Dosimetric Impact of Delineation and Motion Uncertainties on the Heart and Substructures in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy.

AIMS: Delineation variations and organ motion produce difficult-to-quantify uncertainties in planned radiation doses to targets and organs at risk. Similar to manual contouring, most automatic segmentation tools generate single delineations per structure; however, this does not indicate the range of clinically acceptable delineations. This study develops a method to generate a range of automatic cardiac structure segmentations, incorporating motion and delineation uncertainty, and evaluates the dosimetric impact in lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen cardiac structures were delineated using a locally developed auto-segmentation tool. It was applied to lung cancer planning CTs for 27 curative (planned dose ≥50 Gy) cases, and delineation variations were estimated by using ten mapping-atlases to provide separate substructure segmentations. Motion-related cardiac segmentation variations were estimated by auto-contouring structures on ten respiratory phases for 9/27 cases that had 4D-planning CTs. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) incorporating these variations were generated for comparison. RESULTS: Variations in mean doses (Dmean), defined as the range in values across ten feasible auto-segmentations, were calculated for each cardiac substructure. Over the study cohort the median variations for delineation uncertainty and motion were 2.20-11.09 Gy and 0.72-4.06 Gy, respectively. As relative values, variations in Dmean were between 18.7%-65.3% and 7.8%-32.5% for delineation uncertainty and motion, respectively. Doses vary depending on the individual planned dose distribution, not simply on segmentation differences, with larger dose variations to cardiac structures lying within areas of steep dose gradient. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy dose uncertainties from delineation variations and respiratory-related heart motion were quantified using a cardiac substructure automatic segmentation tool. This predicts the 'dose range' where doses to structures are most likely to fall, rather than single DVH curves. This enables consideration of these uncertainties in cardiotoxicity research and for future plan optimisation. The tool was designed for cardiac structures, but similar methods are potentially applicable to other OARs.

Quality of Decision Making in Radiation Oncology.

High-quality decision making in radiation oncology requires the careful consideration of multiple factors. In addition to the evidence-based indications for curative or palliative radiotherapy, this article explores how, in routine clinical practice, we also need to account for many other factors when making high-quality decisions. Foremost are patient-related factors, including preference, and the complex interplay between age, frailty and comorbidities, especially with an ageing cancer population. Whilst clinical practice guidelines inform our decisions, we need to account for their applicability in different patient groups and different resource settings. With particular reference to curative-intent radiotherapy, we explore decisions regarding dose fractionation schedules, use of newer radiotherapy technologies and multimodality treatment considerations that contribute to personalised patient-centred care.

Validation of a Fully Automated Hybrid Deep Learning Cardiac Substructure Segmentation Tool for Contouring and Dose Evaluation in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Accurate and consistent delineation of cardiac substructures is challenging. The aim of this work was to validate a novel segmentation tool for automatic delineation of cardiac structures and subsequent dose evaluation, with potential application in clinical settings and large-scale radiation-related cardiotoxicity studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A recently developed hybrid method for automatic segmentation of 18 cardiac structures, combining deep learning, multi-atlas mapping and geometric segmentation of small challenging substructures, was independently validated on 30 lung cancer cases. These included anatomical and imaging variations, such as tumour abutting heart, lung collapse and metal artefacts. Automatic segmentations were compared with manual contours of the 18 structures using quantitative metrics, including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean distance to agreement (MDA) and dose comparisons. RESULTS: A comparison of manual and automatic contours across all cases showed a median DSC of 0.75-0.93 and a median MDA of 2.09-3.34 mm for whole heart and chambers. The median MDA for great vessels, coronary arteries, cardiac valves, sinoatrial and atrioventricular conduction nodes was 3.01-8.54 mm. For the 27 cases treated with curative intent (planned target volume dose ≥50 Gy), the median dose difference was -1.12 to 0.57 Gy (absolute difference of 1.13-3.25%) for the mean dose to heart and chambers; and -2.25 to 4.45 Gy (absolute difference of 0.94-6.79%) for the mean dose to substructures. CONCLUSION: The novel hybrid automatic segmentation tool reported high accuracy and consistency over a validation set with challenging anatomical and imaging variations. This has promising applications in substructure dose calculations of large-scale datasets and for future studies on long-term cardiac toxicity.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of substituted 3-amino-N-(thiazol-2-yl)pyrazine-2-carboxamides as inhibitors of mycobacterial methionine aminopeptidase 1.

Tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is the number one cause of deaths due to a single infectious agent worldwide. The treatment of TB is lengthy and often complicated by the increasing drug resistance. New compounds with new mechanisms of action are therefore needed. We present the design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of pyrazine-based inhibitors of a prominent antimycobacterial drug target - mycobacterial methionine aminopeptidase 1 (MtMetAP1). The inhibitory activities of the presented compounds were evaluated against the MtMetAP1a isoform, and all derivatives were tested against a broad spectrum of myco(bacteria) and fungi. The cytotoxicity of the compounds was also investigated using Hep G2 cell lines. Overall, high inhibition of the isolated enzyme was observed for 3-substituted N-(thiazol-2-yl)pyrazine-2-carboxamides, particularly when the substituent was represented by 2-substituted benzamide. The extent of inhibition was strongly dependent on the used metal cofactor. The highest inhibition was seen in the presence of Ni2+. Several compounds also showed mediocre in vitro potency against Mtb (both Mtb H37Ra and H37Rv). Despite the structural similarities of bacterial and fungal MetAP1 to mycobacterial MtMetAP1, title compounds did not exert antibacterial nor antifungal activity. The reasons behind the higher activity of 2-substituted benzamido derivatives, as well as the correlation of enzyme inhibition with the in vitro growth inhibition activity is discussed.

Patterns of palliative radiotherapy fractionation for brain metastases patients in New South Wales, Australia.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is a paucity of studies examining variation in the use of palliative radiation therapy (RT) fractionation for brain metastases. The aim of this study is to assess variation in palliative RT fractionation given for brain metastases in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, and identify factors associated with variation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a population-based cohort of patients who received whole brain RT (WBRT) for brain metastases (2009-2014), as captured in the NSW Central Cancer Registry. A logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with fractionation type. RESULTS: Of the 2,698 patients that received WBRT, 1,389 courses (51%) were < 6 fractions, 1,050 courses (39%) were 6-10 fractions, and 259 courses (10%) were > 10 fractions. Older patients were more likely to be treated with shorter courses (P < 0.0001). Patients with primary lung cancers were more likely to receive shorter courses compared with other primary cancers (P < 0.0001). Patients without surgical excision were more likely to receive < 6 fractions compared to those who underwent surgical excision. Shorter courses were more likely to be delivered to patients with the most disadvantaged socioeconomic status (SES) compared with patients with the least disadvantaged SES (P < 0.0001). There were significant fluctuations in the proportion of courses using lower number of fractions over time from 2009 to 2014, but no apparent trend (P = 0.02). There was wide variation in the proportion of shorter courses across residence local health districts, ranging from 24% to 69% for < 6 fractions, 21% to 72% for 6-10 fractions, and 4% to 20% for > 10 fractions (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study has identified significant unwarranted variations in fractionation for WBRT in NSW. Accelerating the uptake of shorter fractionation regimens, if warranted through evidence, should be prioritised to enhance evidence-based care.

Patterns of use of palliative radiotherapy fractionation for bone metastases and 30-day mortality.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adoption of single-fraction radiation therapy (SFRT) has not been universal in the palliative treatment of bone metastases, despite evidence supporting its safety and efficacy. The aim of this study was to assess SFRT use for bone metastases in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, and the rate of 30-day mortality (30DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a population-based cohort of patients who received palliative radiation therapy (RT) for bone metastases (2009-2014), as captured in the NSW Central Cancer Registry. A logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with fractionation type. The proportion of patients dying within 30-days from treatment start date was calculated. RESULTS: Of the 14,602 courses of palliative RT delivered for bone metastases, 30% were SFRT. SFRT was more likely to be delivered to older patients: ≥80 years (34%) versus < 60 years (28%). Patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES) (35%) were more likely to receive SFRT compared with higher SES (25%). SFRT delivered to patients from outer regional area of residence (34%) were higher compared to those from the major city (29%). The proportion of SFRT delivered to patients with comorbidities ≥2 (34%) was higher than patients with no comorbidity (29%). SFRT was associated with higher 30DM of 21% compared with 11% for multi-fraction RT (MFRT). CONCLUSION: SFRT is underused for the treatment of bone metastases in NSW. This is an impetus to develop tools making SFRT obligatory in this setting unless there is good justification not to.

