Neonatal herpes: case series in two obstetric centres over a 10-year period (2013-2023), France.

Neonatal herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection (HSV infection in infants less than 6 weeks of age) is rare but mortality and morbidity rates are high after disseminated disease and encephalitis. In France, the epidemiology is poorly described, and two decades ago, incidence was estimated to be 3 per 100,000 live births a year. We describe determinants, epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of neonatal HSV infection in a managed-care population attending in two major obstetric and paediatric centres, Paris, France, over a 10-year period. This retrospective case series study was conducted from 2013 to 2023, in infants less than 42 days of age who had virologically confirmed HSV infection. We report an overall rate of neonatal herpes of 5.5 per 100,000 live births a year and an incidence of symptomatic cases of 1.2 per 100,000 live births a year. HSV-1 was the major serotype involved (84.2%) and post-natal acquisition through the orolabial route reached 63.2%. All neonates who had neonatal HSV PCR screening (owing to clinical signs in parents) and who received prompt acyclovir treatment remained asymptomatic. Symptomatic forms accounted for 21.1% cases of the total and mortality was high (62.5% of symptomatic forms).   Conclusion: This case series confirms that neonates at risk for HSV disease and poor outcome are those born to HSV-seronegative mothers, preterm infants, and those who received acyclovir after onset of symptoms (mainly because mothers did not present evidence of acute HSV infection). Our study confirms the major role of HSV-1 and the frequency of its early post-natal acquisition. What is known: • Neonatal herpes simplex virus infection is rare but motality and morbidity rates are high after disseminted disease and encephalitis. National recommendations exist worldwide but mangement of this disease is not always easy. What is new: • As in France epidemiology of neonatal herpes is poorly described, our report is potentially an important addition to the existing literature. Moreover, we describe local practice that may be useful to physicians.

Perinatal outcomes between immediate vs deferred selective termination in dichorionic twin pregnancies with fetal congenital anomalies: a French multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Because selective termination for discordant dichorionic twin anomalies carries a risk of pregnancy loss, deferring the procedure until the third trimester can be considered in settings where it is legal. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether perinatal outcomes were more favorable following deferred rather than immediate selective termination. STUDY DESIGN: A French multicenter retrospective study from 2012 to 2023 on dichorionic twin pregnancies with selective termination for fetal conditions, which were diagnosed before 24 weeks gestation. Pregnancies with additional risk factors for late miscarriage were excluded. We defined 2 groups according to the intention to perform selective termination within 2 weeks after the diagnosis of the severe fetal anomaly was established (immediate selective termination) or to wait until the third trimester (deferred selective termination). The primary outcome was perinatal survival at 28 days of life. Secondary outcomes were pregnancy losses before 24 weeks gestation and preterm delivery. RESULTS: Of 390 pregnancies, 258 were in the immediate selective termination group and 132 in the deferred selective termination group. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Overall survival of the healthy co-twin was 93.8% (242/258) in the immediate selective termination group vs 100% (132/132) in the deferred selective termination group (P<.01). Preterm birth <37 weeks gestation was lower in the immediate than in the deferred selective termination group (66.7% vs 20.2%; P<.01); preterm birth <28 weeks gestation and <32 weeks gestation did not differ significantly (respectively 1.7% vs 0.8%; P=.66 and 8.26% vs 11.4%; P=.36). In the deferred selective termination group, an emergency procedure was performed in 11.3% (15/132) because of threatened preterm labor, of which 3.7% (5/132) for imminent delivery. CONCLUSION: Overall survival after selective termination was high regardless of the gestational age at which the procedure was performed. Postponing selective termination until the third trimester seems to improve survival, whereas immediate selective termination reduces the risk of preterm delivery. Furthermore, deferred selective termination requires an expert center capable of performing the selective termination procedure on an emergency basis if required.

