en anglais) aient un impact, il faut un engagement entre diverses parties prenantes dans les domaines de la recherche, du développement et des politiques. Il est nécessaire de se concentrer sur les aspects relationnels de l'engagement et de la collaboration si l'on souhaite comprendre la façon dont ce type de programme permet l'émergence de résultats. L'évaluation des grands consortia de recherche utilise de plus en plus fréquemment l'analyse des réseaux sociaux (SNA ou social network analysis en anglais) en appliquant sa vision relationnelle de la causalité. Dans cet article, en vue d'explorer son potentiel en tant que méthode d'évaluation, nous utilisons trois applications d'analyse des réseaux sociaux au sein de grands programmes R4D similaires dans le cadre de notre travail d'évaluation de trois pôles interdisciplinaires du Fonds de recherche sur les défis mondiaux. Notre analyse comparative montre que l'analyse des réseaux sociaux peut révéler les dimensions structurelles des interactions au sein de ces programmes et permettre d'apprendre comment les réseaux évoluent dans le temps. Nous menons une réflexion quant aux défis communs qui émanent de ces cas, y compris la gestion de différentes formes de biais qui résultent de données de réseau incomplètes, de multiples interprétations sur des échelles différentes et les défis liés au fait d'établir une inférence causale et les dilemmes éthiques connexes. Nous concluons par des leçons sur les dimensions méthodologiques et opérationnelles de l'utilisation de l'analyse des réseaux sociaux dans les systèmes de suivi, d'évaluation et d'apprentissage (SEA) qui visent à soutenir à la fois l'apprentissage et la redevabilité.

Impact of risk-based partial vaccination on clinical incidence and seroprevalence of foot and mouth disease in Lao PDR.

Foot and mouth disease (FMD) is endemic in the Lao People's Democratic Republic (PDR) and it causes economic loss to smallholder husbandry systems. An intervention programme based on a risk-based partial vaccination strategy was implemented in three provinces of Lao PDR (Champasak, Savannakhet and Xiangkhouang) to immunise domestic cattle and buffalo during 2016-2020. Two cross-sectional surveys were conducted in 2016/17 and 2020 to evaluate the impact of the vaccination programme on the prevalence of FMD virus exposure and clinical incidence of the disease. A total of 212 villages were visited during the two surveys, collecting 1609 household-level questionnaire results and 5931 blood samples of domestic cattle and buffalo. Blood samples were tested for the presence of antibodies to the non-structural proteins of FMD virus, and seroprevalence of 42.5 and 47.5% in 2016/17 and 2020, respectively were found. Multivariable regression analysis indicated that the efficacy of the FMD vaccination programme for reducing FMD virus circulation varied by province. In general, the incidence of clinical FMD increased toward the end of the 5-year intervention period, coinciding with a reduction of vaccine coverage in the last 2 years of the period. The findings suggest that the risk-based vaccination strategy achieved a marginally protective effect against the circulation of FMD virus with the possible limiting factors being operational constraints of public veterinary services, lack of farmers' compliance and unsustainable funding. We conclude that consistent resource availability and higher vaccination coverage is required to successfully control FMD with a risk-based vaccination strategy in Lao PDR.

SurF: an innovative framework in biosecurity and animal health surveillance evaluation.

Surveillance for biosecurity hazards is being conducted by the New Zealand Competent Authority, the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) to support New Zealand's biosecurity system. Surveillance evaluation should be an integral part of the surveillance life cycle, as it provides a means to identify and correct problems and to sustain and enhance the existing strengths of a surveillance system. The surveillance evaluation Framework (SurF) presented here was developed to provide a generic framework within which the MPI biosecurity surveillance portfolio, and all of its components, can be consistently assessed. SurF is an innovative, cross-sectoral effort that aims to provide a common umbrella for surveillance evaluation in the animal, plant, environment and aquatic sectors. It supports the conduct of the following four distinct components of an evaluation project: (i) motivation for the evaluation, (ii) scope of the evaluation, (iii) evaluation design and implementation and (iv) reporting and communication of evaluation outputs. Case studies, prepared by MPI subject matter experts, are included in the framework to guide users in their assessment. Three case studies were used in the development of SurF in order to assure practical utility and to confirm usability of SurF across all included sectors. It is anticipated that the structured approach and information provided by SurF will not only be of benefit to MPI but also to other New Zealand stakeholders. Although SurF was developed for internal use by MPI, it could be applied to any surveillance system in New Zealand or elsewhere.