Temporal Variation in the Abundance and Timing of Daily Activity of Chagas Disease Vector Triatoma gerstaeckeri (Stål, 1859) in a Natural Habitat in the Lower Rio Grande Valley, South Texas.

Chagas disease caused by Trypanosoma cruzi is a burden to millions of people in South and Central America. A sylvatic life cycle of the parasite exists in the Southern United States, but recent studies indicate an active peri-domestic life cycle of T. cruzi in Texas. The United States-Mexico border region in Texas displays areas of high poverty and sub-standard housing conditions which are important risk factors for a potential spill-over transmission to a domestic life cycle including humans. The objectives of the study were to examine short- and long-term temporal variation in vector activity and to evaluate the effect of different combinations of attractants on the capture of potential triatomine vectors. We collected local triatomine vectors (all of them identified as Triatoma gerstaeckeri) from a natural habitat in South Texas during the course of a year. The exact time of collection was recorded to examine the timing of flight activity of the triatomine vector. We also conducted a comparative study of the efficiency of 2 commonly used attractants (light and CO2) and the combination of those on the capture rate of Tr. gerstaeckeri. Our study indicates a short season of dispersal of Tr. gerstaeckeri (April/May) and it suggests a unimodal distribution of activity peaking between 2 and 3 hr after sunset. Ultra-violet light served as the main attractant of Tr. gerstaeckeri while CO2 from dry ice did not significantly contribute to the collection of vectors. The pronounced timing of activity in Tr. gerstaeckeri reported in this study contributes to our understanding of the epidemiology of T. cruzi in wildlife and its potential as a Chagas disease vector to humans in the Rio Grande Valley, South Texas.

Diphtheria.

Diphtheria is a contagious upper respiratory illness that was a major cause of childhood mortality in the prevaccine era. In the early twentieth century, an effective toxoid vaccine was developed. Implementation of childhood vaccination virtually eliminated diphtheria from developed countries after the Second World War and implementation of the Expanded Program on Immunization in developing countries led to rapid declines in diphtheria globally in the 1980s. However, in the 1990s, a massive epidemic of diphtheria spread throughout the countries of the former Soviet Union. Unlike the prevaccine era, most cases of severe disease and deaths were reported among adults. Multiple factors contributed to the epidemic, including increased susceptibility among both adults and children; suboptimal socioeconomic conditions; high population movement; and delay in implementing appropriate control measures. Mass immunization was the key element in the epidemic control strategy developed and implemented in a well-coordinated response by an international public health coalition. This strategy focused on rapidly raising population immunity of both adults and children; the immunization of more than 140,000,000 adults and adolescents and millions of children successfully controlled the epidemic. While improved coverage of children in developing countries with diphtheria toxoid has led to progressive decreases in diphtheria; eradication is unlikely in the foreseeable future and gaps in immunity among adult population exist or are developing in many other countries. Routine childhood immunization with diphtheria toxoid is the key to controlling diphtheria while the role of routine adult reimmunization is less established; mass immunization will remain an important control measure for widespread diphtheria outbreaks.

Public health considerations for the use of a first generation HIV vaccine. Report from a WHO-UNAIDS-CDC consultation, Geneva, 20-21 November 2002.

SUMMARY: To accelerate the development and future availability of safe, effective and affordable HIV vaccines it is essential to address not only the associated biomedical obstacles, but also the logistic aspects that would guide the introduction and use of those vaccines. It is likely that initial vaccines may only be partially effective, and their public health use will have to be carefully considered. This report summarizes the discussions from a consultation held in Geneva (20-21 November 2002) organized by the World Health Organization (WHO), the joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The group identified a number of logistic issues that need to be addressed to accelerate the development and future availability of HIV vaccines, and made broad recommendations in four different areas: (a) Vaccine manufacturing and licensing; (b) vaccination acceptability and social marketing; (c) immunisation strategies and delivery; and (d) access and economic issues. The implementation of these recommendations will require the participation of multiple stakeholders in the public and private sector, in industrialized and developing countries. These actions will be essential to ensure widespread and rapid access to HIV vaccines globally, soon after their efficacy is demonstrated in clinical trials.

Diphtheria in Thailand in the 1990s.