Performance of cell-free DNA testing for common fetal trisomies in triplet pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: In singleton pregnancies, the use of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis as a screening test for common fetal trisomies has spread worldwide though we still lack sufficient data for its use in triplet pregnancies. The objective of this study is to assess the performance of cfDNA testing in detecting fetal aneuploidies in triplet pregnancies as a first-tier test. METHOD: We performed a retrospective cohort study including data from pregnant women with a triplet pregnancy who underwent cfDNA testing between May 1, 2017, and January 15, 2020. cfDNA was obtained by massive parallel sequencing (VeriSeq NIPT solution; Illumina®). The objectives of the study were to assess the diagnostic performance of cfDNA testing for trisomy 21 (T21) (primary outcome), trisomy 18 (T18) and 13 (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: During the study period, cfDNA testing was performed in 255 women with triplet pregnancy, of which 165 (64.7%) had a neonatal outcome available. Three tests were positive for T21, one of which was confirmed by an antenatal karyotype, and the other was confirmed at birth. The third case did not undergo an invasive procedure and was not confirmed at birth (false positive). In one case, cfDNA testing was positive for T18 and was confirmed by an antenatal karyotype. There were no cases of trisomy 13 in the cohort. The no-call rate was 2.4% at first sampling. Fifty-eight (22.7%) women had embryo reduction, which in 40 (69%) of whom was performed after the cfDNA test result. CONCLUSION: cfDNA testing could be offered as primary screening for main fetal aneuploidies in triplet pregnancies after provision of appropriate patient information.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of French prospective multicenter cohort study COVIPREG during the first two COVID-19 waves.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnant women was the subject of many questions since the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We aim to assess maternal and neonatal outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection contracted during 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy during the first two COVID-19 waves across a prospective French multicenter cohort study. Patients were included between April 2020 and January 2021 in 10 maternity hospitals in Paris area with two groups (i) pregnant women with a positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal RT-PCR between [14WG; 37WG[(symptomatic infection), (ii) pregnant women with a negative serology (or equivocal) at delivery and without a positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal RT-PCR at any time during pregnancy (G2 group) MAIN FINDINGS: 2410 pregnant women were included, of whom 310 had a positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal RT-PCR and 217 between [14WG; 37WG[. Most infections occurred between 28 and 37 weeks of gestation (56 %). Most patients could be managed as outpatients, while 23 % had to be hospitalized. Among women with a positive RT-PCR, multiparous women were over-represented (OR = 2.45[1.52;3.87]); were more likely to deliver before 37 weeks of gestation (OR = 2.19[1.44;3.24]) and overall cesarean deliveries were significantly increased (OR = 1.53[1.09;2.13]). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the maternal, obstetrical, and neonatal burden associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections during the first two pandemic waves before availability of vaccines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04355234 (registration date: 21/04/2020).

Prenatal diagnosis of isolated bilateral clubfoot: Is amniocentesis indicated?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefit of cytogenetic testing by amniocentesis after an ultrasound diagnosis of isolated bilateral talipes equinovarus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This multicenter observational retrospective study includes all prenatally diagnosed cases of isolated bilateral talipes equinovarus in five fetal medicine centers from 2012 through 2021. Ultrasound data, amniocentesis results, biochemical analyses of amniotic fluid and parental blood samples to test neuromuscular diseases, pregnancy outcomes, and postnatal outcomes were collected for each patient. RESULTS: In all, 214 fetuses with isolated bilateral talipes equinovarus were analyzed. A first-degree family history of talipes equinovarus existed in 9.8% (21/214) of our cohort. Amniocentesis was proposed to 86.0% (184/214) and performed in 70.1% (129/184) of cases. Of the 184 karyotypes performed, two (1.6%) were abnormal (one trisomy 21 and one triple X syndrome). Of the 103 microarrays performed, two (1.9%) revealed a pathogenic copy number variation (one with a de novo 18p deletion and one with a de novo 22q11.2 deletion) (DiGeorge syndrome). Neuromuscular diseases (spinal muscular amyotrophy, myasthenia gravis, and Steinert disease) were tested for in 56 fetuses (27.6%); all were negative. Overall, 97.6% (165/169) of fetuses were live-born, and the diagnosis of isolated bilateral talipes equinovarus was confirmed for 98.6% (139/141). Three medical terminations of pregnancy were performed (for the fetuses diagnosed with Down syndrome, DiGeorge syndrome, and the 18p deletion). Telephone calls (at a mean follow-up age of 4.5 years) were made to all parents to collect medium-term and long-term follow-up information, and 70 (33.0%) families were successfully contacted. Two reported a rare genetic disease diagnosed postnatally (one primary microcephaly and one infantile glycine encephalopathy). Parents did not report any noticeably abnormal psychomotor development among the other children during this data collection. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the low rate of pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities diagnosed prenatally after this ultrasound diagnosis, the risk of chromosomal aberration exceeds the risks of amniocentesis. These data may be helpful in prenatal counseling situations.

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Unvaccinated Pregnant Women: Non-Reassuring Fetal Heart Rate Tracing Because of Placentitis.

In 2020, a new coronavirus, called severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in China. SARS-CoV-2 infection has been shown to be highly morbid in pregnant women, being a risk factor for several obstetric conditions leading to increased maternal and neonatal mortality. A few studies since 2020 have shown SARS-CoV-2 maternal-fetal transmission and noted placental abnormalities grouped under the term placentitis. We hypothesized that these placental lesions could be responsible for abnormalities in placental exchange and therefore abnormalities in cardiotocographic monitoring, leading to premature fetal extraction. The objective is to identify the clinical, biochemical, and histological determinants associated with the occurrence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR) outside labor in fetuses of SARS-CoV-2-infected mothers. We conducted a retrospective multicenter case series of the natural history of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infections resulting in fetal delivery outside labor due to NRFHR. Collaboration was sought with the maternity hospitals in the CEGORIF, the APHP and Brussels hospitals. The investigators were contacted by e-mail on three successive occasions over a period of one year. Data from 17 mothers and 17 fetuses were analyzed. Most women had a mild SARS-CoV-2 infection; only two women presented severe infection. No woman was vaccinated. We found a substantial proportion of maternal coagulopathy at birth: elevation of APTT ratio (62%), thrombocytopenia (41%) and liver cytolysis (58.3%). Iatrogenic prematurity was noted in 15 of 17 fetuses, and 100% were born by cesarean delivery due to emergency criteria. One male neonate died on the day of birth due to peripartum asphyxia. Three cases of maternal-fetal transmission were recorded following WHO criteria. Placental analysis in 15 cases revealed eight cases of SARS-CoV-2 placentitis, causing placental insufficiency. In total, 100% of the placentas analyzed showed at least one lesion suggestive of placentitis. SARS-CoV-2 maternal infection during pregnancy is likely to generate neonatal morbidity in relation to placental damage resulting in placental insufficiency. This morbidity may be the consequence of induced prematurity as well as acidosis in the most severe situations. Placental damage occurred in unvaccinated women and in women with no identified risk factor, in contrast to severe maternal clinical forms.

Nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 load and perinatal outcomes after maternal infection diagnosed close to delivery.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of COVID-19 during the pregnancy can cause several negative maternal and neonatal outcomes. Nasopharyngeal viral load is associated with inflammatory markers and might influence the disease severity in non-pregnant patients, but there are no data about the relationship between viral load and perinatal outcomes in pregnant patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the hypothesis that nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 load (estimated with real-time polymerase chain reaction delta cycle (ΔCt), measured in hospital clinical laboratories) is associated with perinatal outcomes, when COVID-19 is diagnosed in the third trimester of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: International, retrospective, observational, multi-center, cohort study enrolling 390 women (393 neonates, three pairs of twins), analyzed with multivariate generalized linear models with skewed distributions (gamma) and identity link. The analyses were conducted for the whole population and then followed by a subgroup analysis according to the clinical severity of maternal COVID-19. RESULTS: The estimated viral load in maternal nasopharynx is not significantly associated with gestational age at birth (adjusted B: -0.008 (95%CI: -0.04; 0.02); p = 0.889), birth weight (adjusted B: 4.29 (95%CI: -25; 35); p = 0.889), weight Z-score (adjusted B: -0.01 (95%CI: -0.03; 1); p = 0.336), 5' Apgar scores (adjusted B: -0. -9.8e-4 (95%CI: -0.01; 0.01); p = 0.889), prematurity (adjusted OR: -0.97 (95%CI: 0.93; 1.03); p = 0.766) and the small for gestational age status (adjusted OR: 1.03 (95%CI: 0.99; 1.07); p = 0.351). Similar results were obtained in subgroup analyses according to COVID-19 clinical severity. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated maternal nasopharyngeal viral load in pregnant women affected by COVID-19 during the third trimester is not associated with main perinatal outcomes.

