The Occurrence of 275 Rare Diseases and 47 Rare Disease Groups in Italy. Results from the National Registry of Rare Diseases.

Knowledge of rare diseases (RD) is often scattered among many data collections and registries of patient cohorts. Therefore, assessing the burden of RD in the general population, developing appropriate policies and planning services for the care of RD patients is difficult. This study aimed at providing a systematic picture of RD occurrence in a population as big as 60 million. Data of diagnoses were certified and collected by a network of 247 specialized centres covering the whole Italian territory. Data received (about 200,000 records) were validated according to formal criteria and, where necessary, corrected by the data sources. Data of age at onset and sex distribution are given for about 400 diseases. Incidence and/or birth prevalence are given for 275 diseases and 47 disease groups, which, altogether, comprise a substantial part of the known rare diseases. Data quality, internal consistency, and external validity of the database have also been assessed and ways to limit the impact of some discrepancies were devised. The information provided by RNMR, cutting across such a wide range of RD, represents a unique coherent basis allowing the prioritization of relevant public health measures and research activities.

Rare disease registries classification and characterization: a data mining approach.

BACKGROUND: The European Commission and Patients Organizations identify rare disease registries (RDRs) as strategic instruments to develop research and improve knowledge in the field of rare diseases. Interoperability between RDRs is needed for research activities, validation of therapeutic treatments, and public health actions. Sharing and comparing information requires a uniform and standardized way of data collection, so levels of interconnection between RDRs with similar aims and/or nature of data should be identified. The objective of this study is to define a classification and characterization of RDRs in order to identify different profiles and informative needs. METHODS: Exploratory statistical analyses (cluster analysis and random forest) were applied to data derived from the EPIRARE project ('Building Consensus and Synergies for the EU Rare Disease Patient Registration') survey on the activities and needs of RDRs. RESULTS: The cluster analysis identified 3 main typologies of RDRs: public health, clinical and genetic research, and treatment registries. The analysis of the most informative variables, identified by the random forest method, led to the characterization of 3 types of RDRs and the definition of different profiles and informative needs. CONCLUSIONS: These results represent a useful source of information to facilitate the harmonization and interconnection of RDRs in accordance with the different profiles identified. It could help sharing the information between RDRs with similar profiles and, whenever possible, interconnections between registries with different profiles.

National registries of rare diseases in Europe: an overview of the current situation and experiences.

The European Union (EU) policy for healthcare requires the establishment of a system of European Reference Networks, union-wide information databases, and registries for rare diseases (RDs) based on shared criteria. In pursuing its goals, the 'Building Consensus and Synergies for the EU Registration of RD Patients in Europe' (EPIRARE) project convened a meeting with experts of the competent health authorities to discuss the role of national institutional RD patient registries in supporting EU patient registration and the room for international cooperation. With this aim, this paper comparatively analyses the current situation of national institutional RD registries in the EU.

The EPIRARE proposal of a set of indicators and common data elements for the European platform for rare disease registration.

BACKGROUND: The European Union acknowledges the relevance of registries as key instruments for developing rare disease (RD) clinical research, improving patient care and health service (HS) planning and funded the EPIRARE project to improve standardization and data comparability among patient registries and to support new registries and data collections. METHODS: A reference list of patient registry-based indicators has been prepared building on the work of previous EU projects and on the platform stakeholders' information needs resulting from the EPIRARE surveys and consultations. The variables necessary to compute these indicators have been analysed for their scope and use and then organized in data domains. RESULTS: The reference indicators span from disease surveillance, to socio-economic burden, HS monitoring, research and product development, policy equity and effectiveness. The variables necessary to compute these reference indicators have been selected and, with the exception of more sophisticated indicators for research and clinical care quality, they can be collected as data elements common (CDE) to all rare diseases. They have been organized in data domains characterized by their contents and main goal and a limited set of mandatory data elements has been defined, which allows case notification independently of the physician or the health service. CONCLUSIONS: The definition of a set of CDE for the European platform for RD patient registration is the first step in the promotion of the use of common tools for the collection of comparable data. The proposed organization of the CDE contributes to the completeness of case ascertainment, with the possible involvement of patients and patient associations in the registration process.