Diphtheria remains endemic in developing countries, but there are limited published data on the subject. Thailand's diphtheria surveillance data are relatively complete and may give a fuller picture of the situation in similar countries. After routine immunization began in 1977, the incidence of reported diphtheria decreased by >98% to <0.1 case per 100,000 persons annually in the 1990s. Despite infant immunization coverage of >90%, diphtheria cases were reported throughout the 1990s, primarily among children <15 years old. Outbreaks were linked to both persistent endemic circulation and to importation of toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae; suboptimal immunization coverage in minority and disadvantaged groups contributed. A serologic survey found 25% of adults 20-39 years old and 14% of adolescents 10-19 years old lacked immunity to diphtheria; these data indicate an accumulation of susceptible adolescents and adults. Diphtheria remains a threat in Thailand; improvements in diphtheria control will depend on improving childhood immunization coverage in Thailand and the surrounding region.

Successful control of epidemic diphtheria in the states of the Former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics: lessons learned.

Epidemic diphtheria reemerged in the Russian Federation in 1990 and spread to all Newly Independent States (NIS) and Baltic States by the end of 1994. Factors contributing to the epidemic included increased susceptibility of both children and adults, socioeconomic instability, population movement, deteriorating health infrastructure, initial shortages of vaccine, and delays in implementing control measures. In 1995, aggressive control strategies were implemented, and since then, all affected countries have reported decreases of diphtheria; however, continued efforts by national health authorities and international assistance are still needed. The legacy of this epidemic includes a reexamination of the global diphtheria control strategy, new laboratory techniques for diphtheria diagnosis and analysis, and a model for future public health emergencies in the successful collaboration of multiple international partners. The reemergence of diphtheria warns of an immediate threat of other epidemics in the NIS and Baltic States and a longer-term potential for the reemergence of vaccine-preventable diseases elsewhere. Continued investment in improved vaccines, control strategies, training, and laboratory techniques is needed.

Diphtheria surveillance and control in the Former Soviet Union and the Newly Independent States.

The Newly Independent States (NIS) inherited a common approach to diphtheria control from the Soviet Union and maintained a centralized system of surveillance and control managed by Soviet-trained epidemiologists with a shared professional culture. This system had controlled a diphtheria resurgence in the 1980s. In response to the epidemic of the 1990s, NIS health authorities responded with a set of control measures based on the Soviet-era experience. These measures included intensified childhood vaccination, aggressive case investigation, widespread diphtheria screening in institutions, and vaccination of adults in high-risk occupation groups. These measures proved insufficient due to high levels of susceptibility among adults, excessive contraindications to childhood vaccination, and insufficient resources in many countries. After these initial delays in implementing effective measures in some countries, most of the NIS health authorities rapidly and successfully implemented mass immunization of the population against diphtheria once the strategy was adopted and sufficient vaccine was available.

Diphtheria in the Russian Federation in the 1990s.

A resurgence of diphtheria spread throughout the Russian Federation in the early 1990s; diphtheria had been well controlled, but circulation of toxigenic strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae had persisted since the implementation of universal childhood vaccination in the late 1950s. More than 115,000 cases and 3,000 deaths were reported from 1990 to 1997, and, in contrast to the situation in the prevaccine era, most of the cases and deaths occurred among adults. Contributing factors included the accumulation of susceptible individuals among both adults and children and probably the introduction of new strains of C. diphtheriae. Vaccine quality, vaccine supply, or access to vaccine providers did not significantly contribute to the epidemic. Mass vaccination of adults and improved childhood immunization controlled the epidemic. High levels of population immunity, especially among children, will be needed to prevent and control similar outbreaks in the future.

Epidemic diphtheria in Belarus, 1992-1997.

In 1990, epidemic diphtheria reemerged in Russia and spread to Belarus in 1992, when 66 cases were reported. Diphtheria cases doubled each year in 1993 and 1994 and peaked in 1995, when 322 cases were reported. Intensified routine immunization of young children and mass vaccination of older children and selected groups of adults were conducted in 1995 and were followed by mass vaccination campaigns targeting all adults in 1996. By the end of 1996, full immunization of >95% of children and coverage of>87% of adults with >/=1 dose resulted in a rapid decline in diphtheria cases. In 1998, only 36 cases of diphtheria were reported. More than 70% of the 965 cases and 26 fatalities reported during 1990-1998 occurred among persons >14 years of age. High levels of immunity among the entire population are needed for rapid control of diphtheria epidemics in the vaccine era.