Management and survival of foetuses with trisomy 18 in a French retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was to evaluate parents' current demands following the announcement of trisomy 18 and maternal risks. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-centre retrospective study was performed in the Paris Saclay Foetal Medicine Department from 2018 to 2021. All patients followed up in the department who had cytogenetic confirmation of trisomy 18 were included. RESULTS: 89 patients were recruited. The most common malformations at ultrasound examination were cardiac or brain abnormalities, distal arthrogryposis as well as severe intrauterine growth retardation. 29% of foetuses with trisomy 18 had more than three malformations. 77.5% of patients requested medical termination of pregnancy. Among the 19 patients who chose to continue their pregnancy, 10 (52.6%) presented with obstetrical complications, of which 7 (41.2%) experienced stillbirth; five babies were born alive with no survival at 6 months. CONCLUSION: In France, in the case of foetal trisomy 18, most women request termination of pregnancy. In the post-natal period, the management of a newborn with trisomy 18 is oriented towards palliative care. The mother's risk of obstetrical complications should be part of counselling. Follow-up, support and safety should be the goal of management of these patients, regardless of the patient's choice.

Systematic review and synthesis of stillbirths and late miscarriages following SARS-CoV-2 infections.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the characteristics of fetal demise after SARS-CoV-2 infections and clarify whether it is associated with clinical severity, placental lesions, or malformations or due to actual fetal infections. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched between December 1, 2019, and April 30, 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies and case series or case reports describing stillbirths or late miscarriages (ie, pregnancy loss occurring between 14 and 22 weeks of gestation, before and after the onset of labor) from mothers with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy (demonstrated by at least 1 positive real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction from nasopharyngeal swabs and/or SARS-CoV-2 placental infection). No language restriction was applied; cases with other causes possibly explaining the fetal demise were excluded. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were followed. The quality of the case series and case reports was evaluated using the specific Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center tool. Maternal and clinical fetal data and placental and fetal virology and histology findings were collected. Data were summarized with descriptive statistics using the World Health Organization criteria to classify disease severity and fetal-neonatal infections. RESULTS: Data from 184 mothers and 190 fetuses were analyzed. No clear link to maternal clinical severity or fetal malformation was evident. Approximately 78% of fetal demise cases occurred during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, approximately 6 to 13 days after the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection or the onset of symptoms. Most placentas (88%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 or presented the histologic features of placentitis (massive fibrin deposition and chronic intervillositis) previously observed in transplacentally transmitted infections (85%-91%). Of note, 11 fetuses (5.8%) had a confirmed in utero transmitted SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 114 fetuses (60%) had a possible in utero transmitted SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSION: The synthesis of available data showed that fetal demise generally occurs a few days after the infection with histologic placental inflammatory lesions associated with transplacental SARS-CoV-2 transmission and eventually causing placental insufficiency.

Noninvasive Prenatal Screening for Trisomy 21 in Patients with a Vanishing Twin.

A vanishing twin (VT) occurs in up to 30% of early diagnosed twin pregnancies and is associated with an increased risk of fetal aneuploidy. Here, we describe our experience in a large VT population of 847 patients that underwent noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for common fetal trisomies over a three-year period. All patients underwent an ultrasound examination prior to NIPT. Two comparison populations were included, namely, the singleton (n = 105,560) and the viable multiple gestation pregnancy samples (n = 9691) collected over the same period. All NIPT samples in the VT population received a result, of which 14 were high-risk for trisomy 21 (1.6%), nine for trisomy 18 (1.1%), and six for trisomy 13 (0.7%). Diagnostic testing confirmed the presence of trisomy 21 in 6/12 samples, giving a positive predictive value of 50%. One trisomy 18 case and no trisomy 13 cases were confirmed. The time between fetal demise and NIPT sampling did not appear to affect the number of true- or false-positive cases. In conclusion, NIPT is an effective screening method for trisomy 21 in the surviving fetus(es) in VT pregnancies. For trisomies 18 and 13, a positive NIPT should be interpreted carefully and ultrasound monitoring is preferrable over invasive diagnostic testing.

Contribution of Serum Cytomegalovirus PCR to Diagnosis of Early CMV Primary Infection in Pregnant Women.

(1) Background: What is the role of serum CMV PCR in the diagnosis of recent primary infection (PI) in pregnant women when IgG avidity is uninformative? (2) Methods: Retrospective cohort study to compare serum versus whole blood CMV PCR. (a) Qualitative assessment: CMV PCR was performed on 123 serum samples and 74 whole blood samples collected from 132 pregnant women with recent CMV PI. PCR positivity rate was used to calculate sensitivity in serum and whole blood. (b) Quantitative assessment: CMV PCR was performed on 72 paired samples of serum and whole blood collected on the same day from 57 patients. (3) Results: In pregnant women, PCR positivity rate was 89% for serum samples versus 100% in whole blood in the case of very recent PI (<15 days), but only 27% in serum versus 68% in whole blood for PI occurring from 6 weeks to 3 months before. Comparing CMV viral loads between serum and whole blood, we determined the limit of CMV DNA detection in serum as 3 log copies/mL (whole blood equivalent). (4) Conclusions: Serum CMV PCR is reliable in confirming PI in cases when only IgM is detected. It is therefore a valuable tool in introducing valaciclovir treatment as early as possible to prevent mother-to-child CMV transmission.