The Italian National Rare Diseases Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Rare disease registries are a priority at European level and specific actions are being implemented by the European Commission to support their development.In Italy, a National Registry of rare diseases has been established in 2001 as a network of regional registries. The latter have gradually been established and the full coverage of the Italian territory was attained during 2011. METHODS: Here we describe the basic features of the National Registry of rare diseases; the activities carried out to promote consistent operations in the regional registries; and the overall quality and composition of the records collected. RESULTS: After a validation process, including removal of duplicate records, 110,841 records of patients with rare diseases, single and with group denominations, are stored in the National Registry of rare diseases. They correspond to the overall diagnoses communicated to national registry by regional registries up to 30 June 2012.The quality of the data collected by the the National Registry of rare diseases has been assessed with respect to completeness and consistency of procedures. Variables characterising case and diagnosis showed a very limited number of missing values. Records reported at least one case of 485 rare conditions. DISCUSSION: To date, the National Registry of rare diseases is a surveillance system with the main objective of producing epidemiologic evidence on rare diseases in Italy, and of supporting policy making and health services planning.Data quality still represents a limitation for any sound epidemiological estimate of rare diseases in Italy. However, improvements of the quality of collected data and the completeness of case notifications should be strengthened.

A framework to start the debate on neonatal screening policies in the EU: an Expert Opinion Document.

The European Union (EU) Council Recommendation on rare diseases urged the member states to implement national and EU collaborative actions to improve the health care of rare disease patients. Following this recommendation, the European Commission launched a tender on newborn screening (NBS) to report on current practices of laboratory testing, form a network of experts and provide guidance on how to further implement NBS screening in a responsible way, the latter of which was provided in an Expert Opinion document. After consultation of experts from EU member states, (potential) candidate member states and European Free Trade Association countries, in a consensus meeting in June 2011, 70 expert opinions were finalized. They included the need to develop case definitions for all disorders screened for to facilitate assessment and international outcome studies. Decision whether a screening program should be performed can be based on screening criteria updated from the traditional Wilson and Jungner (1968) criteria, relating to disease, treatment, test and cost. The interest of the child should be central in the assessment of pros and cons. A European NBS body should assess evidence on (new) screening candidate disorders. For rare conditions, best level evidence should be used. The health system should ensure treatment to cases diagnosed by screening, controlled and revised by follow-up outcome studies. Screening methodology should aim to avoid unintended findings, such as mild forms and carrier status information, as much as possible. Activities to improve NBS in Europe, such as training and scientific evaluation, could benefit from collaboration at EU level and beyond.

Newborn screening programmes in Europe; arguments and efforts regarding harmonization. Part 2. From screening laboratory results to treatment, follow-up and quality assurance.

In a survey conducted in 2010/2011 data from the 28 EU member states, four EU candidate states (Croatia, FYROM, Iceland, Turkey), three potential EU candidate states (Bosnia Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia), and two EFTA states (Norway and Switzerland) were collected. The status and function of newborn screening (NBS) programmes were investigated from the information to prospective parents and the public via confirmation of a positive screening result up to decisions on treatment. This article summarises the results from screening laboratory findings to start of treatment. In addition we asked about the existence of feedback loops reporting the conclusions of confirmation of screening results to the screening laboratory and communication of long-term outcome to diagnostic units and possibly existing central registries. Parallel to the description of actual practices of where, how and by whom the different steps of the programmes are executed, we also asked for the existence of guidelines or directives regulating the screening programmes, material to support information of parents about diagnoses and treatment and training facilities for professionals involved in the programmes. This survey gives a first comprehensive overview of the steps following a positive screening result in European NBS programmes. The 37 data sets reveal substantial variation of national screening panels, but also a lot of similarities. Analysis across all countries revealed that actual practice is often organised but not regulated by guidelines. Material to inform patients is available more often for explaining treatment (69 %) than explaining the necessity of confirmatory diagnostics (41 %). Training of professionals is rarely regulated by a guideline (2 %), but is offered for paediatricians (40 %) and dieticians (29 %) and only rarely for other professions (e.g. geneticists, clinical nurse specialists, psychologists). Registry-based evaluation of long-term outcome is as yet almost nonexistent (3 %).

Newborn screening programmes in Europe; arguments and efforts regarding harmonization. Part 1. From blood spot to screening result.

