Good long-term patients reported outcomes, return-to-work and return-to-sport rate and survivorship after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-based multiligament knee injuries (MLKI) with posteromedial corner tears as significant risk factor for failure.

PURPOSE: To assess the survival rate and associated risk factors of a wide cohort of patient's underwent surgical treatment for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-based multiligament knee injury (MLKI) at long-term follow-up and to investigate the long-term patient's reported outcomes (PROMS) and functional activity. METHODS: All cases of PCL-based MLKI performed at one single sport-medicine institution were extracted and patient's with a minimum 2 years of follow-up included. VAS, Lysholm, KOOS, Tegner Activity level scores, the incidence and time of return to sport (RTS) and return to work (RTW) were collected before, after surgery and at final follow-up. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to investigate the outcomes associated with the patient's acceptable symptoms state (PASS) for each sub-score of the KOOS. The Kaplan-Meier method with surgical failure (re-operation to one of the reconstructed ligaments) as endpoint was used to perform the survivorship analysis for the entire cohort. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were included and evaluated at an average of 10 years. All PROMS significantly improved from pre- to post-surgery (range ηp2 0.21-0.43, p < 0.05) except for the Tegner score which significantly improved from pre-surgery and to final follow-up (ηp2 = 0.67, p < 0.001). RTW was achieved in the 95.2% after 2.4 ± 1.9 months. RTS was achieved in 78.6% after 6.7 ± 5.0 months. The higher number of surgeries were the significant negative predictors of PASS for the KOOS sub-scales Sport (p = 0.040) and Quality of Life (p = 0.046), while the presence of meniscal lesions was a significant negative predictor of PASS only for the KOOS sub-scale of Sport (p = 0.003). Six patients (14.3%) underwent reoperation and were considered as surgical failures. The global survivorship was 95.2%, 92.6%, 87.1%, and 74.7% at 2, 5, 12, and 15 years, respectively. The survivorship in patient undergoing PMC reconstruction surgery was significantly lower (p = 0.004; HR 7.1) compared to patients without a PMC lesion. CONCLUSION: Good-to-excellent PROMS could be obtained and maintained at long-term follow-up after surgery, with the higher number of surgeries and meniscal lesions as significant negative predictors of the PASS. Moreover, the presence of a PMC lesion significantly increases the risk of the PCL reconstruction failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Satisfactory long-term outcomes for combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and lateral closing wedge high tibial osteotomy.

PURPOSE: A combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is considered a valuable treatment in young patients affected by symptomatic medial osteoarthritis and ACL deficiency. However, only a few studies have investigated the outcomes of this procedure, especially in the long term. Therefore, the aim of this study is to report clinical and radiographic outcomes of ACL reconstruction and lateral closing wedge HTO at a mean of 14 years of follow-up. METHODS: Patients were prospectively evaluated pre-operatively, after 6.5 ± 2.7 years and 14.3 ± 2.2 years. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected, knee laxity was assessed through KT-1000 arthrometer, and limb alignment and knee osteoarthritis were evaluated on long-cassette radiographs. Survivorship of the surgical procedure was calculated through the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: 32 patients were initially enrolled and completed the mid-term evaluation (6.5 ± 2.7 years), and 23 patients (72%) were available for the final evaluation at 14.3 ± 2.2 years after surgery. Statistically significant improvement was found for all the clinical scores (VAS, WOMAC, Tegner, subjective IKDC, objective IKDC) between the pre-operative status and the mid-term follow-up (p < .001). VAS, subjective IKDC and objective IKDC showed no statistically significant differences (p > .05) between the mid-term and the final follow-up; a significant decrease of WOMAC (p < .05) and Tegner (p < .001) was found from mid-term to final follow-up. Significant progression of osteoarthritis was found for all the knee compartments. The survivorship was 95.7% at 5 years, 82.6% at 10 years, and 72.8% at 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: Combined ACL reconstruction and lateral closing wedge HTO showed satisfactory clinical outcomes and survivorship at a mean of 14 years follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has experienced exponential growth over the last decade, including increasingly younger patients with high functional demands. Highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) has been proven effective in reducing osteolysis and loosening revisions while improving long-term survival and performance in total hip arthroplasty; nevertheless, this superiority is not demonstrated in TKA. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine whether HXLPE improved overall survival and postoperative functional and radiological outcomes compared to conventional polyethylene (CPE) in TKA. METHODS: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, a literature search of five databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Science Direct and Embase) was made. A PICOS model was performed. The initial screening identified 2541 studies. Each eligible clinical article was analysed according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence (LoE). Only randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of LoE 1 and 2 were included. The methodological quality of the articles was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. RESULTS: Six clinical studies were included in the final study. This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). A total of 2285 knees were included. Eight outcomes (total reoperations, reoperations for prosthesis loosening and infections, radiolucent lines, osteolysis, mechanical failure, postoperative KSS knee score and function score) were analysed. For none of them, a statistically significant difference was found about the superiority of HXLPE over CPE (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences between HXLPE and CPE for TKA concerning clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes; nevertheless, HXLPE did not show higher failure rates or complications and can be safely used for TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.