The population benefit of evidence-based radiotherapy: 5-Year local control and overall survival benefits.

BACKGROUND: To describe the population benefit of radiotherapy in a high-income setting if evidence-based guidelines were routinely followed. METHODS: Australian decision tree models were utilized. Radiotherapy alone (RT) benefit was defined as the absolute proportional benefit of radiotherapy compared with no treatment for radical indications, and of radiotherapy over surgery alone for adjuvant indications. Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) benefit was the absolute incremental benefit of concurrent chemoradiotherapy over RT. Five-year local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) benefits were measured. Citation databases were systematically queried for benefit data. Meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed. FINDINGS: 48% of all cancer patients have indications for radiotherapy, 34% curative and 14% palliative. RT provides 5-year LC benefit in 10.4% of all cancer patients (95% Confidence Interval 9.3, 11.8) and 5-year OS benefit in 2.4% (2.1, 2.7). CRT provides 5-year LC benefit in an additional 0.6% of all cancer patients (0.5, 0.6), and 5-year OS benefit for an additional 0.3% (0.2, 0.4). RT benefit was greatest for head and neck (LC 32%, OS 16%), and cervix (LC 33%, OS 18%). CRT LC benefit was greatest for rectum (6%) and OS for cervix (3%) and brain (3%). Sensitivity analysis confirmed a robust model. INTERPRETATION: Radiotherapy provides significant 5-year LC and OS benefits as part of evidence-based cancer care. CRT provides modest additional benefits.

A Population-based Model of Local Control and Survival Benefit of Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer.

AIMS: To estimate the population-based locoregional control and overall survival benefits of radiotherapy for lung cancer if the whole population were treated according to evidence-based guidelines. These estimates were based on a published radiotherapy utilisation (RTU) model that has been used to estimate the demand and planning of radiotherapy services nationally and internationally. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The lung cancer RTU model was extended to incorporate an estimate of benefits of radiotherapy alone, and of radiotherapy in conjunction with concurrent chemotherapy (CRT). Benefits were defined as the proportional gains in locoregional control and overall survival from radiotherapy over no radiotherapy for radical indications, and from postoperative radiotherapy over surgery alone for adjuvant indications. A literature review (1990-2015) was conducted to identify benefit estimates of individual radiotherapy indications and summed to estimate the population-based gains for these outcomes. Model robustness was tested through univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: If evidence-based radiotherapy recommendations are followed for the whole lung cancer population, the model estimated that radiotherapy alone would result in a gain of 8.3% (95% confidence interval 7.4-9.2%) in 5 year locoregional control, 11.4% (10.8-12.0%) in 2 year overall survival and 4.0% (3.6-4.4%) in 5 year overall survival. For the use of CRT over radiotherapy alone, estimated benefits would be: locoregional control 1.7% (0.8-2.4%), 2 year overall survival 1.7% (0.5-2.8%) and 5 year overall survival 1.2% (0.7-1.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The model provided estimates of radiotherapy benefit that could be achieved if treatment guidelines are followed for all cancer patients. These can be used as a benchmark so that the effects of a shortfall in the utilisation of radiotherapy can be better understood and addressed. The model can be adapted to other populations with known epidemiological parameters to ensure the planning of equitable radiotherapy services.