In many European countries neonatal screening has been introduced over the last 50 years as an important public health programme. Depending on health care structure, available funds, local politics, input from professional groups, parent groups, and the general public this introduction has led to different approaches in the way the screening programmes have been set up, financed and governed. To get some insight about the current situation, in 2009 the European Union, via its EAHC agency, put out a call for a tender that was acquired by our project group. An online survey was compiled in which the whole screening programme was covered by a questionnaire. This survey covered the EU member states, (potential) candidate member states and EFTA countries, in total 40 countries. Results showed little consensus concerning 1. information of parents including informed consent; 2. which conditions are screened for, ranging from 1 to around 30 conditions; 3. sampling time post partum; 4. screening methodology including cut-offs values even between screening laboratories within countries.; 5. storage of residual specimens, varying from 3 months to 1000 years. In addition, confirmatory diagnostics and follow-up also show large discrepancies (Burgard et al. http://www.iss.it/cnmr/prog/cont.php?id=1621&lang=1&tipo=64 2011). In addition to the current practices report an expert opinion document has been produced with recommendations to the EU Commission for future improvements, e.g. in parallel to the way the USA has harmonized its practices based on recommendations by the American College of Medical Genetics (Watson et al., Pediatrics 117: S296-S307, 2006).

National plans and strategies on rare diseases in Europe.

This analysis of national plans and strategies on RD in Europe shows that a few countries have already set up national plans. Existing national plans show a good consistency, but also a quite different stage of progress, depending on start date as well as on resource allocation. Several other EU countries have launched actions on RD, often with a considerable strategic effort; however, such initiatives are yet not integrated in a consistent national strategy taking into account the EC recommendations. The project EUROPLAN represents a major initiative to support the development of a shared strategy on RD at EU and Member State level; critical steps include the comparative evaluation of existing plans and actions, identification of gaps and achievements, the development of consensus indicators, as well as the integration of successful national achievements within the EU strategy.

Bioactivation, toxicokinetics and acute effects of chloroform in Fisher 344 and Osborne Mendel male rats.

Chloroform has been regarded as a renal carcinogen, based on results obtained with Osborne Mendel (OM) rats. Fisher 344 (F344) rats, considered representative of OM rats on the basis of comparable acute toxic effects, have been used in most of the studies aimed to elucidate the mechanisms of kidney tumour induction. In the present work, in vitro and in vivo chloroform bioactivation in the liver and kidney of F344 and OM rats has been reported, as well as additional toxicokinetics and acute toxicity information. Complete similarity of chloroform metabolism and toxicokinetics was evidenced in the two rat strains. Chloroform metabolism was fully saturated at the OM rat bioassay doses (90-180 mg kg(-1) body wt.), working at a maximal rate of 40-50 micro mol (14)CO(2) expired kg(-1) h(-1). No acute hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity or consequent cell proliferation was evidenced at 180 mg kg(-1) body wt. chloroform. In the rat liver, phosgene was confirmed as the major metabolite. Renal microsomes from both F344 and OM rats in vitro were unable to produce any oxidative metabolite; at variance, adducts due to oxidative and reductive metabolites were detected in vivo. Our results indicated the presence in the rat kidney of electrophilic metabolites other than phosgene, representing either oxidative metabolites formed elsewhere and sufficiently stable to be transported to the kidney or electrophilic metabolites secondary to the formation of reductive radicals. Therefore, the rat kidney represents a suitable model to study the toxicological effects, including genotoxicity, of chloroform metabolites in the absence of cytotoxic effects produced by phosgene formed in situ.

CYP-specific bioactivation of four organophosphorothioate pesticides by human liver microsomes.