Impact of the 1st Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown on In Utero Transfer Activity in the Paris Area, France.

BACKGROUND: To assess changes in the number and profile of in utero transfer requests during the first lockdown. METHODS: An observational, retrospective, cohort study. All pregnant women, from the Paris area (France), for whom a request for in utero transfer to the transfer unit was made during the first lockdown in France (from 17 March to 10 May 2020) or during a mirror period (years 2016 to 2019) were included. We compared the numbers and proportions of various indications for in utero transfer, the rates of in utero transfer acceptance and the proportion of outborn deliveries. RESULTS: 206 transfer requests were made during the lockdown versus 227, 236, 204 and 228 in 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. The relative proportion of requests for threatened preterm births and for fetal growth restriction decreased from 45% in the mirror period to 37% and from 8 to 3%, respectively. The transfer acceptance rates and outborn deliveries did not differ between time periods. CONCLUSIONS: Although a reduction in in utero transfer requests was observed for certain indications, the first lockdown was not associated with a decrease in acceptance rates nor in an increase in outborn births of pregnancies with a high risk of prematurity in the Paris area.

Neonatal outcomes for women at risk of preterm delivery given half dose versus full dose of antenatal betamethasone: a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Antenatal betamethasone is recommended before preterm delivery to accelerate fetal lung maturation. However, reports of growth and neurodevelopmental dose-related side-effects suggest that the current dose (12 mg plus 12 mg, 24 h apart) might be too high. We therefore investigated whether a half dose would be non-inferior to the current full dose for preventing respiratory distress syndrome. METHODS: We designed a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial in 37 level 3 referral perinatal centres in France. Eligible participants were pregnant women aged 18 years or older with a singleton fetus at risk of preterm delivery and already treated with the first injection of antenatal betamethasone (11·4 mg) before 32 weeks' gestation. We used a computer-generated code producing permuted blocks of varying sizes to randomly assign (1:1) women to receive either a placebo (half-dose group) or a second 11·4 mg betamethasone injection (full-dose group) 24 h later. Randomisation was stratified by gestational age (before or after 28 weeks). Participants, clinicians, and study staff were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the need for exogenous intratracheal surfactant within 48 h after birth. Non-inferiority would be shown if the higher limit of the 95% CI for the between-group difference between the half-dose and full-dose groups in the primary endpoint was less than 4 percentage points (corresponding to a maximum relative risk of 1·20). Four interim analyses monitoring the primary and the secondary safety outcomes were done during the study period, using a sequential data analysis method that provided futility and non-inferiority stopping rules and checked for type I and II errors. Interim analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02897076. FINDINGS: Between Jan 2, 2017, and Oct 9, 2019, 3244 women were randomly assigned to the half-dose (n=1620 [49·9%]) or the full-dose group (n=1624 [50·1%]); 48 women withdrew consent, 30 fetuses were stillborn, 16 neonates were lost to follow-up, and 9 neonates died before evaluation, so that 3141 neonates remained for analysis. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary outcome occurred in 313 (20·0%) of 1567 neonates in the half-dose group and 276 (17·5%) of 1574 neonates in the full-dose group (risk difference 2·4%, 95% CI -0·3 to 5·2); thus non-inferiority was not shown. The per-protocol analysis also did not show non-inferiority (risk difference 2·2%, 95% CI -0·6 to 5·1). No between-group differences appeared in the rates of neonatal death, grade 3-4 intraventricular haemorrhage, stage ≥2 necrotising enterocolitis, severe retinopathy of prematurity, or bronchopulmonary dysplasia. INTERPRETATION: Because non-inferiority of the half-dose compared with the full-dose regimen was not shown, our results do not support practice changes towards antenatal betamethasone dose reduction. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health.