Application of Guideline Recommended Treatment in Routine Clinical Practice: A Population-based Study of Stage I-IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

AIMS: The application of guideline recommended treatment (GRT) in routine clinical practice can be difficult due to differences between the clinic population and the clinical trial populations on which evidence is based. The study aims were to measure receipt of GRT in stage I-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, identify factors associated with GRT and its impact on survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: New diagnoses of stage I-IIIB NSCLC from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2011 in South West Sydney residents were identified from the district Clinical Cancer Registry. Treatment received was assigned as GRT or not based on Australian guidelines (using Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status and TNM stage). Multivariate Poisson regression models with robust variance identified predictors of GRT receipt. Cox regression models identified multivariate predictors of patient survival. RESULTS: In total, 592 eligible cases were identified, of whom 66% (n = 389) received GRT. This ranged from 81% of stage I to 39% of stage IIIB (relative risk 0.48, 0.38-0.60, P < 0.0001). Stage I-IIIA patients who were ECOG 2 and stage III patients aged 70 years and older were less likely to receive GRT. The median survival was 30 months in the GRT group and 16 months in the non-GRT group (P < 0.001). GRT receipt was associated with improved survival in stage I-II disease only (hazard ratio 0.41, P < 0.001; and hazard ratio 0.43, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: One-third of NSCLC patients did not receive GRT. Stage and performance status were key predictors for GRT receipt. Patients with early stage NSCLC were associated with improved survival with the receipt of GRT.

Decision making in lung cancer ­ how applicable are the guidelines?

Modelling demand for radiotherapy is contingent on the uniform application of clinical practice guidelines. However, decision making in lung cancer is a complex process requiring the integration of multimodality treatment in patients who frequently have underlying comorbidities. Population studies have shown that guideline adherence in lung cancer is modest, ranging from 44 to 52%. The application of guideline treatment decreases with increasing age and the presence of comorbidities. Patient and clinician attitudes also impact on this. In some regions, sociodemographic factors, such as lower income and non-White race, have been associated with a lack of guideline treatment. One of the major barriers in treating lung cancer patients according to guidelines is the mismatch between the clinic population and those enrolled in clinical trials from which evidence is derived. The lung cancer clinic population often consists of patients who are older, have multiple comorbidities and are of borderline performance status, all characteristics that are usually exclusion criteria for clinical trials. Hence, there is uncertainty not only about the magnitude of benefit, but also potential toxicities of guideline treatment. Further research is necessary in order to define the best treatment in these patients and thus increase the applicability of guidelines to the general lung cancer population. Lung cancer is an extreme example of the difficulties in translating evidence into clinical practice. The applicability of guidelines to specific cancer populations will affect the modelling of demand for radiotherapy and other treatment modalities.

Incorporating a radiologist in a radiation oncology department: a new model of care?

AIMS: Increasingly complex imaging techniques, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans are being used by radiation oncologists to improve the accuracy of their radiotherapy planning contours, despite limited formal training in diagnostic imaging. This study aimed to assess whether the availability of an 'in-house' radiologist would be beneficial in enhancing the interpretation of oncological imaging and accuracy of contouring. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A radiology/oncology fellow was based in the oncology department, providing radiological advice on diagnostic and planning images, for two sessions per week over a 9 month period. Oncology staff were able to book a time slot with the radiologist on a MOSAIQ cancer database and record the reason for the consultation and its outcome. The radiologist also reviewed the accuracy of the patient's contours for the weekly quality assurance audit meetings. RESULTS: The radiologist reviewed 56 scans during the 49 consultation sessions. Advice over diagnostic images and target volume delineation were the main reasons for the consultations, which resulted in a change of practice in 45% of cases, ranging from changing target volumes (25%) to carrying out further imaging (20%). For the quality assurance audit meetings, the radiologist's review of 99 patients' planning contours resulted in a significant change in management in 6% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to attempt to formally quantify the clinical benefit of having a dedicated 'in-house' radiologist within a radiation oncology department, clearly showing the valuable impact of such a role.

The registration of diagnostic versus planning fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in radiotherapy planning for non-small cell lung cancer.

