Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pineal Res ; 62(1)2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27736028

RESUMO

The MARIA randomized trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of melatonin for the reduction of reperfusion injury in patients undergoing revascularization for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This was a prespecified interim analysis. A total of 146 patients presenting with STEMI within 6 hours of chest pain onset were randomized to receive intravenous and intracoronary melatonin (n=73) or placebo (n=73) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Primary endpoint was myocardial infarct size as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 6 ± 2 days. Secondary endpoints were changes in left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction (LVEF) at 130 ± 10 days post-PPCI and adverse events during the first year. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between groups. MRI was performed in 108 patients (86.4%). Myocardial infarct size by MRI evaluated 6 ± 2 days post-PPCI, did not differ between melatonin and placebo groups (P=.63). Infarct size assessed by MRI at 130 ± 10 days post-PPCI, performed in 91 patients (72.8%), did not show statistically significant differences between groups (P=.27). The recovery of LVEF from 6 ± 2 to 130 ± 10 days post-PPCI was greater in the placebo group (60.0 ± 10.4% vs 53.1 ± 12.5%, P=.008). Both left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were lower in the placebo group (P=.01). The incidence of adverse events at 1 year was comparable in both groups (P=.150). Thus, in a nonrestricted STEMI population, intravenous and intracoronary melatonin was not associated with a reduction in infarct size and has an unfavourable effect on the ventricular volumes and LVEF evolution. Likewise, there is lack of toxicity of melatonin with the doses used.


Assuntos
Melatonina/administração & dosagem , Traumatismo por Reperfusão Miocárdica/prevenção & controle , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Melatonina/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 15(6): 1013-8, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22940889

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Anaemia is a frequent complication after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Iron therapy has been variably employed by medical centres over the years. In our study we test the clinical effectiveness of intravenous and oral iron supplementation in correcting anaemia, and its impact on blood transfusion requirements, in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial with three parallel groups of patients. Group I (n = 54): intravenous iron(III)-hydroxide sucrose complex, three doses of 100 mg/24 h during pre- and postoperative hospitalization and 1 pill/24 h of oral placebo in the same period and during 1 month after discharge. Group II (n = 53): oral ferrous fumarate iron 1 pill/24 h pre- and postoperatively and during 1 month after discharge, and intravenous placebo while hospitalized. Group III (n = 52): oral and intravenous placebo pre- and postoperatively, following the same protocol. Data were collected preoperatively, at theatre, at intensive care unit admission, before hospital discharge and 1 month later. RESULTS: (1) Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics and surgical procedures were similar in the three groups; (2) no inter-group differences were found in haemoglobin and haematocrit during the postoperative period; (3) the intravenous iron group showed higher serum ferritin levels at hospital discharge (1321 ± 495 ng/ml; P < 0.001) and 1 month later (610 ± 387; P < 0.001) compared with the other groups and (4) we did not observe statistical differences in blood transfusion requirements between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of intravenous or oral iron supplementation proved ineffective in correcting anaemia after cardiopulmonary bypass and did not reduce blood transfusion requirements. [Current Controlled Trials number: NCT01078818 (oral and intravenous iron in patients postoperative cardiovascular surgery under EC)].


Assuntos
Anemia Ferropriva/tratamento farmacológico , Transfusão de Sangue , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Compostos Férricos/administração & dosagem , Compostos Ferrosos/administração & dosagem , Hematínicos/administração & dosagem , Sacarose/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Anemia Ferropriva/sangue , Anemia Ferropriva/etiologia , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/efeitos adversos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Método Duplo-Cego , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Compostos Férricos/efeitos adversos , Óxido de Ferro Sacarado , Compostos Ferrosos/efeitos adversos , Ácido Glucárico , Hematínicos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espanha , Sacarose/efeitos adversos , Comprimidos , Fatores de Tempo , Falha de Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA