Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 21(1): 692, 2021 Oct 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34627198

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) incidence is increasing worldwide. It represents a major risk factor for adverse foetal-maternal outcomes. Awareness among women in regard to GDM-related risks (in particular foetus ones) has been proven to have an impact on compliance with recommendations. Therefore we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of our post-diagnosis counselling, that informs affected women of the GDM related risks for complications, in determining an adequate level of understanding. METHOD: This is a cohort study involving 400 women undergoing the 24-28 weeks 75 g oral glucose tolerance test. Two hundred women diagnosed with GDM received the post-diagnosis counselling (treatment group) and two hundred women diagnosed without did not receive any counselling (control group). Both populations were surveyed with a 5 question questionnaire regarding their awareness about GDM foetal-maternal related risks. Their level of education about GDM foetal-maternal related risks, estimated according to the number of correct answers, was scored as: primary (score 0-1), secondary (score 2-3) or tertiary (score 4-5). RESULTS: Most of the women in the treatment group after receiving the post-diagnosis counselling have demonstrated a secondary level of education 132/200 (66%). Their mean level of awareness was higher in comparison to the control group 2.6 ± 1.8 (SD) versus 2.14 ± 1.8 (SD) p value = 0.012. In particular, they've demonstrated to be more aware of the risks for the foetus to become macrosomic (p = 0.004) or to die in utero (p = 0.0001). A high level of education and to have had previous pregnancies positively affected correct answers. CONCLUSIONS: Our post-diagnosis counselling has played a role in improving women awareness about GDM foetal-maternal related risks. Future study will explore the impact of women's level of awareness on glycaemic control.


Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional/psicologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Teste de Tolerância a Glucose , Humanos , Itália , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ; 14(6)2021 Jun 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34201123

RESUMO

Progestin-only contraceptive implants provide long-acting, highly effective reversible contraception. We searched the medical publications in PubMed, CENTRAL, and EMBASE for relevant articles on hormonal implants published in English between 1990 and 2021. Levonorgestrel (LNG) 6-capsule subdermal implants represented the first effective system approved for reversible contraception. The etonogestrel (ENG) single rod dispositive has been widely employed in clinical practice, since it is a highly effective and safe contraceptive method. Abnormal menstrual bleeding is a common ENG side effect, representing the main reason for its premature discontinuation. Emerging evidence demonstrated that it is possible to extend the use of the ENG implant beyond the three-year period for which it is approved. The ENG implant could be an effective and discrete alternative to the IUD in young girls, such as post-partum/post-abortion. Implants should be inserted by trained skilled clinicians who previously provide adequate counselling about their contraceptive effect, benefits, and any possible adverse events. More studies are needed to validate the extended use of the ENG implant for up to 5 years.

3.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 303(5): 1185-1190, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33111167

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nowadays several Prenatal Tests for Chromosomal Abnormalities Detection (PTCAD) are available. In those cases in which there is not an Institutional protocol to advise women about the available PTCAD, the choice of which one to undergo is up to the woman and largely depends on her knowledge about them. Therefore, we decided to evaluate, as a primary outcome, knowledge about PTCAD among pregnant women attending our Term Clinic. As a secondary outcome we evaluated the relationship between the patient's knowledge and the subsequently chosen PTCAD. METHODS: From August 2017 to August 2018 an anonymous questionnaire with multiple-choice answers was administered to all pregnant women attending our Term antenatal Clinic, a tertiary obstetric unit in Catanzaro (Italy). RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-five pregnant women were enrolled in the study. We observed that 28.8% of the pregnant women that chose one of the PTCAD, avoided the first trimester combined screening test; among these, 11.4% were in favour of the cell-free foetal DNA test. The latter was erroneously considered diagnostic by 34.3% of the women that had chosen it. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that women's knowledge about PTCAD is poor and that there is a potentially dangerous confusion between the words 'screening' and 'diagnostic'. Informative campaigns about PTCAD and the application of dedicated antenatal counselling appointments should be a health-care priority to avoid unnecessary risks and costs for pregnant women and possible legal issues.


Assuntos
Aberrações Cromossômicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Gravidez , Gestantes
4.
J Diabetes Res ; 2020: 5393952, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33015192

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Screening strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) earlier than 24-28 weeks of gestation should be considered to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes. Nonetheless, there is uncertainty about which women would benefit most from early screening and which screening strategies should be offered to women with GDM. The Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS) recommendations on selective screening for GDM at 16-18 weeks of gestation are effective in preventing fetal macrosomia in high-risk (HR) women, but the appropriateness of timing and effectiveness of these recommendations in medium- (MR) and low-risk (LR) women are still controversial. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively enrolled 769 consecutive singleton pregnant women who underwent both anomaly scan at 19-21 weeks of gestation and screening for GDM at 16-18 and/or 24-28 weeks of gestation, in agreement with the NHS recommendations and risk stratification criteria. Comparison of maternal characteristics, fetal biometric parameters at anomaly scan (head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC), femur length (FL), estimated fetal weight (EFW)), and neonatal birth weight (BW) percentile among risk groups was examined. RESULTS: 219 (28.5%) women were diagnosed with GDM, while 550 (71.5%) were normal glucose-tolerant women. Out of 164 HR women, only 62 (37.8%) underwent the recommended early screening for GDM at 16-18 weeks of gestation. AC and EFW percentiles, as well as neonates' BW percentiles, were significantly higher in HR women diagnosed with GDM at 24-28 weeks of gestation with respect to normal glucose-tolerant women, as well as MR and LR women who tested positive for GDM. Comparative analysis between MR and LR women with GDM and women with normal glucose tolerance revealed significant differences in both AC and EFW percentiles (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in neonatal BW percentiles. CONCLUSION: In MR and LR women with GDM, a mild acceleration of fetal growth can be detected at the time of anomaly scan. However, in these at-risk categories, the NHS recommendations for screening and treatment of GDM at 24-28 weeks of gestation are still effective in normalizing BW and preventing fetal macrosomia, thus supporting a risk factor-based selective screening program for GDM.


Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Macrossomia Fetal/prevenção & controle , Cuidado Pré-Natal/organização & administração , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/métodos , Adulto , Antropometria , Peso ao Nascer , Glicemia/análise , Feminino , Fêmur/fisiopatologia , Desenvolvimento Fetal , Peso Fetal , Idade Gestacional , Teste de Tolerância a Glucose , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Itália/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , Aumento de Peso
6.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 246: 72-78, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31962259

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) is usually perceived as a simple and safe alternative to natural birth, but in some instances can be technically difficult with consequent health hazards for both the mother and the fetus. We have proposed an evidence-based literature review of the most common difficult CS scenarios, with the aim to provide useful information about their management, possible prevention and resolution of complications. METHODS: We identified articles through a reserch in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Ovid MEDLINE for studies published between 1979 and 2019. We included the best available evidence, such as RCTs, non-randomised controlled clinical trials, case-control studies, cohort studies, and case series. About sixty articles were included in this review, four hundred and thirty-six were excluded after reviewing the title or abstract or because they weren't in English. FINDINGS: The possible causes of "difficult" caesarean sections were divided into four categories: difficult access to the lower uterine segment; complicated fetal extraction, laceration or organ damage and abnormal placentation. CONCLUSIONS: Knowing in advance the potential technical difficulties and resulting risks allows the surgeon to plan appropriate strategies.


Assuntos
Cesárea/métodos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Recesariana , Feminino , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica , Intestinos/lesões , Complicações Intraoperatórias/cirurgia , Apresentação no Trabalho de Parto , Leiomioma , Obesidade Materna , Placenta Acreta , Placenta Prévia , Gravidez , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez , Aderências Teciduais , Ureter/lesões , Bexiga Urinária/lesões , Neoplasias Uterinas
7.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31569431

RESUMO

Background-The first trimester combined test (FTCT) is an effective screening tool to estimate the risk of fetal aneuploidy. It is obtained by the combination of maternal age, ultrasound fetal nuchal translucency (NT) measurement, and the maternal serum markers free ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A). However, conflicting data have been reported about the association of FTCT, ß-hCG, or PAPP-A with the subsequent diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Research design and methods-2410 consecutive singleton pregnant women were retrospectively enrolled in Calabria, Southern Italy. All participants underwent examinations for FTCT at 11-13 weeks (plus 6 days) of gestation, and screening for GDM at 16-18 and/or 24-28 weeks of gestation, in accordance with current Italian guidelines and the International Association Diabetes Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) glycemic cut-offs. Data were examined by univariate and logistic regression analyses. Results-1814 (75.3%) pregnant women were normal glucose tolerant, while 596 (24.7%) were diagnosed with GDM. Spearman univariate analysis demonstrated a correlation between FTCT values and subsequent GDM diagnosis (ρ = 0.048, p = 0.018). The logistic regression analysis showed that women with a FTCT <1:10000 had a major GDM risk (p = 0.016), similar to women with a PAPP-A <1 multiple of the expected normal median (MoM, p = 0.014). Conversely, women with ß-hCG ≥2.0 MoM had a reduced risk of GDM (p = 0.014). Conclusions-Our findings indicate that GDM susceptibility increases with fetal aneuploidy risk, and that FTCT and its related maternal serum parameters can be used as early predictors of GDM.


Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangue , Gonadotropina Coriônica Humana Subunidade beta/sangue , Diabetes Gestacional/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Idade Materna , Medição da Translucência Nucal , Gravidez , Proteína Plasmática A Associada à Gravidez/análise
8.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30558120

RESUMO

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a strong risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and the postpartum period is crucial for early treatment in at-risk women. However, despite recommendations, only a fraction of women undergo a postpartum screening for glucose intolerance (ppOGTT). The present study aims to verify the reason(s) for poor adherence in our population. Research design and methods: This retrospective study includes 451 women in which GDM was diagnosed between 2015⁻2016. During 2017, we verified by phone interview how many women underwent ppOGTT at 6⁻12 weeks postpartum, as recommended by the Italian guidelines. The non-compliant women were asked about the reason(s) for failing to screen. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test and the 2-tailed Fisher exact test were used to compare continuous and categorical features, respectively, among women performing or non-performing ppOGTT. Results: Out of 451 women with GDM diagnosis, we recorded information from 327. Only 97 (29.7%) performed ppOGTT. The remaining 230 women (70.3%) provided the following explanation for non-compliance: (1) newborn care (30.4%); (2) misunderstood importance (28.3%); (3) oversight (13.0%); (4) unavailability of test reservation in the nearest centers (10.4%); (5) normal glycemic values at delivery (8.3%); (6) discouragement by primary care physician (5.6%). Conclusions: In our population, most women with recent GDM failed to perform ppOGTT. Our results indicated that the prominent barriers could potentially be overcome.


Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Teste de Tolerância a Glucose/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Pós-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Estudos Longitudinais , Programas de Rastreamento/psicologia , Cuidado Pós-Natal/psicologia , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
9.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 298(1): 9-16, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29560505

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To propose an evidence-based review on the most frequent indications for Cesarean section (CS) given by specialists in disciplines other than Obstetrics and Gynecology, with the aim of increasing consciousness about the available data in the literature and the guidelines recommendations about topics that are not frequently managed by obstetricians and gynecologists. METHODS: We analyzed hospital discharge data regarding deliveries occurred in a 10-year study period in our department to obtain the prevalence and the list of the most recurrent non-obstetrical indications for CS. A search was performed in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Ovid MEDLINE and only studies published in English from 1950 to 2017 were included. For indications for which no systematic reviews existed, we included the best available evidence, including guidelines of non-obstetrics scientific societies or organizations, RCTs, non-randomized controlled clinical trials, case-control studies, cohort studies, and case series. RESULTS: The rising rate of CS registered in the recent years is not justified by reduction in maternal--fetal risk or perinatal outcomes and often reflects inappropriate clinical behaviour and a wrong tendency that assimilates CS as a defensive practice. In a relevant percentage of cases, the indication to CS is given by specialists in other disciplines, even when specific guidelines do not give clear recommendation about the route of delivery. CONCLUSIONS: To refuse non-obstetrical indications for CS, when scientific support is lacking, could be a useful and safe strategy to further reduce the rate of unnecessary CS.


Assuntos
Cesárea , Complicações na Gravidez/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Obstetrícia , Parto , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez
10.
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol ; 2017: 5495927, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28831237

RESUMO

Currently, the only efficient way to prevent human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection in pregnancy is primary prophylaxis through hygienic measures. So, we evaluated knowledge of HCMV and its prevention in a group of pregnant women. An anonymous questionnaire with multiple-choice answers was administered to all pregnant women who were followed up at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit of "Pugliese-Ciaccio Hospital," a third-level hospital in Catanzaro (Southern Italy), from November 2015 to March 2016. Previously prescribed serology results for HCMV were also evaluated. Three hundred and fifty women participated in the study and the results clearly demonstrated that knowledge of pregnant women about HCMV is poor. Moreover, prescribed screening procedures need to be optimized, since one out of three pregnant women has not been tested for HCMV or the screening was not performed adequately. For this reason, it is important to implement informative campaign in both pregnant women and providing physicians.


Assuntos
Infecções por Citomegalovirus/prevenção & controle , Citomegalovirus/isolamento & purificação , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/virologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
13.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 30(7): 525-31, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24720344

RESUMO

Despite the easy access to contraception today, the rate of unintended pregnancies is still high because of scarce education among women on the methods available and of non-adherence to indications or discontinuation of the contraceptive method chosen. Adherence to contraception can be implemented through counseling programs intended to provide potential users with information regarding all contraceptive options available and to address women's concerns in line with their lifestyle, health status, family planning, and expectations. In here, we evaluate a multi-step decisional path in contraceptive counseling, with specific focus on potential users of long-acting release contraception etonorgestrel. We propose an algorithm about the management of possible issues associated with the use of subcutaneous contraceptive implant, with a special focus on eventual changes in bleeding patterns. We hope our experience may help out health-care providers (HCPs) to provide a brief but comprehensive counseling in family planning, including non-oral routes of contraceptive hormones. Indeed, we believe that a shared and informed contraceptive choice is essential to overcome eventual side-effects and to improve compliance, rate of continuation and satisfaction, especially with novel routes of administration.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Anticoncepção/métodos , Aconselhamento/métodos , Tomada de Decisões , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticoncepção/efeitos adversos , Anticoncepção/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto Jovem
14.
Transl Med UniSa ; 7: 1-5, 2013 Sep 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24251245

RESUMO

We report the case of a yolk sac tumor of the ovary in a 26 years old woman. The laparoscopic approach and the BEP chemotherapy were fundamental to have a minimally invasive treatment and to preserve fertility.

16.
Transl Med UniSa ; 2: 59-63, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23905045

RESUMO

Pregnancy is a recognized risk factor for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Headache is very frequent in normal pregnancy and it is a common sign shared between several intracranial diseases. We present a case series of 10 women in the third trimester of pregnancy admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) with neurological signs and symptoms. 4 of these patients were diagnosed with SAH. Data in this study suggest that a timely diagnosis and an appropriate treatment is crucial for mother and baby.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...