AIMS: Radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) increasingly utilises fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) fusion. However, it is unknown whether a PET/CT scan conducted in the treatment position results in more accurate registration to the radiotherapy planning CT (rCT) than a diagnostic PET/CT scan. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of registration of the CT components of the planning PET/CT scan (pCT) and diagnostic PET/CT scan (dCT) scan with the rCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with stage I-III NSCLC underwent an rCT immediately followed by a planning PET/CT scan, both carried out with arms placed above the head and immobilisation in the treatment position. All previously underwent a diagnostic FDG PET/CT, which was carried out with the arms above the head, but without custom immobilisation. dCT and pCT were registered to the rCT using a rigid body mutual information algorithm. Four observers identified 12 anatomical points on each scan and differences in their absolute location were analysed. RESULTS: At the carina, the mean absolute error (MAE) for pCT-rCT compared with dCT-rCT was 4.37 versus 5.73 mm (P=0.028). However, there was no significant difference in the root mean squared error (RMSE) for that point. There were no significant differences in MAE or RMSE for all other anatomical points. The MAE for all points was 4.11 versus 4.15 mm (P=NS) and RMSE was 4.40 versus 4.48 mm for pCT-rCT compared with dCT-rCT (P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: There is an average of 4mm of misregistration when registering the CT components of PET/CT scans to the rCT for NSCLC. Using a rigid registration technique, the registration of a diagnostic PET/CT is as good as the registration of a planning PET/CT.

Dosimetric implications of the addition of 18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in CT-based radiotherapy planning for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Summary The aim of this study was to assess the impact of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) CT on radiotherapy planning parameters for patients treated curatively with radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Five patients with stages I-III NSCLC underwent a diagnostic FDG-PET CT (dPET CT), planning FDG-PET CT (pPET CT) and a simulation CT (RTP CT). For each patient, three radiation oncologists delineated a gross tumour volume based on RTP CT alone, and fused with dPET CT and pPET CT. Standard expansions were used to generate PTVs, and a 3D conformal plan was created. Normal tissue doses were compared between plans. Coverage of pPET CT PTV by the plans based on RTP CT and dPET CT was assessed, and tumour control probabilities were calculated. Mean PTV was similar between RTP CT, dPET CT and pPET CT, although there were significant inter-observer differences in four patients. The plans, however, showed no significant differences in doses to lung, oesophagus, heart or spinal cord. The RTP CT plan and dPET CT plan significantly underdosed the pPET PTV in two patients with minimum doses ranging from 12 to 63% of prescribed dose. Coverage by the 95% isodose was suboptimal in these patients, but this did not translate into poorer tumour control probability. The effect of fused FDG-PET varied between observers. The addition of dPET and pPET did not significantly change the radiotherapy planning parameters. Although FDG-PET is of benefit in tumour delineation, its effect on normal tissue complication probability and tumour control probability cannot be predicted.

No improvement in lung cancer care: the management of lung cancer in 1996 and 2002 in New South Wales.

BACKGROUND: Patterns-of-care studies emphasize significant variation in the management of lung cancer. The aim of the study was to compare the patterns of care for patients diagnosed with lung cancer in 1996 and 2002 within three health areas in New South Wales. METHODS: Treatment data were collected from medical records and treating doctors for the calendar year 1996 and between 1 November 2001 and 31 December 2002. Patients were residents of either south-western Sydney, Hunter or Northern Sydney health areas at the time of diagnosis. chi(2)-tests were used to investigate changes in treatment patterns between the two time periods. An adjusted odds ratio for treatment in 2002 relative to 1996 was calculated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Data were available for 738 and 567 cases in 1996 and 2002, respectively. Cancer-specific therapy was given within 6 months of diagnosis to 62 and 64% of patients, respectively. Adjusting for health area, age, sex, pathology and performance status, the odds ratio (OR) of treatment in 2002 relative to 1996 was 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.35). When stage was included, the odds of treatment in 2002 relative to 1996 for non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 950) was 1.21 (95%CI 0.87-1.68). After adjustment for potential confounders, patients diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer (n = 176) were substantially less likely to receive treatment in 2002 compared with patients diagnosed in 1996 (OR = 0.11; 95%CI 0.04-0.34). CONCLUSION: The odds of receiving treatment in 2002 and 1996 were similar. However, patients diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer in 2002 were significantly less likely to receive treatment. Overall, this study suggests there has been no change in lung cancer care in New South Wales. Further work is required to determine what proportion of persons with lung cancer should receive cancer-specific treatment so that clinical practices can be judged appropriately.

Prioritization of radiotherapy in Australia and New Zealand.

The purpose of this study was to document how radiation oncology departments in Australia and New Zealand manage extended waiting lists by prioritizing patients for radiotherapy and how these centres define the "waiting time". A literature search on strategies for management of waiting lists in radiotherapy, both locally and internationally, was performed. A collaborative survey of all the radiotherapy departments in Australia and New Zealand was then undertaken. Of the 32 centres surveyed around Australia and New Zealand, 25 (77%) responded. There was considerable variation in the definitions used for "waiting times". Eleven of the 25 centres had formally documented protocols. New Zealand has a national policy for prioritization of patients for radiotherapy. Six centres had verbal protocols. Four centres had no significant waiting times and did not require a protocol for prioritization. One centre prioritized according to clinician discretion, two centres used a first-come, first-served basis. One centre replied but their protocol was missing. The variation in the definition of waiting time reduces its usefulness as an indirect measure of resources and as a method of comparing centres. There is also wide variation in the management of waiting lists, particularly in the prioritization schedules used by different centres. The major factor contributing to waiting lists at present is a shortage of radiation oncology staff, particularly radiation therapists. The implementation of standardized protocols for prioritizing patients may be useful in helping to manage scarce resources not withstanding the need to increase the resource base. However, the existence of such protocols should not give legitimacy to undue delays in commencing radiation treatment.

Comparison of patterns of care in lung cancer in three area health services in New South Wales, Australia.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in New South Wales (NSW). The incidence of and mortality from lung cancer differ throughout different area health services in NSW. AIM: To compare patterns of care in lung cancer among three area health services in NSW. METHODS: South-western Sydney Area Health Service (SWSAHS), Northern Sydney Area Health Service (NSAHS) and Hunter Area Health Service (HAHS) residents diagnosed with lung cancer in 1996 were identified from the NSW Central Cancer Registry and their medical records were reviewed. The main outcome measures were specialist care, investigations, treatment and survival. RESULTS: The study population comprised 256 SWSAHS, 270 NSAHS and 212 HAHS residents. NSAHS residents were older, with a median age of 73 years compared with 68 years in SWSAHS and 70 years in HAHS (P = 0.001). The performance status and stage distributions of the populations were similar. Twenty per cent of HAHS residents did not have a pathological diagnosis compared with 10% in SWSAHS and 9% in NSAHS (P = 0.005). Forty-five per cent of HAHS residents received no treatment compared with 25 and 22% in SWSAHS and NSAHS, respectively (P < 0.001). Despite these differences, there was no significant difference in overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer patterns of care were significantly different among the areas. The variability of practice identified in this study needs to be addressed to ensure optimum care for all patients with lung cancer. Although there was no significant difference in survival, under-utilization of efficacious treatment is likely to have affected patients' quality of life.

Lung cancer patterns of care in south western Sydney, Australia.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in New South Wales (NSW). There is a significantly higher incidence of lung cancer in the South Western Sydney Area Health Service (SWSAHS) than the NSW average. The aim of this study was to document patterns of lung cancer care for SWSAHS residents. METHODS: SWSAHS residents diagnosed with lung cancer in 1993 and 1996 were identified from the NSW Central Cancer Registry and their medical records reviewed. RESULTS: The study population comprised 527 patients of median age 68 years. 12% did not see a lung cancer specialist, 9% did not have a pathological diagnosis, and 28% did not receive any active treatment throughout the course of their illness. The median survival was 6.7 months and the 5 year overall survival was 8% (95% CI 6 to 10). The rates of pathological diagnosis, specialist referral, and treatment decreased with older age and poorer performance status. CONCLUSIONS: The management of lung cancer patients in SWSAHS is suboptimal. A significant proportion of patients are not receiving treatment. To improve patient care and outcomes, all lung cancer patients should be referred to a specialist for management, ideally in a multidisciplinary setting. Both consumers and general practitioners need to be educated about options available for the management of lung cancers and ageist and nihilistic attitudes need to be overcome.