The bioactivation of azinphos-methyl (AZIN), chlorpyrifos (CPF), diazinon (DIA), and parathion (PAR), four widely used organophosphorothioate (OPT) pesticides has been investigated in human liver microsomes (HLM). In addition, the role of human cytochrome P450 (CYPs) in OPT desulfuration at pesticide levels representative of human exposure have been defined by means of correlation and immunoinhibition studies. CYP-mediated oxon formation from the four OPTs is efficiently catalyzed by HLM, although showing a high variability (>40-fold) among samples. Two distinct phases were involved in the desulfuration of AZIN, DIA, and PAR, characterized by different affinity constants (K(mapp1) = 0.13-9 microM and K(mapp2) = 5- 269 microM). Within the range of CPF concentrations tested, only the high-affinity component was evidenced (K(mapp1) = 0.27-0.94 microM). Oxon formation in phenotyped individual HLM showed a significant correlation with CYP1A2-, 3A4-, and 2B6-related activities, at different levels depending on the OPT concentration. Anti-human CYP1A2, 2B6, and 3A4 antibodies significantly inhibited oxon formation, showing the same OPT concentration dependence. Our data indicated that CYP1A2 is mainly involved in OPT desulfuration at low pesticide concentrations, while the role of CYP3A4 is more significant to the low-affinity component of OPT bioactivation. The contribution of CYP2B6 to total hepatic oxon formation was relevant in a wide range of pesticide concentrations, being a very efficient catalyst of both the high- and low-affinity phase. These results suggest CYP1A2 and 2B6 as possible metabolic biomarkers of susceptibility to OPT toxic effect at the actual human exposure levels.

Metabolism of chloroform in the human liver and identification of the competent P450s.

The oxidative and reductive cytochrome P450 (P450)-mediated chloroform bioactivation has been investigated in human liver microsomes (HLM), and the role of human P450s have been defined by integrating results from several experimental approaches: cDNA-expressed P450s, selective chemical inhibitors and specific antibodies, correlation studies in a panel of phenotyped HLM. HLM bioactivated CHCl(3) both oxidatively and reductively. Oxidative reaction was characterized by two components, suggesting multiple P450 involvement. The high affinity process was catalyzed by CYP2E1, as clearly indicated by kinetic studies, correlation with chlorzoxazone 6-hydroxylation (r = 0.837; p < 0.001), and inhibition by monoclonal antihuman CYP2E1 and 4-methylpyrazole. The low affinity phase of oxidative metabolism was essentially catalyzed by CYP2A6. This conclusion was supported by the correlation with coumarin 7-hydroxylase (r = 0.777; p < 0.01), inhibition by coumarin and by the specific antibody, in addition to results with heterologously expressed P450s. Chloroform oxidation was poorly dependent on pO(2), whereas the reductive metabolism was highly inhibited by O(2). The production of dichloromethyl radical was significant only at CHCl(3) concentration > or =1 mM, increasing linearly with substrate concentration. CYP2E1 was the primary enzyme involved in the reductive reaction, as univocally indicated by all the different approaches. The reductive pathway seems to be scarcely relevant in the human liver, since it is active only at high substrate concentrations, and in strictly anaerobic conditions. The role of human CYP2E1 in CHCl(3) metabolism at low levels, typical of actual human exposure, provides insight into the molecular basis for eventual difference in susceptibility to chloroform-induced effects due to either genetic, pathophysiological, or environmental factors.

Kinetic parameters of OPT pesticide desulfuration by c-DNA expressed human CYPs.

The role of different cytochrome P450 isoforms (CYPs) in the desulfuration of four organophosphorothionate pesticides (OPTs), namely diazinon (DIA), azinphos-methyl (AZ), chlorpyrifos (CPF) and parathion (PARA), at OPT levels representative of actual human exposure has been investigated. For this purpose c-DNA expressed human CYPs and a method, based on acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition, able to detect nM levels of oxon have been used. Our results indicate that the four tested OPTs at low concentration were mainly desulfurated by CYP2B6, 2C19 and 1A2, showing K(m) values in the range 0.8-5 µM and the highest efficiency (intrinsic clearance (ICL)) values. CYP3A4 was generally endowed with high K(m) and resulted linear up to 25-100 µM OPT, concentrations saturating the most efficient CYPs. The tentative extrapolation of the relative contribution of single CYPs, taking into account the average content of different isoforms in the human liver, indicate that CYP1A2 is the major responsible for oxon formation. Indeed this CYP catalyses the 50-90% of desulfuration reaction, depending on the OPT. As CYP3A4 activity is not completely saturated up to 100 µM OPT, and due to the high hepatic content, its contribution to oxon formation may result relevant in poisoning episodes, when individuals are exposed at high doses of OPTs.