Epidemic diphtheria in the 1990s: Azerbaijan.

The diphtheria epidemic in the former Soviet Union reached Azerbaijan in 1991, when 66 cases of diphtheria were reported, a number that compared with 4 cases in 1990. From 1990-1996, 2182 cases of diphtheria and 286 diphtheria fatalities (case fatality rate: 13.1%) were reported in Azerbaijan, primarily among persons 5-39 years of age. Almost 45% of cases and 61% of deaths occurred among children 5-14 years of age. The high burden of severe disease among children and young adults suggested a different pattern of preexisting immunity against diphtheria in the Azerbaijani population than was observed in the concurrent diphtheria epidemic in Russia. Because resources were limited in Azerbaijan, mass immunization of the population was carried out in stages, focusing initially on school-aged children. Mass immunization campaigns targeting children were moderately successful in stabilizing the epidemic; mass immunization campaigns targeting both adults and children were eventually needed to fully stop the epidemic.

Epidemic investigation of diphtheria, Republic of Kazakhstan, 1990-1996.

The diphtheria epidemic that began in Russia in 1990 reached Kazakhstan in 1992 when 45 case-patients (a 50% increase over 1991) were reported. In 1993, 82 case-patients were reported, and 489 were reported in 1994. The epidemic peaked in 1995 when 1105 case-patients were reported (incidence rate=6.7/100,000 population). In 1996, after public health practice modifications and several mass vaccinations, 455 case-patients were reported. From 1990 to 1996, children

Diphtheria epidemic in the Republic of Uzbekistan, 1993-1996.

The Republic of Uzbekistan, like the other Newly Independent States in the 1990s, experienced epidemic diphtheria during the 1990s. The outbreak in Uzbekistan began in 1993 in southern regions that bordered areas of Tajikistan that were experiencing a very intense diphtheria epidemic. However, the Uzbek epidemic rapidly spread and threatened to involve the entire country. From 1993-1996, 1169 cases of diphtheria were reported, compared with 58 in 1990-1992. Unvaccinated or only partially vaccinated cases were more likely to have clinically severe forms of diphtheria than those who were fully vaccinated. Strong epidemiologic links with the Tajik diphtheria epidemic and the predominance of mitis biotype strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae in Uzbekistan make it likely that the Uzbek outbreak arose independently of the predominantly biotype gravis epidemic that began in Russia. The epidemic appeared to be due to low population immunity and the large-scale reintroduction of toxigenic strains of C. diphtheriae. Several mass vaccination campaigns and general enhancement of routine immunization procedures led to control of the epidemic in 1996.

How many doses of diphtheria toxoid are required for protection in adults? Results of a case-control study among 40- to 49-year-old adults in the Russian Federation.

During the Russian diphtheria epidemic of the 1990s, adults had an unexpectedly high rate of disease. A retrospective, matched case-control study was done to measure the effectiveness of one, two, or three or more doses of diphtheria toxoid against diphtheria among 40- to 49-year-old Russians. Thirty-nine diphtheria case-patients and 117 controls were studied. Previous vaccinations were included if one dose was received within the previous 10 years. Five cases (13%) and 33 controls (28%) had received three or more doses of vaccine. The matched odds ratio was 0.3 (95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.9) for three or more doses compared with no doses, which was a vaccine effectiveness of 70% (95% confidence interval, 10-90). A trend existed toward milder disease with increasing doses (chi2 test for trend, P=.02). The results suggest that Russian adults, who were unlikely to have acquired immunity to diphtheria through immunization or natural infection, required at least three doses of diphtheria toxoid for reliable protection against disease.

Epidemic diphtheria in the Newly Independent States of the Former Soviet Union: implications for diphtheria control in the United States.

The re-emergence of diphtheria in the Newly Independent States of the former Soviet Union in the 1990s raised global awareness of the potential for resurgent disease in countries with long-standing immunization programs. In the United States, the large population of susceptible adults and the possibility of a reintroduction of toxigenic strains of diphtheria create a setting in which diphtheria could spread. In addition, at least one focus of continued circulation of endemic toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae has been identified. Few physicians now have expertise in the diagnosis and treatment of persons with diphtheria, and laboratory capacity is lacking throughout the country. These concerns highlight the importance of maintaining high levels of age-appropriate diphtheria toxoid vaccination, surveillance, accessible and reliable laboratory testing, and training of health care providers. Although the risk of resurgence of diphtheria in the United States is low, public health authorities must ensure that the capacity to recognize, diagnose, and control diphtheria is maintained.

