Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effective doses from analog film, panoramic digital, and panoramic scout for cone-beam computerized tomography (CT). STUDY DESIGN: Three different types of Veraviewepocs machines were investigated: Veraviewepocs Conventional, Veraviewepocs Digital, and Veraviewepocs 3D (Morita, Kyoto, Japan). Organ absorbed doses were measured using an anthropomorphic phantom loaded with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD 100H) at 16 sites located in sensitive organs. The resulting effective organ doses (muSv) were compared by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The highest value (5.2 muSv) was for Veraviewepocs Conventional. The Veraviewepocs Digital (2.7 muSv) and Veraviewepocs 3D (2.95 muSv) presented low effective doses in the same range. CONCLUSIONS: The panoramic digital system delivered the least radiation dose. The use of the panoramic scout for cone-beam CT was marginally higher in dose than its 2D counterpart.

Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: Because of the advantages and possibilities of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), orthodontists use this method routinely for patient assessment. The aim of this study was to compare the radiation doses for conventional panoramic and cephalometric imaging with the doses for 2 different CBCT units and a multi-slice CT unit in orthodontic practice. METHODS: The absorbed organ doses were measured by using an anthropomorphic phantom loaded with thermoluminescent dosimeters at 16 sites related to sensitive organs. The 4 devices (Sirona DS Plus [Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Germany], i-CAT [Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, Pa], NewTom DVT 9000 [QR, Verona, Italy], and Somatom Sensation [Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany]) were used with standard protocols and, when possible, in the auto-exposure mode. Equivalent and effective doses were calculated. The calculation of the effective doses was based on the International Commission on Radiological Protection's 2005 recommendations. RESULTS: The lowest organ dose (13.1 microSv) was received by the thyroid gland during conventional panoramic and lateral cephalometric imaging. The highest mean organ dose (15,837.2 microSv) was received by the neck skin from the multi-slice CT. The effective dose was also lower for the panoramic and lateral cephalometric device (10.4 microSv), and highest for the multi-slice CT (429.7 microSv). CONCLUSIONS: From a radiation-protection point of view, conventional images still deliver the lowest doses to patients. When 3-dimensional imaging is required in orthodontic practice, a CBCT should be preferred over a CT image. Further studies are necessary to justify the routine use of CBCT in orthodontic treatment planning.