Breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: Evidence for an efficient diagnostic workup.

INTRODUCTION: During the last few years it has been shown that an anaplastic T cell lymphoma can develop as a rare and late sequelae of implant-based breast reconstruction. This malignancy was recognized in the 2017 by WHO and named breast implant associated anaplastic large T cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). BIA-ALCL usually presents as abundant effusion around the implant, thus, in addition to cytology smears, its diagnosis also requires immunohistochemistry, T cells clonality and cytometry. Due to the increasing attention of clinicians, it is likely that the number of the BIA-ALCL suspected cases will grow in the future, implying the necessity of a reliable and cost-effective diagnostic procedure. METHODS: To achieve this goal, we retrospectively analyzed the results of laboratory investigations performed at our Institute (Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan, Italy) on 44 effusions obtained from 31 women suspected for BIA-ALCL. RESULTS: Through cytology, eight out of 44 effusions showed the presence of BIA-ALCL cells. Lymphoma cells were than confirmed in seven samples by immunohistochemistry and/or T cell clonality and/or cytometry. Overall, cytology showed 100% sensitivity, 97% specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 87.5% and 100% respectively. Further analyses were particularly useful in effusions showing small percentages of BIA-ALCL cells. Moreover, an extended cytometric profile that can be applied when fast confirmation of the cytologic result is required was also identified. CONCLUSIONS: Our results evidenced a central role of cytopathology in the management of BIA-ALCL suspected effusions and suggested that further laboratory investigations might be applied only in cases showing atypical/activated lymphoid cells through cytology.

A new case of myelodysplastic syndrome associated with t(3;3)(q21;q26) and inv(11)(p15q22).

INTRODUCTION: Myeloid malignancies are associated with a number of recurrent and sporadic rearrangements that may be oncogenic by ensuring growth advantage and/or increased survival. t(3;3)(q21;q26) has been recognized as a recurrent abnormality in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with poor prognostic significance. Inversion of chr(11) engendering NUP98-DDX10 chimeric product is sporadic and usually associated with diseases with poor prognosis (therapy-related myeloid neoplasm). To date, these cytogenetic abnormalities have been described as isolated events. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report the first case of an 80-year-old man with high-risk MDS harboring a translocation t(3,3)(q21q26) jointly with an inv(11)(p15q22) detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis and conventional cytogenetic techniques. CONCLUSION: A similar pattern of acquisition was never described before in MDS. The coexistence of two independent, high-risk oncogenic, rare events in the same clone suggests that there may be a functional constraint for synergy between the two events, leading to a proliferative advantage and suggests the utility of extended genotyping in myeloid malignancies.