Increased protections during a measles outbreak of children previously vaccinated with a second dose of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine.

BACKGROUND: In 1989 a second dose of measles vaccine was recommended for US children to prevent school outbreaks of measles. Coverage of school age children with a second dose remains incomplete, and data on the effectiveness of this recommendation are limited. We investigated a measles outbreak in Mesa County, CO, in December, 1994, and evaluated the efficacy of preoutbreak immunizations at an elementary school (School A) where many students had received two doses. METHODS: All reported suspected cases of measles were investigated; cases that met a clinical case definition were tested by a measles IgM antibody assay. A confirmed case required laboratory confirmation or had to meet the clinical case definition and be epidemiologically linked to a confirmed case. Vaccination records of students at School A were reviewed. The effectiveness of one and two doses of measles vaccine was estimated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Sixty-two confirmed cases were reported, including 17 at School A. At School A the attack rate in unvaccinated children (7 of 16, 44%) was higher than in those with 1 dose (10 of 320, 3%) or 2 doses (0 of 289, 0%). Estimated vaccine effectiveness was 92% for 1 dose and 100% for 2 doses. Two doses were better than one dose in decreasing the likelihood of acquiring measles (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The lower attack rate among two dose recipients provides evidence that a two dose strategy can help prevent measles in schools. Administering the second dose at elementary school entry can help prevent the persistence of susceptible cohorts of children and is likely to be important in sustaining elimination of indigenous transmission of measles in the United States.

Epidemiology of epidemic diphtheria in three regions, Russia, 1994-1996.

BACKGROUND: A massive diphtheria epidemic which began in the former Soviet Union in 1990 is the first large-scale diphtheria epidemic in developed countries in more than 30 years and has primarily affected adults. In response, health authorities attempted to maximize vaccination for children and conducted an unprecedented campaign to vaccinate adults. METHODS: We analyzed diphtheria surveillance data (case report forms and diphtheria vaccine coverage data) from three Russian regions from January 1994 to December 1996 and estimated vaccine effectiveness by the screening method. RESULTS: We reviewed records from 2243 (97.2%) of 2307 reported cases. The highest cumulative incidence in the period was among children aged 5 to 9 years (106 cases per 100,000 population); adults aged 40-49 years had the highest adult incidence for disease (88 cases per 100,000) and the highest incidence of any age group of clinically severe disease (29 cases per 100,000) and death (5.1 deaths per 100,000). The incidence among women aged 2049 years (82 per 100,000 women) was higher than among men (47 per 100,000, p<0.01). The annual incidence decreased from 25.2 cases per 100,000 population in 1994 to 9.4 cases per 100,000 in 1996. The decrease occurred as adult coverage increased from an estimated 25-30% in December 1992 to 88% in December 1995. Vaccine effectiveness was high among both children and adults. CONCLUSIONS: The Russian diphtheria epidemic primarily affected adults, especially women; this pattern is likely representative of diphtheria epidemics in immunized populations. Raising childhood immunization coverage and mass adult vaccination was effective in controlling the Russian epidemic. An improved understanding of the current epidemiology of diphtheria will be useful to design public health responses to prevent or control modern epidemics.

Risk of diphtheria among schoolchildren in the Russian Federation in relation to time since last vaccination.

BACKGROUND: Between 1990 and 1996, more than 110,000 cases and 2900 deaths from diphtheria were reported in the Russian Federation. In 1994, because disease rates were high among children aged 7-10 years, the age of administration of the second booster dose of diphtheria vaccine was lowered from 9 years to 6 years, the age of school entry. To assess the impact of this policy change, we did a matched case-control study in three Russian cities. METHODS: Children aged 6-8 years who had diphtheria between September, 1994, and December, 1996, were each matched with five to seven children acting as controls who were within 3 months of age of the case and were from the same class at school. We did a matched analysis using conditional logistic regression. FINDINGS: We analysed the immunisation records of 58 cases and 306 controls. All but one case and all controls had received at least three doses of diphtheria-toxoid vaccine. 19 (33%) cases and 144 (47%) controls had received a booster dose of diphtheria toxoid within the previous 2 years. Cases were more likely than were controls to have received only four doses rather than five (odds ratio 2.8 [95% CI 1.2-6.5]) and to have a time since the last dose of diphtheria toxoid of 3-4 years (3.1 [1.1-9.1]) or 5-7 years (15.0 [2.5-89.0]), compared with children for whom it was 2 years or less. On multivariate analysis only a time since the last dose of 5-7 years remained significantly associated with disease (matched odds ratio adjusted for total number of doses 10.9 [1.6-75.1]). CONCLUSION: A booster dose of diphtheria-toxoid vaccine given to children in the Russian Federation at 6-8 years of age reduced the interval since the last dose of diphtheria toxoid and improved protection against diphtheria.