Cervical Dilators Used Concurrently With Misoprostol to Shorten Labor in Second-Trimester Termination of Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of cervical dilators concurrently with misoprostol to shorten labor in second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy. METHODS: This multicenter randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy of cervical dilators inserted concurrently with misoprostol with that of misoprostol, alone, to shorten labor for women undergoing termination of pregnancy between 15 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was the proportion of women with a duration of labor exceeding 12 hours. Secondary outcomes included median duration of labor, time to amniotomy, side effects, complications, NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) score, and women's distress as measured by the IES-R (Impact of Event Scale-Revised). These outcomes also were studied separately in the nulliparous subgroup. To demonstrate a reduction of 50% of the proportion of women with a duration of labor exceeding 12 hours in the dilator group, with a power of 80% and a 2-sided 0.05 significance level, a sample of 268 women (134 in each group) was required. RESULTS: Between December 2017 and September 2019, this study enrolled and analyzed 347 women: 174 in the dilator group and 173 in the control group, including 87 and 93 nulliparous patients, respectively. Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics were similar between groups. The proportion of women with labor exceeding 12 hours was not different between groups (49/174 [28.2%] in the dilator group vs 53/173 [30.6%] in the control group [ P =.61] for the whole population, and 37/87 [42.5%] vs 42/93 [45.2%] [ P =.72], respectively, among nulliparous patients). Median duration of labor was 8.5 hours in the dilator group compared with 9.2 hours in the control group ( P =.65) for the whole population, and 10.5 hours compared with 11.8 hours, respectively, among nulliparous patients ( P =.33). Median time to amniotomy was 3.6 hours in the dilator group compared with 5.0 hours in the control group ( P =.08) for the whole population, and 3.5 hours compared with 6.7 hours, respectively, among nulliparous patients ( P =.003). Side effects, complications, NPRS score, and IES-R score were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Cervical dilators inserted concurrently with misoprostol did not reduce the proportion of women whose labor exceeded 12 hours compared with misoprostol alone. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03194230.

State of the art of antenatal diagnosis and management of vein of Galen aneurysmal malformations.

Vein of Galen aneurysmal malformation (VGAM) is a severe rare vascular anomaly whose prognosis depends on cerebral and cardiac consequences that can be hard to diagnose, let alone predict in utero. We performed an updated review to summarize current research on the genetics, ultrasound and MRI of VGAM that could help in the diagnosis and management of VGAM. Prenatal diagnosis of VGAM has greatly improved in recent years. Ultrasound allows in utero detection of VGAM in most cases now and is the best exam for prenatal cardiac evaluation. Tricuspid insufficiency is the only cardiac feature associated with poor prognosis. Cardiomegaly may indicate a risk of cardiac failure at birth and should prompt discussion of birth in a specialized facility. Ultrasound can identify constituted cerebral lesions, but MRI diagnoses early signs of cerebral hemodynamic changes, notably through the detection of pseudo-feeders. Genetic exploration should be proposed after VGAM diagnosis. Ultrasound and MRI are essential complementary tools for the diagnosis of VGAM, but also for prognostic evaluation, and provide information for the counseling of parents and optimal management of the pregnancy.

Perception of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic by pregnant women during the first lockdown in France: worry, perceived vulnerability, adoption and maintenance of prevention measures according to the Covimater study.

Background: We aimed to describe pregnant women's worry about the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the associated reasons, their perceived vulnerability to this infection, and factors influencing continued poor/non-existent or decreased implementation of preventive measures over time. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted in July 2020 using a web-questionnaire completed by 500 women who were pregnant during the first lockdown in France (March-May 2020). Questions focused on worry caused by the pandemic, perceived vulnerability to infection by SARS-CoV-2 and implementation of preventive measures during and after lockdown. A robust variance Poisson regression model was used to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for perceived vulnerability and continued poor/non-existent or decreased implementation of preventive measures. Results: Participants felt significantly more vulnerable to infection than women of childbearing age who were included in a parallel study on the French general population, but were significantly less worried about the pandemic. Obese participants and those who unsuccessfully sought exchanges with healthcare professionals about their infection risk felt significantly more vulnerable (aPR = 1.32 95%CI[1.05-1.64] and 1.88 [1.43-2.48], respectively). Participants with continued poor/non-existent or decreased implementation of preventive measures two months after the lockdown ended were more likely to have experienced violence during the lockdown (2.06, [1.32-3.22]), or to live in areas less affected by the pandemic (1.66 [1.05-2.62]). A good knowledge of viral transmission (0.54 [0.30-0.97]) and a high perceived vulnerability score (0.66 [0.44-0.99]) were associated with maintained/increased implementation of preventive measures. Conclusions: Our results can guide prevention and support policies for pregnant women during pandemics, current or future.