Surgery and post-operative radiotherapy for early stage cervical cancer.

The use of post-operative radiotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer is controversial. The aim of this study was to document the results and toxicity of adjuvant irradiation in patients with Stage 1B and 2A cervical cancer. We performed a retrospective review of all patients treated with post-operative radiotherapy at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital between 1986 and 1993. Patient, tumour and treatment factors and late toxicity were recorded. Relapse-free and overall survival were calculated. Eighty-one patients form the study population. The median follow-up was 6.1 years. Fifty-eight patients (72%) had stage 1B cervical cancer and 23 (28%) stage 2A. The 5 year relapse-free and overall survival were 78% and 80% respectively. Six patients (7%) had late toxicity requiring inpatient medical treatment and 6 patients (7%) required surgery. The survival was comparable to other series reported in the literature. There was an incidence of 14% late toxicity requiring medical or surgical intervention which is greater than with hysterectomy or pelvic irradiation alone. Clinical prognostic factors should be used to select patients for either surgery or radiotherapy alone to minimise the increased toxicities associated with a combination of surgery and radiotherapy.

Malignant fibrous histiocytoma of the trachea.

Primary tracheal sarcomas are rare. Only 23 cases have previously been reported in the English literature. The present case describes a 72-year-old woman with a malignant fibrous histiocytoma of the trachea. She underwent an endoscopic resection followed by radiotherapy and is well at 12 months follow up. Other cases are reviewed. Tracheal resection is the standard care. However, local resection with postoperative radiotherapy remains an option. Adjuvant chemotherapy may improve local control. Long-term survival has been documented.

Carcinoma of the male breast: a review of adjuvant therapy.

The purpose of the present paper was to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of male breast cancer patients seen for adjuvant therapy at a single institution. A retrospective review of computerized records in the Departments of Medical and Radiation Oncology at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH) was undertaken. Between 1983 and 1996, 24 men were referred for treatment of breast cancer. Of these, 19 had localized breast cancer, four had metastatic disease and one had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The median age was 57.5 years (range: 26-78) and median follow-up was 6.2 years (range: 0.6-36). Pathological staging was performed. Survival was assessed using actuarial life table analysis. Of the 19 patients who presented with localized disease, there were 12 T1, five T2 and two T4 cancers. Eleven patients had axillary lymph node involvement. Ten patients were oestrogen receptor (ER) positive, two patients were ER negative and seven patients had unknown receptor status. All patients underwent surgery. Eleven patients received radiotherapy. The median dose and dose per fraction were 50 Gy and 2 Gy, respectively. Adjuvant systemic therapy was delivered to 10 patients, of whom nine were node-positive. Four patients received chemotherapy alone, three patients received chemotherapy and tamoxifen, and three patients received tamoxifen only. Seven patients relapsed (one local, five distant, one both). Of the two patients with local relapses, one had received radiotherapy. Of the distant failures, four of six patients had no systemic therapy. There were only two node-positive patients who were not given systemic treatment and both relapsed. Median survival in all patients with invasive cancer was 7.5 years, and in those with localized disease it was 7.6 years. The median survival of node-positive patients was 3.8 years. In node-negative patients the median survival had not been reached at a median follow-up of 6.2 years. The majority of patients (12/14) with known receptor status were ER+, a finding that parallels those of other studies. Local control rates were 88% (7/8) in patients who had mastectomy alone and 91% (10/11) in those patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. Systemic therapy was found to be beneficial in patients with node-positive disease. Chemotherapy was administered more frequently than hormonal therapy. The median survivals were consistent with those reported in other series.