PIP: More than 110,000 cases and 2900 deaths from diphtheria were reported in the Russian Federation in 1990-96. In response to the high disease rates in children 7-10 years of age, the timing of the second booster dose of diphtheria vaccine was lowered in 1994 from 9 to 6 years of age--the age of school entry. The impact of this change was assessed in a matched, retrospective, case-control study conducted in three Russian cities. 58 children 6-8 years old who had diphtheria between September 1994 and December 1996 were matched with 306 controls within 3 months of age and from the same school class. All but one case and all controls had received at least three doses of diphtheria toxoid vaccine and 19 cases (33%) and 144 controls (47%) had received a booster dose of the vaccine within the previous 2 years. Cases were more likely than controls to have received 4 rather than 5 doses (odds ratio (OR), 2.8; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-6.5) and to have an interval since the last vaccine dose of 3-4 years (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1-9.1) or 5-7 years (OR, 15.0; 95% CI, 2.5-89.0) compared with children for whom it was 2 years or less since the last dose. In the multivariate analysis, only time since the last vaccine dose of 5-7 years was significantly associated with disease (matched OR adjusted for total number of doses, 10.9; 95% CI, 1.6-75.1). These findings indicate that a booster dose of diphtheria toxoid at the age of school entry is effective in preventing diphtheria among school-aged children. This evidence should be considered in the development of routine childhood immunization schedules in countries where diphtheria remains endemic.

Diphtheria in the former Soviet Union: reemergence of a pandemic disease.

The massive reemergence of diphtheria in the Newly Independent States of the former Soviet Union marked the first large-scale diphtheria epidemic in industrialized countries in 3 decades. Factors contributing to the epidemic included a large population of susceptible adults; decreased childhood immunization, which compromised what had been a well-established childhood vaccination program; suboptimal socioeconomic conditions; and high population movement. The role of a change in the predominant circulating strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae in this epidemic remains uncertain. Massive, well-coordinated international assistance and unprecedented efforts to vaccinate adults were needed to control the epidemic.

Measles outbreaks in Micronesia, 1991 to 1994.

BACKGROUND: Several islands in Micronesia experienced large measles outbreaks, during 1991 through 1994. Except for Guam, none of the islands had reported measles outbreaks during the previous 20 years. METHODS: To characterize the outbreaks, measles surveillance data, hospital records and death certificates were reviewed. Preoutbreak vaccination coverage rates were assessed by reviewing public health vaccination records. Viral isolates were genetically sequenced to determine the source of transmission. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness of outbreak control measures. RESULTS: Between 1991 and 1994 more than 1300 measles cases and 16 measles-related deaths were reported in Micronesia. Preoutbreak vaccination coverage rates among 2-year-old children were 55 to 94%. Genetic sequencing of the viral isolates and epidemiologic investigations suggested transmission between islands and new importations from outside of Micronesia. The highest attack rates were among children ages < 5 years (20/1000) and 10 to 19 years (38/1000). Compared with attack rates among children ages < 1 and 10 to 19 years, attack rates were lower among those ages 5 to 9 years, in whom 2-dose vaccination coverage rates were highest (P < 0.001). Early and rapid implementation of mass vaccination campaigns was significantly associated with shorter duration of outbreaks (P = 0.049). CONCLUSION: The measles outbreaks in Micronesia show that island populations may be highly susceptible to measles. High two-dose vaccination coverage levels must be maintained to prevent such outbreaks. Early and rapidly implemented mass measles vaccination campaigns were effective in control of island outbreaks. Strengthening public health infrastructure and surveillance is necessary for early identification of outbreaks and rapid implementation of mass campaigns.